Finding 1076084 (2023-004)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-09-30
Audit: 322522
Organization: City of New Castle (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City failed to verify that contractors were not suspended or debarred before entering into covered transactions, leading to a repeat finding of material weakness.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal procurement and suspension/debarment regulations was not met, risking unallowable costs and potential recovery of funds.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The City should enhance internal controls to ensure verification of contractor eligibility for all transactions over $25,000 funded by federal awards.

Finding Text

FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context Suspension and Debarment The City elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing them to claim their total COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) of $3,870,958 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The Treasury determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards and the fact the City did not subgrant any of its SWIF award, the City was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the City in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the City divulged that it was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements related to the SLFRF awards. There were 11 covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 that were identified. All 11 transactions, totaling $3,696,810, were selected for testing. The City did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment on any of the covered transactions due to the City not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot ensure the contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recovery them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that the City strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all contractors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participations in federal programs before entering into any contracts. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 499641 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 499642 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 499643 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1076083 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1076085 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $337,665
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $177,894
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $27,706