Finding 33559 (2022-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2022-11-14
Audit: 31830
Organization: Suffolk University (MA)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: One student received less loan funding than they were eligible for due to incomplete transfer credit records.
  • Impacted Requirements: Annual limits for subsidized loans were not met, leading to questioned costs of approximately $91,000.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Review past cases of under-awarded students and implement additional checks for transfer student credit updates.

Finding Text

Finding ? Eligibility ? Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Assistance Listing #84.268, June 30, 2022 Award Year, U.S. Department of Education Criteria or Specific Requirement Annual Limits for Subsidized Loans: For an undergraduate student who has successfully completed the second year of study, but has not successfully completed the third year of an undergraduate program, the annual loan limit is $5,500 for a program of study at least an academic year in length. Condition Found We found one student out of our sample of forty who was awarded loan funds less than the student was eligible for. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $988; likely questioned costs determined to be approximately $91,000. Cause Admitted transfer students did not always have the full number of transfer credits recorded in the system at the time of acceptance and updates to credits were made after acceptance. Since aid is packaged quickly after acceptance, updates for the added credits were not considered for this select group which at times resulted in an under award. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should consider a review of past students who may have been under awarded for potential adjustment. Added reviews over packaging associated with transfer students should be placed into operation and we understand management has already put that in place for these students. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding - Eligibility Condition Out of forty students selected for testing, one student was under awarded subsidized and unsubsidized loans based on their grade level. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions During our annual audit, one student was identified as receiving less than the maximum eligibility in Federal Direct Student Loans for her grade level. This issue was the result of human error. While processes were in place to identify and resolve any students who are potentially awarded federal student loan amounts which exceed their eligibility, isolating students who are under-awarded is more complex. ? A student's eligible loan amount can be less than the maximum associated with their grade level for several legitimate reasons: ? A student elects to reject or reduce their loan amount. ? A student reaches or approaches the maximum lifetime limit in federal student loan programs for an undergraduate program. ? A student is enrolled in their final semester which may require loan amount proration. ? A student earns more credits or is granted additional transfer credits after the loan is initially awarded. To ensure all students are receiving the maximum Federal Direct Student Loan eligibility, the Office of Student Financial Services has put the following steps in place: ? Additional training has been provided to undergraduate financial aid counselors to remind them of the need for accuracy when determining eligibility based on grade level. ? To ensure the most up to date information on transfer credit evaluation is available to financial aid counselors at the time of awarding, staff in Undergraduate Admission have received additional training on the importance of recording the total number of transfer credits awarded at the time of acceptance. ? A thorough review of all 2022-2023 Federal Direct Student Loan amounts for undergraduate students was conducted that included an examination of all registered undergraduate students who were awarded. Any students who did not appear to receive the maximum amount for their grade level were reviewed prior to disbursement by the assigned counselor to determine if an increase was appropriate. If a student had additional eligibility, the award amount was revised and an updated award offer was sent to the student. ? The staff in Student Financial Services will continue this monitoring process on a monthly basis to ensure any future awards are also offered at the student's maximum eligibility. Responsible Official: Jennifer Ricciardi Completion Date: August 31, 2022

Categories

Questioned Costs Eligibility Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 33560 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 610001 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 610002 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Loan Program $73.15M
84.425 Covid-19 - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III - Institutional Portion $6.55M
84.425 Covid-19 - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III - Student Portion $6.36M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $5.76M
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $4.20M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $987,512
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $740,436
14.418 Private Enforcement Initiatives $397,058
84.047 Upward Bound $325,684
84.047 Veterans Upward Bound $271,758
84.217 McNaire Post-Baccalaureate Achievement $227,499
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance $200,044
14.416 Education and Outreach Initiatives $99,973
93.110 Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs $95,561
47.050 Geosciences $52,858
47.049 Mathematical and Physical Sciences $44,696
93.242 Mental Health Research Grants $35,642
43.001 Science $16,113
47.074 Biological Sciences $14,446
16.560 National Institute of Justice Research, Evaluation, and Development Project Grants $12,932
43.003 Exploration $2,082