Finding 500454 (2023-002)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-09-30

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Authority lacks a structured journal voucher system, leading to potential accountability and transparency issues in financial reporting.
  • Impacted Requirements: SAS 99 compliance is at risk due to inadequate segregation of duties and insufficient training for employees on journal entry processes.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a clear approval process with designated roles for preparation, review, and authorization of journal entries, backed by proper documentation.

Finding Text

Federal Program: Assistance Listing #14.871 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. Criteria: SAS 99 requires proper documented internal control over journal entries. Condition: The Authority does not have an organized journal voucher system that ensures transparency and accountability in financial reporting. There is not a designated preparer, reviewer, and authorizer. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: Absence of clear guidelines and procedures for creating, approving, and recording journal vouchers can lead to inconsistencies. Employees are not adequately trained on how to segregate their duties within the journal voucher system. Effect: The absence of a structured approval process can make it difficult to hold individuals accountable for financial entries, increasing the risk of fraud or misuse of funds. Variability in how transactions are recorded can lead to inconsistencies, making it challenging to maintain accurate and reliable financial records. Without a formalized process for documenting transactions, errors in recording may go unnoticed, leading to inaccurate financial statements. The inability to easily document and authorize adjustments or corrections can result in delays and increased workload for staff. There is a regulatory compliance risk that can potentially lead to penalties. Recommendation: There should be an individual responsible for initiating the journal entry. A person who verifies the accuracy and appropriateness of the entry. A manager or finance officer responsible for the final approval and authorization of the transaction. Ensure that every journal voucher is backed by adequate supporting documentation, such as invoices, receipts, contracts, or other relevant paperwork that justifies the transaction. Reviewers should follow a standardized checklist to ensure that all key details (such as dates, amounts, account codes, and descriptions) are correct. There should be controls on the approving and posting the journal entries. Management’s Response: Management will develop and install a journal voucher system which requires approval by a person other than the preparer.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Response: Management will develop and install a journal voucher system which requires approval by a person other than the preparer.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 500453 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 500455 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1076895 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1076896 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1076897 2023-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $6.62M
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $279,005
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $222,651
14.182 Section 8 New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation $155,496