Finding 1137840 (2024-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-05-22
Audit: 356963
Auditor: Mike Estes PC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program has a deficit of $103,785, indicating overspending beyond allowable costs.
  • Impacted Requirements: Restricted cash for HAP payments and interfund balances must comply with HUD regulations to avoid permanent transfers between funds.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Review and reduce overhead expenses, particularly consulting fees, to address the deficit and ensure compliance.

Finding Text

Most of the audit year was under the direction of an Interim Director. The current Executive Director began on July 1, 2024. Section Eight Housing Choice Voucher Program-CDFA#14.871 and Low Rent Program-CDFA#14.850 Finding 2024-001-Insufficent Restricted Cash and Deficit in Unrestricted Net Position-Allowable Costs Criteria and Condition HUD designates the Housing Choice Voucher advances to be in two categories: (a)-strictly to be used for HAP payments and (b)-to be used to pay for all non-HAP payment expenses identified with the HCV program. The (b) portion is considered Unrestricted HAP equity. When this number is a negative, this means that the HCV program has spent more than it should have. At September 30, 2024, the deficit as shown on page 11, of the Statement of Net Position, is $103,785. Context The $190,020 of restricted cash in the HCV program is $16,765 for HAP payments and $173,255 of remaining DHAP disaster funds which can only be spent with the permission of HUD. In addition, the HCV program has $410,700 of unrestricted cash. However, the HCV owes the General Fund (Low Rent) program a greater amount, $546,722, as shown on page 11 of the Statement of Position. Therefore, there are no available funds to cover the deficit of $103,875. Interfund amounts should be periodically reduced to close to zero. If not, an indefinite interfund due to is characterized as a permanent transfer between funds, which is not allowed per HUD regulations. Effect The authority has incurred and paid $103,785 (the deficit amount) more for HCV overhead than it should have. Cause It appears that the authority is paying a significant amount for consulting fees that is included in administrative expense. This is at least part of the issue. Questioned Costs None Recommendation The authority should seek ways to reduce the overhead expenses associated with the HCV program. Consulting fees in particular should be reviewed. $75,369 paid in the audit year to one consulting firm was charged to the HCV program. An additional amount of $101,401 was paid to the same firm from the General (Low Rent) Fund. The amount paid by this authority for consulting fees, even with an ongoing RAD conversion, appears to be excessive, in our opinion. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action I am Jedidiah Jackson. I was hired as Executive Director and started July 1, 2024. I believe that many of the issues noted in this audit have been corrected and I am working on the remaining issues.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 561398 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 561399 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1137841 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $3.04M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $457,559
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $178,905