Finding 4876 (2022-006)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-12-16
Audit: 7039
Organization: Samu Foundation (DC)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: SAMU lacks proper documentation for procurement processes, including rationale for methods and contractor selections.
  • Impacted Requirements: This finding violates 2 CFR §200.303 and §200.318, which mandate effective internal controls and detailed procurement records.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: SAMU should improve documentation practices to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards.

Finding Text

Finding 2022-006: Procurement Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined that SAMU did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, we noted that vendors did not always have a signed contract in place to outline the price and nature of services to be provided to SAMU. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as SAMU's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, there were instances in which vendors selected for testing did not have a signed contract in place with SAMU. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend SAMU retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials: SAMU had a workshop for procurement practices together with Project Hope back in October/November 2022. The procurement process of Services and (nonrecurring) Goods has been updated in May/June 2023. Therein all the requirements were explained to fulfill the procurement standards established by 2 CFR 200.318. In the meantime, all procurement specialists have been advised to request a minimum of three formal quotes for procurements above $10,000, once those have been received and a proposal with an explanation (via email) of why a certain vendor has been preselected to provide the services and goods in question. With this information, the MD and Finance/Admin head are asked for internal approval and process the procurement of the Services and Goods. The approval is provided by email. An updated procurement policy is in preparation, the procurement process will be discussed again in another workshop in Q1 2024.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 4874 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 4875 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 4877 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 581316 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 581317 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 581318 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 581319 2022-007
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program $1.61M