Finding 389338 (2023-003)

Material Weakness
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-29

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development found that the Authority is not properly selecting applicants from the waiting list for Section 8 vouchers, leading to material non-compliance.
  • Impacted Requirements: The Authority failed to follow its own written policies for waiting list selections, violating federal regulations and resulting in a material weakness in internal controls.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The Authority should develop and implement stronger internal control procedures to ensure compliance with federal guidelines and rectify the identified weaknesses.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and Mainstream Vouchers Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.871 and 14.879 Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions – Selections from the Waiting List Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: Yes Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Selections from the Waiting List. The PHA must have written policies in its HCVP administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list and PHA documentation must show that the PHA follows these policies when selecting applicants from the waiting list. Except for as provided in 24 CFR section 982.203(Special admission (non-waiting list)), all families admitted to the program must be selected from the waiting list. “Selection” from the waiting list generally occurs when the PHA notifies a family whose name reaches the top of the waiting list to come in to verify eligibility for admission (24CFR sections 5.410, 982.54(d), and 982.201 through 982.207). Condition: Based upon inspection of the waiting list provided to us during the time of audit, the new move-in list and discussions with management, it could not be determined with any certainty that new move-ins were selected from the wait list in an order that is in accordance with the Authority’s policy. Context: Fifteen (15) names were selected from the new move-in list and those names were to be traced to the waiting list to verify new move-ins were chosen in an order that was in accordance with the Authority’s policy. It was determined that fifteen (15) out of fifteen (15) new move-ins selected could not be traced with any certainty back to the Authority's waiting list. Known Questioned Costs: $71,909 Cause: There is a material weakness in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to selections from the waiting list. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and Mainstream Vouchers programs are in material non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to selections from the waiting list. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority has recognized the material weakness in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and Mainstream Vouchers programs and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance with federal regulations.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority has recognized the material weakness in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and Mainstream Vouchers programs and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance with federal regulations. Melissa Beadle, Deputy Director, will be responsible for implementing this corrective action by June 30, 2024. CMHA is aware that the HAB/MRI software does not store waitlist reports by date processed and since then, CMHA has been saving Excel files of the waitlist reports. The applicants that were selected for the audit were applicants that had preference points. All applicants with preference points were contacted at the same time to be informed that they were eligible for a voucher. The CMHA waitlists were ran by preference points and time/date of application. Once those applicants were pulled the waitlist was not saved to Excel. The preference point list was then sorted alphabetically for sign in purposes and tracking of applicant documentation. This is the list that was provided to the auditor.

Categories

Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Eligibility Material Weakness Special Tests & Provisions Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 389336 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 389337 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 389339 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 389340 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 389341 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 965778 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 965779 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 965780 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 965781 2023-001
    Material Weakness
  • 965782 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 965783 2023-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $2.62M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $2.19M
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $1.45M
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $319,652
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $311,696