Finding 2024-003, Unallowable Expense (Assistance Listing 93.696) Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.403, costs charged to a federal award must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the program. Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic, requires that costs allocated to the program meet these criteria to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Condition and Context: During our testing of the Agency’s expenses charged to the program, we noted one item out of ten items tested that did not relate to the federal program. Cause: The expense was incorrectly allocated to the program due to misclassification or inadequate review during the allocation process. Internal controls designed to ensure proper expense classification were either insufficient or not effectively implemented, leading to the incorrect charge. Effect: Although the expense was charged to the federal program, it was not allowable under the program’s cost principles, resulting in noncompliance with federal regulations. If not addressed, this could lead to inaccurate financial reporting and potential disallowance of costs. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency enhance its internal controls over expense allocation by implementing a more structured review and approval process. This should include enhanced staff training on cost allowability, periodic reconciliations of expenses to program requirements, and management oversight to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Additionally, the Agency should establish clear documentation procedures to verify and support the appropriateness of charges to the program before expenses are recorded.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027X210084, H173X210104, H173A210104, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the earmarking requirements. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met and to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Special Education Director allocated a portion of the salaries of the teachers that provided services to nonpublic schools and requested reimbursement based on this calculation. There was no documentation of how the calculation was performed or that a review of that calculation by another individual occurred. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Special Education Director is responsible for reporting and tracking funds spent related to the required proportionate share amounts for each grant. The Special Education Director had a procedure in place to request nonpublic school expenditures related to each grant; however, the procedure was not properly documented to allow examiners to verify amounts reimbursed. Examiners were also not able to confirm a secondary review was in place over this procedure, other than the preparation and review by the Special Education Director. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the earmarking requirements could not be verified as having been met. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school and that the calculated expenditures are reviewed by another individual. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.323, 93.847 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G231006 (23/24), R01DK108054 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: WV Department of Health and Human Resources Pass-Through Number(s): G231006 Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: $3,320 Context: In a sample size of twenty-eight expenditure transactions, five were incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Cause: Four of the exceptions were the result of the department administering the grant not submitting a revised internal form to update the funding source. These transactions were not included on the final invoice to the awarding agency but were included in the SEFA. One of the exceptions was the result of clerical entry error. • • Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.323, 93.847 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G231006 (23/24), R01DK108054 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: WV Department of Health and Human Resources Pass-Through Number(s): G231006 Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: $3,320 Context: In a sample size of twenty-eight expenditure transactions, five were incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Cause: Four of the exceptions were the result of the department administering the grant not submitting a revised internal form to update the funding source. These transactions were not included on the final invoice to the awarding agency but were included in the SEFA. One of the exceptions was the result of clerical entry error. • • Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.323, 93.847 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G231006 (23/24), R01DK108054 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: WV Department of Health and Human Resources Pass-Through Number(s): G231006 Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: $3,320 Context: In a sample size of twenty-eight expenditure transactions, five were incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Cause: Four of the exceptions were the result of the department administering the grant not submitting a revised internal form to update the funding source. These transactions were not included on the final invoice to the awarding agency but were included in the SEFA. One of the exceptions was the result of clerical entry error. • • Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.323, 93.847 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G231006 (23/24), R01DK108054 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: WV Department of Health and Human Resources Pass-Through Number(s): G231006 Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: $3,320 Context: In a sample size of twenty-eight expenditure transactions, five were incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Cause: Four of the exceptions were the result of the department administering the grant not submitting a revised internal form to update the funding source. These transactions were not included on the final invoice to the awarding agency but were included in the SEFA. One of the exceptions was the result of clerical entry error. • • Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.323, 93.847 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G231006 (23/24), R01DK108054 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: WV Department of Health and Human Resources Pass-Through Number(s): G231006 Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: $3,320 Context: In a sample size of twenty-eight expenditure transactions, five were incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Cause: Four of the exceptions were the result of the department administering the grant not submitting a revised internal form to update the funding source. These transactions were not included on the final invoice to the awarding agency but were included in the SEFA. One of the exceptions was the result of clerical entry error. • • Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: N/A Context: In a sample size of fourteen expenditure transactions, one was incurred after the end date of the period of availability. • • Cause: Transaction was related to a payroll period that began prior to the end date of the period of performance and ended after said date. Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: N/A Context: In a sample size of fourteen expenditure transactions, one was incurred after the end date of the period of availability. • • Cause: Transaction was related to a payroll period that began prior to the end date of the period of performance and ended after said date. Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: N/A Context: In a sample size of fourteen expenditure transactions, one was incurred after the end date of the period of availability. • • Cause: Transaction was related to a payroll period that began prior to the end date of the period of performance and ended after said date. Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: N/A Context: In a sample size of fourteen expenditure transactions, one was incurred after the end date of the period of availability. • • Cause: Transaction was related to a payroll period that began prior to the end date of the period of performance and ended after said date. Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: N/A Context: In a sample size of fourteen expenditure transactions, one was incurred after the end date of the period of availability. • • Cause: Transaction was related to a payroll period that began prior to the end date of the period of performance and ended after said date. Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.323, 93.847 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G231006 (23/24), R01DK108054 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: WV Department of Health and Human Resources Pass-Through Number(s): G231006 Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal awards period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: In a sample of transactions that were in the expense detail supporting the total federal expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), transactions were identified as being incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Questioned costs: $3,320 Context: In a sample size of twenty-eight expenditure transactions, five were incurred after the end date of the period of availability. Cause: Four of the exceptions were the result of the department administering the grant not submitting a revised internal form to update the funding source. These transactions were not included on the final invoice to the awarding agency but were included in the SEFA. One of the exceptions was the result of clerical entry error. • • Effect: Amounts are included on the SEFA for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024, that were incurred after the end date of the period of performance. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Perform a review policies and procedures regarding proper monitoring of period of performance related to grant end dates. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted: Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements. For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted: Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements. For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted: Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements. For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted: Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements. For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted: Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements. For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding number: 2024-011 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program ALN #: 84.424 Award number: 0309-000548-2024-0035 Award year: September 12, 2023 to September 30, 2025 Finding: Internal Control and Compliance over Period of Performance Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Criteria Period of Performance A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. LEAs and SEAs must obligate funds during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. This maximum period includes a 15-month period of initial availability plus a 12-month period for carryover. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of period of performance associated with those expenditures charged to grant awards which began during fiscal year 2024 and cost transfers, we noted noncompliance for 2 expenditures out of a sample of 4. Per review of the underlying vendor invoices, the service period for these expenditures started prior to the award start date of September 12, 2023.Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient review of invoices to ensure the underlying services performed by vendors are within the grant awards outlined grant period. Effect Insufficient review of vendor invoices increases the risk of costs being charged to a grant award outside its approved budget period. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: $1,250,864 Recommendation We recommend that the Boston Public Schools (BPS) re-enforce its policies and procedures to ensure their review of expenditures charged to the award also includes a detailed review of the underlying vendor service period. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee BPS will take a multi-step approach to ensuring accuracy of spending to the grant award period: 1. Reinforce our existing practice of ensuring that period of service is reflected on Purchase Orders, which it was for the PO’s in question. 2. Working with major suppliers to ensure they understand the grant funded nature of their program and the eligible dates of service, which are outlined on the Purchase Order 3. Review / Update training for our Accounts Payable team on ensuring that the period of service on an invoice matches the period of service on the Purchase Order 4. Review / Update training for our State & Federal Grants, Programs, and Compliance teams to ensure that expenses are reviewed before the end of the grant period to ensure compliance with federal regulations.
2024-001 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED (REPEAT OF PRIOR YEAR FINDING 2023-0001) Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Federal Assistance Listing Number U.S. Department of Labor WIOA Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.278 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs must “Be adequately documented.” Condition: During our testing of activities allowed or unallowed, for 4 of the 60 nonpayroll items tested, management could not provide adequate support that the charges were properly reviewed and approved prior to payment. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the WIOA Cluster were $1,377,447 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: The Board did not demonstrate that proper internal controls are in place and operating effectively to ensure that unallowable charges to the federal program do not occur. Effect: Unallowable payments to the federal program may have occurred due to the lack of effective internal controls in place. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding and will take the necessary corrective actions as noted in the corrective action plan attached.
2024-001 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED (REPEAT OF PRIOR YEAR FINDING 2023-0001) Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Federal Assistance Listing Number U.S. Department of Labor WIOA Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.278 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs must “Be adequately documented.” Condition: During our testing of activities allowed or unallowed, for 4 of the 60 nonpayroll items tested, management could not provide adequate support that the charges were properly reviewed and approved prior to payment. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the WIOA Cluster were $1,377,447 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: The Board did not demonstrate that proper internal controls are in place and operating effectively to ensure that unallowable charges to the federal program do not occur. Effect: Unallowable payments to the federal program may have occurred due to the lack of effective internal controls in place. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding and will take the necessary corrective actions as noted in the corrective action plan attached.
2024-001 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED (REPEAT OF PRIOR YEAR FINDING 2023-0001) Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Federal Assistance Listing Number U.S. Department of Labor WIOA Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.278 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs must “Be adequately documented.” Condition: During our testing of activities allowed or unallowed, for 4 of the 60 nonpayroll items tested, management could not provide adequate support that the charges were properly reviewed and approved prior to payment. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the WIOA Cluster were $1,377,447 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: The Board did not demonstrate that proper internal controls are in place and operating effectively to ensure that unallowable charges to the federal program do not occur. Effect: Unallowable payments to the federal program may have occurred due to the lack of effective internal controls in place. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding and will take the necessary corrective actions as noted in the corrective action plan attached.
2024-001 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED (REPEAT OF PRIOR YEAR FINDING 2023-0001) Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Federal Assistance Listing Number U.S. Department of Labor WIOA Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.278 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs must “Be adequately documented.” Condition: During our testing of activities allowed or unallowed, for 4 of the 60 nonpayroll items tested, management could not provide adequate support that the charges were properly reviewed and approved prior to payment. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the WIOA Cluster were $1,377,447 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: The Board did not demonstrate that proper internal controls are in place and operating effectively to ensure that unallowable charges to the federal program do not occur. Effect: Unallowable payments to the federal program may have occurred due to the lack of effective internal controls in place. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding and will take the necessary corrective actions as noted in the corrective action plan attached.
2024-001 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED (REPEAT OF PRIOR YEAR FINDING 2023-0001) Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Federal Assistance Listing Number U.S. Department of Labor WIOA Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.278 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs must “Be adequately documented.” Condition: During our testing of activities allowed or unallowed, for 4 of the 60 nonpayroll items tested, management could not provide adequate support that the charges were properly reviewed and approved prior to payment. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the WIOA Cluster were $1,377,447 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: The Board did not demonstrate that proper internal controls are in place and operating effectively to ensure that unallowable charges to the federal program do not occur. Effect: Unallowable payments to the federal program may have occurred due to the lack of effective internal controls in place. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding and will take the necessary corrective actions as noted in the corrective action plan attached.
2024-001 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED (REPEAT OF PRIOR YEAR FINDING 2023-0001) Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Federal Assistance Listing Number U.S. Department of Labor WIOA Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.278 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs must “Be adequately documented.” Condition: During our testing of activities allowed or unallowed, for 4 of the 60 nonpayroll items tested, management could not provide adequate support that the charges were properly reviewed and approved prior to payment. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the WIOA Cluster were $1,377,447 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: The Board did not demonstrate that proper internal controls are in place and operating effectively to ensure that unallowable charges to the federal program do not occur. Effect: Unallowable payments to the federal program may have occurred due to the lack of effective internal controls in place. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding and will take the necessary corrective actions as noted in the corrective action plan attached.
2024-001 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED (REPEAT OF PRIOR YEAR FINDING 2023-0001) Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Federal Assistance Listing Number U.S. Department of Labor WIOA Cluster 17.258/17.259/17.278 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs must “Be adequately documented.” Condition: During our testing of activities allowed or unallowed, for 4 of the 60 nonpayroll items tested, management could not provide adequate support that the charges were properly reviewed and approved prior to payment. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the WIOA Cluster were $1,377,447 for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: The Board did not demonstrate that proper internal controls are in place and operating effectively to ensure that unallowable charges to the federal program do not occur. Effect: Unallowable payments to the federal program may have occurred due to the lack of effective internal controls in place. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding and will take the necessary corrective actions as noted in the corrective action plan attached.
Finding 2024-003 – Reporting Name of Federal Agency: Department of Labor- Federal Program Name and Assistance Listing Number: YouthBuild Program -17.274 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: YB-38231-22-60-A-36 May 02, 2022 through September 01, 2025. Criteria In accordance with the Funding Opportunity Announcement, the Company is required to provide and expend cash, in-kind or third party resources equivalent to exactly 25 percent of the grant award amount as "matching" funds. Match can be in the form of cash, in-kind contributions and third-party contributions and must meet the requirement found at 2 CFR 200.306, 2 CFR 200.403, 2 CFR 200.434, and 2 CFR 2900.8. 2 CFR 2900.8 requires that match is recognized at the time in which the funds are expended. The matching funds are required to be reported in the quarterly financial reports submitted by the Company. Condition The Company did not record in-kind matching funds contributions and related expense for the year ending June 30, 2024. In addition, the Company did not report their in-kind matching funds contributions or the related expenses on the quarterly financial report to the Department of Labor. Cause Internal controls over reporting of in-kind contributions and in-kind expenses were not operating effectively. Effect This resulted in an understatement of revenue and expense of $702,250 for the year ending June 30, 2024. In addition, the Company was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the YouthBuild program. Questioned Costs N/A. Context A sample of 2 financial reports out of 2 financial reports required during the year ended June 30, 2024 did not report the in-kind contribution of matching funds. Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that management reviews its internal controls over reporting of the ETA-9130 Financial Report to ensure complete and accurate reports. Additionally, we recommend that management strengthens its policies and procedures to ensure proper recognition and recording of revenue from in-kind contributions and related expenses. Views of Responsible Officials The Crenulated will request a quarterly in-kind contribution report from DOE and will ensure the in-kind contributions are recorded in the financial statements. The Crenulated plans to hire an in-house
CONDITION: During my review of a random sample of eleven (11) invoices related to the District’s expenditure of federal funds, I noted that there was not an approved purchase order issued in eight (8) of those instances. This is a repeat Finding (2023-003) from the prior fiscal year. CRITERIA: In accordance with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), the District shall use properly prepared and approved purchase orders for federal purchases. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance requires that all expenditures (costs) must be adequately documented. EFFECT: The District did not comply with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), or Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding the use of purchase orders and the adequate documentation of federal expenditures. QUESTIONED COST: None CAUSE: Management of the District did not properly interpret the provisions of its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs to include the use of purchase orders for federal expenditures in all instances. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District utilize properly prepared and approved purchase orders for all future federal program purchases in compliance with its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5) and Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: During my review of a random sample of eleven (11) invoices related to the District’s expenditure of federal funds, I noted that there was not an approved purchase order issued in eight (8) of those instances. This is a repeat Finding (2023-003) from the prior fiscal year. CRITERIA: In accordance with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), the District shall use properly prepared and approved purchase orders for federal purchases. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance requires that all expenditures (costs) must be adequately documented. EFFECT: The District did not comply with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), or Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding the use of purchase orders and the adequate documentation of federal expenditures. QUESTIONED COST: None CAUSE: Management of the District did not properly interpret the provisions of its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs to include the use of purchase orders for federal expenditures in all instances. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District utilize properly prepared and approved purchase orders for all future federal program purchases in compliance with its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5) and Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: During my review of a random sample of eleven (11) invoices related to the District’s expenditure of federal funds, I noted that there was not an approved purchase order issued in eight (8) of those instances. This is a repeat Finding (2023-003) from the prior fiscal year. CRITERIA: In accordance with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), the District shall use properly prepared and approved purchase orders for federal purchases. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance requires that all expenditures (costs) must be adequately documented. EFFECT: The District did not comply with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), or Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding the use of purchase orders and the adequate documentation of federal expenditures. QUESTIONED COST: None CAUSE: Management of the District did not properly interpret the provisions of its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs to include the use of purchase orders for federal expenditures in all instances. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District utilize properly prepared and approved purchase orders for all future federal program purchases in compliance with its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5) and Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: During my review of a random sample of eleven (11) invoices related to the District’s expenditure of federal funds, I noted that there was not an approved purchase order issued in eight (8) of those instances. This is a repeat Finding (2023-003) from the prior fiscal year. CRITERIA: In accordance with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), the District shall use properly prepared and approved purchase orders for federal purchases. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance requires that all expenditures (costs) must be adequately documented. EFFECT: The District did not comply with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), or Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding the use of purchase orders and the adequate documentation of federal expenditures. QUESTIONED COST: None CAUSE: Management of the District did not properly interpret the provisions of its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs to include the use of purchase orders for federal expenditures in all instances. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District utilize properly prepared and approved purchase orders for all future federal program purchases in compliance with its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5) and Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
CONDITION: During my review of a random sample of eleven (11) invoices related to the District’s expenditure of federal funds, I noted that there was not an approved purchase order issued in eight (8) of those instances. This is a repeat Finding (2023-003) from the prior fiscal year. CRITERIA: In accordance with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), the District shall use properly prepared and approved purchase orders for federal purchases. In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance requires that all expenditures (costs) must be adequately documented. EFFECT: The District did not comply with the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5), or Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding the use of purchase orders and the adequate documentation of federal expenditures. QUESTIONED COST: None CAUSE: Management of the District did not properly interpret the provisions of its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs to include the use of purchase orders for federal expenditures in all instances. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District utilize properly prepared and approved purchase orders for all future federal program purchases in compliance with its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626.5) and Section 2 CFR 200.403(g) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were $1,944 of known questioned costs identified. Context: During testing of the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements, there were two vendor vouchers in a sample of 60, where the School Corporation was unable to locate any supporting documentation. These two selections totaled $1,530 charged to the grant. It was further noted that during our testing of payroll costs charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund, for 2 selections in a sample of 40, the School Corporation was unable to provide any support to validate the amount of payroll charged to the grant. These two selections totaled $414 charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation’s management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and that expenditures charged to the grant comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were $1,944 of known questioned costs identified. Context: During testing of the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements, there were two vendor vouchers in a sample of 60, where the School Corporation was unable to locate any supporting documentation. These two selections totaled $1,530 charged to the grant. It was further noted that during our testing of payroll costs charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund, for 2 selections in a sample of 40, the School Corporation was unable to provide any support to validate the amount of payroll charged to the grant. These two selections totaled $414 charged to the COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation’s management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and that expenditures charged to the grant comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation was a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools with a portion of the proportionate share being remitted to the member school for earmarking costs. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation received the full earmarking amount from the Cooperative for grant award 21611-047-PN01 and a portion of grant award 22611-047-PN01. The School Corporation spent only a portion of the required proportionate share amount on allowable costs for each grant award tested in the audit period. For grant awards 21611-047-PN01 and 22611-047-PN01, the School Corporation spent $15,361 and $14,999, respectively, out of the required amount for the proportionate share of $48,324 and $57,883, respectively. For grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP, the School Corporation did not expend any amounts as these funds were spent and handled at the Cooperative. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the teachers paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 21619-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP was $926, $1,913, and $1,009, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047-PN01, and 22619-047-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, there was confusion at the School Corporation as to whether the Cooperative or the School Corporation handled what portions of the nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Upon further inquiry, it was determined that the School Corporation handles the portion for the 611 grants by receiving funds from the Cooperative, and the Cooperative handles the 619 grants. However, proper time and effort logs were not maintained for expenditures used to meet the earmarking requirements; therefore, the School Corporation was not able to meet the required earmarking requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.