Finding 520621 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-01-28

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District overcharged the Child Nutrition Cluster program by $285,408 due to incorrect calculations of indirect costs.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with allowable costs and cost principles as outlined by USDA and ADE.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Ensure future indirect cost calculations align with USDA and ADE guidelines to prevent similar overcharges.

Finding Text

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $285,408 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria According to the Memo SP60‐2016, Indirect Costs Guidance for State Agencies and School Food Authorities, issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), a District may recover indirect costs of services rendered to school food service at a rate not to exceed the unrestricted indirect cost rate approved by the Arizona Department of Education (ADE). The approved indirect cost rate is subject to change each fiscal year. Condition The District charged the Child Nutrition Cluster program, reported in the Food Service Fund, $391,714 in indirect costs for the fiscal year, whereas the maximum allowable indirect costs was calculated at $106,306. Cause The District was unaware that they could only take $25,000 of expenditures from their food service management costs. Effect The District overcharged indirect costs of $285,408 to the Child Nutrition Cluster program as reported in the Food Service Fund. Context When calculating indirect costs, the District did not exclude specific costs prohibited in the indirect cost calculation. As a result, the 25 percent indirect cost rate was applied to a net food service expenditure amount that was greater than it should have been. Therefore, the District overcharged $285,408 to the Child Nutrition Cluster program as reported in the Food Service Fund. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should ensure indirect costs are calculated in accordance with the formula set forth in the guidance issued by USDA and ADE. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles School Nutrition Programs Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 520619 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 520620 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1097061 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1097062 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1097063 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.555 National School Lunch Program $1.73M
10.553 School Breakfast Program $883,044
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $882,275
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $364,621
84.287 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers $360,056
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $171,779
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $129,634
94.434 Preschool Development Grant $118,079
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $75,133
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $62,170
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $41,535
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $30,188
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $1,501
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $288