2023-005 – Procurement, Suspension & Debarment – Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.031 Federal Program Name: Higher Education Institutional Aid Federal Award Number: P031S210057, P031S170020, P031C210038 Award Year: 2022-23, 2021-22 Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Federal Program Name: Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) Institutional Portion, Federal Award Number: P425F201298 Award Year: 2022-23 Criteria – Non-federal entities, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided the policies and procedures conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition/context – A sample of 4 expenditures greater than the micropurchase threshold of $10,000 but less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000 were selected from the 20 transactions that exceeded the micropurchase threshold of $10,000. For all four of the expenditures the University did not obtain the required rate quotations; per the University’s documented policy two quotes should have been obtained or have documentation supporting their conclusion to sole source the purchases. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Questioned costs – None. Cause/effect – The personnel completing purchases on behalf of the University were unaware of the internal procurement policies that are in conformance with federal statutes and 2 CFR Part 200. The lack of obtaining the required rate quotations increases the risk that the price paid was not competitive when compared to the market and that the transaction may not have been in a manner providing full and open competition. The lack of a documented standard of conduct that covers conflict of interest increases the risk that an actual or perceived conflict could occur. Repeat finding – Yes, 2022-006 Recommendation – We recommend the University implement controls to ensure all employees making federal purchases on behalf of the University are aware of the University’s documented procurement policy that is in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. In addition, we recommend the University document its standard of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The University puts measures in place to guarantee that every employee who makes federal purchases on the University's behalf is aware of the documented procurement policy that complies with 2 CFR Part 200. The University will formalize its code of conduct, which addresses conflicts of interest and sets performance standards for staff members who choose, award, and manage contracts.
2023-005 – Procurement, Suspension & Debarment – Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.031 Federal Program Name: Higher Education Institutional Aid Federal Award Number: P031S210057, P031S170020, P031C210038 Award Year: 2022-23, 2021-22 Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.425E, 84.425F Federal Program Name: Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) Institutional Portion, Federal Award Number: P425F201298 Award Year: 2022-23 Criteria – Non-federal entities, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided the policies and procedures conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition/context – A sample of 4 expenditures greater than the micropurchase threshold of $10,000 but less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000 were selected from the 20 transactions that exceeded the micropurchase threshold of $10,000. For all four of the expenditures the University did not obtain the required rate quotations; per the University’s documented policy two quotes should have been obtained or have documentation supporting their conclusion to sole source the purchases. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Questioned costs – None. Cause/effect – The personnel completing purchases on behalf of the University were unaware of the internal procurement policies that are in conformance with federal statutes and 2 CFR Part 200. The lack of obtaining the required rate quotations increases the risk that the price paid was not competitive when compared to the market and that the transaction may not have been in a manner providing full and open competition. The lack of a documented standard of conduct that covers conflict of interest increases the risk that an actual or perceived conflict could occur. Repeat finding – Yes, 2022-006 Recommendation – We recommend the University implement controls to ensure all employees making federal purchases on behalf of the University are aware of the University’s documented procurement policy that is in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. In addition, we recommend the University document its standard of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The University puts measures in place to guarantee that every employee who makes federal purchases on the University's behalf is aware of the documented procurement policy that complies with 2 CFR Part 200. The University will formalize its code of conduct, which addresses conflicts of interest and sets performance standards for staff members who choose, award, and manage contracts.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10555 Federal Award Program Year: July 1, 2022 – July 30, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 07-84-09-001 Type of Finding: Other matter Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Condition: The School’s policy governing procurement requirements for the purchase of goods or services when the aggregate dollar amount is greater than $10,000 but less than $100,000 was not followed. Questionable Costs: None reportable Context: Two vendors with purchases over $10,000 and under $100,000 were selected for testing and no price/rate quotes were obtained for one of the vendors. Effect: Purchases of goods or services were made that may not have been obtained in the most effective manner or in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The School did not adequately monitor purchases from its vendors to ensure compliance with it policies. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: All purchases should be monitored by the purchasing and grant management departments to ensure that the purchases are in compliance with the School’s procurement policies.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10555 Federal Award Program Year: July 1, 2022 – July 30, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 07-84-09-001 Type of Finding: Other matter Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Condition: The School’s policy governing procurement requirements for the purchase of goods or services when the aggregate dollar amount is greater than $10,000 but less than $100,000 was not followed. Questionable Costs: None reportable Context: Two vendors with purchases over $10,000 and under $100,000 were selected for testing and no price/rate quotes were obtained for one of the vendors. Effect: Purchases of goods or services were made that may not have been obtained in the most effective manner or in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The School did not adequately monitor purchases from its vendors to ensure compliance with it policies. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: All purchases should be monitored by the purchasing and grant management departments to ensure that the purchases are in compliance with the School’s procurement policies.
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Grantor: Pennsylvania Department of Education Program: Early Intervention (Philadelphia), Early Intervention (Chester) Assistance Listing #: 84.027, 84.173 Title: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Audit Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Passthrough Numbers: 232-210026, 231-210026, 232-210035, 231-210035 Criteria or Specific Requirement - Procurement guidance is located in sections 2 CFR 200.317-200.326 of Uniform Guidance focusing on increased competition and transparency in the procurement process. There are five general procurement standards covering the purchase of property, supplies and services under the Uniform Guidance as follows: (a) Costs must be reasonable and necessary, (b) must provide for full and open competition, (c) an organization must maintain written standards of conduct covering internal and external conflicts of interest, and (d) the organization must maintain documentation addressing cost and price analysis and vendor selections where applicable based on the method of procurement used. The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement: (a) micro-purchases, (b) small purchases, (c) sealed bids, (d) competitive proposals or (e) sole source. Condition - We noted for all of the eight procurements sampled, Elwyn did not provide a contemporaneously documented written conclusion on the method of each procurement that either demonstrated the procurements were conducted in a manner that provided full and open competition, or documented why noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Elwyn provided their rationale for each of the procurements as part of the audit sample and testing process. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to sufficiently document rationale and to ensure that procurement method selected was supported. Effect or Potential Effect - Written documentation insufficiently detailing the method and conclusions involved in procurement decisions, impacts the ability to demonstrate that full and open competition occurred, or that noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Questioned Costs - None Context - We tested a sample of eight procurement transactions and noted that the Organization did not maintain contemporaneously written documentation and conclusions as required by its procurement policy for the selected items. Repeat Finding - No Recommendation - We recommend Elwyn enforce its existing policy and procedures to ensure compliance with procurement requirements. Elwyn should provide targeted training to members of the Organization involved in procurement processes on its existing policy and procedures to ensure understanding of the Organization’s requirements for documentation of procurement methods. Additionally, Elwyn should ensure all procurement decisions are contemporaneously documented with the information necessary to conclude on appropriateness of the procurement with respect to the procurement policy and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - Management agrees with the finding and recommendation set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the lapses in internal control.
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Grantor: Pennsylvania Department of Education Program: Early Intervention (Philadelphia), Early Intervention (Chester) Assistance Listing #: 84.027, 84.173 Title: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Audit Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Passthrough Numbers: 232-210026, 231-210026, 232-210035, 231-210035 Criteria or Specific Requirement - Procurement guidance is located in sections 2 CFR 200.317-200.326 of Uniform Guidance focusing on increased competition and transparency in the procurement process. There are five general procurement standards covering the purchase of property, supplies and services under the Uniform Guidance as follows: (a) Costs must be reasonable and necessary, (b) must provide for full and open competition, (c) an organization must maintain written standards of conduct covering internal and external conflicts of interest, and (d) the organization must maintain documentation addressing cost and price analysis and vendor selections where applicable based on the method of procurement used. The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement: (a) micro-purchases, (b) small purchases, (c) sealed bids, (d) competitive proposals or (e) sole source. Condition - We noted for all of the eight procurements sampled, Elwyn did not provide a contemporaneously documented written conclusion on the method of each procurement that either demonstrated the procurements were conducted in a manner that provided full and open competition, or documented why noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Elwyn provided their rationale for each of the procurements as part of the audit sample and testing process. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to sufficiently document rationale and to ensure that procurement method selected was supported. Effect or Potential Effect - Written documentation insufficiently detailing the method and conclusions involved in procurement decisions, impacts the ability to demonstrate that full and open competition occurred, or that noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Questioned Costs - None Context - We tested a sample of eight procurement transactions and noted that the Organization did not maintain contemporaneously written documentation and conclusions as required by its procurement policy for the selected items. Repeat Finding - No Recommendation - We recommend Elwyn enforce its existing policy and procedures to ensure compliance with procurement requirements. Elwyn should provide targeted training to members of the Organization involved in procurement processes on its existing policy and procedures to ensure understanding of the Organization’s requirements for documentation of procurement methods. Additionally, Elwyn should ensure all procurement decisions are contemporaneously documented with the information necessary to conclude on appropriateness of the procurement with respect to the procurement policy and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - Management agrees with the finding and recommendation set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the lapses in internal control.
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Grantor: Pennsylvania Department of Education Program: Early Intervention (Philadelphia), Early Intervention (Chester) Assistance Listing #: 84.027, 84.173 Title: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Audit Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Passthrough Numbers: 232-210026, 231-210026, 232-210035, 231-210035 Criteria or Specific Requirement - Procurement guidance is located in sections 2 CFR 200.317-200.326 of Uniform Guidance focusing on increased competition and transparency in the procurement process. There are five general procurement standards covering the purchase of property, supplies and services under the Uniform Guidance as follows: (a) Costs must be reasonable and necessary, (b) must provide for full and open competition, (c) an organization must maintain written standards of conduct covering internal and external conflicts of interest, and (d) the organization must maintain documentation addressing cost and price analysis and vendor selections where applicable based on the method of procurement used. The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement: (a) micro-purchases, (b) small purchases, (c) sealed bids, (d) competitive proposals or (e) sole source. Condition - We noted for all of the eight procurements sampled, Elwyn did not provide a contemporaneously documented written conclusion on the method of each procurement that either demonstrated the procurements were conducted in a manner that provided full and open competition, or documented why noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Elwyn provided their rationale for each of the procurements as part of the audit sample and testing process. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to sufficiently document rationale and to ensure that procurement method selected was supported. Effect or Potential Effect - Written documentation insufficiently detailing the method and conclusions involved in procurement decisions, impacts the ability to demonstrate that full and open competition occurred, or that noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Questioned Costs - None Context - We tested a sample of eight procurement transactions and noted that the Organization did not maintain contemporaneously written documentation and conclusions as required by its procurement policy for the selected items. Repeat Finding - No Recommendation - We recommend Elwyn enforce its existing policy and procedures to ensure compliance with procurement requirements. Elwyn should provide targeted training to members of the Organization involved in procurement processes on its existing policy and procedures to ensure understanding of the Organization’s requirements for documentation of procurement methods. Additionally, Elwyn should ensure all procurement decisions are contemporaneously documented with the information necessary to conclude on appropriateness of the procurement with respect to the procurement policy and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - Management agrees with the finding and recommendation set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the lapses in internal control.
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Grantor: Pennsylvania Department of Education Program: Early Intervention (Philadelphia), Early Intervention (Chester) Assistance Listing #: 84.027, 84.173 Title: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Audit Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Passthrough Numbers: 232-210026, 231-210026, 232-210035, 231-210035 Criteria or Specific Requirement - Procurement guidance is located in sections 2 CFR 200.317-200.326 of Uniform Guidance focusing on increased competition and transparency in the procurement process. There are five general procurement standards covering the purchase of property, supplies and services under the Uniform Guidance as follows: (a) Costs must be reasonable and necessary, (b) must provide for full and open competition, (c) an organization must maintain written standards of conduct covering internal and external conflicts of interest, and (d) the organization must maintain documentation addressing cost and price analysis and vendor selections where applicable based on the method of procurement used. The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement: (a) micro-purchases, (b) small purchases, (c) sealed bids, (d) competitive proposals or (e) sole source. Condition - We noted for all of the eight procurements sampled, Elwyn did not provide a contemporaneously documented written conclusion on the method of each procurement that either demonstrated the procurements were conducted in a manner that provided full and open competition, or documented why noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Elwyn provided their rationale for each of the procurements as part of the audit sample and testing process. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to sufficiently document rationale and to ensure that procurement method selected was supported. Effect or Potential Effect - Written documentation insufficiently detailing the method and conclusions involved in procurement decisions, impacts the ability to demonstrate that full and open competition occurred, or that noncompetitive procurement was appropriate. Questioned Costs - None Context - We tested a sample of eight procurement transactions and noted that the Organization did not maintain contemporaneously written documentation and conclusions as required by its procurement policy for the selected items. Repeat Finding - No Recommendation - We recommend Elwyn enforce its existing policy and procedures to ensure compliance with procurement requirements. Elwyn should provide targeted training to members of the Organization involved in procurement processes on its existing policy and procedures to ensure understanding of the Organization’s requirements for documentation of procurement methods. Additionally, Elwyn should ensure all procurement decisions are contemporaneously documented with the information necessary to conclude on appropriateness of the procurement with respect to the procurement policy and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - Management agrees with the finding and recommendation set forth within and has developed a corrective action plan to address the lapses in internal control.
Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Award Information: Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Assistance Listing Number: 20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program. Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as sub-recipients of states, must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes meeting the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors and maintaining records to document history of procurements. This also includes conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319 including the use of micro-purchases and small purchase methods for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR section 200.320. Condition The District does not have documented procurement procedures in accordance with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause Previous management did not implement and previous District policies did not include documentation of procurement procedures in accordance with federal standards. New management is in place and have commenced an ongoing project to summarize accounting related activities into an accounting procedures manual, this includes the required procurement procedures. Effect The District does not have documented procurement procedures as required by federal standards. Not having the required procurement procedures in place could lead to awarding contracts and making purchases without adequate competition. Questioned Costs No questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District formally document a procurement policy in accordance with federal standards to include all general requirements such as oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, maintaining records to document history of procurements and conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. Management Response and Planned Corrective Action Following these findings are management’s view and corrective action plan.
Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Award Information: Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Assistance Listing Number: 20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program. Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as sub-recipients of states, must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes meeting the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors and maintaining records to document history of procurements. This also includes conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319 including the use of micro-purchases and small purchase methods for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR section 200.320. Condition The District does not have documented procurement procedures in accordance with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause Previous management did not implement and previous District policies did not include documentation of procurement procedures in accordance with federal standards. New management is in place and have commenced an ongoing project to summarize accounting related activities into an accounting procedures manual, this includes the required procurement procedures. Effect The District does not have documented procurement procedures as required by federal standards. Not having the required procurement procedures in place could lead to awarding contracts and making purchases without adequate competition. Questioned Costs No questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District formally document a procurement policy in accordance with federal standards to include all general requirements such as oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, maintaining records to document history of procurements and conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. Management Response and Planned Corrective Action Following these findings are management’s view and corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
2023-001 – Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Criteria: One of the more significant provisions of the Uniform Guidance that affects the Town is the procurement standards under 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Under the procurement standards, the Town is required to have a documented purchasing policy, which at a minimum, incorporates the provisions of the Uniform Guidance. Statement of Condition: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revised regulations applicable to federally funded programs. The regulations are contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Uniform Guidance replaced OMB Circulars A-133, A-87, and A-110 and incorporates requirements for grant recipients. The Uniform Guidance includes not only protocols for program management and administration, but also updates compliance regulations for federal awards. Cause: The Town had not adopted a procurement policy that covered all aspects required by the Uniform Guidance. However, during our testing of procurement over federal expenditures, we did not notate any violations of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Items required by the Uniform Guidance procurement standards were not addressed in the policy followed by the Town during the fiscal year. Recommendation: We recommend that management review the applicable provisions of the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and update the Town’s procurement policy appropriately. This would include adding any missing components to the Town’s current procurement policy and updating definitions of types of procurement, i.e. micro-purchases, small purchases, and small acquisition threshold, to match the language used in the Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Department of Education, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the District did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with contracting and awarding contracts to lower tier entities. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – Overall procurement policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes, prior year finding 2022-004 Recommendation – We recommend that management establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the District did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with contracting and awarding contracts to lower tier entities. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – Overall procurement policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes, prior year finding 2022-004 Recommendation – We recommend that management establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the District did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with contracting and awarding contracts to lower tier entities. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – Overall procurement policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes, prior year finding 2022-004 Recommendation – We recommend that management establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the District did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with contracting and awarding contracts to lower tier entities. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – Overall procurement policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes, prior year finding 2022-004 Recommendation – We recommend that management establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Title: USDA School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program FAL Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Passthrough: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Year: 2023 Criteria: §200.213 Suspension and debarment. Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, sub awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. §200.317 Procurements by states. When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a state must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The state will comply with §200.322 Procurement of recovered materials and ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes any clauses required by section §200.326 Contract provisions. All other non-Federal entities, including sub recipients of a state, will follow §§200.318 General procurement standards through 200.326 Contract provisions. §200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. APPENDIX II TO PART 200—CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR NON-FEDERAL ENTITY CONTRACTS UNDER FEDERAL AWARDS In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the government-wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Condition: During our testing of single audit disbursements, we identified a vendor which would meet the requirement of verifying that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from receiving the contract which was funded through Federal dollars. The vendor received more than $25,000 in payments from the District from Federal grant sources. The vendor is not currently suspended or debarred from receiving Federal contracts; however, the District did not have proper internal controls in place to verify this prior to the purchase. The District did make improvement in this area for all new work during the year. However, these projects were completed in the year under audit before the District became aware of the requirements above and could not retroactively cure the errors. Cause: District personnel did not verify that vendors which meet the $25,000 thresholds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in contracts funded through Federal awards due to a misunderstanding of staff personnel regarding this requirement. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal regulations related to the grant and could put funding in jeopardy or require the District to reimburse the program for improper grant distributions. Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend the District establish a policy and implement procedures regarding large purchases related to Federal grants to insure that no vendors who are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in transactions funded through Federal grants are used. As identified above, there are several methods in which the District can verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. The District may have the vendor provide an annual certification that it is not currently suspended, debarred, or otherwise prevented from receiving Federal dollars. In other occasions in which a single purchase is going to be made, the purchasing procedures should include looking up the vendor on the GSA website, printing a copy of the verification, and placing it in the file with the purchase order. The District has options, and it should establish what method is the least intrusive but also effective in complying with the requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Responsible Official’s Plan: Specific corrective action plan for finding: The Grants Finance Department, Federal Grants Department, Operations Department along with the Purchasing Department will review Vendors that are issued requisitions at each approval level to assist in catching $25K or more for Suspension and Debarment. A printed document from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility for Requisitions over $25K will be attached. Infinite Visions is set up to alert originators entering requisitions over $25,000 to contact Purchasing or Grants Department to check the vendor in SAM.GOV to confirm the vendor is vetted to comply with federal regulations. At the initial setup of new vendors, the Purchasing Department will review vendors in SAM.GOV. A printed document from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility of vendor will be attached to the vendor file. Timeline for completion of corrective action plan: The process was implemented immediately upon awareness of the finding and we are hopeful that all issues have been resolved by FY24. Employee position(s) responsible for meeting the timeline: Grants Specialists, CPO, Finance Specialists, Purchasing Specialist, Federal Grants Coordinator, Federal Grants Specialist
2023-001 Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 22GOV0019AA, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Town of East Hartford, State of Connecticut Office of Workforce Strategy Pass-Through Number: SLFRP0128 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy of the Organization does not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy of the Organization and noted that the policy does not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding
2023-001 Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 22GOV0019AA, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Town of East Hartford, State of Connecticut Office of Workforce Strategy Pass-Through Number: SLFRP0128 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy of the Organization does not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy of the Organization and noted that the policy does not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN - ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND - AL NUMBER 84.425U PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 4203 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 2023-001. Equipment and Real Property Management / Special Tests and Provisions Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): 29 CFR 5.5 (Wage Rate Requirements) requires all contractors and subcontractors performing construction contracts in excess of $2,000, financed by federal assistance funds, to pay laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or subcontractor not less than the prevailing wage rates established by the Department of Labor for the locality of the project. Non-federal entities shall include in the applicable construction contracts a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements. Such requirements include the submission of weekly certified payrolls for each week in which any contract work is performed, to the non-federal entities. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.326 and Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503 require a non-federal entity to obtain a performance bond for the public construction contract. Condition: The District paid two contractors $153,001 and $248,750 from the Education Stabilization Fund for two roofing projects without obtaining contracts that included the prevailing wage rate provision, and weekly certified payrolls were not submitted to the District. Additionally, the District did not obtain performance bonds for the two roofing projects, as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503. Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight. Effect: The District did not comply with Wage Rate Requirements or Bonding Requirements. Context: The District had two construction contracts for facility repairs and improvements paid from the Education Stabilization Fund. Examined both contracts for compliance. Recommendation: The District should ensure that all applicable construction contracts contain the Wage Rate Requirements provision, obtain weekly certified payrolls from the contractor or subcontractor, and obtain performance bonds. The District should also contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for further directives regarding this matter. Views of responsible officials: The District will ensure contracts are obtained and all applicable construction contracts contain the required notification regarding compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act. We will make sure to get copies of the weekly certified payrolls for applicable projects. We will be in contact with DESE for guidance and implementation of program controls over program expenditures by June 30, 2024.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN - ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND - AL NUMBER 84.425U PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 4203 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 2023-001. Equipment and Real Property Management / Special Tests and Provisions Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): 29 CFR 5.5 (Wage Rate Requirements) requires all contractors and subcontractors performing construction contracts in excess of $2,000, financed by federal assistance funds, to pay laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or subcontractor not less than the prevailing wage rates established by the Department of Labor for the locality of the project. Non-federal entities shall include in the applicable construction contracts a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements. Such requirements include the submission of weekly certified payrolls for each week in which any contract work is performed, to the non-federal entities. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.326 and Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503 require a non-federal entity to obtain a performance bond for the public construction contract. Condition: The District paid two contractors $153,001 and $248,750 from the Education Stabilization Fund for two roofing projects without obtaining contracts that included the prevailing wage rate provision, and weekly certified payrolls were not submitted to the District. Additionally, the District did not obtain performance bonds for the two roofing projects, as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503. Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight. Effect: The District did not comply with Wage Rate Requirements or Bonding Requirements. Context: The District had two construction contracts for facility repairs and improvements paid from the Education Stabilization Fund. Examined both contracts for compliance. Recommendation: The District should ensure that all applicable construction contracts contain the Wage Rate Requirements provision, obtain weekly certified payrolls from the contractor or subcontractor, and obtain performance bonds. The District should also contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for further directives regarding this matter. Views of responsible officials: The District will ensure contracts are obtained and all applicable construction contracts contain the required notification regarding compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act. We will make sure to get copies of the weekly certified payrolls for applicable projects. We will be in contact with DESE for guidance and implementation of program controls over program expenditures by June 30, 2024.
U.S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COVID-19 ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND - AL NUMBER 84.425U PASS THROUGH NUMBER 4401 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 2023-002 Equipment and Real Property Management / Special Tests and Provisions Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): 29 CFR 5.5 (Wage Rate Requirements) requires all contractors and subcontractors performing construction contracts in excess of $2,000, financed by federal assistance funds, to pay laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or subcontractor not less than the prevailing wage rates established by the Department of Labor for the locality of the project. Non-federal entities shall include in the applicable construction contracts a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements. Such requirements include the submission of weekly certified payrolls for each week in which any contract work is performed, to the non-federal entities. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.326 and Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503 require a non-federal entity to obtain a performance bond for the public construction contract. Condition: The District paid $1,064,887 for installation of an HVAC system from the Education Stabilization Fund without obtaining a written contract that included the prevailing wage rate provision, and weekly certified payrolls were not submitted to the District. Additionally, the District did not obtain a performance bond from the contractor, as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-503. Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight. Effect: The District did not comply with Wage Rate Requirements or Bonding Requirements. Context: A total of two payments/contracts for facility repairs and improvements were paid from the Education Stabilization Fund. Both were examined. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for guidance regarding this matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures. Views of responsible officials: The District supplied the bidding groups with all the federal guidelines and requirements. However, we did not request or receive documentation regarding the adherence to those requirements. The District will contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for guidance regarding the matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures.
Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Interior Title: Rangeland Resource Management FAL Number: 15.237 Passthrough: L20AC00454-1-L21AC10556 (2) Award Year: 2023 Criteria: §200.213 Suspension and debarment. Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, sub awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. §200.317 Procurements by states. When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a state must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The state will comply with §200.322 Procurement of recovered materials and ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes any clauses required by section §200.326 Contract provisions. All other non-Federal entities, including sub recipients of a state, will follow §§200.318 General procurement standards through 200.326 Contract provisions. §200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. APPENDIX II TO PART 200—CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR NON-FEDERAL ENTITY CONTRACTS UNDER FEDERAL AWARDS In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the government-wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Questioned Costs: None Condition: During our testing of single audit disbursements, we identified two vendors which would meet the requirement of verifying that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from receiving the contract, which was funded through Federal dollars. The vendors received more than $25,000 in payments from the District from Federal grant sources. The vendors are not currently suspended or debarred from receiving Federal contracts; however, the District did not have proper internal controls in place to verify this prior to the payment. Cause: District personnel were unaware of the requirement to ensure vendors receiving more than $25,000 were not on the suspension and debarment listing. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal regulations related to the grant and could put funding in jeopardy or require the District to reimburse the program for improper grant distributions. Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend the District establish a policy and implement procedures regarding large purchases related to Federal grants to insure that no vendors who are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in transactions funded through Federal grants are used. As identified above, there are several methods in which the District can verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. The District may have the vendor provide an annual certification that it is not currently suspended, debarred, or otherwise prevented from receiving Federal dollars. In other occasions in which a single purchase is going to be made, the purchasing procedures should include looking up the vendor on the GSA website, printing a copy of the verification, and placing it in the file with the purchase order. The District has options, and it should establish what method is the least intrusive, but also effective, in complying with the requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Responsible Official’s Plan: Specific corrective action plan for finding: The procurement Officer of SJSWCD has updated the procurement process on 12/7/2023 that all contractors who will be receiving Federal monies must provide an annual certification that they are not suspended, debarred, inactive, or otherwise excluded from participating in transactions funded through Federal grants. The policy change will be approved at the next board meeting. Timeline for completion of corrective action plan: December 7, 2023 Employee position(s) responsible for meeting the timeline: District Manager/Procurement Officer
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173; 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-058-PN01, 21611-058-PN01, 22611-058-PN01, 22611-056-ARP, 20619-056-PN01, 21619-056-PN01, 22619-056-PN01, 22619-056-ARP, 23611-056-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The School Corporation had adopted a purchasing policy; however, the policy did not conform to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. The policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations, avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service being procured, and ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. There were forty-seven vendors identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. Eight of the vendors were selected for testing. For eight of eight vendors tested that fell within the small purchases threshold, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations to ensure the procurements provided full and open competition. In addition, history of the procurements which would include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and basis for price was not documented. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined there was a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in the federal award, prior to entering into a covered transaction. One employee was responsible for checking SAM exclusions by running a vendor exclusion list and comparing that list to a vendor history report from the School Corporation's financial software. However, there was no documented oversight, review, or approval process to ensure the process was completed and accurate. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173; 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-058-PN01, 21611-058-PN01, 22611-058-PN01, 22611-056-ARP, 20619-056-PN01, 21619-056-PN01, 22619-056-PN01, 22619-056-ARP, 23611-056-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The School Corporation had adopted a purchasing policy; however, the policy did not conform to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. The policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations, avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service being procured, and ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. There were forty-seven vendors identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. Eight of the vendors were selected for testing. For eight of eight vendors tested that fell within the small purchases threshold, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations to ensure the procurements provided full and open competition. In addition, history of the procurements which would include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and basis for price was not documented. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined there was a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in the federal award, prior to entering into a covered transaction. One employee was responsible for checking SAM exclusions by running a vendor exclusion list and comparing that list to a vendor history report from the School Corporation's financial software. However, there was no documented oversight, review, or approval process to ensure the process was completed and accurate. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173; 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-058-PN01, 21611-058-PN01, 22611-058-PN01, 22611-056-ARP, 20619-056-PN01, 21619-056-PN01, 22619-056-PN01, 22619-056-ARP, 23611-056-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The School Corporation had adopted a purchasing policy; however, the policy did not conform to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. The policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations, avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service being procured, and ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. There were forty-seven vendors identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. Eight of the vendors were selected for testing. For eight of eight vendors tested that fell within the small purchases threshold, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations to ensure the procurements provided full and open competition. In addition, history of the procurements which would include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and basis for price was not documented. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined there was a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in the federal award, prior to entering into a covered transaction. One employee was responsible for checking SAM exclusions by running a vendor exclusion list and comparing that list to a vendor history report from the School Corporation's financial software. However, there was no documented oversight, review, or approval process to ensure the process was completed and accurate. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173; 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-058-PN01, 21611-058-PN01, 22611-058-PN01, 22611-056-ARP, 20619-056-PN01, 21619-056-PN01, 22619-056-PN01, 22619-056-ARP, 23611-056-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The School Corporation had adopted a purchasing policy; however, the policy did not conform to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. The policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations, avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service being procured, and ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. There were forty-seven vendors identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. Eight of the vendors were selected for testing. For eight of eight vendors tested that fell within the small purchases threshold, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations to ensure the procurements provided full and open competition. In addition, history of the procurements which would include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and basis for price was not documented. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined there was a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in the federal award, prior to entering into a covered transaction. One employee was responsible for checking SAM exclusions by running a vendor exclusion list and comparing that list to a vendor history report from the School Corporation's financial software. However, there was no documented oversight, review, or approval process to ensure the process was completed and accurate. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173; 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-058-PN01, 21611-058-PN01, 22611-058-PN01, 22611-056-ARP, 20619-056-PN01, 21619-056-PN01, 22619-056-PN01, 22619-056-ARP, 23611-056-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The School Corporation had adopted a purchasing policy; however, the policy did not conform to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. The policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations, avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service being procured, and ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. There were forty-seven vendors identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. Eight of the vendors were selected for testing. For eight of eight vendors tested that fell within the small purchases threshold, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations to ensure the procurements provided full and open competition. In addition, history of the procurements which would include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and basis for price was not documented. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined there was a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in the federal award, prior to entering into a covered transaction. One employee was responsible for checking SAM exclusions by running a vendor exclusion list and comparing that list to a vendor history report from the School Corporation's financial software. However, there was no documented oversight, review, or approval process to ensure the process was completed and accurate. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173; 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-058-PN01, 21611-058-PN01, 22611-058-PN01, 22611-056-ARP, 20619-056-PN01, 21619-056-PN01, 22619-056-PN01, 22619-056-ARP, 23611-056-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The School Corporation had adopted a purchasing policy; however, the policy did not conform to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. The policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations, avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service being procured, and ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. There were forty-seven vendors identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. Eight of the vendors were selected for testing. For eight of eight vendors tested that fell within the small purchases threshold, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations to ensure the procurements provided full and open competition. In addition, history of the procurements which would include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and basis for price was not documented. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined there was a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in the federal award, prior to entering into a covered transaction. One employee was responsible for checking SAM exclusions by running a vendor exclusion list and comparing that list to a vendor history report from the School Corporation's financial software. However, there was no documented oversight, review, or approval process to ensure the process was completed and accurate. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173; 84.027X; 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-058-PN01, 21611-058-PN01, 22611-058-PN01, 22611-056-ARP, 20619-056-PN01, 21619-056-PN01, 22619-056-PN01, 22619-056-ARP, 23611-056-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The School Corporation had adopted a purchasing policy; however, the policy did not conform to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. The policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations, avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service being procured, and ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. There were forty-seven vendors identified that fell within the small purchases threshold. Eight of the vendors were selected for testing. For eight of eight vendors tested that fell within the small purchases threshold, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations to ensure the procurements provided full and open competition. In addition, history of the procurements which would include the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and basis for price was not documented. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined there was a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in the federal award, prior to entering into a covered transaction. One employee was responsible for checking SAM exclusions by running a vendor exclusion list and comparing that list to a vendor history report from the School Corporation's financial software. However, there was no documented oversight, review, or approval process to ensure the process was completed and accurate. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2023-001 Procurement Policy Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) and (b). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $3,500 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(c); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(d); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(f). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non- Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” Non-federal entities had a grace period of two full fiscal years after the effective date of the Uniform Guidance before they had to comply with the procurement requirements of 2 CFR section 200. For a non-federal entity with a fiscal year-end of June 30, its effective date for the procurement requirements was July 1, 2017. However, during this grace period, non-federal entities were required to clearly document whether they decided to comply with the previous version of the applicable procurement standards or the new standards contained in the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City’s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. The City has not updated its purchasing policies and procedures to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. The City has also not formally documented whether it has decided to extend its applicable date of compliance with 2 CFR part 200 to be effective beginning July 1, 2018. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Cause: The City has not evaluated its existing procurement policies for compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City is not in compliance with the procurement policy provisions of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. Not updating the City’s procurement policy could lead to future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards. The current audit did not identify noncompliance with direct and material compliance requirements of the major federal award program. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes. 2022-001. Recommendation: The City should evaluate and update existing purchasing policies and procedures in order to bring the City into compliance with the procurement policy requirements of 2 CFR part 200 and the Uniform Guidance. The updated policy should include, among other things: 1. Thresholds and appropriate approval procedures for allowable federal procurement methods. 2. Written standards for how conflicts of interest involving employees engaged to select, award, and administer contracts will be governed. 3. How to ensure that contracts and awards are made only to responsible and eligible contractors and how oversight of contractor performance will be monitored. 4. How records will be maintained in order to document the history of federal procurements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City is still in the process of working with an outside firm on a review of procurement and purchasing policies. The consultation includes compliance review of this standard. Expected completion – FYE 2024.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-001 Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-001, 2021-001 Program Names/ Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 AZ-90-X127, AZ-90-X132, AZ-90-X-143, AZ-2018-003-00, AZ-2019-010-00, AZ-2019-035, AZ-2023-001-00 N/A Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program 20.509 CA-2021-028-00, CA-2022-226-00, CA-2022-231-00, GRT-22-0008862-T N/A Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation and Quechan Indian Tribe Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. The Board adopted a Policies and Procedures Manual that requires the collection of three quotes for purchases of at least $3,000 but less than $100,000 and formal bid procedures for purchases over $100,000. Condition The Authority did not follow its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual or federal regulations. Cause YCIPTA was operating under an expired contract and did not follow Board-adopted policies. Effect YCIPTA was not in compliance with the Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual and federal regulations. Context During our review of procurement, the following were noted: For one purchase in excess of the federal procurement threshold of $250,000, YCIPTA did not perform a sealed bid or proposal. For two purchases in the YCIPTA’s quote range, the YCIPTA did not obtain or maintain quotes. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation YCIPTA should adhere to its Board adopted Policies and Procedures Manual. When purchases are expected to be in excess of $100,000, formal procurement methods should be used to ensure the best pricing possible. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Assistance Listing No. 10.557 U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement (45 CFR 200.318-200.326) Condition - The Health System entered into various professional services contracts for marketing, advertising, and information dissemination that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and are considered micro-purchase awards but did not maintain appropriate documentation to document the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history to support its procurement decisions. Questioned Costs - None Context - We tested two out of a total of seven contracts that were considered micro-purchases. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our testing of procurement requirements, the two vendor contracts tested over the micro-purchase threshold did not have appropriate documentation to evidence the basis of vendor selection (documentation of the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history). Effect - Micro-purchases were made without appropriate documentation to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Cause - The Organization does not have a comprehensive procurement policy that is in line with Uniform Guidance requirements. Adequate supporting documentation on the procurements were not obtained or maintained within vendor files and vendor contracts do not contain the necessary contract provision and language required by the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding - No Recommendation - We recommend the Health System revisit controls over this compliance requirement to ensure that appropriate documentation is gathered and retained within its procurement files to support all Federally funded purchasing decisions. We also recommend the Organization perform a comprehensive review of its procurement policy and ensure that it is in compliance and in-line with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Finding 2023-004 – Material Weakness AL No: 20.507 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Transit Formula Grants - Direct Award. Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. Condition: The District was unable to provide documentation that the procurement of the CNG tank replacement project for five Orion buses exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000 was approved by the Board. There is documentation that an invitation for bid (IFB) was released for the project, but only one bid was received and the District awarded the contract to the sole bidder. Missing documentation includes support of the rationale to approve the contract absent evidence of full and open competition. The District was also not able to provide the request for proposal for review. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E (Uniform Guidance) states the following: Section 200.318(a) states that “The non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or service required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Sections 200.317 through 200.327.” Section 200.318(i) states that “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Section 200.320(c) states that “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold…; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the retirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non- Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Section 200.324(a) states that “The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.” Cause: Staff turnover at the District and the need for the project to be completed by a certain date to avoid the buses losing certification led to the lack of adequate records being maintained. Effect: The District was unable to prove it was in compliance with the Uniform Guidance regarding open competition on procurements. Context: The CNG tank replacement needed to be completed by a certain timeframe in order for the buses to be operational, so not every step was documented. The awarded contract was signed on the date of a Board meeting, but the Board minutes did not document that this contract was reviewed nor approved by the Board. Recommendation: We recommend the District establish a procurement folder on its server with subfolders for each individual procurement where documentation of each procurement is maintained, including advertising of the procurement, requests for proposals, proposals received, analysis of reasons for selecting the winning bid, executed contract, certifications by contractor if not part of proposal or executed contract, management report to board recommending which bid should be approved, board resolution approving the winning bid and for contracts under $250,000 a memo or form documenting bids received and reason for selecting the bid, including reasons for not selecting the lowest bid if applicable. We also recommend training be provided to staff that work on procurements of the requirements under Uniform Guidance Section 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.326. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included at the Corrective Action Plan end of this report.