Finding 391227 (2023-003)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-04-01

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District failed to properly check for vendor debarment as required by 2 CFR § 180.300, missing self-certifications for two out of three vendors tested.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with federal regulations can lead to disqualification of transactions and rejection of federal fund claims.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement policies to ensure compliance with debarment checks and establish monitoring procedures for ongoing adherence.

Finding Text

Criteria or Specific Requirement (Obtaining Certificate of Non-Debarment or Checking Sam.gov for Debarment): Debarment is an action by a federal agency to prohibit a recipient from receiving federal funds through procurement transactions and applicable non-procurement transactions. (Examples given for applicable non-procurement transactions are: grants, cooperative agreements, scholarships, fellowships, contracts of assistance, loans, loan guarantees, subsidies, insurances, payments for specified uses, and donation agreements.) Non-Federal entities cannot contract with nor make subawards under procurement transactions and applicable non-procurement transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR § 180.300 provides that a non-federal entity must use one of the following procedures when contracting with vendor or when paying a vendor over $25,000 during the audit year: (a) Check SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collect a certification from that person; or (c) Add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: We inquired about the District’s procedures under 2 CFR § 180.300 regarding suspension and debarment. We were informed that self-certifications are contained in the District’s contracts. We selected a sample of three vendors in the population of six vendors which received over $25,000 during the audit period. The District provided a contract provision self-certifying on suspension and debarment on one procurement, which was the general contractor’s contract. However, the District stated they could not locate a suspension and debarment self-certification for the other two vendors. We inquired if perhaps the District had checked the Sam.gov website, but the District had not. Cause: It appears that the primary cause of this condition is that the District has limited experience with Single Audit requirements in general. Indeed, the District has not been required to have a Single Audit since the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Effect: The federal government can disqualify any transaction and reject the claim for federal funds when the underlying transaction is with a suspended or debarred individual or entity. Questioned costs: No costs are questioned. Perspective: The population of vendors with expenditures over $25,000 was six. The electric company was excluded as an obvious sole source. The general contractor had already been tested during walk throughs. A sample of two in addition to the general contractor test was selected; both vendors produced exceptions. We note that the two exceptions represented 5.2% of the dollar value of sample tested with the general contractor representing 94.8% of the dollar value. Extrapolating the 5.2% to the population, of vendors subject to debarment requirements, the expected dollar error for debarment checks is $103,162. It is noted that the auditor checked SAM.gov on all three vendors tested, and neither vendor was suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We would recommend that the District adopt policies and procedures under 2 CFR § 180.300 requiring that the non-federal entity must use one of the following procedures when contracting with vendor or when paying a vendor over $25,000 during the audit year: (a) Check SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collect a certification from that person; or (c) Add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Further, we recommend that a monitoring procedure be implemented to review for compliance with these procedures. Views of responsible officials: Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Response: We concur. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The District is actively working to develop written policies that will guide future procurement and selection of firms that participate in these federally-funded projects, including debarment and conflict of interest procedures. We plan to implement new policies by end of F& 23/24. Implementation Date: June 2024 Name of Responsible Person: Hugh Logan, General Manager

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 391223 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 391224 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 391225 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 391226 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 967665 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 967666 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 967667 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 967668 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 967669 2023-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
66.458 Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds $3.78M
10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities $2.36M
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $93,557