Finding 1182698 (2025-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
BL
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-03-25

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Agency has ongoing discrepancies between the general ledger and grant reports, particularly with amounts passed to subrecipients, indicating a lack of effective reconciliation.
  • Impacted Requirements: The failure to reconcile and monitor grant reporting leads to potential omissions or overstatements in expenditures, risking noncompliance with grant agreements.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Enhance reconciliation processes using general ledger data, ensure consistency in reporting, and implement regular compliance reviews to improve accuracy and adherence to grant requirements.

Finding Text

Significant Deficiency Finding 2025-002 – Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.’s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance with all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency implemented reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, the reconciliations performed by the Agency displayed discrepancies between the general ledger and the grant reports that were not resolved, specifically amounts that were passed through to subrecipients. Rather than utilizing the Agency’s general ledger to report expenses on grant reports, the Agency used subrecipients’ monthly financial reports that were submitted to the Agency to report expenses on the Agency’s grant reports. Additionally, various grant reporting requires input of duplicate information for certain line items, however, these reports contained different amounts for line items that should match. We also noted that a compliance review is not being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: The Agency continues to improve in this area over prior years. A reconciliation process was implemented; however, discrepancies in reconciliations were noted. All reporting was not derived from general ledger expense accounts nor were reports reconciled to the general ledger expense accounts. There was no consistency in expenses that were being reported on multiple grant reports. Due to the volume of grant reports required to be submitted, the grant reporting process is difficult to maintain. We were also unable to obtain monitoring documentation, indicating that a formal process has not been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliation and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reports and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs. Perspective Information: This appears to be a systemic event as these conditions were noted on most of the grants that were tested. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency continue to improve its reconciliation process and further enhance reconciliations to ensure information can be cross-referenced between the various reports required to be submitted. Grant reporting should be performed using the general ledger expense accounts to ensure all expenses are captured. Reconciliations should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve the reports before submission to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately in the accounting system. We also recommend the Agency require a periodic review of adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note that such a review was performed. Response: The Agency will improve its reconciliation and reporting procedures. All grant reports will be prepared using general ledger data and reviewed before submission. Monthly reconciliations and periodic compliance checks will be performed and documented. These actions are intended to improve accuracy, consistency, and compliance across all grants. Monthly check-ins for WCIAAA staff currently take place to help improve communication, monitoring, and oversight of all grant and fiscal reporting.

Corrective Action Plan

The Agency will improve its reconciliation and reporting procedures. All grant reports will be prepared using general ledger data and reviewed before submission. Monthly reconciliations and periodic compliance checks will be performed and documented. These actions are intended to improve accuracy, consistency, and compliance across all grants. Monthly check-ins for WCIAAA staff currently take place to help improve communication, monitoring, and oversight of all grant and fiscal reporting.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1182681 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182682 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182683 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182684 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182685 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182686 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182687 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182688 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182689 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182690 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182691 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182692 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182693 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182694 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182695 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182696 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1182697 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
93.044 SPECIAL PROGRAMS FOR THE AGING, TITLE III, PART B, GRANTS FOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AND SENIOR CENTERS $82,642
93.045 SPECIAL PROGRAMS FOR THE AGING, TITLE III, PART C, NUTRITION SERVICES $78,871
93.052 NATIONAL FAMILY CAREGIVER SUPPORT, TITLE III, PART E $43,899
93.043 SPECIAL PROGRAMS FOR THE AGING, TITLE III, PART D, DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION SERVICES $20,827
93.048 SPECIAL PROGRAMS FOR THE AGING, TITLE IV, AND TITLE II, DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS $20,000
93.634 SUPPORT FOR OMBUDSMAN AND BENEFICIARY COUNSELING PROGRAMS FOR STATES PARTICIPATING IN FINANCIAL ALIGNMENT MODEL DEMONSTRATIONS FOR DUALLY ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS $16,598
93.324 STATE HEALTH INSURANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $16,300
93.071 MEDICARE ENROLLMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $15,968
93.041 SPECIAL PROGRAMS FOR THE AGING, TITLE VII, CHAPTER 3, PROGRAMS FOR PREVENTION OF ELDER ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION $4,760
93.747 ELDER ABUSE PREVENTION INTERVENTIONS PROGRAM $1,255
93.053 NUTRITION SERVICES INCENTIVE PROGRAM $68