Finding 1177696 (2025-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-03-10

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: NDS incorrectly submitted reimbursement claims for program participants, leading to lower reimbursements due to misclassification of eligibility.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 7 CFR 226.23(e) was not met, as participant eligibility was not accurately determined and classified.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: NDS should emphasize the importance of accurate eligibility classification and establish regular reviews of eligibility data to ensure correct reimbursements.

Finding Text

SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Finding 2025-002 - Eligibility Federal Program: Child and Adult Care Food Program ALN: 10.558 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Pennsylvania Department of Education Criteria: Under 7 CFR 226.23(e), institutions must accurately determine and classify participant eligibility (Free, Reduced Price, or Paid) based on properly completed household income eligibility forms. Institutions must claim reimbursement based on the correct eligibility category. Condition: Our testing identified that NDS incorrectly submitted reimbursement information of certain program participants resulting in underclaiming of reimbursements. Although the incorrect reporting did not result in overpayments, the institution did not comply with the requirements under the federal program. Cause: Staff responsible for entering student eligibility information into the NDS database incorrectly coded participants as free, reduced price, or paid. Additionally, no review control exists to ensure that participant eligibility data is entered correctly. Effect: During our testing of participant eligibility, we noted that four out of 90 sampled participants were incorrectly submitted for reimbursement as “Reduced Price” when income documentation supported a “Free” eligibility classification. As a result, the institution claimed reimbursement at the reduced price rate rather than the higher free rate, resulting in lower reimbursement than what the institution was entitled to receive. There was no impact on participants’ access to or cost of meals, as participant eligibility was appropriately determined, and the misclassification did not result in the receipt of unallowable federal funds. Questioned Costs: Because the error resulted in lower reimbursements, there were no questioned costs, as defined under 2 CFR 200.1, identified as a result of this finding. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that NDS reiterate the importance of eligibility classification and implement a periodic review of student eligibility information in the database to ensure accurate reimbursements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management has acknowledged the errors identified and has taken action to strengthen controls surrounding these processes.

Corrective Action Plan

Section III – Federal Award Finding and Questioned Costs Finding 2025-002 – Eligibility Federal Program: Child and Adult Care Food Program (ALN 10.558) Views of Responsible Officials: NDS management met with CACFP staff to review procedures intended to enhance oversight of student eligibility determinations on February 10, 2026. The Assistant Administrator for the Child and Adult Care Food Program, Ms. Dawn McCoy, (dmccoy@ndsarch.org) will be responsible for ensuring adherence to these updated procedures.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Cash Management Eligibility Reporting

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.558 CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM $4.76M
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $3.85M
10.582 FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM $261,305
10.556 SPECIAL MILK PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN $21,011
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $20,579