Finding #2022-002 ? Grant Program: Department of Transportation Airport Improvement Program ? Assistance Listing #20.106 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(f), a cost is not allowable under a federal program if it is included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. Condition & Context: As a result of our audit procedures, we noted amounts previously reimbursed for February through May 2020 payroll under AIP 69 (CARES Act) in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 were also reimbursed under AIP 73 (ARPA) during the year ended June 30, 2022. Cause: Lack of procedures related to monitoring and review of reimbursement requests. Effect: $414,761 of expenditures were removed from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Additionally, an audit adjustment was proposed to adjust the previously reported grant revenue to deferred revenue as of June 30, 2022. Recommendation: We recommend management develop a system of reviewing and monitoring reimbursement requests to ensure that expenditures previously reimbursed under federal funding with similar allowable activities are not included in future requests. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
United States Department of the Treasury Reference Number: 2022-006 Program: 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Federal Award Number: ERA-2101123208 and ERAE0280 Type of Finding: Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Condition: Audit testing of a statistical sample of 40 cases processed during the period from September XX1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, revealed the following: ? Three cases revealed that three applicants received assistance in excess of the allowable maximum assistance resulting in overpayments of $11,225. Additionally, audit testing noted one of these applicants received an additional overpayment of $3,250 during the year ending June 30, 2023. The overpayments resulted from errors in applying statutorily established limits for rental assistance, duplicating assistance payments for the same months for one applicant, and the payment of a security deposit assistance in excess of one month?s rent. ? Three cases that received the correct amount of assistance were not processed in accordance with the program requirements. Specific supporting documentation required by the program guidelines was not obtained to support assistance payments. Criteria: The following summarizes the applicable portions of the ERA program requirements: ? United States Department of the Treasury Program FAQs updated July 6, 2022: ERA1 allows an eligible household to receive up to 12 months of assistance (plus an additional three (3) months if necessary to ensure housing stability for the household, subject to the availability of funds). ERA2 allows an eligible household to receive up to 15 months of assistance (plus an additional three (3) months if necessary to ensure housing stability for the household, subject to the availability of funds). The amount of a security deposit should not exceed one month?s rent, except in cases where a higher amount is reasonable and customary in the local housing market. DSHA?s ERA program design and guidelines limits security deposit assistance to one month?s rent. Grantees must establish policies and procedures to govern the implementation of their ERA programs consistent with the statutes and the ERA program requirements. ? 501(k)(3)(B) of Division N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and 2 CFR 200.403 requires a grantee to confirm that the ERA1 assistance does not duplicate any other assistance, including federal, state, or local assistance provided for the same costs. Questioned Costs: Audit testing of 40 cases totaling $243,254 of assistance identified $11,295 of overpayments. Context: During the period of September 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, DSHA approved and disbursed assistance for 9,986 cases totaling $64,082,208. Effect: Federal program expenditures of rental assistance were overpaid. Cause: Internal controls over compliance were not appropriately designed, implemented, or operated to appropriately address the risk of noncompliance with the federal program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend DSHA enhance its policies and procedures for processing rental assistance applications to ensure compliance with the federal program?s requirements.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-007 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities and Period of Performance? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.425F ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Institutional Portion Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: The Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (CRRSAA) section 314(c )(1-3) notes that HEERF Institutional Portion funds are to be used to defray expenses associated with coronavirus or to carry out student support activities that address needs related to coronavirus. 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for this federal program did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grant. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: $766,177 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: For a sample of 23 individual costs charged to the grant, 4 items tested, all payroll related, did not include adequate documentation. For the payroll items, the University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each student worker charged to the grant. For a sample of 23 individual costs charged to the grant, 7 items tested were utilized to cover costs related to building renovations and the associated project management. The documentation provided did not indicate that these costs were utilized to defray expenses associated with coronavirus. The control over compliance to ensure costs charged to the grant were allowable did not operate effectively. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-010 Recommendation: We recommend that management review its processes and controls surrounding applicable compliance requirements to improve the existing system such that it will ensure compliance with the requirements of federal grants. In addition, we recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University's current process is to collect and retain procurement documents for no less than five years. The institution will work to strengthen the current process in place relevant to securing adequate documentation. Supporting documentation was provided for data selection relating to the upgrades to the HVAC, ventilation, and the spacing of the academic facilities which were all completed in accordance with Covid guidelines. The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting.. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
Finding 2022-003 ? Material Weakness: Allowable Costs & Activities ? Compliance and Control Finding ALN 84.042 ? Student Support Services, 84.044 ? Talent Search and 84.047 ? Upward Bound ? TRIO Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 47.076 ? Research and Development Cluster: National Science Foundation ?Missouri Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation, Research Initiation Grant, and Entrepreneurship Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Pass-Through Entity: None ALN 84.031 ? Title III ? Higher Education ? Institutional Aid Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: None Criteria Or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.403 requires adequate documentation for allowable activities and costs and 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1) requires charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: We noted through procedures performed that payroll costs were not supported with adequate documentation. Internal controls designed for these federal programs did not detect these errors. Cause: Controls over compliance put in place by management were not operating effectively as it relates to allowable costs and activities charged to the grants. Effect: Instances of noncompliance were not detected by management. Questioned Costs: TRIO Cluster - $40,361 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. National Science Foundation - $24,744 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Title III - $34,906 of known questioned costs were identified in our testing sample. Likely questioned costs exceed $25,000. Context: TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 26 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. National Science Foundation - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 24 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Title III - TRIO Cluster - For a sample of 40 individual costs charged to the grant, 21 payroll items tested did not include adequate documentation. The University did not provide documentation to support the time and effort of each employee charged to the grant. Identification As A Repeat Finding: 2021-003, 2021-008, 2021-015, 2020-003, and 2020-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management adjust its time-keeping process to verify that the amount of time charged to the grant is accurate and based on the employee?s time spent working on the grant. Internal controls over allowable costs and activities should ensure procedural improvements are implemented properly. Views Of Responsible Officials: The University is working with our third-party payroll provider to automate time and effort reporting. We are currently using paper forms for reporting until we can implement Time & Effort through ADP. The Director of Title III & Finance Compliance officer to further discuss time and effort.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Special Education Grants to States - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 20611-130-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Proportionate share is an amount of funds that must be expended on special education/related services for parentally-placed private school and homeschooled students. The amount to be spent is automatically calculated within each grant application. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, policies and procedures to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students was met for each grant. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-130-PN01 grant were not spent in full, and the School Corporation did not file a waiver which if approved would have allowed the funds to be moved and spent under the regular Part B special education scope. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-130-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement could result in the loss of future funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Special Education Grants to States - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 20611-130-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Proportionate share is an amount of funds that must be expended on special education/related services for parentally-placed private school and homeschooled students. The amount to be spent is automatically calculated within each grant application. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented, policies and procedures to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students was met for each grant. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-130-PN01 grant were not spent in full, and the School Corporation did not file a waiver which if approved would have allowed the funds to be moved and spent under the regular Part B special education scope. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-130-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement could result in the loss of future funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2022-004 Unallowable Costs Federal Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Child Care and Development Funds Block Grant (CCDF) - CRRSA (Coronavirus Response and Relieve Supplemental Act) Assistance Listing Number: 93.575 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2102NMCCC5 Award Period: 12/27/2020-09/30/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E: 200.403 (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. 200.403 (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. 200.405 Allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received Condition: Out of 40 transactions tested, we identified 3 where the underlying support identified payments made to entities for teachers and staff that participate in HeadStart activities. Questioned Costs: $354,000 Context: We sampled 40 transactions. After bringing this to the Department's attention, the Grants Managers did perform a thorough assessment and accumulated all payments under this additional funding for this purpose. Cause: Program staff were allocating this additional funding to entities that have CCDF and Headstart programs. However, there was not appropriate tracking to separate the transactions and ensure they were charged to the correct federal programs. Effect: Costs associated with another federal program were charged to CCDF. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the program work closely with ASD to ensure expenditures are tracked and mapped to the appropriate federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: The Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) agrees with this audit finding and the ASD Director, CFO and Grants Manager will work with The Federal Program Team to develop formal policies and procedures for grant management to ensure compliance with programmatic grant requirements and track expenditures to ensure costs charged to grants are allowable, necessary, and reasonable. This will be completed by June 30, 2023.
2022-003 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The College is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.430(i) establishes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses including charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages. 2 CFR 200.403(h) establishes that costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. Condition: In our sample of expenditures selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) Through testing of operational expenditures of the College, it was determined; a. Payroll expenditures charged to the award were not for costs newly associated with the coronavirus, a requirement communicated within the supplemental guidance in the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III Frequently Asked Questions published May 11, 2021 and updated May 24, 2021. b) Through testing of disbursements to students, it was determined; a. No support could not be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to disbursement of funds. b. 26 instances identified in which the College directly controlled how student?s use their emergency financial aid grant. c. 8 instances identified in which college discharged outstanding balance on student account for costs incurred prior to March 13, 2020. d. 2 instances identified in which the College charged coronavirus vaccine incentive payments under the student portion of HEERF award. Cause: The College did not have a full understanding of the federal program requirements between HEERF I, II and III as it relates to Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Period of Performance. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in disallowed costs charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs of $2,219,674Context/Sampling: a) For operational expenditures of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 7 non-payroll expenditures out of approximately 50 non-payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $143,000 of $245,000 total non-payroll costs charged to the federal program, and 53 payroll expenditures out of approximately 6,700 payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $1,920,000 total payroll costs charged to the federal program. b) For disbursements to students of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 43 disbursements funded from institutional portion out of approximately 600, accounting for approximately $53,000 of $711,000 total disbursements to students funded through institutional portion charged to the federal program, and 17 disbursements funded from student portion out of approximately 400, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $246,000 total disbursements to students funded through student portion charged to the federal program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures and control processes to comply with federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-003 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The College is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.430(i) establishes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses including charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages. 2 CFR 200.403(h) establishes that costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. Condition: In our sample of expenditures selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) Through testing of operational expenditures of the College, it was determined; a. Payroll expenditures charged to the award were not for costs newly associated with the coronavirus, a requirement communicated within the supplemental guidance in the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III Frequently Asked Questions published May 11, 2021 and updated May 24, 2021. b) Through testing of disbursements to students, it was determined; a. No support could not be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to disbursement of funds. b. 26 instances identified in which the College directly controlled how student?s use their emergency financial aid grant. c. 8 instances identified in which college discharged outstanding balance on student account for costs incurred prior to March 13, 2020. d. 2 instances identified in which the College charged coronavirus vaccine incentive payments under the student portion of HEERF award. Cause: The College did not have a full understanding of the federal program requirements between HEERF I, II and III as it relates to Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Period of Performance. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in disallowed costs charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs of $2,219,674Context/Sampling: a) For operational expenditures of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 7 non-payroll expenditures out of approximately 50 non-payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $143,000 of $245,000 total non-payroll costs charged to the federal program, and 53 payroll expenditures out of approximately 6,700 payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $1,920,000 total payroll costs charged to the federal program. b) For disbursements to students of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 43 disbursements funded from institutional portion out of approximately 600, accounting for approximately $53,000 of $711,000 total disbursements to students funded through institutional portion charged to the federal program, and 17 disbursements funded from student portion out of approximately 400, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $246,000 total disbursements to students funded through student portion charged to the federal program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures and control processes to comply with federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-003 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The College is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.430(i) establishes the standards for documentation of personnel expenses including charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages. 2 CFR 200.403(h) establishes that costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. Condition: In our sample of expenditures selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) Through testing of operational expenditures of the College, it was determined; a. Payroll expenditures charged to the award were not for costs newly associated with the coronavirus, a requirement communicated within the supplemental guidance in the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III Frequently Asked Questions published May 11, 2021 and updated May 24, 2021. b) Through testing of disbursements to students, it was determined; a. No support could not be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to disbursement of funds. b. 26 instances identified in which the College directly controlled how student?s use their emergency financial aid grant. c. 8 instances identified in which college discharged outstanding balance on student account for costs incurred prior to March 13, 2020. d. 2 instances identified in which the College charged coronavirus vaccine incentive payments under the student portion of HEERF award. Cause: The College did not have a full understanding of the federal program requirements between HEERF I, II and III as it relates to Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Period of Performance. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in disallowed costs charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs of $2,219,674Context/Sampling: a) For operational expenditures of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 7 non-payroll expenditures out of approximately 50 non-payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $143,000 of $245,000 total non-payroll costs charged to the federal program, and 53 payroll expenditures out of approximately 6,700 payroll transactions, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $1,920,000 total payroll costs charged to the federal program. b) For disbursements to students of the College a nonstatistical sample of 60 expenditures was selected for testing, including 43 disbursements funded from institutional portion out of approximately 600, accounting for approximately $53,000 of $711,000 total disbursements to students funded through institutional portion charged to the federal program, and 17 disbursements funded from student portion out of approximately 400, accounting for approximately $74,000 of $246,000 total disbursements to students funded through student portion charged to the federal program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures and control processes to comply with federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context A sample of 40 vendor disbursements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify the transactions were for allowable activities and costs. There were 3 of the 40 transactions, totaling $4,129, that were paid to vendors for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the costs. As such, the 3 transactions could not be verified as an allowable activity or cost of the food service program and were considered questioned costs. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 29 disbursements. Additionally, the School Corporation incurred costs in the amount of $49,365 paid from the School Lunch fund for a vehicle used to distribute meals to students at the Indiana Department of Education approved meal sites during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that prior written approval was received from the pass-through entity. Finally, in fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation paid a portion of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools salary from the School Lunch fund without supporting documentation to support the percentage paid. The Assistant Superintendent of Schools spent time on federal program and nonfederal program activities, but did not maintain documentation of time spent on each activity. The total paid to the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the School Lunch fund without proper documentation was $29,753. The costs that were not properly documented were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: ". . . Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.439(b) states in part: "The following rules of allowability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $83,247 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation could not provide appropriate supporting documentation for 2 of 25 (8 percent) vendor disbursements selected for testing. Due to the lack of supporting documentation these disbursements were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation could not provide appropriate supporting documentation for 2 of 25 (8 percent) vendor disbursements selected for testing. Due to the lack of supporting documentation these disbursements were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation could not provide appropriate supporting documentation for 2 of 25 (8 percent) vendor disbursements selected for testing. Due to the lack of supporting documentation these disbursements were unable to be verified as allowable activities or costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.333 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements could result in the loss future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and ensure documentation be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, 20619-045-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation was a member of the Orange-Lawrence-Jackson-Martin-Greene Joint Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Proportionate Share Monitoring Reports and other supporting documentation for amounts reported to the IDOE for Earmarking were not retained for audit. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance applies to the 19611-047-PN01, 19619-047-PN01, 20611-045-PN01, and 20619-045-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2022-004 ? Unallowable Use of Public Housing Program Funds (Significant Deficiency, Non-compliance) Public Housing Program ? Assistance Listing No. 14.850a, Grant Period: Fiscal Year-End June 30, 2022 Criteria The cost principles in 2 CFR Part 200, Sub-part E of the Uniform Guidance describe allowable and unallowable uses of federal award program subsidies. Parts 200.403 and 200.405 prohibit the use of federal award program subsidies to fund expenditures outside of the applicable federal award program. Public Housing Program funds cannot be used to fund expenditures and/or deficits of other federal or non-federal programs. HUD Handbook 7475.1 defines allowable expenditures under Public Housing Program versus expenditures of the Central Office Cost Center (COCC). Equipment purchases of the COCC should not be charged to the Public Housing Program. Condition, Cause, Perspective and Questioned Costs During fiscal year 2022, the Authority charged the purchase of an administrative vehicle, in the amount of $35,256, to the Public Housing Program. Effect Non-compliance with federal requirements with respect to the Public Housing Program. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority review allowable Public Housing Program versus COCC expenditures in HUD Handbook 7575.1 and refrain from charging COCC expenditures to the Public Housing Program. Management?s Response The Authority review allowable Public Housing Program versus COCC expenditures in HUD Handbook 7575.1 and refrain from charging COCC expenditures to the Public Housing Program. The Authority?s Executive Director, Africa Porter, has assumed the responsibility of executing this corrective action as of April 1, 2023.
Program Information: AL #: 93.441 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 22, Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21, COVID-19 Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21 Award Numbers: 235-18-0004 Award Periods: 4/1/18-3/31/24 Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403(h) states: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards: (g) be adequately documented." Condition/Context: During transactional testing the following was noted: ? 1 out of 1 IDC journal entry selection was lacking proper documented approvals of an authorized individual other than the preparer. [ ] Compliance Finding [ X ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: Without additional review and approval, entries being made may have errors. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls and implement policies to ensure that support of approval is obtained and maintained for all expenditure transactions including journal entries. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.
Program Information: AL #: 93.441 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 22, Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21, COVID-19 Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21 Award Numbers: 235-18-0004 Award Periods: 4/1/18-3/31/24 Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403(h) states: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards: (g) be adequately documented." Condition/Context: During transactional testing the following was noted: ? 1 out of 1 IDC journal entry selection was lacking proper documented approvals of an authorized individual other than the preparer. [ ] Compliance Finding [ X ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: Without additional review and approval, entries being made may have errors. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls and implement policies to ensure that support of approval is obtained and maintained for all expenditure transactions including journal entries. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.
Program Information: AL #: 93.441 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 22, Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21, COVID-19 Indian Health Services ? CRIHB 21 Award Numbers: 235-18-0004 Award Periods: 4/1/18-3/31/24 Criteria: 2 CFR ?200.403(h) states: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards: (g) be adequately documented." Condition/Context: During transactional testing the following was noted: ? 1 out of 1 IDC journal entry selection was lacking proper documented approvals of an authorized individual other than the preparer. [ ] Compliance Finding [ X ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: Without additional review and approval, entries being made may have errors. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls and implement policies to ensure that support of approval is obtained and maintained for all expenditure transactions including journal entries. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster- Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Number(s) and Year(s)(or Other Identifying Numbers): Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." USDA Indirect Cost Guidance Memo SP 60-2016 "It is unallowable to bill the nonprofit school food service account (NSFSA) for indirect costs that were previously paid from the general fund unless an agreement exists to show that the district had been ?loaning? the NSFSA funds to cover the indirect costs in one or more prior years." 7 CFR 210.21(f)(1) states in part: ". . . (ii) (A) The contractor must separately identify for each cost submitted for payment to the school food authority the amount of that cost that is allowable (can be paid from the nonprofit school food service account) and the amount that is unallowable (cannot be paid from the nonprofit school food service account); or (B) The contractor must exclude all unallowable costs from its billing documents and certify that only allowable costs are submitted for payment and records have been established that maintain the visibility of unallowable costs, including directly associated costs in a manner suitable for contract cost determination and verification; (iii) The contractor's determination of its allowable costs must be made in compliance with the applicable Departmental and Program regulations and Office of Management and Budget cost circulars; . . . (vi) The contractor must maintain documentation of costs and discounts, rebates and other applicable credits, and must furnish such documentation upon request to the school food authority, the State agency, or the Department." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: "Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims allocation reports in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls over indirect costs that would ensure they were properly paid. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $74,500 were identified. Context: The School Corporation was approved for an indirect cost rate for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in order to allocate indirect costs to the School Corporation?s Cafeteria fund. However, the School Corporation did not charge these indirect costs in the appropriate time frame. On June 30, 2022 the School Corporation applied the indirect costs retroactively for the child nutrition cluster fiscal year's 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in the amounts of approximately $33,150 and $41,350, respectively from the Cafeteria Fund to the Operations Fund. For after the fact transfers, the School Corporation is required to enter into an inter-fund loan agreement and to document the Operation fund support of the School Lunch fund. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls for the timing of indirect costs claims and transfers. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the finding, has prepared an initial corrective action plan and will discuss resolution with Indiana Department of Education.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster- Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Number(s) and Year(s)(or Other Identifying Numbers): Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." USDA Indirect Cost Guidance Memo SP 60-2016 "It is unallowable to bill the nonprofit school food service account (NSFSA) for indirect costs that were previously paid from the general fund unless an agreement exists to show that the district had been ?loaning? the NSFSA funds to cover the indirect costs in one or more prior years." 7 CFR 210.21(f)(1) states in part: ". . . (ii) (A) The contractor must separately identify for each cost submitted for payment to the school food authority the amount of that cost that is allowable (can be paid from the nonprofit school food service account) and the amount that is unallowable (cannot be paid from the nonprofit school food service account); or (B) The contractor must exclude all unallowable costs from its billing documents and certify that only allowable costs are submitted for payment and records have been established that maintain the visibility of unallowable costs, including directly associated costs in a manner suitable for contract cost determination and verification; (iii) The contractor's determination of its allowable costs must be made in compliance with the applicable Departmental and Program regulations and Office of Management and Budget cost circulars; . . . (vi) The contractor must maintain documentation of costs and discounts, rebates and other applicable credits, and must furnish such documentation upon request to the school food authority, the State agency, or the Department." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: "Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims allocation reports in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls over indirect costs that would ensure they were properly paid. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $74,500 were identified. Context: The School Corporation was approved for an indirect cost rate for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in order to allocate indirect costs to the School Corporation?s Cafeteria fund. However, the School Corporation did not charge these indirect costs in the appropriate time frame. On June 30, 2022 the School Corporation applied the indirect costs retroactively for the child nutrition cluster fiscal year's 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in the amounts of approximately $33,150 and $41,350, respectively from the Cafeteria Fund to the Operations Fund. For after the fact transfers, the School Corporation is required to enter into an inter-fund loan agreement and to document the Operation fund support of the School Lunch fund. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls for the timing of indirect costs claims and transfers. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the finding, has prepared an initial corrective action plan and will discuss resolution with Indiana Department of Education.
2022-004 ? ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program ALN 14.872 ? Public Housing Capital Fund Program CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: a Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto und these principles. b Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonFederal entity. d Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles GAAP, except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. f Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g Be adequately documented. 2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 200.403 CONDITION The Authority?s purchasing process does not adequately document approval of the purchase or coding of the transaction. CAUSE The Authority does not utilize purchase orders and has no consistent alternative procedure for documenting the authorization of purchases. EFFECT Ineligible purchases could be processed and charged to the Authority?s federal programs without detection. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 purchase transactions. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority institute written authorization procedures for purchasing. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 ? ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program ALN 14.872 ? Public Housing Capital Fund Program CRITERIA Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: a Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto und these principles. b Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonFederal entity. d Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles GAAP, except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this Part. f Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g Be adequately documented. 2 CFR Chapter 1 Part 200 200.403 CONDITION The Authority?s purchasing process does not adequately document approval of the purchase or coding of the transaction. CAUSE The Authority does not utilize purchase orders and has no consistent alternative procedure for documenting the authorization of purchases. EFFECT Ineligible purchases could be processed and charged to the Authority?s federal programs without detection. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 purchase transactions. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority institute written authorization procedures for purchasing. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding. FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding. FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding. FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding. FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 ? 84.425W - American Rescue Plan School Emergency Relief Fund ? Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $30,180.00 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $3,234,746.01 were expended and reported on the Early County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the Institution is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 202.403 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that ?retention? bonuses were paid to individuals who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were hired to perform specific functions as detailed within the associated contracts and were paid amounts in excess of the stated rate noted within these contracts. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain in the service of the School District for a stated period of time were not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $30,180.00 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $30,180.00 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process and approved by the local Board of Education; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21-1600, 22-1600 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The Food Service Director, Food Service Manager, and Food Service Assistant had other job responsibilities, and, therefore, were paid from multiple cost objectives. The amount of their compensation paid from the Child Nutrition Cluster (program) was based on a pre-determined percentage. No personnel activity reports or other time and effort documentation was presented to support the amounts charged to the program. The total amount paid from the School Lunch fund, for these positions, during the audit period was $48,502, which was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH DEARBORN COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that adequate supporting documentation be retained related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, and to provide adequate supporting documentation, enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $48,502 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls and retain adequate supporting documentation related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21-1600, 22-1600 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The Food Service Director, Food Service Manager, and Food Service Assistant had other job responsibilities, and, therefore, were paid from multiple cost objectives. The amount of their compensation paid from the Child Nutrition Cluster (program) was based on a pre-determined percentage. No personnel activity reports or other time and effort documentation was presented to support the amounts charged to the program. The total amount paid from the School Lunch fund, for these positions, during the audit period was $48,502, which was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH DEARBORN COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that adequate supporting documentation be retained related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, and to provide adequate supporting documentation, enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $48,502 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls and retain adequate supporting documentation related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21-1600, 22-1600 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The Food Service Director, Food Service Manager, and Food Service Assistant had other job responsibilities, and, therefore, were paid from multiple cost objectives. The amount of their compensation paid from the Child Nutrition Cluster (program) was based on a pre-determined percentage. No personnel activity reports or other time and effort documentation was presented to support the amounts charged to the program. The total amount paid from the School Lunch fund, for these positions, during the audit period was $48,502, which was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH DEARBORN COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that adequate supporting documentation be retained related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, and to provide adequate supporting documentation, enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $48,502 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls and retain adequate supporting documentation related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21-1600, 22-1600 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The Food Service Director, Food Service Manager, and Food Service Assistant had other job responsibilities, and, therefore, were paid from multiple cost objectives. The amount of their compensation paid from the Child Nutrition Cluster (program) was based on a pre-determined percentage. No personnel activity reports or other time and effort documentation was presented to support the amounts charged to the program. The total amount paid from the School Lunch fund, for these positions, during the audit period was $48,502, which was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH DEARBORN COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that adequate supporting documentation be retained related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, and to provide adequate supporting documentation, enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $48,502 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls and retain adequate supporting documentation related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21-1600, 22-1600 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The Food Service Director, Food Service Manager, and Food Service Assistant had other job responsibilities, and, therefore, were paid from multiple cost objectives. The amount of their compensation paid from the Child Nutrition Cluster (program) was based on a pre-determined percentage. No personnel activity reports or other time and effort documentation was presented to support the amounts charged to the program. The total amount paid from the School Lunch fund, for these positions, during the audit period was $48,502, which was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH DEARBORN COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that adequate supporting documentation be retained related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls, and to provide adequate supporting documentation, enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $48,502 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls and retain adequate supporting documentation related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.