Finding 540338 (2024-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-28

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District overclaimed ineligible costs totaling $358,991 across two federal grants due to inadequate internal controls and grant management procedures.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, which mandates effective internal controls over federal awards to ensure proper management and reporting.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Develop written procedures for expense allocation, create a comprehensive grant summary schedule, and ensure timely reconciliation and claims submission to avoid future discrepancies.

Finding Text

AL No: 20.507 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Transit Cluster - Direct Award Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Condition: The District’s internal controls over compliance requirements did not identify ineligible costs applied to two separate Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants as follows.  Section 5307 Grant Award CA-2020-173-01: The District overclaimed Sacramento fixed route operating expenses beyond the amount apportioned for these routes in the grant agreement, resulting in ineligible costs of $183,848 being charged to the program. Questioned Costs: $183,548  Section 5307 Grant Award CA-2023-122-01: The District overclaimed Woodland fixed route operating expenses beyond the amount apportioned for these routes in the grant agreement, resulting in ineligible costs of $175,143 being charged to the program. Questioned Costs: $175,143. In addition to these ineligible costs, there were substantial changes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and federal grant revenue reported in the general ledger (GL) during the course of the audit. These changes and issues are as follows.  There was a total of $302,813 removed from the SEFA and GL for claims prepared for expenses incurred after the period of performance end date specified in the grant for the relevant project and therefore would have been ineligible if the claim was submitted to the grantor. These claims were prepared for paratransit and microtransit operating assistance.  There was a total of $243,823 removed from the SEFA and GL for claims prepared for an FTA direct program grant that is already past the end date of the period of performance and therefore would have been ineligible if the claim was submitted to the grantor. These claims were drafted for Woodland microtransit operating assistance.  There was a total of $354,429 added to the SEFA for federal grant revenues recorded in the GL but not initially included on the SEFA. These claims are for the Yolo County Bike and Pedestrian Trail Network Planning Project and the Yolo 80 Managed Lanes Tolling Advance Planning project.  There was a total of $1,106,389 of expenses reported on the SEFA but not recognized as revenue in the GL for amounts previously overclaimed for ineligible expenses but reclaimed and approved for eligible expenses in the current period. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.303 states that “The nonfederal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Cause:. Grant management procedures are not documented and a schedule of all available grants was not prepared by the District to use when reconciling expenses for inclusion on the SEFA and accruing grant revenue. The errors on the SEFA were not captured by the District’s review procedures due to recent staff turnover, lack of documented procedures on grant management, and/or lack of training. Effect: Expenses were omitted from the SEFA that should have been included and other expenses were included on the SEFA that were not eligible. The SEFA had to be revised for multiple grants over the course of the audit, which delayed the audit testing and major program determination process. Context: The number of grants has increased since the pandemic due to new pandemic related grants becoming available that delayed the use of the District’s regular federal grants. This caused grants to be combined by grantors with different allowable expenses, areas of service, and periods of performance and caused grants to be extended, causing complexity. The District confirmed that there will be no other federal grants used for reimbursement of the expenses that were removed from the SEFA during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the District develop written procedures to allocate expenses to routes and purposes under federal grants that document the timing of the preparation and review of the allocation schedule. A summary tab should be added to the allocation schedule to reconcile amounts for each route/purpose to total operating expenses, preventive maintenance, insurance, communications and other expenses allocated to the population of expenses in the general ledger. We also recommend the District develop a schedule to summarize all approved and pending grants that includes the amounts available under each grant, each route/purpose within each grant, periods of performance for each amount available, the last date to submit invoices, and amounts claimed and still available for each grant by route/purpose. The District should re-evaluate budgets if changes or delays occur to federal grants and ensure a new federal or local funding source is identified and claimed for the expenses. The SEFA should be prepared after expenses are reconciled to the GL at the invoice level by route/purpose and the allocation schedule is thoroughly reviewed. The SEFA should be reviewed by a knowledgeable member of management to ensure completeness and accuracy. We also recommend the District claim expenses more quickly to allow the granting agency time to review and approve the claims before the audit begins. We recommend the District reconcile expenses within 30 days of quarter end and prepare claims within 45 days of quarter end. If the District is unsure about the period of performance dates or other restrictions on a grant, staff should contact the granting agency for clarification. Finally, we recommend the District discuss the overclaimed amounts of $183,548 and $175,143 described above with the FTA to determine whether these overclaimed funds must be returned or whether they may be used to claim future expenses. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included at the Corrective Action Plan end of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-003 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the audit recommendations and remains committed to strengthening grant management and financial oversight. This year’s challenges in grant reconciliation stemmed from overlapping prior-year FTA claims issues, pending grant amendments, and limited time, as noted in Finding 2024-002. Additionally, the increased complexity of federal grants following the pandemic required adjustments to allocation methods and financial reporting. To address these issues, staff has refined internal processes, including improving worksheets, enhancing review procedures, and consolidating grant data into a single summary sheet for better tracking. The 2024 FTA Triennial Review acknowledged these improvements, and the corrective action plan was considered sufficient, with recommendations to closely monitor grant activity and update the worksheets as necessary. Moving forward, staff will continue formalizing procedures for expense allocation, improve reconciliation processes, and ensure grant expenditures align with available funding. Grant tracking will provide a clearer overview of balances, deadlines, and remaining funds. The Finance department also adjusted its billing practices to reconcile expenses earlier in the reporting cycle, allowing sufficient time for review and claim adjustments. Regarding the overclaimed amounts of $183,548 and $175,143, staff will work with the FTA to determine whether repayment is required or if the funds can be applied to future eligible expenses. These efforts will strengthen compliance, improve accuracy in financial reporting, and overall grant management. Responsible Party: Director of Finance & Administration Implementation Date: Ongoing; full implementation expected by December 31, 2025

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 540339 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 540340 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 540341 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 540342 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1116780 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1116781 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1116782 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1116783 2024-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1116784 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.933 National Infrastructure Investments $293,602
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $176,970
20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grants $170,000
20.526 Buses and Bus Facilities Formula, Competitive, and Low Or No Emissions Programs $129,537
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $60,827