Finding 569933 (2024-002)

Material Weakness
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-07-01
Audit: 361183
Auditor: Cbiz CPAS PC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: All nine salary and fringe benefit transactions charged to federal awards lacked necessary review and approval.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with federal guidelines due to improper calculation of indirect costs and inaccurate SEFA reporting.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should implement documented reviews and strengthen internal controls to ensure accurate cost allocation and SEFA preparation.

Finding Text

Criteria All costs charged to federal awards must be reviewed and approved to ensure they are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. Additionally, non-federal entities are required to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that accurately reflects the total federal awards expended during the fiscal year. Context All nine transactions of our sample of nine out of 218 salaries and fringe benefit transactions allocated to federal awards were not reviewed and approved prior to reimbursement request. Management noted that documented review and approval over salaries and fringe benefit allocations to federal awards did not occur during 2024. Indirect costs allocated to the Technical Assistance for Specialty Crops Program were improperly calculated resulting in an overstatement on the SEFA. Cause Lack of documented review processes over costs allocated to federal awards and improper calculations of indirect costs. Effect Failure to review costs allocated to federal awards and failure to accurately report federal expenditures on the SEFA resulted in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance, which led to questioned costs, and may lead to potential withholding of future funds, or other administrative actions by the federal awarding agency. Questioned Cost: $84,474 for indirect costs not properly calculated. Recommendation We recommend that management document its review of all costs allocated to federal awards. We recommend that management review and enhance its internal controls, policies and procedures as needed to ensure indirect costs allocated to the grants are properly calculated and the SEFA is accurately prepared and reported. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has implemented a review process over the hours submitted by staff for specific grant work on 05/01/2025. The Chief Science Officer (CSO) will review and sign off on the hours submitted which form the basis of the salaries and benefit reimbursement(s). The Finance Director computes the salaries and benefits allowance along with the indirect costs per the award budget and the hours submitted. The Chief Finance Officer will review the salary, benefit and indirect computations prior to submitting a reimbursement request.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Reporting Cash Management Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 569934 2024-004
    Material Weakness
  • 569935 2024-005
    Material Weakness
  • 569936 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 569937 2024-002
    Material Weakness
  • 569938 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 569939 2024-004
    Material Weakness
  • 569940 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1146375 2024-002
    Material Weakness
  • 1146376 2024-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1146377 2024-005
    Material Weakness
  • 1146378 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1146379 2024-002
    Material Weakness
  • 1146380 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1146381 2024-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1146382 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.937 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities $2.10M
10.604 Technical Assistance for Specialty Crops Program $761,278
10.310 Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (afri) $150,951
10.328 Food Safety Outreach Program $25,553