Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Finding No. 2022-004 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles for Payroll Federal Program ALN 93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity The Families and Children Administration of the Department of Family of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Category Significant deficiency of internal controls over compliance Criteria Section 200.405 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) indicates that a cost is allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met, among other things, if the cost charged is incurred specifically for the federal award. Also, under cost principles established by 2 CFR Section 200.430, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated and be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition found For the period that covers October 1, 2021, to January 31, 2022, two employees approved time and attendance reports did not agree with what was reflected within the payroll system and therefore petitioned to the federal program. Time charged to the federal program was not based on actual hours. Cause Resignation of the personnel in charge of reconciling expenses to amounts charged to expense and billed to the program and a significant delay in replacing the personnel to continue the process of reconciliation on a timely basis. Effect The amount charged to the federal program and paid to the employees exceeded compensation contracted with the employees. If the compensation costs allocated to the grant cannot be supported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the granting agency could determine that these costs are not allowable. Such condition may cause the federal grantor to issue warnings and/or impose penalties to the University. Questioned cost Known questioned cost amounts to $1,934. Context As part of our compliance tests with allowable costs and cost principles, we selected forty-three (43) expense transactions of the Promoting Safe and Stable Families program amounting to $760,673, of which ten (10) items amounting to $51,998 were related to payroll paid under the program. Our test disclosed two (2) instances where the employee's hours worked on the program differed from the amount charged for the period examined. Amount petitioned to the program for the period under evaluation between the two employees amounted to $16,107. The actual amount per approved time sheets amounted to $14,173, leaving a difference of $1,934 between the two employees. The payroll population for the test amounted to $930,169. The projected difference amounts to $34,596 when known questioned costs of $1,934 (3.72% of the payroll sample) are projected to total payroll and benefits expended for the program. Identification of a repeat finding This is a repeat finding from the inmediate previous audit, finding no. 2021-007. Recommendation The University's program staff and management should ensure that the amounts charged to the federal award and disbursed to the employees are accurate and under the correct contract rates. Monthly reconciliation of all expenses, including of salaries charged to program versus actual hours incurred must be timely performed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions The University?s management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 58-61.
Finding 2022-005 Indirect Cost Allocation ? Questioned Costs Condition: Grant 102-TCC-BS-PY21, PY Business Services & Solutions, grant document did not contain a specific allowable indirect cost amount. The budget contained a line for ?Subcontractors and Other? of $66,077. The Organization charged an indirect allocation to this grant of $47,070, an overcharge of $19,007. Grant 102-TCC-CT-BS-PY21, Thurston Chamber ? Sector Training, had an indirect budget line item of $17,274. The Organization charged $24,736, an over change of $7,462. Grant 102-TCCC-PEC-PY21, Thurston Chamber Pathway to Employment Cohort, had no budget line item for indirect costs. The Organization charged indirect costs under ?Career Services? for $73,535, an overcharge of $73,535. These overcharges total questioned costs of $100,004. The Organization lacked a methodology of pooling all indirect costs and allocating the costs uniformly across all revenue sources. Cause: The Organization did not obtain adequate training and understanding of the calculation and allocation of indirect costs in government funded programs. Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR ? 200.405 Allocable costs. (a) A cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart. (b) All activities which benefit from the non-Federal entity's indirect (F&A) cost, including unallowable activities and donated services by the non-Federal entity or third parties, will receive an appropriate allocation of indirect costs. (c) Any cost allocable to a particular Federal award under the principles provided for in this part may not be charged to other Federal awards to overcome fund deficiencies, to avoid SECTION 3 ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (continued) Finding 2022-005 Indirect Cost Allocation ? Questioned Costs restrictions imposed by Federal statutes, regulations, or terms and conditions of the Federal awards, or for other reasons. However, this prohibition would not preclude the non-Federal entity from shifting costs that are allowable under two or more Federal awards in accordance with existing Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Effect: The Organization charged federal programs for unallowed indirect costs. Recommendation: To ensure compliance with indirect cost calculation and allocation procedures, the Organization should obtain additional grant training. Management?s response: Management agrees with the need for additional grant training, especially as it applies to calculating and allocating indirect costs. However, we do have issues with the classification of expenses within the original contract and hope we can reconcile those prior to the finalization of the grant award. Person Responsible: President/CEO Finance Officer
Finding 2022-005 Indirect Cost Allocation ? Questioned Costs Condition: Grant 102-TCC-BS-PY21, PY Business Services & Solutions, grant document did not contain a specific allowable indirect cost amount. The budget contained a line for ?Subcontractors and Other? of $66,077. The Organization charged an indirect allocation to this grant of $47,070, an overcharge of $19,007. Grant 102-TCC-CT-BS-PY21, Thurston Chamber ? Sector Training, had an indirect budget line item of $17,274. The Organization charged $24,736, an over change of $7,462. Grant 102-TCCC-PEC-PY21, Thurston Chamber Pathway to Employment Cohort, had no budget line item for indirect costs. The Organization charged indirect costs under ?Career Services? for $73,535, an overcharge of $73,535. These overcharges total questioned costs of $100,004. The Organization lacked a methodology of pooling all indirect costs and allocating the costs uniformly across all revenue sources. Cause: The Organization did not obtain adequate training and understanding of the calculation and allocation of indirect costs in government funded programs. Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR ? 200.405 Allocable costs. (a) A cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart. (b) All activities which benefit from the non-Federal entity's indirect (F&A) cost, including unallowable activities and donated services by the non-Federal entity or third parties, will receive an appropriate allocation of indirect costs. (c) Any cost allocable to a particular Federal award under the principles provided for in this part may not be charged to other Federal awards to overcome fund deficiencies, to avoid SECTION 3 ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (continued) Finding 2022-005 Indirect Cost Allocation ? Questioned Costs restrictions imposed by Federal statutes, regulations, or terms and conditions of the Federal awards, or for other reasons. However, this prohibition would not preclude the non-Federal entity from shifting costs that are allowable under two or more Federal awards in accordance with existing Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Effect: The Organization charged federal programs for unallowed indirect costs. Recommendation: To ensure compliance with indirect cost calculation and allocation procedures, the Organization should obtain additional grant training. Management?s response: Management agrees with the need for additional grant training, especially as it applies to calculating and allocating indirect costs. However, we do have issues with the classification of expenses within the original contract and hope we can reconcile those prior to the finalization of the grant award. Person Responsible: President/CEO Finance Officer
Finding 2022-005 Indirect Cost Allocation ? Questioned Costs Condition: Grant 102-TCC-BS-PY21, PY Business Services & Solutions, grant document did not contain a specific allowable indirect cost amount. The budget contained a line for ?Subcontractors and Other? of $66,077. The Organization charged an indirect allocation to this grant of $47,070, an overcharge of $19,007. Grant 102-TCC-CT-BS-PY21, Thurston Chamber ? Sector Training, had an indirect budget line item of $17,274. The Organization charged $24,736, an over change of $7,462. Grant 102-TCCC-PEC-PY21, Thurston Chamber Pathway to Employment Cohort, had no budget line item for indirect costs. The Organization charged indirect costs under ?Career Services? for $73,535, an overcharge of $73,535. These overcharges total questioned costs of $100,004. The Organization lacked a methodology of pooling all indirect costs and allocating the costs uniformly across all revenue sources. Cause: The Organization did not obtain adequate training and understanding of the calculation and allocation of indirect costs in government funded programs. Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR ? 200.405 Allocable costs. (a) A cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart. (b) All activities which benefit from the non-Federal entity's indirect (F&A) cost, including unallowable activities and donated services by the non-Federal entity or third parties, will receive an appropriate allocation of indirect costs. (c) Any cost allocable to a particular Federal award under the principles provided for in this part may not be charged to other Federal awards to overcome fund deficiencies, to avoid SECTION 3 ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (continued) Finding 2022-005 Indirect Cost Allocation ? Questioned Costs restrictions imposed by Federal statutes, regulations, or terms and conditions of the Federal awards, or for other reasons. However, this prohibition would not preclude the non-Federal entity from shifting costs that are allowable under two or more Federal awards in accordance with existing Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Effect: The Organization charged federal programs for unallowed indirect costs. Recommendation: To ensure compliance with indirect cost calculation and allocation procedures, the Organization should obtain additional grant training. Management?s response: Management agrees with the need for additional grant training, especially as it applies to calculating and allocating indirect costs. However, we do have issues with the classification of expenses within the original contract and hope we can reconcile those prior to the finalization of the grant award. Person Responsible: President/CEO Finance Officer
CFDA Title and Number: 93.045 ? Aging Cluster Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Internal Control over Compliance: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.405 requires the following direct cost allocation principles: If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the cost must be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on any reasonable documented basis. 2 CFR Part 200.414 requires that indirect costs are supported with a cost allocation plan or an indirect cost proposal prepared in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. 2 CFR Part 200 Appendices III-VII contain the requirements for the development and submission of indirect cost rate proposals and cost allocation plans. A non-Federal entity that has never received a negotiated indirect cost rate, may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs. Typical examples of indirect (F&A) cost for many nonprofit organizations include depreciation on buildings and equipment, the costs of operating and maintaining facilities, and general administration and general expenses, such as the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration, and accounting. Condition: The Association uses the number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) assigned to programs and locations to generate the distribution lists to allocate the program?s direct and indirect costs. However, the distribution lists have not been updated since 2019 even though the number of FTEs by program and location had changed since 2019. Cause: The Association has not reviewed or updated the distribution lists since 2019. There is no process to review or update the distribution list periodically. Effect or Potential Effect: The outdated distribution lists may cause the allocation of direct and indirect costs to be recorded imprecisely for each program code. Questioned Cost: $15,074 (We selected 42 items to be tested out of 24,368 total items. 7 out of 42 items were noted to have exceptions. The questioned cost of $15,074 is a projected amount.) Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Association update the distribution lists regularly to record the allocations accurately, especially when there are significant personnel changes.
CFDA Title and Number: 93.045 ? Aging Cluster Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Internal Control over Compliance: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.405 requires the following direct cost allocation principles: If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the cost must be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on any reasonable documented basis. Condition: The Association staff made an error when processing the payroll entries for the pay date of January 26, 2022. Thus, they had to remove the batch for that period and manually post every transaction for the period of January 1 to 15, 2022. When the staff posted the entries, they did not allocate the costs to the correct program/site for the employees who worked for multiple programs, causing payroll expenditures for that period to be charged to one specific program. Cause: Manual entry error. Effect or Potential Effect: Overstatement of payroll costs charged to the Senior Nutrition Program. Questioned Cost: $25,808 (We selected 40 items to be tested out of 2,132 total items. 1 out of 40 items was noted to have exceptions. The questioned cost of $25,808 is a projected amount.) Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend to provide employee training to improve payroll processing and avoid errors. Additionally, manual postings should be reviewed and approved by a supervisor.
CFDA Title and Number: 93.045 ? Aging Cluster Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Internal Control over Compliance: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.405 requires the following direct cost allocation principles: If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the cost must be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on any reasonable documented basis. Condition: The Association uses two accounting systems: NOVAtime (time clock system) and MIP (in-house accounting/payroll system) to record the payroll expenses and allocations for each program. The allocation percentages are setup differently in both accounting system. Cause: When the FSA has employee changes, the staff only adjusts the allocation percentage in NOVAtime, which cause minor discrepancies when allocating the payroll-related expenses. Effect or Potential Effect: Overstate and/or understate the program expenses. Questioned Cost: Unable to determine. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Association update the MIP system when the staff update the NOVA time system after the personnel action form is reviewed and approved. The Association should also add the system adjustment instructions to the policies and procedures.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Assistance Listing 84.425U passed through the Pennsylvania Department of Education; Grant Period - Year Ended June 30, 2022. Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 CFR Section 200.405(c) of the Uniform Guidance, any cost allocable to a particular federal award may not be charged to other federal awards except when shifting costs that are allowable under two or more federal awards in accordance with existing federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of federal awards. Condition: The District allocated duplicate costs to both the CRRSA Act ESSER II Fund and ARP Act ESSER III Fund programs. Cause: The District allocated costs to the programs by posting year end adjusting journal entries instead of charging costs directly to the programs as costs were incurred. As a result, costs were duplicated. Effect: Expenditure of federal awards was overstated. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs totaled $21,229. Perspective Information: Not applicable. Identification of Repeat Findings: Not applicable. Recommendation: The District should record costs that are directly allocable to federal programs when costs are incurred to reduce the risk of duplicating costs allocated to federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Planned Corrective Action: See District?s corrective action plan.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Assistance Listing 84.425U passed through the Pennsylvania Department of Education; Grant Period - Year Ended June 30, 2022. Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 CFR Section 200.405(c) of the Uniform Guidance, any cost allocable to a particular federal award may not be charged to other federal awards except when shifting costs that are allowable under two or more federal awards in accordance with existing federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of federal awards. Condition: The District allocated duplicate costs to both the CRRSA Act ESSER II Fund and ARP Act ESSER III Fund programs. Cause: The District allocated costs to the programs by posting year end adjusting journal entries instead of charging costs directly to the programs as costs were incurred. As a result, costs were duplicated. Effect: Expenditure of federal awards was overstated. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs totaled $21,229. Perspective Information: Not applicable. Identification of Repeat Findings: Not applicable. Recommendation: The District should record costs that are directly allocable to federal programs when costs are incurred to reduce the risk of duplicating costs allocated to federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Planned Corrective Action: See District?s corrective action plan.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Reference Number: 2022-030 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Agency of Human Services (Agency) Federal Program: Immunization Cooperative Agreements, COVID-19 - Immunization Cooperative Agreements Assistance Listing Number: 93.268 Award Number and Year: 19NH23IP922615 (7/1/2020 ? 6/30/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per 2 CFR section 200.403(a), except where otherwise authorized by statute, in order for a cost to be allowable under Federal awards it must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Per 2 CFR section 200.405, a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Agency included an unallowable cost in an administrative cost pool which was allocated to the program. Context: The Agency?s Department of Health (Department) charged a settlement payment of $3,891.30 related to a Superfund site lawsuit to an administrative cost pool, and a portion of this payment was allocated to the program. The allocated cost was not necessary or reasonable for the performance of the Federal award nor was it assignable in part to the Federal award as a cost necessary to the overall operation of the Department. Cause: The Agency?s internal controls were not operating sufficiently to ensure that costs charged to an administrative cost pool were allowable and allocable per the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.403 and 200.405. Effect: Unallowable costs were allocated to the program. Questioned costs: Undetermined, due to the distribution of costs through the Department?s approved cost allocation plan. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that costs charged to administrative cost pools are allowable and allocable per 2 CFR sections 200.403 and 200.405. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2022-030 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Agency: Agency of Human Services (Agency) Federal Program: Immunization Cooperative Agreements, COVID-19 - Immunization Cooperative Agreements Assistance Listing Number: 93.268 Award Number and Year: 19NH23IP922615 (7/1/2020 ? 6/30/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Per 2 CFR section 200.403(a), except where otherwise authorized by statute, in order for a cost to be allowable under Federal awards it must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Per 2 CFR section 200.405, a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Agency included an unallowable cost in an administrative cost pool which was allocated to the program. Context: The Agency?s Department of Health (Department) charged a settlement payment of $3,891.30 related to a Superfund site lawsuit to an administrative cost pool, and a portion of this payment was allocated to the program. The allocated cost was not necessary or reasonable for the performance of the Federal award nor was it assignable in part to the Federal award as a cost necessary to the overall operation of the Department. Cause: The Agency?s internal controls were not operating sufficiently to ensure that costs charged to an administrative cost pool were allowable and allocable per the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.403 and 200.405. Effect: Unallowable costs were allocated to the program. Questioned costs: Undetermined, due to the distribution of costs through the Department?s approved cost allocation plan. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency review and enhance internal controls and procedures to ensure that costs charged to administrative cost pools are allowable and allocable per 2 CFR sections 200.403 and 200.405. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants 2022-003: Activities Allowed or Unallowed (Material Weakness) Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.405(d) states, ?If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the cost must be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then, notwithstanding paragraph (c) of this section, the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on any reasonable documented basis.? Condition: One of the eight payroll samples selected for testing had incorrect salary percentages applied to the grant when compared to the tasks completed and approved budget for the grant. Cause: The School District filed the final expenditures reports (FS-10F) well after fiscal year end. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be receiving federal monies that would not provide benefits to this specific program. Discrepancies were identified upon audit and are to be adjusted before final expenditure reports are filed. Recommendation: The School District should review all expenditures being charged to the respective grants to ensure expenditures are in line with amounts budgeted per the FS-10. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan. 89
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants 2022-003: Activities Allowed or Unallowed (Material Weakness) Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.405(d) states, ?If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the cost must be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then, notwithstanding paragraph (c) of this section, the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on any reasonable documented basis.? Condition: One of the eight payroll samples selected for testing had incorrect salary percentages applied to the grant when compared to the tasks completed and approved budget for the grant. Cause: The School District filed the final expenditures reports (FS-10F) well after fiscal year end. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be receiving federal monies that would not provide benefits to this specific program. Discrepancies were identified upon audit and are to be adjusted before final expenditure reports are filed. Recommendation: The School District should review all expenditures being charged to the respective grants to ensure expenditures are in line with amounts budgeted per the FS-10. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan. 89
2022-004 Unallowable Costs Federal Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Child Care and Development Funds Block Grant (CCDF) - CRRSA (Coronavirus Response and Relieve Supplemental Act) Assistance Listing Number: 93.575 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2102NMCCC5 Award Period: 12/27/2020-09/30/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E: 200.403 (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. 200.403 (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. 200.405 Allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received Condition: Out of 40 transactions tested, we identified 3 where the underlying support identified payments made to entities for teachers and staff that participate in HeadStart activities. Questioned Costs: $354,000 Context: We sampled 40 transactions. After bringing this to the Department's attention, the Grants Managers did perform a thorough assessment and accumulated all payments under this additional funding for this purpose. Cause: Program staff were allocating this additional funding to entities that have CCDF and Headstart programs. However, there was not appropriate tracking to separate the transactions and ensure they were charged to the correct federal programs. Effect: Costs associated with another federal program were charged to CCDF. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the program work closely with ASD to ensure expenditures are tracked and mapped to the appropriate federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding and the ASD Director, CFO and Grants Manager will work with The Federal Program Team to develop formal policies and procedures for grant management to ensure compliance with programmatic grant requirements and track expenditures to ensure costs charged to grants are allowable, necessary, and reasonable. This will be completed by June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022-004 ? Unallowable Use of Public Housing Program Funds (Significant Deficiency, Non-compliance) Public Housing Program ? Assistance Listing No. 14.850a, Grant Period: Fiscal Year-End June 30, 2022 Criteria The cost principles in 2 CFR Part 200, Sub-part E of the Uniform Guidance describe allowable and unallowable uses of federal award program subsidies. Parts 200.403 and 200.405 prohibit the use of federal award program subsidies to fund expenditures outside of the applicable federal award program. Public Housing Program funds cannot be used to fund expenditures and/or deficits of other federal or non-federal programs. HUD Handbook 7475.1 defines allowable expenditures under Public Housing Program versus expenditures of the Central Office Cost Center (COCC). Equipment purchases of the COCC should not be charged to the Public Housing Program. Condition, Cause, Perspective and Questioned Costs During fiscal year 2022, the Authority charged the purchase of an administrative vehicle, in the amount of $35,256, to the Public Housing Program. Effect Non-compliance with federal requirements with respect to the Public Housing Program. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority review allowable Public Housing Program versus COCC expenditures in HUD Handbook 7575.1 and refrain from charging COCC expenditures to the Public Housing Program. Management?s Response The Authority review allowable Public Housing Program versus COCC expenditures in HUD Handbook 7575.1 and refrain from charging COCC expenditures to the Public Housing Program. The Authority?s Executive Director, Africa Porter, has assumed the responsibility of executing this corrective action as of April 1, 2023.
Subrecipient Monitoring 2022-007 GENERAL INFORMATION: Grant Title: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Number: Assistance Listing #: 21.027 Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury CONDITION: We noted during our audit that the Randolph County Commission failed to properly monitor subrecipients. Specifically, there was no assurance that the allocated funds sent were expensed by the subrecipients. CRITERIA: 'Proper internal control over federal awards passed to subrecipients requires the establishment and maintenance of an effective system to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR Part 200.332 states, in part, that: "(a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes:(1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x)Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi)Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii)Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv)Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) (i) An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. (4) (ii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with ? 200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency).... (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ?200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ?200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward.... (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records." QUESTIONED COSTS: $163,617 CONTEXT: Disbursements totaling $163,617 were made to subrecipients without activities being monitored to ensure expenditures of the subaward were being used for authorized purposes and in accordance with the grant guidelines. CAUSE: The Randolph County Commission did not have procedures in place to ensure subrecipient monitoring requirements were performed. EFFECT: Failure to properly monitor subrecipients increases the likelihood of errors or irregularities not being prevented or detected in a timely manner. Additionally, the risk of unallowable activities and unallowable costs is significantly increased. Management failed to comply with all applicable, material compliance requirements of the grant agreement. REPEAT FINDING: Yes PRIOR YEAR FINDING NUMBER: 2021-002 RECOMMENDATION: The Randolph County Commission is directed to review these regulations and comply with the provisions set forth therein. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: We will comply and monitor subrecipient spending going forward.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.