Finding 390231 (2023-003)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-29
Audit: 301124
Organization: Rider University (NJ)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University failed to perform due diligence on its third-party servicer for the Perkins Loan program due to the absence of a required compliance audit report.
  • Impacted Requirements: This situation violates the Code of Federal Regulations that mandates internal controls and due diligence when using third-party services.
  • Recommended Follow-up: The University should establish a procedure with the servicer to ensure timely completion of compliance reports for future due diligence.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Federal Perkins Loan Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.038 Award Period: 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Code of Federal Regulations Title 34, Subtitle B, Chapter VI, Part 674.19 requires that in administering its Federal Perkins Loan program, an institution shall establish and maintain an internal control system of checks and balances that ensures that no office can both authorize payments and disburse funds to students. When an institution uses a third-party servicer for its Perkins Loan program, the institution must perform due diligence to ensure that the third-party service is in compliance with the requirements for the functions the third-party servicer is performing for the institution. Such due diligence could include obtaining and reviewing the third-party servicer’s most recent Title IV compliance audit. Condition: The University utilizes a third party service for its Perkins Loan servicing. This is a very common practice for colleges and universities in order to provide the most efficient and effective means to not only collect loans but meet the federal regulations for servicing student Perkins Loans. In order to perform the due diligence required per the Code of Regulations, the institution utilizes the external compliance report performed for the third party servicer by other auditors. The third party servicer’s compliance audit report for the year ended June 30, 2023 was not issued as of the report date of the uniform guidance report. Therefore, the University was unable to perform due diligence on the third party provider’s internal control over the Perkin’s requirements. Questioned costs: None. Context: We noted that the University was not able to obtain the third party’s compliance report as of the date of the Uniform Guidance Report. Cause: The third party servicer, did not have their Title IV compliance audit report completed for the year ending June 30, 2023 so that the University can perform their required due diligence on the third party servicer. Effect: The University did not perform due diligence to ensure that the third-party service is in compliance with the requirements for the functions the third-party servicer is performing for the institution. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University implement a procedure with the third party servicer to ensure that their report is completed timely so that the University can perform the necessary due diligence they need to perform. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal Perkins Loan Program – Assistance Listing No. 84.038 Recommendation: We recommend the University implement a procedure with the third party servicer to ensure that their report is completed timely so that the University can perform the necessary due diligence they need to perform. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to the finding: Recognizing the importance of resolving this finding the University intends to adjust policies and procedures around reviewing the third-party servicer processes around regulations and compliance items therein. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Miranda Cole, Director and Tristan Schmittinger, Associate Director. Planned completion date for a corrective action plan: 3/26/2024

Categories

Student Financial Aid Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 390228 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 390229 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 390230 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 966670 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 966671 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 966672 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 966673 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $27.19M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $5.67M
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Programs $2.74M
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $511,032
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $394,909
84.042 Trio_student Support Services $337,777
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $222,337
84.217 Trio_mcnair Post-Baccalaureate Achievement $167,159
47.074 Biological Sciences $162,442
47.070 Computer and Information Science and Engineering $45,869
47.050 Geosciences $33,297
81.049 Office of Science Financial Assistance Program $24,593
94.005 Americorps Education Awards $18,735
45.024 Promotion of the Arts_grants to Organizations and Individuals $7,832
47.076 Education and Human Resources $7,328
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $5,658
45.164 Promotion of the Humanities_public Programs $3,755