Finding 516537 (2024-003)

Material Weakness
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-12-23

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Authority failed to comply with prevailing wage rate requirements for Capital Fund projects.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with 24 CFR Part 905 and related wage rate laws.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a monitoring system for prevailing wage rates and review requirements for future projects.

Finding Text

Finding 2024-003: Prevailing Wage Rates Capital Funds – 14.872 Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Projects funded with Capital Funds that are developed and/or modernized in accordance with 24 CFR Part 905, Subpart F, including projects that contain only public housing units and mixed-finance projects are subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (42 USC 1437j(a) and (b); 24 CFR section 905.308). Condition: They Authority had Capital Fund grant expenditures during the fiscal year related to four different contractors. For two of those, the Authority did not require prevailing wage rates and therefore did not monitor for them. The other two had the clauses in the contract but the Authority was unable to provide any documentation to support the clause was monitored. Cause: The Authority did not have procedures in place to determine when prevailing wages rates were required and further did not monitor to ensure they were complied with when they did require them. Effect or Potential Effect: The Authority did not comply with the prevailing wage rate requirements. Recommendation: The Authority should review the prevailing wage rate requirements so it can determine when they apply for future projects. The Authority should establish a documented monitoring system to show it complied with the prevailing wage rate requirements. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee's management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

The Housing Authority of the Town of Carrollton, Missouri, is aware of the prevailing wage rate requirements. The Director was confused with the small purchase threshold and therefore did not require documentation on those contracts, but will in the future. The other contracts complied with the requirement, but were not located on the audit date, therefore we agree with the finding. A checklist of required contract documents has been developed to assure compliance in the future.

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions Subrecipient Monitoring HUD Housing Programs Material Weakness

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 516536 2024-002
    Material Weakness
  • 516538 2024-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1092978 2024-002
    Material Weakness
  • 1092979 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1092980 2024-004
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $450,037
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $168,510
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $154,915