Finding 46811 (2022-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
F
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-01-11
Audit: 50734
Auditor: Auditor General

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District failed to comply with the Davis-Bacon Act for a construction project funded by Federal money, leading to questioned costs of $1,251,947.
  • Impacted Requirements: Contracts over $2,000 must include clauses for prevailing wage rates, and the District did not ensure compliance or verify wage rates against those set by the U.S. Department of Labor.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement training for staff on the Davis-Bacon Act, ensure future contracts include necessary clauses, and document compliance with the Florida Department of Education regarding questioned costs.

Finding Text

Finding: District controls did not always ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act for Federally funded construction projects exceeding $2,000, resulting in Federal program questioned costs totaling $1,251,947. Criteria: The ESSER Fund provides Federal funds for school facility repairs and improvements to reduce the risk of virus transmission and exposure to environmental health hazards and to support student health needs. Title 29, Section 5.5, Code of Federal Regulations (Davis-Bacon Act), requires the District to include prevailing wage rate clauses in any construction contract exceeding $2,000 that is financed either wholly or in part by Federal funds and to ensure that contractors and subcontractors pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. The United States Department of Labor established ?prevailing wages? by geographic area and interprets the Davis Bacon Act to apply to construction, alteration, or repair of a public building or public work. Condition: During the 2019-20 fiscal year, the Board entered into a construction contract for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning repairs and upgrades at all District schools and various administrative and support offices. As of June 2022, the District had expended ESSER funds totaling $1,251,947 on the project. We noted that the contract for the project did not contain clauses that required the contractors and subcontractors to comply with the Davis-Bacon Act provisions. In addition, in response to our inquiry, District personnel indicated that they had not performed direct comparisons of wage rates paid by the contractor and subcontractors for the project with the prevailing wages established by the United States Department of Labor. Cause: District personnel were not aware that the Davis-Bacon Act applied to the project. Effect: Without an appropriate understanding of the Davis-Bacon Act and when to apply the Act requirements, there is an increased risk that that construction contractors and subcontractors paid with Federal moneys will not pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. Although we requested, the District did not provide the certified payrolls from the contractor demonstrating that the prevailing wage rates were paid for these projects. Consequently, the District incurred questioned costs totaling $1,251,947. Recommendation: The District should establish procedures to comply with all provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act. Such procedures should include appropriate training for staff to understand the Davis-Bacon Act and when the Act requirements should be applied. In addition, the procedures should ensure that Federally funded facility contracts include the required prevailing wage rate clauses and that wage rates paid by the contractor and subcontractors for such projects are directly compared to and determined to be consistent with the prevailing wages established for the geographic area by the United States Department of Labor. Also, the District should document to the Florida Department of Education (FDOE) the allowability of the questioned costs of $1,251,947 or contact the FDOE regarding necessary corrective action. District Response: The District will enhance its procedures to ensure compliance with the Davis Bacon Act.

Corrective Action Plan

Current applicable financial personnel, district staff, and school board personnel, including the school board attorney, have been apprised of the Davis-Bacon Act and its application to various projects. The requirements of the act will be addressed annually to ensure all parties (i.e. new employees and new board members) are aware of requirements resulting from the act. All Federally funded facility contracts will include the required prevailing wage rate language and that those wage rates paid by contractors and/or subcontractors for projects are consistent with prevailing wages established by U.S. Department of Labor.

Categories

Questioned Costs Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 623253 2022-001
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $550,373
10.555 National School Lunch Program $502,253
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $480,048
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $445,922
32.009 Emergency Connectivity Fund Program $185,937
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $165,252
84.287 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers $155,788
10.553 School Breakfast Program $133,822
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $78,253
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants $77,516
12.U01 Navy Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps $58,722
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services_projects of Regional and National Significance $44,102
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $39,852
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $20,998
84.358 Rural Education $20,251