Finding 1228735 (2023-005)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2026-09-03
Audit: 410398
Organization: Activate Work Inc. (CO)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization charged expenses to Federal funds that did not match the approved budget, lacking necessary prior approvals for budget changes.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 is critical; deviations from the budget require formal approval to avoid noncompliance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen internal controls by monitoring expenses against the budget, obtaining prior approval for changes, training staff on compliance, and documenting all budget revisions.

Finding Text

Finding 2023-005: 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds:COVID-19 - Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: Under 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, specifically 2 CFR §200.308 (Revision of Budget and Program Plans), non-Federal entities are required to expend Federal award funds in accordance with the approved budget and program plan included in the Federal award. Significant deviations from the approved budget or program plan may require prior written approval from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: During testing, it was noted that the Organization incurred and charged expenditures to the Federal pass-through award that were not consistent with the approved budget categories and allocations. In certain instances, expenditures exceeded the approved budget amounts within specific cost categories without evidence of formal budget modification approval from the pass-through entity which was required under the grant agreement. Effect: Failure to expend funds in accordance with the approved budget may result in noncompliance with Federal award requirements and could lead to questioned costs or required repayment if expenditures are determined to be unallowable or not properly authorized. Questioned Cost: None. Cause: The Organization does not have adequate internal controls or monitoring procedures in place to ensure expenditures are regularly compared against the approved grant budget. In addition, program and finance staff were not consistently aware of the requirement to obtain prior approval for budget revisions when reallocating funds across cost categories. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen internal controls over Federal grant financial management by: • Implementing procedures to monitor actual expenditures against the approved grant budget on a regular basis. • Establishing a process to request and obtain prior approval from the pass-through entity for budget modifications, when required. • Ensuring finance and program staff review grant budgets before charging expenditures to the award. • Providing training to relevant staff on Uniform Guidance requirements related to budget compliance. • Maintaining documentation of approved budget revisions and related correspondence with the pass-through entity. Response: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Action Taken in Response to Finding: Budget-to-actual comparisons began in 2024 and were subsequently standardized and incorporated into Financial Policies and Procedures. As of 2026, budget-to-actual comparisons are performed on a monthly basis as part of the month-end (EOM) close, prior to the preparation and submission of Federal reimbursement requests. This ensures that: • Expenditures are reviewed against approved grant budgets prior to reimbursement • Variances are identified and evaluated • Costs charged to Federal awards align with approved budgets and allowable use requirements Additionally, Budget and Program Revisions and Allowable Use of Funds policies were incorporated into the Financial Policies and Procedures to formalize requirements for budget compliance and modification. Control Enhancement: A standardized budget-to-actual review has been implemented across all applicable Federal awards. This process: • Compares actual expenditures to approved grant budgets on a monthly basis • Identifies variances requiring review or correction • Ensures expenditures are aligned with budget categories and allowable cost requirements • Requires budget review prior to submission of reimbursement requests Monitoring & Review: • Budget-to-actual comparisons are performed monthly as part of EOM close • Initial review is completed by Finance • Secondary review is performed by the Director of Finance & Operations • Program staff are engaged as needed to validate alignment with program activities • Any required budget modifications are identified and addressed prior to reimbursement Testing & Validation: • Beginning in June 2026, quarterly internal reviews will be conducted to validate that budget monitoring controls are operating effectively • Testing will confirm that: o Budget-to-actual reviews are completed consistently o Variances are appropriately identified and addressed o Reimbursements align with approved budgets Documentation & Evidence: • Budget-to-actual reports maintained in Teams / Sharepoint • Supporting documentation for budget revisions retained • Approval and review evidenced via email/workflow/sign-off Control Owner(s): • Director of Finance & Operations • Finance Team Responsible Party: Director of Finance & Operations, with executive oversight by the Chief Executive Officer Anticipated Completion Date: All corrective actions will be implemented by June 30, 2026. Ongoing monthly monitoring and quarterly validation will continue. Status: • Budget-to-actual comparisons (limited): Implemented 2024 • Standardized monthly workflow (EOM close): Implemented April 2026 • Policy integration into Financial Policies and Procedures: Completed May 2026 • Quarterly internal reviews will be conducted to validate that budget monitoring controls are operating effectively: June 2026

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1228719 2023-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228720 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228721 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228722 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228723 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228724 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228725 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228726 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228727 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228728 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228729 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228730 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228731 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228732 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228733 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1228734 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
11.307 ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE $314,592
17.268 H-1B JOB TRAINING GRANTS $247,672
10.561 STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MATCHING GRANTS FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $124,895
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $28,349