Finding 1167722 (2023-007)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2026-01-05
Audit: 378959
Organization: Defensewerx (FL)
Auditor: WARREN AVERETT

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization lacks formal policies to ensure that changes in key personnel are approved by the funding agency, leading to potential compliance risks.
  • Impacted Requirements: Federal awards require approval for changes in key personnel, including significant time reductions or disengagements, which the Organization failed to document.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Establish formal policies to retain evidence of funding agency approvals for key personnel changes and maintain an updated list of all key personnel for compliance.

Finding Text

Criteria Applications/proposals or awards may include staffing proposals that specify individuals who will work on the project and the extent of the planned involvement of personnel. The non-Federal entity may change the staffing mix and level of involvement, within limits specified by agency policy or in the award, but may be required to obtain Federal awarding agency approval of changes in key personnel (as identified in the award, which may differ from the non-Federal entity’s designation in the application/proposal) and changes in the principal investigator’s/project director’s time commitment/level of participation in the project. For federal awards and cooperative agreements, this may include not only a change in the principal investigator or project director but also the disengagement from the project for more than three months, or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the project, by the approved project director or principal investigator. Condition The Organization does not have formal policies and procedures to determine whether key personnel involved in projects were approved by the underlying contract funding agency. The Organization represented that it did obtain verbal approval for changes in the key personnel. Cause The Organization does not have formal policies and procedures regarding approval of key personnel on projects funded via federal awards. Effect The Organization was not able to provide evidence that it was in compliance with the special tests and provisions over key personnel. Questioned Costs None Context We performed testing over partnership intermediary agreements in effect for the period under audit. The Organization was not able to provide evidence of the key personnel being approved by the funding agency as required by the agreements. Recommendation The Organization should create formal policies and procedures that require retention of evidence of the funders' approval of any changes in identified key personnel. The Organization should also add policies and procedures in place to maintain a listing of all key personnel identified in the various partnership intermediary agreements. Views of Responsible Officials See the accompanying Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with the recommendations offered for the relevant programs and will establish updated policies and procedures to address the finding regarding the retention of evidence of the funders’ approval of any changes in identified key personnel.

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1167670 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167671 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167672 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167673 2023-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167674 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167675 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167676 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167677 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167678 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167679 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167680 2023-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167681 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167682 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167683 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167684 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167685 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167686 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167687 2023-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167688 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167689 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167690 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167691 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167692 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167693 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167694 2023-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167695 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167696 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167697 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167698 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167699 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167700 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167701 2023-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167702 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167703 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167704 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167705 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167706 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167707 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167708 2023-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167709 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167710 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167711 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167712 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167713 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167714 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167715 2023-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167716 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167717 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167718 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167719 2023-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167720 2023-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167721 2023-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167723 2023-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167724 2023-009
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1167725 2023-010
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
12.800 AIR FORCE DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES PROGRAM $52.76M
12.RD1 INNOVATION HUB MODEL STUDY $18.61M
12.630 BASIC, APPLIED, AND ADVANCED RESEARCH IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING $5.41M
97.108 PUBLIC SAFETY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION RESEARCH, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION $860,853
81.010 OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS (OTT)-TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT, DEMONSTRATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION $279,687
12.114 COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT $38,776