Finding 1092297 (2024-001)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-12-19

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: 17 tenant files had annual reexaminations overdue by over five months, indicating ongoing compliance challenges.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with 24 CFR 982 and local policies on timely reexaminations and documentation of Housing Quality Standards inspections.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Promptly complete overdue reexaminations and enhance monitoring to ensure future compliance.

Finding Text

Finding 2024-001 – Housing Choice Voucher Program Tenant Files – Eligibility – Internal Control over Tenant Files – Noncompliance and Material Weakness - Housing Choice Voucher Program – ALN 14.871 Condition & Cause: We reviewed 100 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files to assess compliance with federal regulations and local policies. We found that 17 files had annual reexaminations completed more than three months past the due date, with an average delay of slightly over five months. Notably, the percentage of materially late reexaminations decreased from 27% in the previous year’s audit to 17% this year. Additionally, two files lacked documentation of a Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspection conducted within the past 24 months. We attribute these discrepancies to the Agency’s ongoing challenges in hiring, training, and retaining qualified staff in the HCV department. We also observed discrepancies between the timeliness of annual reexaminations and the Authority’s FY 2024 SEMAP self-assessment for Indicator #9. Although we reviewed the supporting documentation for this indicator without finding deviations, it is important to investigate the discrepancy, especially since the Authority had a similar audit finding in the prior year (Finding 2023-001). Criteria: 24 CFR 982, the Housing Authority’s Administrative Plan, and specific HUD guidelines on documenting and maintaining Housing Choice Voucher tenant files. Effect: Late annual reexaminations can lead to inaccurate subsidy calculations, potentially resulting in overpayments or underpayments to landlords, thereby jeopardizing the program’s integrity. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency identify and complete all overdue reexaminations promptly. The Agency should also continue to monitor this area for compliance to prevent future discrepancies. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Was sampling statistically valid? Yes Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendations.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Eligibility Material Weakness Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 515855 2024-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 515856 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092298 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $4.31M
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $2.97M
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $1.08M
14.856 Lower Income Housing Assistance Program_section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation $332,128