Finding 1148147 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
G
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-07-21
Audit: 362668
Auditor: Ncheng LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Some administrative costs exceeded the 10% limit set by federal guidelines for the Continuum of Care Program.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 24 CFR § 578.59 regarding administrative cost caps was not maintained.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement stronger monitoring procedures for tracking administrative costs to ensure future compliance.

Finding Text

Program: Continuum of Care Program (ALN 14.267) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Criteria: According to 24 CFR § 578.59 and the applicable Compliance Supplement for the Continuum of Care (CoC) Program, no more than 10 percent of any grant awarded may be used to pay for administrative costs. Administrative costs include those related to general management, oversight, coordination, and training on CoC program requirements. These costs must be monitored carefully to ensure compliance with federal earmarking limits. Costs for CoC planning activities and Unified Funding Agency (UFA) costs are excluded from this limit. Condition: During our audit, we noted that in some instances slightly more than 10% of the funds awarded were charged to administrative costs. These excess charges exceeded the federal limit established for administrative expenditures under the CoC program. Cause: Although administrative costs are tracked separately, the cumulative amount charged was not flagged as exceeding the 10% limit during the review process. This appears to have been an oversight in monitoring controls specific to earmarking compliance. Effect: The administrative charges exceeding the 10% cap could be viewed as inconsistent with federal program requirements. While the financial impact appears limited, strengthening monitoring in this area will help maintain compliance and avoid potential issues in future audits or funding reviews. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: This issue was identified during our review of compliance with earmarking requirement across multiple CoC grants. While not systemic across all contracts, the occurrence of charges exceeding the allowable threshold highlights the need for improved internal controls around earmarking compliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: To ensure compliance with federal earmarking requirements, we recommend that the organization implement more robust internal monitoring procedures for administrative costs charged to CoC grants. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Categories

Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 571704 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 571705 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1148146 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $736,671
93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services $452,244
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $380,234
21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program $331,125
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging, Title Iii, Part C, Nutrition Services $154,747
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $110,732
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $97,034
93.044 Special Programs for the Aging, Title Iii, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers $47,070
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $37,883
93.053 Nutrition Services Incentive Program $25,812
93.043 Special Programs for the Aging, Title Iii, Part D, Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Services $4,808
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $3,923