Finding Text
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery
Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listings Number: 21.027
Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was
2022-003.
Condition and Context
Suspension and Debarment
The City elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing them to claim their
total COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation from
the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) of $3,870,958 as revenue loss to use for
government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds were expended under the revenue
loss eligible use category. The Treasury determined that there are no subawards under this
eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to
subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the
case of the revenue loss portion of the award.
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients
are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or
otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods
and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are
expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded
Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or
condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that
the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards and the fact the City did
not subgrant any of its SWIF award, the City was only required to comply with suspension and
debarment requirements related to covered transactions.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22
CITY OF NEW CASTLE
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Upon inquiry of the City in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity
with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded, the City divulged that it was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements
related to the SLFRF awards. There were 11 covered transactions that equaled or exceeded
$25,000 that were identified. All 11 transactions, totaling $3,696,810, were selected for testing.
The City did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment on any
of the covered transactions due to the City not having any policies or procedures in place to
verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred or otherwise excluded or
disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
31 CFR 19.300 states:
"When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must
verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this
by:
(a) Checking the EPLS; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person."
Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states: ". . . recipients are expected
to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined
in the Uniform Guidance . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded
within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting
of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to
effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23
CITY OF NEW CASTLE
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City
cannot ensure the contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any
program funds the City used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be
unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recovery them. Furthermore, noncompliance with
the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could
result in the loss of future federal funding to the City.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommend that the City strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all contractors
that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from
participations in federal programs before entering into any contracts.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.