Finding 1208264 (2025-007)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-04-21

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: One participant was admitted to the TRIO program without meeting any eligibility criteria, specifically under the disability category.
  • Impacted Requirements: The participant's documentation did not show a substantial limitation of a major life activity as defined by the ADA, violating federal eligibility standards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen the eligibility review process and implement an independent supervisory review to ensure compliance with federal requirements for disability assessments.

Finding Text

Criteria Under 34 CFR 646.3(d), the TRIO Student Support Services (SSS) program requires that, at the time of admission, each participant meet at least one of the following eligibility criteria: be a low-income individual, a first-generation college student, or an individual with disabilities. This requirement is established under Program regulations at 34 CFR 646.7 define an “individual with a disability” by reference to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12102, which defines a disability as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. Condition During our review of TRIO participant eligibility, we identified one (1) participant admitted under the disability eligibility criteria. The participant file included a doctor’s note describing a moderate to high level of refractive errors (hypermetropia and astigmatism) in both eyes and recommending corrective lenses (with UV 400, Anti-reflective and blue light filter). However, the documentation did not demonstrate a substantial limitation of a major life activity under the ADA framework. In addition, the participant did not qualify under the low-income or first-generation criteria at the time of admission. Therefore, the participant did not meet any TRIO eligibility criteria at the time of entry into the program. Cause The condition occurred because the University relied on limited documentation provided by the applicant to assess whether the evidence supported or not a disability status under the ADA definition prior to admission. Additionally, existing procedures did not ensure that eligibility determinations were based solely on documentation available at the time of program entry. Furthermore, there was no secondary or supervisory review to ensure eligibility was properly supported prior to admission. Effect The lack of appropriate eligibility assessment led to the admission of an ineligible participant into the TRIO program and the provision of associated services, resulting in noncompliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that the University strengthen its TRIO participant eligibility review process to ensure that all students admitted to the program under the disability criteria provide appropriate supporting evidence of the disability and demonstrate that the disability results in a substantial limitation of a major life activity, in accordance with applicable federal definitions. In addition, the University should implement an independent supervisory review of disability determinations. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to Management's unaudited corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

As a resolution plan to ensure proper compliance with eligibility criteria required for student admission to the TRIO Program, specifically regarding disability, we will implement the following measures: Review and modify the program admission application to include a checklist format for the documents submitted by the student to validate compliance with eligibility criteria during the program admission process. Create a form that a qualified professional or specialist can use to validate and document relevant information about the disability to determine eligibility and reasonable accommodations or modifications, as established and defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This form will be required when the medical certification provided by the qualified professional/specialist does not detail relevant information to determine the student’s eligibility based on disability or is more than one year old. Access and participate in training sessions, workshop, seminars, and webinars that focus on the ADA and its amendments, and on Title 42, Chapter 126, Section 1210, to gain greater knowledge and experience in meeting disability eligibility criteria in the Program.

Categories

Eligibility

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1208255 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208256 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208257 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208258 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208259 2025-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208260 2025-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208261 2025-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208262 2025-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208263 2025-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208265 2025-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208266 2025-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1208267 2025-009
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.063 FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM $16.17M
84.268 FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT LOANS $13.63M
84.031 HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL AID $3.05M
84.042 TRIO STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES $1.06M
47.076 STEM EDUCATION (FORMERLY EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES) $793,099
84.033 FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM $371,888
84.007 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS $320,473
12.905 CYBERSECURITY CORE CURRICULUM $81,968
84.425 EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND $53,496
20.616 NATIONAL PRIORITY SAFETY PROGRAMS $49,173
12.903 GENCYBER GRANTS PROGRAM $27,968
12.902 INFORMATION SECURITY GRANTS $10,156