Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: Various Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Year: Programs active between July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Compliance requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the pass-through entity (PTE). ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. ? The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient?s cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section 2 CFR 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d), all pass-through entities must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of 2 CFR 200.500 when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.521(c) and (d): the pass-through entity must be responsible for issuing a management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity responsible for issuing a management decision must do so within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.501(h), since 2 CFR Part 200 does not make Subpart F applicable to for-profit subrecipients, the PTE is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary, to ensure compliance by for-profit subrecipients for the subaward. The agreement with the for-profit subrecipient must describe applicable compliance requirements and the for-profit subrecipient?s compliance responsibility. Methods to ensure compliance for federal awards made to for-profit subrecipients may include pre-award audits, monitoring during the agreement, and post-award audits. Condition, including Perspective Lehigh University passed through $3,277,289 to its subrecipients in the research and development cluster (R&D cluster), which represents approximately 10% of total R&D cluster expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022. As a pass-through entity, Lehigh University?s Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) is responsible for monitoring the activities and compliance of its subrecipients. Monitoring includes reviewing the compliance audit reports from its subrecipients as they become available through the federal audit clearinghouse to ascertain the existence of non-compliance and appropriate follow-up with the subrecipient to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken to remediate the finding(s). Our procedures performed determined that the Office of Research and Special Projects (ORSP) did not complete the review of their compliance reports within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Cause and Effect The ORSP lost two full time personnel in summer of 2020, one of whom was responsible for the review of the subrecipient compliance reports and issuing the management decision for any audit findings. That position was not filled until the December 2021 and no one else in ORSP completed these reviews during this timeframe. The lack of monitoring subrecipients timely could result in continuing to pass-through federal monies to a subrecipient who is not in compliance with federal compliance. Noncompliance by a subrecipient that is not identified and addressed timely could jeopardize the University?s receipt of future federal awards and public reputation. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding Yes, finding 2021-001 Recommendation We recommend that Lehigh University strengthen its processes and controls to ensure the review of its subrecipient?s compliance reports is completed within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC. Views of Responsible Officials Lehigh University accepts this finding. The review of fiscal year 2022 has been conducted and is complete for the review of those institutions who have submitted their audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements. ALN Number 17.258, 17.259, 17.278- Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Federal Award No. NIA Federal Agency Department of Labor Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR ?200.332(f)) states all pass-through entities (PTE?s) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold?a non- Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted?set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (d) states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Sec. 184(a)(4) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act states the State must conduct an annual on-site monitoring review of each local area?s compliance with 2 CFR part 200. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (e) states depending upon the passthrough entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Condition The Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) does not efficiently or effectively review the required federal audits for Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements per 2 CFR 200.332 (f). For three out of thirteen subrecipients the agency did not maintain or provide the correct Single Audit or the determination if a Single Audit was required when requested. MDES does not appropriately ensure on-site monitoring is done in a timely manner. During review of ten subrecipients, auditor noted that all documented monitoring was done after the fiscal year was complete, the monitoring was not completed on-site, and the reports for the monitoring were provided back to the agency after the fiscal year was complete. Per discussion with agency personnel, a pre-award scoring is being performed to determine ability of the subrecipient to enact the grant, however a risk based assessment to ensure the subrecipient has proper accountability with the award is not being performed. Cause Staff did not follow policies and procedures for subrecipient on-site monitoring requirements. Effect Subrecipients could be in noncompliance with 2 CFR ? 200.501, Audit requirements, and go undetected by MDES. In addition, MDES could lose federal funding for not properly monitoring their subrecipients. Without proper monitoring of their federal reports, subrecipients may participate in unallowable activities that goes undetected by MDES, the grantor. Recommendation We recommend that the Mississippi Department Employment Security strengthen controls to ensure compliance with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements. Repeat Finding No. Statistically Valid No.
Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements. ALN Number 17.258, 17.259, 17.278- Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Federal Award No. NIA Federal Agency Department of Labor Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR ?200.332(f)) states all pass-through entities (PTE?s) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold?a non- Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted?set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (d) states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Sec. 184(a)(4) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act states the State must conduct an annual on-site monitoring review of each local area?s compliance with 2 CFR part 200. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (e) states depending upon the passthrough entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Condition The Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) does not efficiently or effectively review the required federal audits for Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements per 2 CFR 200.332 (f). For three out of thirteen subrecipients the agency did not maintain or provide the correct Single Audit or the determination if a Single Audit was required when requested. MDES does not appropriately ensure on-site monitoring is done in a timely manner. During review of ten subrecipients, auditor noted that all documented monitoring was done after the fiscal year was complete, the monitoring was not completed on-site, and the reports for the monitoring were provided back to the agency after the fiscal year was complete. Per discussion with agency personnel, a pre-award scoring is being performed to determine ability of the subrecipient to enact the grant, however a risk based assessment to ensure the subrecipient has proper accountability with the award is not being performed. Cause Staff did not follow policies and procedures for subrecipient on-site monitoring requirements. Effect Subrecipients could be in noncompliance with 2 CFR ? 200.501, Audit requirements, and go undetected by MDES. In addition, MDES could lose federal funding for not properly monitoring their subrecipients. Without proper monitoring of their federal reports, subrecipients may participate in unallowable activities that goes undetected by MDES, the grantor. Recommendation We recommend that the Mississippi Department Employment Security strengthen controls to ensure compliance with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements. Repeat Finding No. Statistically Valid No.
Subrecipient Monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements. ALN Number 17.258, 17.259, 17.278- Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Federal Award No. NIA Federal Agency Department of Labor Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR ?200.332(f)) states all pass-through entities (PTE?s) must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold?a non- Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity?s fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single audit conducted?set forth in ? 200.501 Audit requirements. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (d) states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Sec. 184(a)(4) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act states the State must conduct an annual on-site monitoring review of each local area?s compliance with 2 CFR part 200. Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.332 (e) states depending upon the passthrough entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Condition The Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) does not efficiently or effectively review the required federal audits for Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements per 2 CFR 200.332 (f). For three out of thirteen subrecipients the agency did not maintain or provide the correct Single Audit or the determination if a Single Audit was required when requested. MDES does not appropriately ensure on-site monitoring is done in a timely manner. During review of ten subrecipients, auditor noted that all documented monitoring was done after the fiscal year was complete, the monitoring was not completed on-site, and the reports for the monitoring were provided back to the agency after the fiscal year was complete. Per discussion with agency personnel, a pre-award scoring is being performed to determine ability of the subrecipient to enact the grant, however a risk based assessment to ensure the subrecipient has proper accountability with the award is not being performed. Cause Staff did not follow policies and procedures for subrecipient on-site monitoring requirements. Effect Subrecipients could be in noncompliance with 2 CFR ? 200.501, Audit requirements, and go undetected by MDES. In addition, MDES could lose federal funding for not properly monitoring their subrecipients. Without proper monitoring of their federal reports, subrecipients may participate in unallowable activities that goes undetected by MDES, the grantor. Recommendation We recommend that the Mississippi Department Employment Security strengthen controls to ensure compliance with the Subrecipient Monitoring requirements. Repeat Finding No. Statistically Valid No.
SUBRECEIPIENT MONITORING Significant Deficiency Immaterial Noncompliance 2022-029 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with On-Site Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements for Special Education Cluster Programs. ALN Number 84.027 Special Education - Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) 84.173 Special Education - Preschool Grants (IDEA, Preschool) Federal Award No. All Current Active Grants Federal Agency United States Department of Education Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria The terms and conditions of the grant agreements between the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) and the U.S. Department of Education require MDE to administer grants in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Guidance). The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200.331) designates MDE, as a pass through entity, to properly identify subaward requirements to subreceipients, evaluate the risk of noncompliance for each subrecipient, and monitor the activities of subreceipients as necessary to ensure that subawards are used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subawards and achieves performance goals. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.332(d)) requires all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. MDE's Office of Special Education Bureau of Monitoring and Technical Assistance (OSE-BMT A) procedures require an on-site monitoring visit of each subgrantee contract based on a four-year rotating cycle and a fiscal monitoring assessment for each subgrantee contract by a five year cycle. The OSE-BMTA written procedures state each monitoring visit will have a monitoring team leader who is responsible for completing the monitoring report and sending the report to the Office of Special Education (OSE) Bureau Director for approval. The monitoring instrument is designed to include all areas of compliance to be monitored and consists of a programmatic portion and a fiscal portion. The written procedures require the monitoring report be provided to the LEA within 30 calendar days of the monitoring visit. The written procedures further state that all noncompliance must be corrected as soon as possible, but in no case more than 12 months from the date of the monitoring report. Condition The Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) did not follow written procedures for the 2020-2021 programmatic and fiscal monitoring cycles and did not perform monitoring visits based on the four-year monitoring cycle for the programmatic portion and the five year monitoring cycle for the fiscal portion, as required by MDE policy. MDE policy requires roughly 35 Local Education Agencies (LEAs) to be included in the cyclical on-site monitoring cycle and approximately 29 LEAs to be included in the cyclical fiscal monitoring cycle each year. During the last completed monitoring cycle, 2020-2021 however, only nine LEA's received an on-site monitoring visit and only 12 received a Fiscal monitoring assessment. During testwork over subrecipient monitoring, the auditor tested 2 of the 21 local education agencies (LEAs) that had an on-site or fiscal monitoring assessment for the 2020-2021 monitoring cycle and noted the following: ? Two instances, or 100%, in which the LEA's did not receive timely notification (within 30 calendar days of an on-site monitoring visit) from MDE. o The monitoring reports were issued 78 days after the monitoring visit. ? One instance or 50% in which there was no documentation of the monitoring instrument. Cause MDE did not follow written policies related to their subreceipient monitoring requirements. Effect MDE programmatic funding divisions rely upon on-site monitoring procedures to verify compliance with program regulations and to identify potential problem areas needing corrective action. Failure to properly monitor subrecipients and ensure closure of the monitoring visits in a timely manner could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Education strengthen controls to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Special Education Cluster Programs. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-037. Statistically Valid Yes.
SUBRECEIPIENT MONITORING Significant Deficiency Immaterial Noncompliance 2022-029 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with On-Site Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements for Special Education Cluster Programs. ALN Number 84.027 Special Education - Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) 84.173 Special Education - Preschool Grants (IDEA, Preschool) Federal Award No. All Current Active Grants Federal Agency United States Department of Education Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria The terms and conditions of the grant agreements between the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) and the U.S. Department of Education require MDE to administer grants in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Guidance). The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200.331) designates MDE, as a pass through entity, to properly identify subaward requirements to subreceipients, evaluate the risk of noncompliance for each subrecipient, and monitor the activities of subreceipients as necessary to ensure that subawards are used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subawards and achieves performance goals. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.332(d)) requires all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. MDE's Office of Special Education Bureau of Monitoring and Technical Assistance (OSE-BMT A) procedures require an on-site monitoring visit of each subgrantee contract based on a four-year rotating cycle and a fiscal monitoring assessment for each subgrantee contract by a five year cycle. The OSE-BMTA written procedures state each monitoring visit will have a monitoring team leader who is responsible for completing the monitoring report and sending the report to the Office of Special Education (OSE) Bureau Director for approval. The monitoring instrument is designed to include all areas of compliance to be monitored and consists of a programmatic portion and a fiscal portion. The written procedures require the monitoring report be provided to the LEA within 30 calendar days of the monitoring visit. The written procedures further state that all noncompliance must be corrected as soon as possible, but in no case more than 12 months from the date of the monitoring report. Condition The Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) did not follow written procedures for the 2020-2021 programmatic and fiscal monitoring cycles and did not perform monitoring visits based on the four-year monitoring cycle for the programmatic portion and the five year monitoring cycle for the fiscal portion, as required by MDE policy. MDE policy requires roughly 35 Local Education Agencies (LEAs) to be included in the cyclical on-site monitoring cycle and approximately 29 LEAs to be included in the cyclical fiscal monitoring cycle each year. During the last completed monitoring cycle, 2020-2021 however, only nine LEA's received an on-site monitoring visit and only 12 received a Fiscal monitoring assessment. During testwork over subrecipient monitoring, the auditor tested 2 of the 21 local education agencies (LEAs) that had an on-site or fiscal monitoring assessment for the 2020-2021 monitoring cycle and noted the following: ? Two instances, or 100%, in which the LEA's did not receive timely notification (within 30 calendar days of an on-site monitoring visit) from MDE. o The monitoring reports were issued 78 days after the monitoring visit. ? One instance or 50% in which there was no documentation of the monitoring instrument. Cause MDE did not follow written policies related to their subreceipient monitoring requirements. Effect MDE programmatic funding divisions rely upon on-site monitoring procedures to verify compliance with program regulations and to identify potential problem areas needing corrective action. Failure to properly monitor subrecipients and ensure closure of the monitoring visits in a timely manner could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Education strengthen controls to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Special Education Cluster Programs. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-037. Statistically Valid Yes.
SUBRECEIPIENT MONITORING Significant Deficiency Immaterial Noncompliance 2022-029 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with On-Site Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements for Special Education Cluster Programs. ALN Number 84.027 Special Education - Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) 84.173 Special Education - Preschool Grants (IDEA, Preschool) Federal Award No. All Current Active Grants Federal Agency United States Department of Education Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria The terms and conditions of the grant agreements between the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) and the U.S. Department of Education require MDE to administer grants in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Guidance). The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200.331) designates MDE, as a pass through entity, to properly identify subaward requirements to subreceipients, evaluate the risk of noncompliance for each subrecipient, and monitor the activities of subreceipients as necessary to ensure that subawards are used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subawards and achieves performance goals. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.332(d)) requires all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. MDE's Office of Special Education Bureau of Monitoring and Technical Assistance (OSE-BMT A) procedures require an on-site monitoring visit of each subgrantee contract based on a four-year rotating cycle and a fiscal monitoring assessment for each subgrantee contract by a five year cycle. The OSE-BMTA written procedures state each monitoring visit will have a monitoring team leader who is responsible for completing the monitoring report and sending the report to the Office of Special Education (OSE) Bureau Director for approval. The monitoring instrument is designed to include all areas of compliance to be monitored and consists of a programmatic portion and a fiscal portion. The written procedures require the monitoring report be provided to the LEA within 30 calendar days of the monitoring visit. The written procedures further state that all noncompliance must be corrected as soon as possible, but in no case more than 12 months from the date of the monitoring report. Condition The Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) did not follow written procedures for the 2020-2021 programmatic and fiscal monitoring cycles and did not perform monitoring visits based on the four-year monitoring cycle for the programmatic portion and the five year monitoring cycle for the fiscal portion, as required by MDE policy. MDE policy requires roughly 35 Local Education Agencies (LEAs) to be included in the cyclical on-site monitoring cycle and approximately 29 LEAs to be included in the cyclical fiscal monitoring cycle each year. During the last completed monitoring cycle, 2020-2021 however, only nine LEA's received an on-site monitoring visit and only 12 received a Fiscal monitoring assessment. During testwork over subrecipient monitoring, the auditor tested 2 of the 21 local education agencies (LEAs) that had an on-site or fiscal monitoring assessment for the 2020-2021 monitoring cycle and noted the following: ? Two instances, or 100%, in which the LEA's did not receive timely notification (within 30 calendar days of an on-site monitoring visit) from MDE. o The monitoring reports were issued 78 days after the monitoring visit. ? One instance or 50% in which there was no documentation of the monitoring instrument. Cause MDE did not follow written policies related to their subreceipient monitoring requirements. Effect MDE programmatic funding divisions rely upon on-site monitoring procedures to verify compliance with program regulations and to identify potential problem areas needing corrective action. Failure to properly monitor subrecipients and ensure closure of the monitoring visits in a timely manner could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Education strengthen controls to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Special Education Cluster Programs. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-037. Statistically Valid Yes.
SUBRECEIPIENT MONITORING Significant Deficiency Immaterial Noncompliance 2022-029 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with On-Site Subrecipient Monitoring Requirements for Special Education Cluster Programs. ALN Number 84.027 Special Education - Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) 84.173 Special Education - Preschool Grants (IDEA, Preschool) Federal Award No. All Current Active Grants Federal Agency United States Department of Education Pass-through Entity NI A Questioned Costs NI A Criteria The terms and conditions of the grant agreements between the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) and the U.S. Department of Education require MDE to administer grants in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Guidance). The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR Part 200.331) designates MDE, as a pass through entity, to properly identify subaward requirements to subreceipients, evaluate the risk of noncompliance for each subrecipient, and monitor the activities of subreceipients as necessary to ensure that subawards are used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subawards and achieves performance goals. The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.332(d)) requires all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. MDE's Office of Special Education Bureau of Monitoring and Technical Assistance (OSE-BMT A) procedures require an on-site monitoring visit of each subgrantee contract based on a four-year rotating cycle and a fiscal monitoring assessment for each subgrantee contract by a five year cycle. The OSE-BMTA written procedures state each monitoring visit will have a monitoring team leader who is responsible for completing the monitoring report and sending the report to the Office of Special Education (OSE) Bureau Director for approval. The monitoring instrument is designed to include all areas of compliance to be monitored and consists of a programmatic portion and a fiscal portion. The written procedures require the monitoring report be provided to the LEA within 30 calendar days of the monitoring visit. The written procedures further state that all noncompliance must be corrected as soon as possible, but in no case more than 12 months from the date of the monitoring report. Condition The Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) did not follow written procedures for the 2020-2021 programmatic and fiscal monitoring cycles and did not perform monitoring visits based on the four-year monitoring cycle for the programmatic portion and the five year monitoring cycle for the fiscal portion, as required by MDE policy. MDE policy requires roughly 35 Local Education Agencies (LEAs) to be included in the cyclical on-site monitoring cycle and approximately 29 LEAs to be included in the cyclical fiscal monitoring cycle each year. During the last completed monitoring cycle, 2020-2021 however, only nine LEA's received an on-site monitoring visit and only 12 received a Fiscal monitoring assessment. During testwork over subrecipient monitoring, the auditor tested 2 of the 21 local education agencies (LEAs) that had an on-site or fiscal monitoring assessment for the 2020-2021 monitoring cycle and noted the following: ? Two instances, or 100%, in which the LEA's did not receive timely notification (within 30 calendar days of an on-site monitoring visit) from MDE. o The monitoring reports were issued 78 days after the monitoring visit. ? One instance or 50% in which there was no documentation of the monitoring instrument. Cause MDE did not follow written policies related to their subreceipient monitoring requirements. Effect MDE programmatic funding divisions rely upon on-site monitoring procedures to verify compliance with program regulations and to identify potential problem areas needing corrective action. Failure to properly monitor subrecipients and ensure closure of the monitoring visits in a timely manner could allow noncompliance with federal regulations to occur and go undetected, potentially resulting in questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Mississippi Department of Education strengthen controls to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Special Education Cluster Programs. Repeat Finding Yes, 2021-037. Statistically Valid Yes.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The Department?s internal control structure does not ensure all subrecipients are monitored in accordance with federal requirements. Criteria: All pass-through entities must monitor subrecipients to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved (2 CFR 200.332(d) through (f)). A pass-through entity (PTE) is responsible for: During-the-Award Monitoring ? Monitoring the activities of the subrecipient (through reporting, site visits, regular contact or other means) as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Subaward monitoring must include the following: 1. Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special) reports required by the PTE. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. The PTE must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR section 200.501 (2 CFR section 200.332(f)). Federal award recipients must determine whether each agreement entered into for the disbursement of federal program funds casts the entity receiving the funds in the role of a subrecipient or a contractor based on the following definitions (2 CFR 200.331): ? A subrecipient receives federal funds from a non-federal entity to carry out part of a federal program. The legal agreement between the two parties creates a federal assistance relationship commonly known as a sub-award. ? A contractor is an entity (dealer, distributor, merchant or other seller) who has a legal agreement with a non-federal entity to provide goods and services needed to carry out the program under the federal award. Condition: RIDOT passes federal awards through to many organization types, including municipalities, non-profits, and colleges/universities. The Department did not have documentation supporting the monitoring of three subrecipients, two of which are non-profits and one of which is a university. The Department did not review the audit reports for six subrecipients or have any documentation supporting its determination as to whether the subrecipients were required to have an audit as required by 2 CFR 200 subpart F. RIDOT identified three vendors providing goods or services to the department as subrecipients. Cause: Policies, procedures and established controls do not encompass all federal requirements. Effect: Monitoring controls and procedures may be insufficient to ensure that subrecipients are complying with applicable program regulations and requirements. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sample: Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION 2022-050 Enhance policies, procedures, and controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f).
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The Department?s internal control structure does not ensure all subrecipients are monitored in accordance with federal requirements. Criteria: All pass-through entities must monitor subrecipients to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved (2 CFR 200.332(d) through (f)). A pass-through entity (PTE) is responsible for: During-the-Award Monitoring ? Monitoring the activities of the subrecipient (through reporting, site visits, regular contact or other means) as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). Subaward monitoring must include the following: 1. Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special) reports required by the PTE. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 3. Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. The PTE must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR section 200.501 (2 CFR section 200.332(f)). Federal award recipients must determine whether each agreement entered into for the disbursement of federal program funds casts the entity receiving the funds in the role of a subrecipient or a contractor based on the following definitions (2 CFR 200.331): ? A subrecipient receives federal funds from a non-federal entity to carry out part of a federal program. The legal agreement between the two parties creates a federal assistance relationship commonly known as a sub-award. ? A contractor is an entity (dealer, distributor, merchant or other seller) who has a legal agreement with a non-federal entity to provide goods and services needed to carry out the program under the federal award. Condition: RIDOT passes federal awards through to many organization types, including municipalities, non-profits, and colleges/universities. The Department did not have documentation supporting the monitoring of three subrecipients, two of which are non-profits and one of which is a university. The Department did not review the audit reports for six subrecipients or have any documentation supporting its determination as to whether the subrecipients were required to have an audit as required by 2 CFR 200 subpart F. RIDOT identified three vendors providing goods or services to the department as subrecipients. Cause: Policies, procedures and established controls do not encompass all federal requirements. Effect: Monitoring controls and procedures may be insufficient to ensure that subrecipients are complying with applicable program regulations and requirements. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sample: Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION 2022-050 Enhance policies, procedures, and controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f).
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
LEVEL OF EFFORT ? SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT RIDE did not ensure the Local Education Agencies (LEAs) have the required written methodology to allocate state and local funds to each Title I school and to ensure that the school receives all of the state and local funds it would otherwise receive if it were not receiving Part A funds. Criteria: The State Education Agency (SEA) must review the LEA compliance with the Title I Part A supplement not supplant provision (e.g., through subrecipient monitoring). Part A supplement not supplant provision states the ?LEA must demonstrate that it has a methodology (e.g., through written procedures) and uses it to allocate state and local funds to each Title I school and ensures that the school receives all of the state and local funds it would otherwise receive if it were not receiving Part A funds (i.e., the LEA?s methodology may not take into account a school?s Title I status) (Section 1118(b)(2) (20 USC 6321(b)(2))). An LEA may use a combination of methodologies to allocate state and local funds to schools (e.g., use a different methodology for high schools than it uses for elementary schools). An LEA also may design its methodology to take into consideration grade span or school type, student enrollment size, or schools in need of additional funds to serve high concentrations of children with disabilities, English learners, or other such groups of students the LEA determines require additional support. RIDE can review the LEA compliance with the part A supplement not supplant provision through sub-recipient monitoring.? 2 CFR 200.332 states ?Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward.? Condition: RIDE?s risk assessment identified that 22 of the 36 applicable LEAs did not have a written methodology to allocate state and local funds to each Title I school and to ensure that the school receives all of the state and local funds it would otherwise receive if it were not receiving Part A funds. The Department did not perform any follow-up to ensure the LEAs took timely and appropriate action to correct the identified deficiency. Cause: RIDE informed us that on-site subrecipient monitoring did not occur due to COVID-19 and lack of available resources. The majority of subrecipient monitoring took place virtually. Although RIDE monitored the subrecipients, they did not obtain corrective action from the LEAs regarding the lack of supplement not supplant policies and procedures. Effect: Noncompliance with federal rules and regulations. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION 2022-054 Enhance internal controls over LEA supplement not supplant requirements by obtaining corrective actions from LEA subrecipients that are not complying with federal requirements for formalized methodologies.
SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS ? OVERSIGHT AND MONITORING RESPONSIBILITIES WITH RESPECT TO CHARTER SCHOOLS WITH RELATIONSHIPS WITH CHARTER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS RIDE does not have any specific procedures to assess the risk posed by conflicts of interest, related party transactions or insufficient segregation of duties between the Charter School and Charter Management Organization (CMO). Criteria: As grantees, SEAs/LEAs are responsible for overseeing and monitoring subrecipients, including charter schools with relationships with Charter Management Organizations (CMOs). The SEA/LEA must: (1) evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring (2 CFR section 200.332(b)); and (2) monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved (2 CFR section 200.332(d)). Charter schools with relationships with CMOs that receive federal grant funds must comply with statutes authorizing the applicable grant program, regulations, the terms and conditions of their grant awards, and relevant department-issued guidance. Additionally, under Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 ? Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Grant Guidance), nonfederal entities that receive federal grants: (1) must establish and maintain effective internal controls over those funds and (2) should have internal controls that comply with the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book), issued in November 1999 and updated in September 2014, or the ?Internal Control ? Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 1992 and updated in May 2013. The Green Book and the COSO Internal Control ? Integrated Framework (COSO framework) provide specific requirements for assessing and reporting on controls in the federal government. Additional requirements applicable to nonfederal entities receiving federal funds include: (1) the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) requirements regarding conflicts of interest, (2) guidance regarding related-party transactions in generally accepted accounting principles, and (3) the GAO Green Book and COSO framework guidance regarding segregation of duties applicable to charter schools with relationships with CMOs. Condition: RIDE?s policies, procedures, and internal control for reviewing charter schools with relationships with Charter Management Organizations (CMOs) is the same for all Local Education Agencies (LEA). Those policies and procedures do not include any specific procedures to assess the risk posed by conflicts of interest, related party transactions or insufficient segregation of duties between the Charter School and CMO. Cause: RIDE currently has one Charter School with a relationship with a CMO and they did not modify their policies, procedures, and internal controls to address the Federal requirements related to the relationship. Effect: RIDE is not in compliance with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Not Applicable RECOMMENDATIONS 2022-055 Enhance the policies, procedures, and internal controls over monitoring LEAs, Charter Schools, and Charter Schools with relationships to CMOs to include assessing the risk posed by conflicts of interest, related-party transactions or insufficient segregation of duties between the Charter School and CMO.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING The State has not implemented adequate subrecipient monitoring activities to ensure material compliance with federal regulations for several federal programs. Background: The State currently relies on the specific grantee agencies to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring, when applicable to the underlying federal programs. There is no statewide monitoring to ensure that activities are performed to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) ?Requirements for pass-through entities?, requires that all pass-through entities must ?monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.? That monitoring must include (1) reviewing financial and performance reports, (2) following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means, (3) issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award.? Condition: For the federal programs cited above, State pass-through agencies did not perform subrecipient monitoring activities required by federal regulations. Our testing evaluated whether the grantee agency obtained and reviewed the subrecipient?s Single Audit, when applicable, or performed other required monitoring activities to comply with federal regulations. For these programs, the following results, specific to agency reviews of financial and performance reports, were deemed to be material noncompliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements: [See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for tables.] For subrecipients that were not required to have Single Audits performed, agencies also did not perform required monitoring procedures, which could have included monitoring the subrecipient?s use of federal awards through reporting, site visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Cause: The State did not conduct subrecipient monitoring activities required to materially comply with federal regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements by subrecipients could occur without the State identifying it in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Valid Statistical Sampling: Yes RECOMMENDATION 2022-039 Improve policies and procedures statewide to ensure compliance with federal regulations for subrecipient monitoring.
New York City Department for the Aging (?DFTA?) Finding #: 2022-016 Funding Year(s): 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 New York City Department for the Aging: Aging Cluster (FAL #93.044, 93.045 & 93.053) Contract Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: New York State Office for the Aging Type of Finding: Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring requirements of 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1) stipulate that pass-through entities include specific Federal award information within sub-award contracts. Such information, among other things, should include: i. Subrecipient?s unique identifying number; ii. Federal Award Identification Number; iii. Federal Award Date of award to City Agency by the Federal agency; iv. Name of Federal awarding agency; and v. Assistance Listing title Condition/Context: Of the forty (40) subrecipient contracts under the Aging Cluster that were selected for testing, none of the contracts included any of the data points described above (i.-v.) in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). Cause/Effect: While DFTA has established subrecipient monitoring procedures, such procedures did not adequately contemplate all of the required elements and/or data points necessary to be included in all of their respective subrecipient agreements. Missing or incomplete required data elements could result in subrecipients not having sufficient information to appropriately comply with Uniform Guidance reporting and/or other program specific compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is similar to finding #2021-005 included on pages 236 through 237 of the of the Fiscal 2021 Single Audit report. Recommendation: We recommend that DFTA create a comprehensive internal control structure which ensures that all subrecipient compliance requirements are being met, including a review of all subrecipient contracts and related amendments, to ensure every subrecipient agreement contains all of the required information stipulated by 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1).
New York City Department for the Aging (?DFTA?) Finding #: 2022-016 Funding Year(s): 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 New York City Department for the Aging: Aging Cluster (FAL #93.044, 93.045 & 93.053) Contract Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: New York State Office for the Aging Type of Finding: Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring requirements of 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1) stipulate that pass-through entities include specific Federal award information within sub-award contracts. Such information, among other things, should include: i. Subrecipient?s unique identifying number; ii. Federal Award Identification Number; iii. Federal Award Date of award to City Agency by the Federal agency; iv. Name of Federal awarding agency; and v. Assistance Listing title Condition/Context: Of the forty (40) subrecipient contracts under the Aging Cluster that were selected for testing, none of the contracts included any of the data points described above (i.-v.) in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). Cause/Effect: While DFTA has established subrecipient monitoring procedures, such procedures did not adequately contemplate all of the required elements and/or data points necessary to be included in all of their respective subrecipient agreements. Missing or incomplete required data elements could result in subrecipients not having sufficient information to appropriately comply with Uniform Guidance reporting and/or other program specific compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is similar to finding #2021-005 included on pages 236 through 237 of the of the Fiscal 2021 Single Audit report. Recommendation: We recommend that DFTA create a comprehensive internal control structure which ensures that all subrecipient compliance requirements are being met, including a review of all subrecipient contracts and related amendments, to ensure every subrecipient agreement contains all of the required information stipulated by 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1).
New York City Department for the Aging (?DFTA?) Finding #: 2022-016 Funding Year(s): 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 New York City Department for the Aging: Aging Cluster (FAL #93.044, 93.045 & 93.053) Contract Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: New York State Office for the Aging Type of Finding: Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring requirements of 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1) stipulate that pass-through entities include specific Federal award information within sub-award contracts. Such information, among other things, should include: i. Subrecipient?s unique identifying number; ii. Federal Award Identification Number; iii. Federal Award Date of award to City Agency by the Federal agency; iv. Name of Federal awarding agency; and v. Assistance Listing title Condition/Context: Of the forty (40) subrecipient contracts under the Aging Cluster that were selected for testing, none of the contracts included any of the data points described above (i.-v.) in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). Cause/Effect: While DFTA has established subrecipient monitoring procedures, such procedures did not adequately contemplate all of the required elements and/or data points necessary to be included in all of their respective subrecipient agreements. Missing or incomplete required data elements could result in subrecipients not having sufficient information to appropriately comply with Uniform Guidance reporting and/or other program specific compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is similar to finding #2021-005 included on pages 236 through 237 of the of the Fiscal 2021 Single Audit report. Recommendation: We recommend that DFTA create a comprehensive internal control structure which ensures that all subrecipient compliance requirements are being met, including a review of all subrecipient contracts and related amendments, to ensure every subrecipient agreement contains all of the required information stipulated by 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1).
New York City Department for the Aging (?DFTA?) Finding #: 2022-016 Funding Year(s): 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 New York City Department for the Aging: Aging Cluster (FAL #93.044, 93.045 & 93.053) Contract Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: New York State Office for the Aging Type of Finding: Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring requirements of 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1) stipulate that pass-through entities include specific Federal award information within sub-award contracts. Such information, among other things, should include: i. Subrecipient?s unique identifying number; ii. Federal Award Identification Number; iii. Federal Award Date of award to City Agency by the Federal agency; iv. Name of Federal awarding agency; and v. Assistance Listing title Condition/Context: Of the forty (40) subrecipient contracts under the Aging Cluster that were selected for testing, none of the contracts included any of the data points described above (i.-v.) in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). Cause/Effect: While DFTA has established subrecipient monitoring procedures, such procedures did not adequately contemplate all of the required elements and/or data points necessary to be included in all of their respective subrecipient agreements. Missing or incomplete required data elements could result in subrecipients not having sufficient information to appropriately comply with Uniform Guidance reporting and/or other program specific compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is similar to finding #2021-005 included on pages 236 through 237 of the of the Fiscal 2021 Single Audit report. Recommendation: We recommend that DFTA create a comprehensive internal control structure which ensures that all subrecipient compliance requirements are being met, including a review of all subrecipient contracts and related amendments, to ensure every subrecipient agreement contains all of the required information stipulated by 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1).
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (?DOHMH?) Finding #: 2022-005 Funding Year(s): 8/1/2020 - 12/31/2022 HIV Prevention Activities ? Health Department Based (FAL #93.940) Contract Numbers: 5 NU62PS924575-04-00; 5 NU62PS924575-05-00; 1NU62PS924626-01-00; 6NU62PS924626-02-01 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Subrecipient Monitoring - Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring requirements of 2 CFR 200.332(d) stipulate that pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Condition/Context: During fiscal 2022, DOHMH passed through federal funding to one subrecipient. We selected this subrecipient for testing and noted that DOHMH did not perform any of the required monitoring procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332(d). Cause/Effect: While DOHMH has established procedures to comply with certain aspects of the subrecipient monitoring compliance requirements, such procedures did not include performing on-site reviews or similar alternate procedures that would allow DOHMH to properly oversee and evaluate the subrecipients? compliance with the requirements of the subaward. Without proper monitoring procedures, DOHMH may not have the appropriate amount of information to ensure the subrecipient is being used in accordance with Federal guidelines and the terms of the subaward. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that DOHMH create a comprehensive internal control structure which ensures that all subrecipient compliance requirements are being met, including performing appropriate monitoring procedures to ensure each subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves the performance goals of the subaward.
(2022-035) Title: Internal control over CNC subrecipient audit procedures needs improvement Prior Year Findings: None State Department: Education State Bureau: Commissioner?s Office Child Nutrition Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster (COVID-19) Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number: 214ME300L1603, 214ME301N1099, 214ME301N1199, 224ME301N1199, 224ME300L1603, 214ME102H1703, 224ME902N8903 Compliance Area: Subrecipient monitoring Type of Finding: Significant deficiency Questioned Costs: None Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303; 2 CFR 200.332 The Department must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Department is managing awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of awards. When a subrecipient?s Federal award expenditures are expected to equal or exceed $750,000 during the fiscal year, the Department must verify that the subrecipient is audited as required. Condition: The Department of Education (DOE) School Finance and Operations is responsible for tracking and reviewing subrecipient audits on behalf of the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC). CNC program subrecipients include schools that are provided Federal funds to support food service programs. The Office of the State Auditor (OSA) requested a list of subrecipients that required audits in fiscal year 2022 from DOE to test compliance with Federal regulations. OSA independently queried the State?s accounting system to develop a separate list for comparison and to ensure completeness. OSA compared DOE?s tracking to OSA?s generated list and found two subrecipients that were excluded from DOE?s tracking. DOE?s tracking excluded two private schools that received Federal funds in excess of the $750,000 Single Audit requirement; therefore, the audits for the two schools were not received or reviewed. Context: In fiscal year 2022, $113 million was provided to 254 subrecipients. Approximately 120 subrecipients were required to have an audit in accordance with Federal regulations. Cause: ? Lack of adequate policies and procedures. DOE policies do not provide guidance over tracking audits of private schools. ? Lack of supervisory oversight Effect: ? Noncompliance with Federal regulations ? Subrecipients may not be complying with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the subaward. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department implement policies and procedures to ensure that audit reports for all subrecipients, including private schools, receiving over $750,000 in Federal awards are tracked, received, and reviewed. Corrective Action Plan: See F-15 Management?s Response: The Department agrees with this finding. Child Nutrition will create policies and procedures to collect, track, and review single audits for private schools receiving over $750,000 in Federal awards. Contact: Jane McLucas, Director of Child Nutrition, DOE, 207-624-6880 (State Number: 22-1203-04)