2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
2022-004: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278), Employment Services Cluster (ALN 17.207/17.801), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Cluster (ALN 93.558) Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs (a) states “a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received.” Condition: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Context: Allocations of non-direct charged wage time (i.e., paid time off, bereavement, jury duty, holiday, medical paid time off, medical waivers) are managed through a labor allocation which is completed by the accounting staff and communicated to the payroll company. This labor allocation is designed to spread the non-direct charged wage time to the same programs that the employee directly charges time. When an employee changes programs to which their time is directly charged the accounting staff is not notified by the staff but notes the change after the fact during reviews of payroll records. Once the change is noted, a new labor allocation is created and communicated to the payroll company which creates a lag in time whereby amounts of non-direct charged wage time are charged to various programs incorrectly. Cause: Limitation of current system being utilized to allocate payroll costs. Effect: Costs charged to the program may be considered unallowable if not allocated in a manner consistent with where the employee actually spends their time. Recommendation: The Consortium should adopt policies and procedures that require that allocations for labor to align with how the employee actually spends their time. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have addressed the issues within the Consortium to properly allocate non-direct wage time.
Finding 2022-001: Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Repeat Finding: 2021-001 Organization did not implement an established and accurate cost allocation plan during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Therefore, not all costs were shared among different grants consistently and accurately. Criteria: Under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2: Grants and Agreements, PART 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E - Cost Principles Sec. 200.405 Allocable Costs - the cost must be allocated to the grants/projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more grants/projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on a reasonable documented basis. Condition: During our prior year audit as well as during a monitoring visit by PDE, it was discovered that certain expenses were allocated to grants on an unsupported basis. Based on testing of expenditures performed for current year an accurate cost allocation plan was not accurately developed or implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Organization did not create or implement an accurate cost allocation plan during the current or prior or fiscal year. Effect: DCLC is not in compliance with 2 CFR Sec. 200.405 - Allocable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that DCLC work to develop and implement a written allocation plan including calculations for all direct and indirect costs that benefit two or more grants or programs. Specifically, DCLC should review actual expenses on an ongoing basis and make any necessary adjustments to the allocated expenses.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003Material weakness in internal controls over compliance for allowable activities and costs and material non-compliance inthe Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program.Federal Agencies: Department of Justice; Department of the TreasuryProgram Titles: Crime Victim Assistance; Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery FundAssistance Listing Numbers: 16.575; 21.027Award Numbers: 22-31219-018, 22-31310-140, 22-31219-019, F19-31219-553, 8152, DA-239Award Periods: VariousCriteriaCharges to federal awards must meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart E - Cost Principles.Condition/Context for EvaluationDuring our audit we identified that a total of 19 of 142 transactions (79 non-payroll transactions and 63 for payrolltransactions) tested for allowable costs and activities did not meet the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of FederalRegulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal AwardsSubpart E - Cost Principles. Below is a disaggregation of the exceptions identified:- Thirteen of the non-payroll transactions tested did not have documentation available to support the allocationof the expense to the program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405.- Three of the non-payroll transactions tested did not meet the reasonable and necessary criteria of 2 CFR200.403.- Two of the payroll transactions tested was charged to the federal award based upon allocations determinedbefore services were performed with no process to identify significant changes in the corresponding workactivity in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i).- Two of the transactions tested did not have adequate documentation to support the item of cost in accordancewith the criteria at 200.403(g).- One of the transactions tested the cost incurred represented a reimbursement for costs in excess of theallowable amount per the Organization?s policies and procedures and did not meet the criteria of 2 CFR 200.403.Our sample was not a statistical sample.Effect or Potential EffectThe Organization charged costs to the federal awards that were unallowable. Questioned CostsActual questioned costs identified during the audit totaled the amounts below by award:Assistance Pass-Through KnownListing Pass-Through Award QuestionedNumber Funder Number Costs21.027 State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services 8152 $ 1921027 King County Regional Homelessness Authority DA-239 $ 3,808CauseInternal controls were not operating effectively to ensure only allowable costs were charged to the federal awards.Repeat FindingNot applicable.RecommendationWe recommend that the Organization provide additional training to employees to ensure that controls operate effectivelyso that only allowable costs are authorized to be charged to federal awards and that record retention controls arestrengthened to ensure documentation and policies are retained to support the distribution of charges between projects.Views of Responsible Officials of AuditeeManagement agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Head Start ALN# 93.600 US Department of Health & Human Services Federal Grant/Contract Number: 10CH011215-02; 10CH011215-03; 10HE000901-01 Grant period – 2021 & 2022 Criteria – Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should follow guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.404 – Reasonable costs – A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Per 2 CFR section 200.405 – Allocable costs –focuses on how costs are allocable, ensuring they are directly tied to the federal award or its benefits. Per 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and that are incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Condition – The following exceptions were noted during testing of 138 program disbursements, 93 payroll disbursements, and 100 journal entry transactions: • 20 invoices could not be located related to program disbursements • 6 invoices tested did not agree to the approved allocation of Head Start expenses • 1 timecard could not be located • multiple instances where an approved pay rate covering the appropriate time-period could not be obtained • 12 instances where supporting documentation for journal entries to adjust Head Start expenses could not be obtained. Cause – Turnover in staff and the passage of time since the period under audit has caused documentation to be misplaced. Effect – Inadequate or inconsistent documentation of expenses may result in erroneous or fraudulent transactions occurring, loss of funding, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – $151,608. Recommendation – Documentation should be prepared, reviewed, and retained to support the expense. Management’s Response – Management has reviewed and accepted the finding. See “Corrective Action Plan”.
Condition: We selected a sample of payroll cost allocations and tested whether the employees’ time were allocated in accordance with Day One’s cost allocations by program. As a result of our test, we noted that one employee’s hours were did not match the allocation guidelines provided by the Organization and hours were improperly charged to the Substance Abuse Prevention and Control program. Criteria: § 200.405 Allocable costs. (a) A cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart.Cause: The Organization has not implemented policies and procedures requiring management review the accuracy of the costs allocations to each program prior to being recording in the accounting records. Questioned Costs: $1,282.83 Effect and Context: By improperly allocating payroll costs to the Substance Abuse Prevention and Control-CPS program, the amount of costs reported for this program are overstated at June 30, 2022. Recommendation: We also recommend management review allocation percentages and application of allocations prior to recording the costs in the accounting records. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See management’s responses documented on page 46-47.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CRRSA Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425U) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were not charged in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $22,992 ? see perspective information. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees that procedures should be implemented to review expenditures claimed under each program within each grant is allowable, charged to the appropriate grant, and is not already claimed. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $22,992 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CRRSA Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425U) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were not charged in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $22,992 ? see perspective information. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees that procedures should be implemented to review expenditures claimed under each program within each grant is allowable, charged to the appropriate grant, and is not already claimed. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $22,992 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CRRSA Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425U) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were not charged in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $22,992 ? see perspective information. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees that procedures should be implemented to review expenditures claimed under each program within each grant is allowable, charged to the appropriate grant, and is not already claimed. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $22,992 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CRRSA Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425U) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were not charged in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $22,992 ? see perspective information. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees that procedures should be implemented to review expenditures claimed under each program within each grant is allowable, charged to the appropriate grant, and is not already claimed. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $22,992 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CRRSA Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425U) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were not charged in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $22,992 ? see perspective information. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees that procedures should be implemented to review expenditures claimed under each program within each grant is allowable, charged to the appropriate grant, and is not already claimed. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $22,992 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CRRSA Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425U) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were not charged in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $22,992 ? see perspective information. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees that procedures should be implemented to review expenditures claimed under each program within each grant is allowable, charged to the appropriate grant, and is not already claimed. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $22,992 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.