Finding 1094836 (2024-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
ELN
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-01-09

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Public Housing Department failed to follow required procedures for eligibility determinations, reexaminations, and documentation, leading to unsupported housing assistance payments.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 2 CFR 200 and 24 CFR regulations regarding documentation, reporting, and tenant selection from waiting lists.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Management should implement stronger internal controls and ensure all eligibility documentation is properly maintained to prevent future issues.

Finding Text

Finding: 2024‐001 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Program Name: Housing Voucher Cluster AL Number: 14.871 Material Non‐Compliance Material Weakness Eligibility, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that applicants have all required documentation in their file. In accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 Subpart F, the City must maintain documentation to support tenant eligibility. In accordance with 24 CFR section 982.516, the City must reexamine family income and composition at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification. In accordance with 24 CFR Part 908 and 24 CFR section 982.158, the Public Housing Agencies (PHA) are required to submit form HUD-50058, Family Report, electronically to HUD each time the PHA completes an issuance, admission, annual reexamination, interim reexamination, portability move-in, expiration, or other change of unit for a family. In accordance with 24 CFR sections 960.202 through 960.208, the City must establish, adopt, and follow policies for admission of tenants as it relates to the Public Housing waiting list. All families admitted to the program must be selected from the waiting list. In accordance with 24 CFR sections 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7), and 982.507, the PHA must determine that the rent to the owner is reasonable at the time of initial leasing. Also, the PHA must determine reasonable rent during the term of the contract. The PHA must maintain records to document the basis for the determination that rent to owner is a reasonable rent. In accordance with 24 CFR section 982.158 and 24 CFR Part 982, Subpart K, the PHA must pay a monthly Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) on behalf of the family that corresponds with the amount on the HUD-50058. This HAP amount must be reflected on the HAP contract and HAP register. Condition: The Public Housing Department did not follow procedures to ensure the proper eligibility determination, reexaminations, waiting lists, reasonable rent, reporting, and housing assistance payments were made and documented. Context: Of the 1,598 housing assistance payments during the current year valued at $771,603, we examined 60 (valued at $33,835) and determined that 60 (100% valued at $33,835) housing assistance payments were not supported with case documentation to confirm eligibility. Reexaminations were not completed timely to allow adjustments to housing assistance payments as necessary. Therefore, the housing assistance payments made during fiscal year 2024 were not supported by accurate information. Case files were missing documentation to support that the rent to the owners were reasonable and that the tenants were selected from the waiting list. Of the 60 housing assistance payments we examined, we determined that 12 applicants (20%) did not have proper documentation on file to support the amounts on the HAP contract or did not have the form HUD-50058, Family Report. Effect: Owners could receive benefits for which they are not eligible. Cause: Weakness in implementation of controls over eligibility, reporting, and special tests procedures. Due to the turnover in the housing department, the City failed to obtain or retain the completed documentations required. Questioned Cost: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. The sample results identified $771,603 in known questioned costs. Recommendation: Management should adhere to the program’s policy and maintain proper eligibility documentation in the applicant’s file. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.

Categories

Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Eligibility Material Weakness Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 518394 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 518395 2024-002
    Material Weakness
  • 518396 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 518397 2024-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1094837 2024-002
    Material Weakness
  • 1094838 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1094839 2024-004
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $1.17M
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $705,509
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $305,791
66.458 Clean Water State Revolving Fund $219,340
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $210,200