Finding 577617 (2022-002)

Material Weakness
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-11-03
Audit: 2238
Auditor: Mike Estes PC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: There is a lack of adequate quality control in tenant procedures, leading to errors in rent calculations and Housing Assistance Payments.
  • Impacted Requirements: Timely and thorough quality control checks are necessary for compliance with Housing Choice Voucher and Low Rent Program standards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Ensure timely reviews and documentation of calculations, especially during the transition to Project Based Accounting, with support from consultants.

Finding Text

Section Eight Housing Choice Voucher Program-CDFA# 14.871, Low Rent Program-CDFA # 14.850, Finding 2022-002-Lack of Adequate Quality Control Regarding Tenant Procedures-Eligibility Criteria and Condition The quality of supervision over tenant file functions, such as calculating tenant rent and Housing Assistance Payments should be timely and sufficient to find errors in calculations or mis-application or mis-understanding of procedures. Context For the Housing Choice Voucher Program, quality control should be timely performed and documented throughout the year. All of the SEMAP sample answers were Yes, that the error rate in the specified sample size was not exceeded. An outside consultant performed the sample. Since our copy of the SEMAP is not dated, we do not know if the sample was performed before or after the SEMAP submission. However, the consultant noted in her review that errors were noted in the samples for Indicators 1, 2, 3,5,6, 7, and 12. We reviewed twenty-five HCV files. Three had an incorrect payment standard. In all three instances, as a result, the tenant rent and the HAP was incorrect. In another file, the re-examination was past due. We reviewed twelve Low Rent files. Two were past-due for re-examination at audit year end. For four tenants, the rent per the most recent 55058 before September 30, 2022 was different than the rent charged per the rental register. Effect Errors were made in the amounts calculated and used for tenant rents and HAP payments. Cause Quality control checks are not as frequent or as thorough as they should be. This PHA is not large enough to have an Executive Director who just delegates and supervises. The E.D. for a PHA this size has to be at least capable of knowing the Low Rent and Housing Choice Voucher program well enough to check calculations in detail, if he or she is not the front line in doing these calculations. It appears that the last two permanent E.D.s were not capable of this. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We understand that the Authority is in the process of converting to Project Based Accounting. Calculations before or after the conversion need to be timely reviewed and documented. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action With the assistance of our consultant, we are trying to correct the errors noted above.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Eligibility

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1171 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1172 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 1173 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1174 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1175 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 577613 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 577614 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 577615 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 577616 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $1.94M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $539,041
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $16,175