Finding 1078441 (2023-005)

-
Requirement
M
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-10-08

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District failed to evaluate subrecipient risks and monitor their compliance with Federal requirements, leading to potential misuse of funds.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with Uniform Guidance, specifically Parts 200.332 and 200.501, regarding subrecipient monitoring and audit verification.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The District should create and implement policies and procedures to ensure adherence to the Uniform Guidance for effective subrecipient oversight.

Finding Text

Subrecipient Monitoring: Criteria – The Uniform Guidance, Part 200.332 states in part, “All pass-through entities must: evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring.” The Uniform Guidance, Part 200.332 also states, “All pass-through entities must: monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity, following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward, issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Part 200.521.” The Uniform Guidance further states: “Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters, performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations and arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in Part 200.425.” The Uniform Guidance, Part 200.332 also states, “All pass-through entities must: Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in Part 200.501” and that “All pass-through entities must: consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records.” Condition – The District did not evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. The District did not monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved, including the monitoring of Part 200.332(d)(1) to Part 200.332(d)(4). In addition, the District did not utilize any of the monitoring tools identified in Part 200.332(e) to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals. The District did not verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in Part 200.501. The District did not consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. Cause – The District was not aware they needed to establish policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance, Part 200.332 and Part 200.501. Effect – The District is not in compliance with subrecipient monitoring as required by the Uniform Guidance, Part 200.332 and Part 200.501. Recommendation – The District should establish policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance, Part 200.332 and Part 200.501. Response – The District will establish policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance, Part 200.332 and Part 200.501. Conclusion – Response accepted.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 501999 2023-005
    -
  • 502000 2023-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 502001 2023-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1078442 2023-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1078443 2023-006
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $393,170
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $328,264
10.555 National School Lunch Program $277,176
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $45,373
10.553 School Breakfast Program $34,614
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $18,500
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $17,411
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $10,000
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $3,753
15.226 Payments in Lieu of Taxes $2,375