Finding 628415 (2022-004)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-09-21

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Commission failed to properly abate Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) for units that did not meet Housing Quality Standards (HQS) after inspections.
  • Impacted Requirements: The Commission did not follow HUD guidelines requiring timely correction of deficiencies, leading to non-compliance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Review and update abatement procedures to ensure compliance with HQS standards and enforce tenant obligations effectively.

Finding Text

2022-004 ? HQS Failed Inspections Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Housing Choice Voucher Program FALN: 14.871/14.879 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MD023, 2022 Award Period: 1/1/2022-12/31/2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: For units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA-approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified incorrect period or must terminate the HAP contract (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). Condition: We noted that the Commission did not properly abate HAP for landlords in which units failed inspections. Questioned costs: $69,944 Context: During our testing of 40 files for HQS enforcement, we noted the following: 10 of 40 units tested failed inspection due to owner responsibilities and the Commission never abated HAP. 5 of 40 units tested failed due to tenant responsibilities and the Commission did not take proper steps to enforce family obligations. Cause: The Commission did not follow established procedures in their Housing Choice Voucher Administrative Plan or as required by HUD. Effect: The Commission is not in compliance with HUD requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Commission review their abatement procedures to ensure any unit that has not met the HQS standards is properly abated as well as review their procedures for enforcing correction of deficiencies to tenants. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Categories

Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 51966 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 51967 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 51968 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 51969 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 51970 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 51971 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 51972 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 51973 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 628408 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 628409 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 628410 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 628411 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 628412 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 628413 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 628414 2022-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $22.73M
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $1.19M
21.023 Covid-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program $450,587
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $326,222
14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids $250,315
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $67,165