Finding 576050 (2024-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-09
Audit: 365941
Organization: City of Winslow, Arizona (AZ)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Public Housing Authority (PHA) failed to comply with key requirements for the Housing Choice Vouchers program, leading to significant documentation gaps.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance failures include missing general depository agreements, inaccurate equity balances, inadequate follow-up on failed inspections, and improper management of the waiting list.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The PHA must improve documentation practices, ensure proper review procedures are in place, and maintain separate waiting lists for different voucher programs as required by HUD.

Finding Text

Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023‐101 Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Housing Voucher Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Award Number: N/A Pass‐Through Agency: N/A Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) participating in the Housing Choice Vouchers program must do the following in relation to special tests and provisions:  PHAs are required to enter into general depository agreements (GDA) with their financial institutions in the form required by Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (24 CFR section 982.156)  PHAs are required to maintain complete and accurate accounts including the balances of HAP and administrative fee equity. (24 CFR section 982.158)  PHAs are required to inspect units leased to determine if they meet Housing Quality Standards (HQS). If a unit fails an inspection, it must be repaired within 30 days if not a life‐threatening condition. (24 CFR section 982.405) If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract (24 CFR section 982.404).  PHAs must have written policies in its HCVP administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list and PHA documentation must show that the PHA follows these policies when selecting applicants for admission from the waiting list. (24 CFR sections 982.204 and 982.205). Condition Internal controls were not functioning to maintain adequate documentation. Cause Internal controls and review procedures did not function as designed throughout the year for all required compliance requirements. Effect The PHA was not in compliance with special tests and provisions requirements. Context We noted the following items during our review of special tests and provisions requirements for the Housing Voucher Cluster:  An executed copy of the depositor agreement as required by HUD was not maintained.  Prior year ending equity balances reported as part of the HUD REAC submission did not agree to beginning equity balances.  For one of 15 continuing tenants reviewed, the City did not maintain documentation following up on a failed HQS inspection.  For one of 20 waiting list applicants reviewed, the date applied did not agree with the application received date by one day. The applications position on the waitlist was affected by two spots.  Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV) program applicants were added to the regular Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) waiting list. However, those selected for EHV were not limited by those on the regular HCV waiting list. EHV vouchers were still distributed on a first come basis to those qualifying for the EHV program. However, the City should maintain a separate wait list for the EHV program. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The PHA should ensure it maintains documentation required by HUD. This includes an executed copy of the depositor agreement, information supporting changes in equity balances, and documentation supporting the follow up of failed HQS inspections. In addition, the PHA should ensure review procedures over the follow up of failed HQS inspections and maintenance of the waiting list are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Material Weakness Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 576047 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 576048 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 576049 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 576051 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 576052 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1152489 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 1152490 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 1152491 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1152492 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1152493 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 1152494 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $2.03M
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $252,642
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $171,540
20.106 Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and Covid-19 Airports Programs $165,314
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $106,575
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $99,629
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $72,180
10.175 Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program $46,120
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $1,882