CONDITION: During the PDE monitoring review of the ARP ESSER grant program, it was noted that the School District did not document in writing its rationale for the noncompetitive procurement of services provided by J. Martin & Associates.
CRITERIA: In accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records include but are not limited to the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases involving noncompetitive procurement, the School District adhere to Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement, as well as the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5).
MANAGEMENT’S PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The School District’s will maintain procurement records, including why the noncompetitive procurement contract was necessary with appropriate documentation vetted by the District Solicitor. Additionally, the District will conduct an analysis to support that the price paid was reasonable. This analysis is needed to justify procurements that are not competitively bid. The timeframe for implementation is effective immediately.