Finding 375616 (2022-007)

Material Weakness
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2024-03-12

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The organization lacked proper controls to ensure that payroll costs charged to federal grants were based on actual expenses, leading to compliance violations.
  • Impacted Requirements: Costs billed to the grant were based on estimates rather than actual wages, resulting in questioned costs of approximately $115,000.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement comprehensive payroll controls, ensure accurate billing practices, and maintain documentation of reviews and approvals to prevent future discrepancies.

Finding Text

#2022-007 - Major Federal Award Finding - Allowable Costs - Payroll Nature of Finding: Compliance Finding - Allowable Costs and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria/Condition: A non-federal entity may only charge allowable costs to federal programs. The Organization did not have controls in place to verify that costs were being charged to the award were based upon actual costs incurred and consistent with those provided in the grant budget. Questioned Costs: Approximately $115,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed: Payroll expenditures charged to the grant during the year were traced in total to the year-to-date payroll reports. Questioned costs represent the error identified in the testing of the population of payroll expenditures of the major program. Cause/Context: There are not proper controls in place to review payroll costs monthly to ensure costs were charge to the grant appropriately. This resulted in three instances of noncompliance: - Amounts were billed to the grant using estimated monthly wages rather than actual wages incurred. - The employee portion of payroll taxes were billed to the grant twice - once as part of gross wages and again as fringe benefits and added to employer payroll tax costs. - Costs were charged to the grant for one employee who was not listed in the grant budget as an allowable cost. Effect: An overstatement of expenditures for the grant was reported and submitted for reimbursement. Recommendation: We recommend that a full-range of controls over payroll and payroll related costs be implemented. The Organization should devote the resources necessary to ensure that such costs are of direct benefit to the program, are reviewed, approved, documented, and that the accounting and reporting process is accurate. Further, controls over grant billings should be established to ensure expenditures represent actual costs incurred. All control activities, including independent review should be documented and evidence of review and approval be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: MARR will retain a CPA consultant to implement a full-range of control over costs charged to federal programs. MARR's primary decision-making authority regarding such controls shall be placed with the MARR's president. MARR's protocol shall ensure that such costs are the direct benefit to the program, are reviewed, approved, documented and ensure the accounting and reporting process be accurate. Further, controls over grant billings will be established to ensure expenditures represent actual costs incurred. All control activities, including independent review, should be documented and evidence of review and approval will be maintained.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: MARR will retain a CPA consultant to implement a full-range of control over costs charged to federal programs. MARR's primary decision-making authority regarding such controls shall be placed with the MARR's president. MARR's protocol shall ensure that such costs are the direct benefit to the program, are reviewed, approved, documented and ensure the accounting and reporting process be accurate. Further, controls over grant billings will be established to ensure expenditures represent actual costs incurred. All control activities, including independent review, should be documented and evidence of review and approval will be maintained.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Cash Management Material Weakness Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 375613 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 375614 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 375615 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 375617 2022-008
    Material Weakness
  • 375618 2022-009
    Material Weakness
  • 375619 2022-010
    Material Weakness
  • 375620 2022-011
    Material Weakness
  • 375621 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 375622 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 375623 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 375624 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 375625 2022-008
    Material Weakness
  • 375626 2022-009
    Material Weakness
  • 375627 2022-010
    Material Weakness
  • 375628 2022-011
    Material Weakness
  • 952055 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 952056 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 952057 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 952058 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 952059 2022-008
    Material Weakness
  • 952060 2022-009
    Material Weakness
  • 952061 2022-010
    Material Weakness
  • 952062 2022-011
    Material Weakness
  • 952063 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 952064 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 952065 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 952066 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 952067 2022-008
    Material Weakness
  • 952068 2022-009
    Material Weakness
  • 952069 2022-010
    Material Weakness
  • 952070 2022-011
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
93.788 Opioid Str $133,750
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $60,744