Finding 1089448 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
L
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-12-04
Audit: 330903

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Reports submitted to the U.S. Department of Transportation were not reviewed by a separate individual, risking incorrect data submission.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with the RAISE grant program and Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, which mandates effective internal controls over federal awards.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Ensure the program manager adheres to the City's Grant Management Policy by implementing a review process for all reports before submission.

Finding Text

U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Transportation Program Name: National Infrastructure Investments Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.933 Significant Deficiency – Reporting Finding 2024-001 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per the U.S. Department of Transportation general terms and conditions under the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant program, the recipient is required to submit to the USDOT a quarterly project progress report and recertification. Additionally, the recipient is required to submit a final project progress report and recertification no later than 120 days after the end of the period of performance. Further, per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The City should have a control in place for reports submitted to the awarding agency to be reviewed by an employee within the department separate from the employee preparing the report. Condition: While the reports were timely submitted to the awarding agency, the reports submitted to the awarding agency were not reviewed by an individual at the City prior to submission. Context: There were 4 quarterly reports tested in which the report was not reviewed by an individual at the City other than the preparer prior to submission. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: By not having the required reports reviewed prior to submission, the City could erroneously submit incorrect data to the awarding agency. Cause: The grant liaison did not follow the City's Grants Management Policy. Recommendation: The City should ensure the program manager is following its Grant Management Policy and Uniform Guidance for this program by reports being reviewed prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: See Corrective Action Plan prepared by the City.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Period of Performance Reporting Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 513006 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.933 National Infrastructure Investments $1.54M
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $1.16M
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $1.14M
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $123,663
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $122,091
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $114,987
45.310 Grants to States $62,536
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $51,905
20.505 Metropolitan Transportation Planning and State and Non-Metropolitan Planning and Research $45,077
21.016 Equitable Sharing $13,012
21.009 Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (vita) Matching Grant Program $11,125
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $6,361
20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grants $3,497
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $3,228