Finding 1155864 (2025-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2025-09-29
Audit: 368245
Organization: Charter Township of Clinton (MI)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Township failed to maintain proper documentation for required pre- and post-rehabilitation inspections on two projects, which is a repeat finding.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 24 CFR 570.506(b)(9)(ii) regarding inspection reports prior to contract approval and upon project completion.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Implement controls for formal inspection reports before and after rehabilitation work, and conduct monthly reviews of ongoing projects to ensure compliance.

Finding Text

Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 14.218, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster - Community Development Block Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year - B-20-MC-26-0033, B-21-MC-26-0033, B-22-MC-26-0033, B-23-MC-26-0033, B-24-MC-26-0033 Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - Yes Criteria - 24 CFR 570.506(b)(9)(ii) requires the Township to prepare and maintain a prerehabilitation inspection report describing the deficiencies to be rehabilitated for residential properties. The Township is also required to inspect the rehabilitation work upon completion to assure that it is carried out in accordance with rehabilitation standards. Condition - We noted no formal evidence that the stated control to ensure performance of required inspections prior to contract approval had been implemented effectively in one instance. We also noted no formal evidence that the stated control to verify inspections were performed upon project completion to ensure that work was carried out in accordance with contract specifications had been implemented effectively in one instance. Questioned Costs - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During testing of seven rehabilitation projects, we noted that management was unable to provide evidence that a review took place over the pre inspection for one project or the post inspection for another project. However in both instances, the required inspections took place at the appropriate time as evidenced by detailed notes left by the Township representative charged with carrying out rehabilitation projects. Cause and Effect - The lack of documentation of an inspection performed that identified work to be performed prior to contract approval could result in questioned costs if the need for the rehabilitation work could not be substantiated. Recommendation - We recommend the Township implement controls to ensure a formal inspection report is prepared prior to approval of all rehabilitation contracts, including contracts for deficiencies identified after the initial prerehabilitation inspection process is complete. We also recommend implementing controls to ensure a formal inspection report is prepared upon completion of rehabilitation work to ensure that work was carried out in accordance with contract specifications. Additionally, we recommend implementing controls to ensure a review of ongoing rehabilitation projects occurs at a minimum on a monthly basis to ensure that prerehabilitation and postrehabilitation inspections are being performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Staff will review folders at various stages of the project to ensure all records of inspections at both the beginning and end of the project are in the file. Staff has already set up either bi weekly or monthly meetings (depending on project activity levels) to report on the status of ongoing projects. These meetings were intended to help staff keep current projects in line with the overall project budget (i.e. not obligating funds beyond what’s available). Using these same meetings to check project files for all necessary records will be an adjustment of negligible effort. In instances where there is a sizable gap between portions of a project (e.g. part of the project can’t be completed until spring) staff will consider closing out the completed portion of the project and completing a final inspection on the balance of the job at a later date.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: We noted no formal evidence that the stated control to ensure performance of required inspections prior to contract approval had been implemented effectively in one instance. We also noted no formal evidence that the stated control to verify inspections were performed upon project completion to ensure that work was carried out in accordance with contract specifications had been implemented effectively in one instance. Planned Corrective Action: Staff will review folders at various stages of the project to ensure all records of inspections at both the beginning and end of the project are in the file. Staff has already set up either bi-weekly or monthly meetings (depending on project activity levels) to report on the status of ongoing projects. These meetings were intended to help staff keep current projects in line with the overall project budget (i.e. not obligating funds beyond what’s available). Using these same meetings to check project files for all necessary records will be an adjustment of negligible effort. In instances where there is a sizable gap between portions of a project (e.g. part of the project can’t be completed until spring) staff will consider closing out the completed portion of the project and completing a final inspection on the balance of the job at a later date. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Edwin Manninen, Matthew Wallace Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Material Weakness

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1155860 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155861 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155862 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155863 2025-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155865 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155866 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155867 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155868 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1155869 2025-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $282,054
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $183,696
66.469 Geographic Programs - Great Lakes Restoration Initiative $109,250
66.605 Performance Partnership Grants $95,956
97.044 Assistance to Firefighters Grant $48,385
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $29,972
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $22,857
90.404 Hava Election Security Grants $19,906
21.016 Equitable Sharing $16,304
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $5,993
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $3,215
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $2,765