Finding 1136239 (2022-005)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2025-05-07

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Authority failed to maintain adequate documentation for rental and utility assistance payments, leading to significant discrepancies in reported costs.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with 2 CFR Section 200.400, which mandates proper documentation for federal grant expenditures.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen internal controls for tracking payments, ensure proper documentation is obtained before payments, and address previously identified issues from past audits.

Finding Text

ALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES AND ALLOWABLE COSTS - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program Emergency Rental Assistance ALN 21.023; passed through the County of Berks Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.400 requires recipients and subrecipients of federal grant funds to maintain adequate documentation to support costs charged to a federal award. FAQ #5 issued by the Department of Treasury related to this program indicates that Grantees must obtain, if available, a current lease, signed by the applicant and the landlord or sublessor, that identifies the unit where the applicant resides and establishes the rental payment amount. Additionally, FAQ #6 notes that all payments for utilities and home energy costs should be supported by a bill, invoice, or evidence of payment to the provider of the utility or home energy service. Condition/Cause During 2022 payments of rental and utility assistance were entered as batches within the financial accounting software. A separate spreadsheet was utilized to track individual payments included within the batches. The original spreadsheet provided contained data entry errors. After revising for corrections, the detail provided by the Authority outlining individual payments was $472,226 lower than expenses reported in the financial reporting software and could not be reconciled by management. For 6 out of 60 cases tested, the amount paid for rent did not agree to a lease agreement or bills on file for the following reasons: (1) clerical errors, (2) duplicate payments due to multiple staff working on the same file, or (3) failure to request support before payment was made. The Authority did not have controls in place to detect the noncompliance prior to issuing payments. Effect The Authority is not in compliance with the 2 CFR Part 200 requirement to maintain adequate documentation to support costs charged to a federal program. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs are $475,094, which includes $472,226 for which expenditure details could not be provided and $2,868 of unallowable costs detected in our sample of cases. Context The Authority was unable to identify payments made for 1.95% of the population. Within our testing of 60 cases, questioned costs comprise approximately 0.59% of the total costs tested. Repeat Finding Yes. 2021-006. Recommendation We recommend the Authority revisit and strengthen internal controls over tracking individual payments for transactions entered as batches, particularly when related to federal awards. We encourage the Authority to continue working to identify the individual transactions making up the remainder of the federal expenditures under this program. We also recommend the Authority revisit and strengthen internal controls over allowable activities and allowable costs related to grant programs. Management Response See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 559792 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 559793 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 559794 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 559795 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 559796 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 559797 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 559798 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 559799 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 559800 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 559801 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 559802 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 559803 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 559804 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 559805 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 559806 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 559807 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 559808 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 559809 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1136234 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1136235 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1136236 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1136237 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1136238 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1136240 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1136241 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1136242 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1136243 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1136244 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1136245 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1136246 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1136247 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1136248 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1136249 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1136250 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1136251 2022-008
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program $24.21M
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $387,284
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $302,081
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $269,207