Finding 1157605 (2024-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
CG
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-09-30

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Four out of five grant claims lacked formal review documentation, compromising internal controls over cash management compliance.
  • Impacted Requirements: Grant claims must be accurate and reconciled to the general ledger, with proper segregation of duties to prevent errors or fraud.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a formal review process where a second person verifies claims before submission, including documentation of their review with a signature and date.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities Assistance Listing Number: 10.937 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NR233A750004G064 - 2023 Award Period: 7/20/2023-6/30/2028 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Cash Management and Matching Criteria or specific requirement: Grant claims filed by the Organization to granting agencies must be accurate, reconcile to the Organizations general ledger system and for cost-reimbursable grants, represent costs incurred. Internal controls should be signed and implemented to prevent and detect errors in the data reported on the grant claims. Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease to occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensure that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. There should be a secondary review of each grant claim prior to being certified and filed to ensure that there are no errors, irregularities, or misrepresentations. Condition: Of the 5 claims for reimbursement selected for testing, noted 4 did not have a formal review documented by someone other than the preparer. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes over the cash management compliance requirement. When testing matching, the two claims that were tested included an indirect match that was not reported correctly, although the matching requirement was met. Questioned costs: None Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that four of five grant claims tested that were submitted for reimbursement did not have formal documentation of review by someone other than the preparer. Cause: Due to limited personnel, the Organization had not implemented formal controls related to reimbursement requests. Effect: There could be the possibility that the client would over- or under-report certain items for reimbursement on claims if there are no reviews in place. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a formal control where someone other than the preparer document their review of the claim prior to submitting to the federal agency. This review would include comparing the amounts in the report to the general ledger or other supporting documents. This review should be supported by documenting the signature and date prior to submission. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities – Assistance Listing No. 10.937 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a formal control where someone other than the preparer document their review of the claim prior to submitting to the federal agency. This review would include comparing the amounts in the report to the general ledger or other supporting documents. This review should be supported by documenting the signature and date prior to submission. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization has created a process to ensure that claims are reviewed and approved prior to submission to the funder. This starts with the Claim/Billing Approval Form that is prepared by the Grants Manager/Designee and is routed to the Project Manager along with the supporting documentation. Once the form has been approved and electronically signed by both staff, it will be saved in the Organization’s internal files, and the claim will be initiated in the funder portal. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jill Matchett, Grants Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 10, 2025

Categories

Cash Management Internal Control / Segregation of Duties HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1157604 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1157606 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1157607 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.937 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities $1.30M
10.902 Soil and Water Conservation $72,993
10.443 Outreach and Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged and Veteran Farmers and Ranchers $62,241
10.311 Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program $47,861
10.912 Environmental Quality Incentives Program $47,507
10.215 Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education $41,887