Audit 391128

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$21.70M
Findings
1
Programs
5
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1177696 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.558 CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM $4.76M Yes 1
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $3.85M Yes 0
10.582 FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM $261,305 Yes 0
10.556 SPECIAL MILK PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN $21,011 Yes 0
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $20,579 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NML6BCNJL3K4 Lizanne F. Hagedorn Auditee
2672628902 Elizabeth Ireland Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (“SEFA”) presents the activities in all the federal and state financial assistance programs of Nutritional Development Services of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia (“NDS”). Programs listed as part of the Child Nutrition Cluster in this report are governed by the United States Department of Agriculture regulations including 7 CFR 210, 220, 215, and 226 and FNS Instruction 796-2, in addition to guidance from the Pennsylvania Department of Education. All financial awards received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal financial awards passed through other governmental agencies or nonprofit organizations, are included on the SEFA.
The accompanying SEFA has been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting.
The SEFA represents the number of meals served under the program multiplied by the reimbursement rate applicable to that program. Included as part of the awards listed on the SEFA, NDS receives funding from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the “Commonwealth”). The amounts noted in the table below for the school lunch and breakfast programs are matches of the federal awards received. The Commonwealth matches the number of claimable breakfast and lunches at $0.10 on each dollar award by the federal government. An additional reimbursement amount is paid for lunch at $0.04 or $0.02 on the dollar if breakfast participation is greater than or less than 20%, respectively. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table
NDS has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Finding 2025-002 - Eligibility Federal Program: Child and Adult Care Food Program ALN: 10.558 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Pennsylvania Department of Education Criteria: Under 7 CFR 226.23(e), institutions must accurately determine and classify participant eligibility (Free, Reduced Price, or Paid) based on properly completed household income eligibility forms. Institutions must claim reimbursement based on the correct eligibility category. Condition: Our testing identified that NDS incorrectly submitted reimbursement information of certain program participants resulting in underclaiming of reimbursements. Although the incorrect reporting did not result in overpayments, the institution did not comply with the requirements under the federal program. Cause: Staff responsible for entering student eligibility information into the NDS database incorrectly coded participants as free, reduced price, or paid. Additionally, no review control exists to ensure that participant eligibility data is entered correctly. Effect: During our testing of participant eligibility, we noted that four out of 90 sampled participants were incorrectly submitted for reimbursement as “Reduced Price” when income documentation supported a “Free” eligibility classification. As a result, the institution claimed reimbursement at the reduced price rate rather than the higher free rate, resulting in lower reimbursement than what the institution was entitled to receive. There was no impact on participants’ access to or cost of meals, as participant eligibility was appropriately determined, and the misclassification did not result in the receipt of unallowable federal funds. Questioned Costs: Because the error resulted in lower reimbursements, there were no questioned costs, as defined under 2 CFR 200.1, identified as a result of this finding. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that NDS reiterate the importance of eligibility classification and implement a periodic review of student eligibility information in the database to ensure accurate reimbursements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management has acknowledged the errors identified and has taken action to strengthen controls surrounding these processes.