Finding 575807 (2023-004)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2025-09-08
Audit: 365796
Organization: Fasd United Inc. (DC)
Auditor: Bert Smith & CO

AI Summary

  • Issue: The Organization charged $23,584 in indirect costs that exceeded the maximum allowed under the grant.
  • Requirements: Without a current Federal negotiated indirect cost rate, the Organization should use a de minimis rate of up to 10% of modified total direct costs.
  • Follow-up: The Organization plans to apply the 10% de minimis rate until a provisional indirect cost rate is established with the federal government.

Finding Text

Condition: The Organization charged indirect costs to the grant that exceeded the maximum allowed amount under the grant. The excess indirect cost charged to the grant was $23,584. Criteria: Recipients and subrecipients that do not have a current Federal negotiated indirect cost rate (including provisional rate) may elect to charge a de minimis rate of up to 10 percent of modified total direct costs (MTDC). Cause: The Organization charged indirect costs based on the rate in the grant award agreement. Context: The total amount of indirect costs charged to the grant was $55,029.Questioned Cost: $23,584. Recommendation: We also recommend the Organization charge the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate to the grant until a provisional indirect cost rate is received from the federal government. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization agrees that the indirect costs charged to the grant exceeded the maximum allowed under the grant. The Organization understood that it could charge a higher initial provisional indirect rate, reflecting the Organization’s actual rate of allowable indirect costs, as stated in the subrecipient agreement while a negotiated indirect cost rate was pending. As the negotiated rate was not completed, the Organization understands that the initial provisional rate was not applicable and the 10% de minimis rate applies from the inception of the award agreement. The Organization will charge the de minimis indirect rate to the project until a federally negotiated rate agreement is approved by the government.

Corrective Action Plan

The Organization corrected the finding prior to the audit and will continue to use the 10% de minimis indirect rate until it receives a government approved rate. The Organization allows that the indirect costs charged to the grant exceeded the maximum allowed under the grant. The Organization understood that it could charge a higher initial provisional indirect rate, reflecting the Organization’s actual rate of allowable indirect costs, as stated in the subrecipient agreement while a negotiated indirect cost rate was pending. As the negotiated rate was not completed, The Organization understands that the initial provisional rate was not applicable and the 10% de minimis rate applies from the inception of the award agreement. The Organization will charge the de minimis indirect rate to the project until a federally negotiated rate agreement is approved by the government

Categories

Questioned Costs Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 575804 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 575805 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 575806 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 575808 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1152246 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1152247 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1152248 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1152249 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1152250 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
12.750 Uniformed Services University Medical Research Projects $383,122
93.073 Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities - Prevention and Surveillance $354,805
93.273 Alcohol Research Programs $27,153