Criteria Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” Condition While performing tests of the Garden’s internal controls over compliance, we noted the Garden had no procurement policy. Cause of Condition The Garden has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect of Condition Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend the Garden implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” Condition While performing tests of the Garden’s internal controls over compliance, we noted the Garden had no procurement policy. Cause of Condition The Garden has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect of Condition Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend the Garden implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” Condition While performing tests of the Garden’s internal controls over compliance, we noted the Garden had no procurement policy. Cause of Condition The Garden has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect of Condition Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend the Garden implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
FINDING 2023-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the County to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement - Policy The County had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The County did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Upon inquiry of the County's policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements, the County stated that they did not have policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SHELBY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 that were paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Each transaction was examined to determine whether the County verified the suspension and debarment status of either vendor prior to payment. The two covered transactions, totaling $223,499, did not include the appropriate provisions in the contracts nor did the County require a certification or check the EPLS to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period for the FY 2022 grant. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SHELBY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors and subrecipients to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Additionally, we recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The Town did not have an approved procurement policy that reflected applicable state laws and regulations including procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. The Town is required to have and use documented procurement procedures, which are consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under procurement and nonprocurement transactions (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the Town to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements, the Town stated that a suspension and debarment clause is included in contracts. Contracts are reviewed by the President of the Town Council. Four covered transactions, totaling $20,152,969, were identified and tested. The Town could not provide documentation that procedures were performed to verify that three of the four vendors paid from the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities award funds with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal programs. Additionally, the Town had two agreements subject to the Buy America Build America (BABA) provisions. The Town could not provide documentation that procedures were performed to ensure the Buy America domestic preference provisions were included in either agreement nor was a BABA waiver obtained. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 TOWN OF FRANKTON SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systematic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 184.4 states in part: "(a) Applicability of Buy America Preference to infrastructure projects. The Buy America Preference applies to Federal awards where funds are appropriated or otherwise made available for infrastructure projects in the United States, regardless of whether infrastructure is the primary purpose of the Federal award. (b) Including the Buy America Preference in Federal awards. All Federal awards with infrastructure projects must include the Buy America Preference in the terms and conditions. The Buy America Preference must be included in all subawards, contracts, and purchase orders for the work performed, or products supplied under the Federal award. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 TOWN OF FRANKTON SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by the management of the Town. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. The Clerk-Treasurer was new to the position as of January 1, 2024. The former Clerk-Treasurer was not knowledgeable on the compliance requirements of the federal award. The Town contracted with outside engineers to manage the compliance requirement, and there was no documentation that BABA provisions or a waiver was obtained for the contracts nor that they included a suspension or debarment clause. Lastly, a procurement policy nor documentation that vendors were not suspended or debarred was not provided for review. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. In addition, the BABA provisions were not appropriately included in infrastructure projects. Any program funds the Town used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Additionally, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the Town establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In addition, we recommended that the Town strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Lastly, we recommended that the Town ensure all applicable contracts contain the required BABA provisions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-005. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The City had not established a purchasing policy that reflected applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Additionally, the City did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The City did not obtain price or rate quotes for the one vendor tested that was less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the City did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 CITY OF MUNCIE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the U.S. Department of the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the City was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. A population of nine covered transactions for goods or services were paid from SLFRF award funds during the audit period. A sample of three transactions were selected for testing. Of the three transactions tested, one vendor was not verified to not be suspended nor debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the small purchase noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CITY OF MUNCIE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the City was not effective at ensuring all required aspects of a procurement policy were included and that small purchases adhered to the procurement requirements. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot ensure their policy includes all the necessary elements and that the detailed history of procurement including the method utilized are retained for audit. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CITY OF MUNCIE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended management of the City establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In addition, we recommended the City adhere to the procurement policies and obtain required quotes and bids or adequately document a sole source situation. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Statistically Valid Sample: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample Repeat Finding: Yes (2022-002) Finding Type: Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance Criteria Reporting Per 2 CFR 200.502, the determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Generally, the activity pertains to events that require the non Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards, such as: expenditures/expense transactions associated with awards including grants. Further, the Uniform Guidance compliance supplement notes, each recipient must report program outlays and program income on a cash or accrual basis, as prescribed by the Federal awarding agency. In accordance with the grant agreement and the reporting requirements for the State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, direct grants and pass through funds are fulfilled utilizing an advanced payment method and tracking reports. The grantee shall submit quarterly financial reports, in a format to be provided by the Department, and including the number of government full time employees responding to COVID 19 as supported by this funding. The reports are prepared and submitted to allow for relevant and reliable information to be provided to the Federal government or State of New Jersey for tracking purposes. The reports are the source documents for the grantee to prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the grantee’s financial statements in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502, Basis for determining Federal awards expended, for the SEFA. Procurement Non Federal entities other than states, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). In accordance with the grant agreement and the reporting requirements for the State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, recipients may use award funds to enter into contracts to procure goods and services necessary to implement one or more of the eligible purposes outlined in sections 602(c) and 603(c) of the Act and Treasury’s Interim Final Rule and Final Rule. As such, recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Under the program, St. Joseph’s Health, Inc. must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Internal Control Additionally, in accordance with Federal requirements, a non Federal entity shall maintain internal controls over Federal programs designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are executed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award that could have a direct and material effect on a Federal program. Condition and Context Reporting On a quarterly basis, St. Joseph’s Health, Inc. (the System) prepares and reports to New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (the Department) the program expenditures for Federal funding amounts on the tracking report of expenditures, which are then used to prepare the annual SEFA in conjunction with the general ledger detail at the end of the fiscal year. While expenditures per the SEFA as prepared by the System were accurate and the quarterly reporting was accepted by the State, the System’s expenditures per the report of expenditures were based upon purchase order amounts, which include expenditures that were incurred subsequent to year end. Procurement Further, the System engaged multiple vendors for several projects under the G2022 09 grant that were above the $10K micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. However, the System did not obtain multiple quotes from different vendors to encourage fair competition in the market. The System’s policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the above compliance requirements did not include certain internal controls that were designed properly and operating effectively to ensure that the System properly reported costs on the report of expenditures or obtained the necessary quotes from potential bidders for procurements over the micro purchase threshold. Cause Management’s review of the submitted quarterly report of expenditures did not identify the need for a reconciliation of incurred expenditures and purchase order balances reported to the Department and as such, as there is a variance between the amounts reported on the SEFA and the amounts reported to the Department on the quarterly reports of approximately $458 thousand. We noted, however that this variance did not represent any unallowable costs. Additionally, Management did not retain or obtain the required documentation indicating quotes from multiple vendors were obtained for the ongoing construction projects under the grant. Effect The System had a material variance in the amount of expenditures reported to the Department as compared to the SEFA and did not obtain multiple quotations from vendors when making selections for various projects ongoing under the Federal program. Questioned Costs None Recommendation Reporting We recommend that the System strengthen its processes and internal controls to ensure the tracking of each report of expenditures provided to the Department has a reconciliation of the amount of expenditures incurred in the period based upon the general ledger and accounting records, used to prepare the annual SEFA, as compared to the purchase order balances. Procurement We recommend that the System strengthen its processes and internal controls to ensure that all procurement related transactions are supported by the appropriate bidding documentation as required by the Uniform Guidance for each respective bidding threshold. View of Responsible Official Management agrees with the auditor's recommendations and will strengthen its processes and internal controls to ensure the report of expenditures provided to the Department has a reconciliation of the amount of expenditures incurred in the period compared to the purchase order balances and all procurement transactions contain the required bidding documentation fro each bidding threshold in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.
Assistance Listing 10.766 Title Community Facilities Loans and Grants Federal Grantor U.S. Department of Agriculture Compliance Area Reporting Type of Finding Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs None Reported Repeat Finding Yes Criteria 2 CFR 200.327 establishes that reports be complete, accurate, and supported by accounting records (if applicable) and be submitted in compliance with the appropriate deadlines. Condition Westward Heights submitted each quarterly report to the USDA after the required due dates. Quarterly reports are due by the end of the following month. Cause Westward Heights did not have an internal control policy in place to ensure timely closing of month-end or year-end financials. Effect The lack of policy resulted in multiple reports being submitted to the USDA after the due date. Recommendation We recommend that Westward Heights establish deadlines for accounting personnel to complete month-end and year-end financials. Views of Responsible Officials Management and Westward Heights’ Board of Directors agree with the finding. See Westward Heights’ Corrective Action Plan for Finding 2023-002.
Federal Program Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (AL 21.029) Procurement Suspended and Debarred Parties Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Cause East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Questioned Costs None Context Per inquiry with East Central Energy and Subsidiaries management, they do not have a procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement compliance requirements. This could result in East Central Energy and Subsidiaries not following state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Recommend for East Central Energy and Subsidiaries to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials East Central Energy and Subsidiaries agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (AL 21.029) Procurement Suspended and Debarred Parties Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Cause East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Questioned Costs None Context Per inquiry with East Central Energy and Subsidiaries management, they do not have a procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement compliance requirements. This could result in East Central Energy and Subsidiaries not following state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Recommend for East Central Energy and Subsidiaries to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials East Central Energy and Subsidiaries agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (AL 21.029) Procurement Suspended and Debarred Parties Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Cause East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Questioned Costs None Context Per inquiry with East Central Energy and Subsidiaries management, they do not have a procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement compliance requirements. This could result in East Central Energy and Subsidiaries not following state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Recommend for East Central Energy and Subsidiaries to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials East Central Energy and Subsidiaries agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (AL 21.029) Procurement Suspended and Debarred Parties Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Cause East Central Energy and Subsidiaries does not have a written procurement policy that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Questioned Costs None Context Per inquiry with East Central Energy and Subsidiaries management, they do not have a procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement compliance requirements. This could result in East Central Energy and Subsidiaries not following state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Recommend for East Central Energy and Subsidiaries to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials East Central Energy and Subsidiaries agrees with the recommendation.
Finding 2023-003, Procurement, Suspension and Debarment, Internal Control and Noncompliance Identification of the federal program Assistance listing number and title: 93.493 Congressional Directives Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal award identification number (FAIN): H79FG000996 Federal Award Year: 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls would be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 states that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.320 discusses the methods of procurement to be followed for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Part 3-I-1 of the 2023 OMB Compliance Supplement summarizes the regulation as follows: • Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation), continued • For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 2 CFR 200.214 provides that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The System’s procurement policies did not conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200.320, and the suspension and debarment requirements in 2 CFR Part 180. Cause The System’s procurement policies lack certain elements of federal procurement, suspension and debarment standards. Effect or potential effect Not having policies that are consistent with federal requirements could lead to procurements under federal awards being inappropriate, not adequately documented or entered into with covered entities. Questioned costs None. Context The System’s procurement policies did not conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200.320. Specifically, the System’s procurement policies did not include a discussion of the criteria, thresholds and procedures to be followed for formal procurement methods (such as sealed bids and proposals), and for noncompetitive procurement. Further, the System’s vendor credentialing policy that is meant to address suspension and debarment requirements, includes a list of certain entities (such as academic institutions) that are exempted from the screening process. No such exemptions are provided for in 2 CFR Part 180. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should enhance its procurement policies to ensure that all Federal requirements on procurement, suspension and debarment are incorporated. Management must ensure that the policies are supported by effective internal control activities to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of responsible officials Vendor review for suspension and disbarment was performed monthly for all but one vendor in accordance with current CHST policies and management was informed of any vendors with issues; however, documentation of clean vendors was not provided. Management will coordinate with appropriate departments to review federal provisions for grant procurement and adjust policies and procedures to comply. Management will work with appropriate departments and each grant team to document monthly suspension and disbarment review process. Grant teams will review all current sourcing and provide sole source documentation where applicable.
Finding 2023-001 Lack of Internal Control Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and Department of the Treasury, respectfully Federal Programs: Highway Planning and Construction & Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, respectfully ALN: 20.205 and 21.027, respectfully Award Numbers: DTFH69-13-H-00087, DTFH69-H-00087, Unknown Award Years: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control and noncompliance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition and Context: Management could not provide adequate procurement documentation for the purchase of a large piece of equipment. During our testing of allowable costs charged to the program we noted two (2) transaction out of six (6) tested that lacked adequate supporting documentation related to procurement. This appears to be an isolated instance of non-compliance. Cause: Lack of internal controls over procurement. Effect: Failure to follow compliance requirements could result in loss of federal funding or questioned costs being incurred. Questioned Costs: None noted. The price for the piece of equipment did not seem unreasonable and was within budgetary requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a procurement policy and ensure that the policy is followed for all large purchases. Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-001 Lack of Internal Control Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and Department of the Treasury, respectfully Federal Programs: Highway Planning and Construction & Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, respectfully ALN: 20.205 and 21.027, respectfully Award Numbers: DTFH69-13-H-00087, DTFH69-H-00087, Unknown Award Years: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control and noncompliance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition and Context: Management could not provide adequate procurement documentation for the purchase of a large piece of equipment. During our testing of allowable costs charged to the program we noted two (2) transaction out of six (6) tested that lacked adequate supporting documentation related to procurement. This appears to be an isolated instance of non-compliance. Cause: Lack of internal controls over procurement. Effect: Failure to follow compliance requirements could result in loss of federal funding or questioned costs being incurred. Questioned Costs: None noted. The price for the piece of equipment did not seem unreasonable and was within budgetary requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a procurement policy and ensure that the policy is followed for all large purchases. Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-001 Lack of Internal Control Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and Department of the Treasury, respectfully Federal Programs: Highway Planning and Construction & Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, respectfully ALN: 20.205 and 21.027, respectfully Award Numbers: DTFH69-13-H-00087, DTFH69-H-00087, Unknown Award Years: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control and noncompliance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition and Context: Management could not provide adequate procurement documentation for the purchase of a large piece of equipment. During our testing of allowable costs charged to the program we noted two (2) transaction out of six (6) tested that lacked adequate supporting documentation related to procurement. This appears to be an isolated instance of non-compliance. Cause: Lack of internal controls over procurement. Effect: Failure to follow compliance requirements could result in loss of federal funding or questioned costs being incurred. Questioned Costs: None noted. The price for the piece of equipment did not seem unreasonable and was within budgetary requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a procurement policy and ensure that the policy is followed for all large purchases. Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-001 Lack of Internal Control Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and Department of the Treasury, respectfully Federal Programs: Highway Planning and Construction & Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, respectfully ALN: 20.205 and 21.027, respectfully Award Numbers: DTFH69-13-H-00087, DTFH69-H-00087, Unknown Award Years: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control and noncompliance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition and Context: Management could not provide adequate procurement documentation for the purchase of a large piece of equipment. During our testing of allowable costs charged to the program we noted two (2) transaction out of six (6) tested that lacked adequate supporting documentation related to procurement. This appears to be an isolated instance of non-compliance. Cause: Lack of internal controls over procurement. Effect: Failure to follow compliance requirements could result in loss of federal funding or questioned costs being incurred. Questioned Costs: None noted. The price for the piece of equipment did not seem unreasonable and was within budgetary requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a procurement policy and ensure that the policy is followed for all large purchases. Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-001 Lack of Internal Control Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and Department of the Treasury, respectfully Federal Programs: Highway Planning and Construction & Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, respectfully ALN: 20.205 and 21.027, respectfully Award Numbers: DTFH69-13-H-00087, DTFH69-H-00087, Unknown Award Years: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control and noncompliance. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.318, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition and Context: Management could not provide adequate procurement documentation for the purchase of a large piece of equipment. During our testing of allowable costs charged to the program we noted two (2) transaction out of six (6) tested that lacked adequate supporting documentation related to procurement. This appears to be an isolated instance of non-compliance. Cause: Lack of internal controls over procurement. Effect: Failure to follow compliance requirements could result in loss of federal funding or questioned costs being incurred. Questioned Costs: None noted. The price for the piece of equipment did not seem unreasonable and was within budgetary requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish a procurement policy and ensure that the policy is followed for all large purchases. Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding. See corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County received a total COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $73,674,384 and chose to calculate its own revenue loss allowance, which totaled $35,932,557, to use for government services. Some SLFRF program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. Additional program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the other eligible use categories. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For funds expended under the revenue loss eligible use category, the above listed procurement requirements do not apply. During the audit period, the County had four vendors with purchases over the $10,000 micropurchase threshold which were expended under an eligible use category other than revenue loss and, as such, were considered small purchase procurements. The County did not provide competitive price quotations for the small purchase procurements for three of the four vendors, which totaled $257,038. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During the engagement, an employee of the Board of County Commissioners stated that verification was completed by checking the Excluded Parties List System when covered transactions were entered into by the County to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Six covered transactions, totaling $3,952,203, were paid from SLFRF funds to six different vendors for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period. Three of the six covered transactions were selected for testing. For all three transactions tested, documentation was not provided that the vendor's suspension and debarment status was verified. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. In addition, the County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had checked the Excluded Parties List System, per the County's procedures, to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions that exceeded $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot demonstrate it obtained an adequate number of price or rate quotations prior to selecting a vendor. Therefore, the County could have overpaid for the services obtained. Furthermore, without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for small purchase procurements. Additionally, we recommended policies and procedures be strengthened to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained. Lastly, we recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement Policy and Related Contract Program: 66.958 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Award No: WIFIA-N18147WI Award Year: 2023 This finding is a repeat finding of 2022-001 Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318 - General Procurement Standards, requires non-Federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: We reviewed the water utility's procurement policy and service contracts with costs reimbursed during 2023, noting they did not contain necessary federal language related to conflicts of interest and debarment and suspension. Cause: The water utility has not received federal funding in the past and did not update their procurement policy when they sought federal funding for the Great Lakes Water Supply project. Additionally, service contracts were entered into prior to receiving federal funds. Effect: Without adequate control of contract language the water utility could enter into contracts related to the Great Lakes Water Supply project that do not qualify for federal reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend the water utility review its procurement policy and make necessary updates to be in compliance with federal standards. Additionally, we recommend the utility enter into contract addendums related to contracts previously executed without required federal language. Management Response: Waukesha Water utility management has worked closely with WIFIA to craft contracts that include all necessary language prior to releasing RFPs for construction contracts. WIFIA was presented all service contracts to review prior to reimbursements received in fiscal year 2023. The finance department is working to update the procurement policy to ensure necessary federal language is included. The finance department will also work with service contractors to execute contract addendums.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-002. Condition and Context Procurement Policy Recipients may use award funds to enter into contracts to procure goods and services necessary to implement one or more of the eligible purposes outlined for COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds. Policies and procedures for the procurement of the goods and services must be the County's own documented procedures which reflect applicable state and federal laws and regulations. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The County did not have documented procurement procedures or policies reflecting applicable state or federal laws and regulations for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The County did not have any policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. A population of seven covered transactions, totaling $2,631,684, that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds were identified. Four of the seven covered transactions, totaling $1,399,462, were selected for testing. For each of the four transactions, the County did not verify the vendors' suspension or debarment status prior to payment due to the County not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified, from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of intenral controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County did not have a procurement policy in place that contained the requirements of the procurement standards as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations. Due to the timing of the adoption of the County's Suspension and Debarment Policy, which defines procedures to verify suspension and debarment status for covered transactions, the items selected for testing were not verified. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure that goods and services are appropriately procured and that contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the County strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all contractors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into contracts. We also recommended strengthening its policies to reflect applicable state and federal laws and regulations for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): SWIF221677 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The County had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement and Suspension and Debarment The County entered into an interlocal agreement with the City to procure services for a Sewer Lift Station Improvement/Line Extension to the New County Jail project. Per the agreement, the City would be responsible for all the procurement and suspension and debarment processes involved in the project, and the County would be responsible for the compliance with all grant funding for the project. On September 23, 2021, the County received notification that it was eligible to receive $1,900,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA) for a SWIF grant from SLFRF funds with the intention of using the funding for the Sewer project shared by the County and City. The notification stated that co-funding would be provided by the County and that the County could enter into the SWIF grant agreement with the IFA once the funding was secure. On February 24, 2022, the City's Common Council approved a bid with B & T Drainage for the project. On March 6, 2022, the County Council approved a $2,330,000 appropriation from its SLFRF funds for co-financing of the project and, on the same day, signed a grant agreement with the IFA for the SWIF grant funded with SLFRF funds totaling $2,300,000. The project was completed as of December 31, 2023. The County did not provide any of the following documentation requested to verify compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements for the SWIF funds spent on the project: Copy of the original contract for $3,965,507. Copy of any change orders. Copy of the Board minutes where the bid was awarded by the Common Council. Copy of the original bids made on the project. Copy of documentation that vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and lack of appropriate supporting documentation was isolated to the project noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (c) (1) The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, contractor selection of rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County participated in a joint project with the City in which the City handled the procurement process. As the County was ultimately responsible for compliance, copies of the quotes or bids obtained by the City should have been obtained by the County; however, this documentation was not obtained or provided for audit. In addition, documentation to demonstrate the City checked the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract should have been obtained by County. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure that the services obtained provided full and open competition or the basis of the price. In addition, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Noncompliance with the provisions of federal regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. We also recommended the County adhere to the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements and obtain required bids and verify that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Finally, we recommended the County obtain and retain appropriate documentation for all expenses paid with SLFRF funds. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Repeat Finding 2022-001 and 2021-001) Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Criteria: The Department of the Treasury’s Final Rule (Effective April 1, 2022) encouraged the use of internal Procurement Policies and Procedures when procuring products and/or services. The Department of the Treasury’s Compliance and Reporting Guidance report (Effective June 24, 2021 through April 30, 2025) required recipients (i.e., City of Evanston) to ensure any procurement using CSLFRF funds to be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 as applicable. Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Section 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies four methods of procurement to be followed, among the methods of procurement the below are three identified thresholds: (a) Informal – micro purchases (any amount up to $10,000) (b) Informal – small purchases ($10,000.01 to $249,999.99) (c) Formal – sealed bids ($250,000 and above) (d) Noncompetitive procurement B. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires the collection of three written quotes for any purchase between $2,500 and $25,000 purchased with federal grant funds, a formal bid process (Bid, RFP, RFQ) for any purchase $25,000 or above purchased with federal grant funds, and a justification memo for a sole source purchase for any amount above $2,500 purchased with federal grant funds. C. The City of Evanston Purchasing Manual requires that for purchases above $2,500 but less than $10,000, approval signature must be obtained from the Department Director. All purchases above $10,000 require approval signature from the City Manager. Purchases above $25,000 must also be approved by the City Council. D. Per Title 2 CFR section 180.300, participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. E. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: “The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.” Condition/Context: 1. We tested two purchase orders totaling $208,832.12. Our procedures revealed the following: a. Dated documentation that demonstrates suspension and debarment searches were performed prior to entering into a covered transaction were not retained in the respective procurement files. b. Documentation supporting multiple source solicitations was not available. Cause: 1. At the time these services were procured, the City of Evanston’s procurement policies requiring suspension and debarment checks were not implemented. 2. The City of Evanston’s procurement policies in relation to single source do not meet federal requirements. Effect: City of Evanston was not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 and the requirements outlined in the City of Evanston Purchasing Manual as it relates to purchases above $25,000. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that City of Evanston: a. Date or time stamp suspension and debarment searches when performed. b. Revise procurement policies to mirror federal guidelines and requirements in relation to single and sole source purchases. c. Communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. d. Ensure all departments are following applicable procedure in a uniform manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The purchases in question were made in the Equipment Replacement Fund where debarment searches are not required. ARPA funds were transferred to the Equipment Replacement Fund after the vehicles were delivered. We supplied the list of exclusions issued by the Office of Inspector General, which, from a compliance standpoint, demonstrates that the vendors are not suspended or debarred before entering a covered transaction. The list covers a one-month window and does not provide an exact date for when the list is retrieved from the Office of Inspector General website. When performing debarment searches in SAM.gov, if a vendor opts not to register or does not complete full registration process, the search results will display no matches, rendering it inconclusive to determine their standing. To prevent any potential deficiencies in control procedures, we intend to adopt the supplementary risk-based assessments proposed by the firm.
FINDING 2023-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): OMB Approval #1505-0271 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The County had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The County had one vendor that was identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeding the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold. The one vendor was selected for testing. For the one vendor, the County did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiring of the County to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements, the County stated procedures were not in place to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. One covered transaction paid with SLFRF grant funds was identified during the audit period. The covered transaction totaled $66,000 with $46,752 paid in the audit period. The identified transaction was examined to determine if the County verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendor prior to payment. Upon review, the County had not performed procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified, from participation in federal assistance programs or activities at any time during the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are de-barred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause The County participated in a joint project with the City of Rochester (City) in which the City handled the procurement process. However, the County did not request copies of the quotes or bids obtained by the city, nor did the County document a sole source vendor situation. In addition, the County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate they checked the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure that services obtained provided full and open competition or the basis of the price. In addition, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In addition, we recommended the County adhere to the procurement policies and obtain required quotes and bids or adequately document a sole source situation. Finally, we recommended that the County strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana State Department of Health Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context Procurement The Indiana State Department of Health created the Health Issues and Challenges Grant Program to provide funding to local and statewide service providers and planning organizations through the American Rescue Plan Act. The funds were to be used to prevent or reduce the prevalence of health issues or improve the health and behavioral health of Indiana residents. The City applied for and was awarded the Health Issues and Challenges grant in the amount of $447,112. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Four vendors fell within the small purchase threshold. Two of the four small purchases were selected for testing. For the two vendors tested, totaling $71,889, the City did not obtain price or rate quotes. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the City did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the rationale for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish documented procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In additions, we recommended the City adhere to the procurement policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.318(a) non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award. Condition: During our testing of vendor procurement compliance, we noted the entity had a procurement policy in line with the federal award’s specific procurement guidelines but not in line with standards of 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. In particular, the policy did not address methods of procurement based on micro-purchase, small purchase, and simplified acquisition purchase thresholds, circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement could be used, and procedures for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Cause: The auditee was not aware of the requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, and believed the contracting guidelines outlined for their specific award were sufficient. Effect: The auditee was not in compliance with procurement policies outlined in of 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. There was a lack of full and open competition and auditee did not ensure the vendors with which it planned to enter into a covered transaction were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs related to this finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt an updated procurement policy in line with 2 CFR 200 requirements and ensure all staff involved in the acquisition of property or services charged to federal grants are aware of relevant procurement requirements.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): ARP2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) awards funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expended to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The Town's policies related to the SLFRF suspension and debarment requirement did not include checking the EPLS for vendor suspension and debarment. Three covered transactions were identified. All three covered transactions were selected for testing. The three covered transactions, totaling $1,836,413, did not include the appropriate provisions in the contracts, nor did the Town require a certification or check the EPLS to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. Additionally, the Town did not have a formalized procurement policy outlining its processes and procedures with regards to the procurement of goods and services using federal grant funds. The policy must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 and should address ensuring vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions if the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period and enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 TOWN OF WHITESTOWN SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the Town was not properly implemented to ensure that the policies and procedures in place related to suspension and debarment were appropriately followed. The Town did not verify that the entities were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the covered transactions. In addition, management of the Town had not established a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures, for the procurement of goods or services with federal funds. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Town could not ensure the vendors paid with federal funds were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the Town used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. In addition, procurements of goods or services could have been noncompliant. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 TOWN OF WHITESTOWN SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended the Town strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. We also recommended the Town adopt a formal procurement policy for the purchase of goods or services with federal funds that complies with the procurement standards outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2023-001 - Procurement (Compliance) Repeat of Prior Audit Finding 2022-003 ALN No.: 93.829 - Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services Award Year: January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023 Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Pass Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria: Under 2 CFR Part 200.318(a) of the Uniform Guidance the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition/Context: South Shore’s documented procurement procedures are not fully in accordance with Uniform guidance standards. Cause: South Shore did implement a documented procurement policy as a result of finding 2022-003 in the prior year. The policy was not fully compliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: South Shore has not complied with the specific requirements for procurement as described in the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: South Shore should further develop a documented procurement policy that is fully in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the recommendation and plans to improve upon the formal procurement policy.
Finding 2023–003: Procurement Federal Department: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agencies: Cook County, Illinois and Women's Business Development Center COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Criteria 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post-Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management Section 200.318, General procurement standards (a) states “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Section 200.317 through 200.327.” Section 200.318 (i) states “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Also, Section 200.327 Contract provisions states that the non-Federal entity's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200 – Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Award. SDA’s Fiscal Policies and Procedures Manual updated July 21, 2022 (“the Manual”) states “Procurement shall be made using one of the following methods: 1) Micro and Small Purchase Threshold; 2) Competitive Sealed Bids and Competitive Negotiations; and 3) Non-Competitive Negotiations. All methods of procurement, when funded by federal grants or contracts, must follow procurement requirements contained in the OMB, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for federal awards. Any purchases over $10,000 must bid competitively if subject to a single federal audit.” In addition, the Manual states “purchases related to Federally funded grants over $10,000 will be bid through either a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process. In addition, Request for Information (RFI) process may be used to help inform the development of either RFP, RFQ or other forms of procurement. Awards will be awarded to responses that meet the outlined criteria and reflect the lowest responsible bid. Contractors will be excluded from conducting business with SDA if the contractor has been debarred and/or suspended from conducting business with the federal government. On a regular basis, SDA will check vendors for any debarment status change on the federal System for Award Management (SAM). All source documents supporting any given transaction (e.g., receipts, invoices, and RFP data) will be retained and filed with SDA contract files in a centralized location. At a minimum, source document data must be sufficient to establish the basis for selection, the basis for the cost (including the reasonableness of cost), the rationale for the method of procurement and selection of contract type, and the basis for payment.” Condition During the current audit period, SDA did not adequately ensure federally funded contracts issued to vendors/contractors followed federal regulations and its internal policy, which includes maintaining documents to support its procurement decisions. Cause Based on our discussions with management, SDA completed a formal RFQ process for all vendors selected but did not maintain adequate documentation of the decision-making process. Effect The failure to maintain adequate documentation to support the procurement of federally funded contracts is a violation of federal regulations. Questioned Costs None. Context During our tests of procurement, we noted a total of four federally funded contracts were awarded by SDA during fiscal year 2023 (based on SDA’s procurement policy that required contracts with expenditures over the $10,000 threshold requiring competitive bid). We selected all four contracts for testing and noted the following: For all four contracts, we noted no evidence that debarment/suspension verification checks were performed prior to awarding the contract. For two contracts, we noted no evidence (justification memo) to support the basis for contractor selection (based on evaluation criteria and scoring outlined in the RFQs). We noted that while the contract agreement includes language that the contractor shall comply with all appliable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, state and local government. To avoid any confusion on the part of the contractors regarding federal compliance, a direct reference to 2 CFR Part 200 Appendix II should be included in the contract. Identification of Repeated Findings Repeated (Prior Finding No. 2022-003). Recommendation We recommend that SDA’s management adhere to its written policy and maintain documentation, including its justification memo to support all management decisions related to federally funded procurements to comply with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action SDA agrees with the finding and recommendation. See SDA’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 40 – 44.
Finding 2023–003: Procurement Federal Department: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agencies: Cook County, Illinois and Women's Business Development Center COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Criteria 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post-Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management Section 200.318, General procurement standards (a) states “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Section 200.317 through 200.327.” Section 200.318 (i) states “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Also, Section 200.327 Contract provisions states that the non-Federal entity's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200 – Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Award. SDA’s Fiscal Policies and Procedures Manual updated July 21, 2022 (“the Manual”) states “Procurement shall be made using one of the following methods: 1) Micro and Small Purchase Threshold; 2) Competitive Sealed Bids and Competitive Negotiations; and 3) Non-Competitive Negotiations. All methods of procurement, when funded by federal grants or contracts, must follow procurement requirements contained in the OMB, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for federal awards. Any purchases over $10,000 must bid competitively if subject to a single federal audit.” In addition, the Manual states “purchases related to Federally funded grants over $10,000 will be bid through either a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process. In addition, Request for Information (RFI) process may be used to help inform the development of either RFP, RFQ or other forms of procurement. Awards will be awarded to responses that meet the outlined criteria and reflect the lowest responsible bid. Contractors will be excluded from conducting business with SDA if the contractor has been debarred and/or suspended from conducting business with the federal government. On a regular basis, SDA will check vendors for any debarment status change on the federal System for Award Management (SAM). All source documents supporting any given transaction (e.g., receipts, invoices, and RFP data) will be retained and filed with SDA contract files in a centralized location. At a minimum, source document data must be sufficient to establish the basis for selection, the basis for the cost (including the reasonableness of cost), the rationale for the method of procurement and selection of contract type, and the basis for payment.” Condition During the current audit period, SDA did not adequately ensure federally funded contracts issued to vendors/contractors followed federal regulations and its internal policy, which includes maintaining documents to support its procurement decisions. Cause Based on our discussions with management, SDA completed a formal RFQ process for all vendors selected but did not maintain adequate documentation of the decision-making process. Effect The failure to maintain adequate documentation to support the procurement of federally funded contracts is a violation of federal regulations. Questioned Costs None. Context During our tests of procurement, we noted a total of four federally funded contracts were awarded by SDA during fiscal year 2023 (based on SDA’s procurement policy that required contracts with expenditures over the $10,000 threshold requiring competitive bid). We selected all four contracts for testing and noted the following: For all four contracts, we noted no evidence that debarment/suspension verification checks were performed prior to awarding the contract. For two contracts, we noted no evidence (justification memo) to support the basis for contractor selection (based on evaluation criteria and scoring outlined in the RFQs). We noted that while the contract agreement includes language that the contractor shall comply with all appliable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, state and local government. To avoid any confusion on the part of the contractors regarding federal compliance, a direct reference to 2 CFR Part 200 Appendix II should be included in the contract. Identification of Repeated Findings Repeated (Prior Finding No. 2022-003). Recommendation We recommend that SDA’s management adhere to its written policy and maintain documentation, including its justification memo to support all management decisions related to federally funded procurements to comply with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action SDA agrees with the finding and recommendation. See SDA’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 40 – 44.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Finding 2023-003 (Continued) (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for projects exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • Written standards for solicitations requiring a formal bid process • Written standards to rationalize limited competition purchases • Written standards to maintain historical documentation of the procurement process Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The City entered into three contracts funded by the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) grant during the audit period. Two of those contracts were selected for testing and the City was unable to provide any procurement history. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verified the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. There were $237,044 in expenditures incurred on the contracts tested in the current fiscal year. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listing Number: 10.760 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The Town contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for projects exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 nor did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was no available history of the procurement process. Cause: The Town’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the Town does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The Town’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • Written standards for solicitations requiring a formal bid process • Written standards to rationalize limited competition purchases • Written standards to maintain historical documentation of the procurement process Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Town at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The Town entered into three contracts funded by the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities (WWTP) grant during the audit period. Two of those contracts were selected for testing. For one of those contracts selected for testing, the Town was unable to provide any procurement history. There were $459,737 in expenditures incurred on the contract tested with exceptions in the current fiscal year. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 65851, CY2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for a project exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • No formal written or documented City policy or ordinance regarding the City’s procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the procurement contract testing, the City was unable to provide any procurement history for a selected vendor contract funded through the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds grant. The City had entered into the vendor contract based on previous experience with the vendor. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verify the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Identification as a repeat finding: See Finding 2022-001 Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 65851, CY2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for a project exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • No formal written or documented City policy or ordinance regarding the City’s procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the procurement contract testing, the City was unable to provide any procurement history for a selected vendor contract funded through the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds grant. The City had entered into the vendor contract based on previous experience with the vendor. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verify the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Identification as a repeat finding: See Finding 2022-001 Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-004: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Both Major Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: FCE did not have a documented procurement policy until January 2024. In addition, for all disbursements tested, FCE did not verify, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. However, FCE provided documentation of the verification that occurred after the payments had been made and no exclusion issues were noted with the vendors. Cause: Prior to the implementation of a formal procurement policy in January 2024, FCE did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. However, FCE performed a search after the payments had been made. In this way, FCE was able to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded.Effect or Potential Effect: FCE was not in compliance with the procurement policy and documentation requirements of the Uniform Guidance until January 2024. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding: See Findings 2022-002 and 2022-003. Recommendation: FCE established internal controls in January 2024 to ensure proper documentation is maintained as evidence to support that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Finding 2023-004: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Both Major Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: FCE did not have a documented procurement policy until January 2024. In addition, for all disbursements tested, FCE did not verify, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. However, FCE provided documentation of the verification that occurred after the payments had been made and no exclusion issues were noted with the vendors. Cause: Prior to the implementation of a formal procurement policy in January 2024, FCE did not require that evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. However, FCE performed a search after the payments had been made. In this way, FCE was able to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded.Effect or Potential Effect: FCE was not in compliance with the procurement policy and documentation requirements of the Uniform Guidance until January 2024. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding: See Findings 2022-002 and 2022-003. Recommendation: FCE established internal controls in January 2024 to ensure proper documentation is maintained as evidence to support that it performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Arizona, the Office of the Governor Pass-Through Number(s): GR-ARPA-HHF-030122-01 and GR-ARPA-090121-01 Award Period: January 1, 2022 – November 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Condition/Context: The Organization did not maintain a formalized and written procurement policy. Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with the Compliance Supplement, Part 6 – Internal Control, 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318 (a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Questioned costs: None Cause: The Organization did not have formal documented procurement policies in place. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the Compliance Supplement and the Code of Federal Regulations related to procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt a formal and written procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the audit condition.
Federal Program Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (AL 21.029) Procurement Suspended and Debarred Parties Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association does not have a written procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Cause Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association does not have a written procurement policy that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Questioned Costs None Context Per inquiry with Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association management, they do not have a procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement compliance requirements. This could result in Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association not following state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Recommend for Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (AL 21.029) Procurement Suspended and Debarred Parties Significant Deficiency Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association does not have a written procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Cause Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association does not have a written procurement policy that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Questioned Costs None Context Per inquiry with Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association management, they do not have a procurement policy in place that adheres to Federal minimum standards. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement compliance requirements. This could result in Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association not following state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Recommend for Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association agrees with the recommendation.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.317 which also requires documentation to be retained to detail the history of procurements. Condition: The organization has not adopted a procurement policy containing required provisions in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. For each of the 5 vendors selected for testing there was no documentation retained to support the rationale for the method of procurement. Additionally, the Organization did not consider whether the vendor was suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government prior to entering the covered transaction for each of the 5 vendors selected for testing. Cause: The Organization has not adopted a procurement policy resulting in the lack of established internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: Without a written procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, demonstrating that the program complies with laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements is difficult. Questioned Costs: None reported based on assessment of comparative pricing readily available. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 5 vendors out of 15 vendors were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327 and adopt a procurement policy containing all required provisions including provisions to check for suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Lack of Formally Adopted Procurement Policy 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance) (Section I – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment) Condition: The Organization does not have a documented procurement policy in place. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement, Section I, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in Title 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327. Cause: The Organization obtained their first federal funding as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Organization did not have a documented procurement policy in place to meet the criteria required under Uniform Guidance. As a result, even though expenditures over $15,000 require additional approvals, no documented policy was in place during 2023. Effect: Lack of a documented procurement policy could result in inappropriate vendor preferences or conflicts of interest. Recommendation: We recommend a formal written procurement policy be implemented that complies with Uniform Guidance. Management’s Response: See accompanying management’s corrective action plan.
Mental and Behavioral Health Education and Training Grants Federal Assistance Listing No. 93.732 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (2 CFR 200.317 – 200.327; 2 CFR 180.220) Condition – The District is required to follow their own documented procurement procedures which conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs – $76,751 Context – Out of a population of nine contracts directly charged to the grant that were above the micro-purchase threshold, 2 contracts were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not and was not meant to be statistically valid. The District did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for one of the vendors selected for testing. Effect – The District did not provide for full and open competition in procuring services with grant funds. Cause – The District had previously been using the vendor and added services to meet the requirements of the grant, and the District did not follow procurement procedures and policies upon charging the services to the grant. Identification as a repeat finding – N/A Recommendation – Contracts directly charged to a federal award should be reviewed to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Responsible Official: Aaron Davis, VP & Chief Experience Officer Planned Corrective Actions: The contract in question was for a vendor (Healthsource Solutions) already under contract with Lubbock County Hospital District dba University Medical Center prior to the grant application. The vendor in question had been used since at least 2010, with the most recent contract for the current wellness portal (Wellness +) beginning in 2017. Because of the success of the wellness portal and established relationship with the vendor, University Medical Center included expansion of existing platforms and additional services provided by Healthsource Solutions as a large component of the Methodology/Approach in the proposed activities of the grant narrative submitted. Use of this vendor and its applications were specifically outlined in the grant project narrative and a critical component of meeting grant objectives. University Medical Center follows the Lubbock County Purchasing Guidelines, which conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. University Medical Center has reviewed the specified requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Guidance for procurement standards, specifically related to noncompetitive procurement and concurs that formal procurement methods were not used for expansion of new services with this existing vendor or adequate documentation was provided for noncompetitive procurement. In order to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance, the University Medical Center will provide training to existing grant Program Managers on Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Additionally, if a new grant is being pursued the grant committee should receive training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards before completing grant applications. On existing or future grants, any potential contracts or purchases over $75,000 should be reviewed by the grant Program Manager (or Grant Committee lead if a Program Manager has yet been assigned) to ensure all procurement guidelines are followed and sufficient documentation is obtained prior to purchase or contract execution. The corrective actions will be immediately implemented at the District.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County received a total COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $73,674,384 and chose to calculate its own revenue loss allowance, which totaled $35,932,557, to use for government services. Some SLFRF program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. Additional program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the other eligible use categories. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For funds expended under the revenue loss eligible use category, the above listed procurement requirements do not apply. During the audit period, the County had four vendors with purchases over the $10,000 micropurchase threshold which were expended under an eligible use category other than revenue loss and, as such, were considered small purchase procurements. The County did not provide competitive price quotations for the small purchase procurements for three of the four vendors, which totaled $257,038. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During the engagement, an employee of the Board of County Commissioners stated that verification was completed by checking the Excluded Parties List System when covered transactions were entered into by the County to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Six covered transactions, totaling $3,952,203, were paid from SLFRF funds to six different vendors for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period. Three of the six covered transactions were selected for testing. For all three transactions tested, documentation was not provided that the vendor's suspension and debarment status was verified. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. In addition, the County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had checked the Excluded Parties List System, per the County's procedures, to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions that exceeded $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot demonstrate it obtained an adequate number of price or rate quotations prior to selecting a vendor. Therefore, the County could have overpaid for the services obtained. Furthermore, without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for small purchase procurements. Additionally, we recommended policies and procedures be strengthened to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained. Lastly, we recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.