Finding No. 2023-003 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Education; U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster; Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 10.CNC; 84.027/84.173; 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 214RI306N1199 – 2023; H027A220054 – 2023; SLFRP4547 – 2021 Pass-Through Agency: RI Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, RI Department of Revenue Pass-Through Number(s): 2725-13202-301; 12060-OPM20600-29669 Award Period: 10/1/22-9/30/23; 7/1/22-6/30/23; 3/3/21-12/31/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement The Town and Coventry Public Schools must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). UG §200.318 General procurement standards. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. §200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must use one of the prescribed methods of procurement. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in §200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in §200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (2) Small purchase. Procurement by small purchase is the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with §200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. Bids are publicly solicited, and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. Either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the allowed circumstances apply. Condition The Town and Coventry Public Schools purchasing policies do not include all elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 noted above. Questioned Costs None Context Although the Town’s and Coventry Public Schools purchasing policies do not include all elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326, we did not identify transactions where contracts were awarded without proper justification in 9 of 9 procurement transactions tested. Cause Management was not aware of the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Effect The Town and Coventry Public Schools are at risk for noncompliance with Federal grants as it relates to procurement. Repeat Finding Yes, repeat of prior year finding 2022-007. Recommendation We recommend that the Town and Coventry Public Schools updates its procurement policy to include all elements identified in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at c CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes utilizing one of the five allowable procurement methods, including small purchase guidelines for items over the micro-purchase threshold and sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals when items exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that the entity maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. Condition: During our testing of the District’s procurements within the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, it was noted that all three procurements tested did not have sufficient documentation recording the appropriate method and history of the transaction. Questioned Costs: None Context: The three procurements which were tested did not retain documentation detailing the procurement process or what quotes were obtained. Cause: Time pressure led to this requirement not being met. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the documentation requirements for procurement transactions as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program to ensure it is following federal guidance and internal policies over the procurement process and documenting the appropriate method and history of the transaction. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2023-007: Significant Deficiency, Procurement and Noncompliance Finding – Procurement – Internal Control over Procurement Assistance Listing Program Title and Number: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.027 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-through Entity: N/A Award year: 2022 and 2023 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. Condition: SPED/Grant Administration did not adhere to the Danbury Public Schools “Bids and Purchases-Competitive” procurement policies, that were compliant with Federal Part 3 compliance guidelines. The DPS had a procurement policy in place that was consistent with the standards of the aforementioned compliance sections; however, the City did not follow their own procurement policy requiring two quotes for a micro-purchase expenditure, three quotes for a small purchase expenditure and advertising for bids publicly for the large >$5,000 purchase expenditures. They only obtained one quote for each expenditure for micro and small purchases, and they did not use a public bid process for expenditures over $5,000. Cause: While the City has a formal policy around required bids, the thresholds had not been updated in several years and there was a lack of controls that ensured the City DPS procurement policy was being adhered to in order to be compliant with the compliance standards. Effect: Possible effects on the performance is centered around potentially not awarding the purchase to the lowest qualified bidder. Prevalence: Systemic in nature. Questioned Cost: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement controls that require review of each expenditure to ensure the City obtained the adequate number of bids for each expenditure. Additionally, we recommend that the City update their procurement thresholds to be more consistent with the compliance thresholds. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2023-007: Significant Deficiency, Procurement and Noncompliance Finding – Procurement – Internal Control over Procurement Assistance Listing Program Title and Number: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.027 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-through Entity: N/A Award year: 2022 and 2023 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. Condition: SPED/Grant Administration did not adhere to the Danbury Public Schools “Bids and Purchases-Competitive” procurement policies, that were compliant with Federal Part 3 compliance guidelines. The DPS had a procurement policy in place that was consistent with the standards of the aforementioned compliance sections; however, the City did not follow their own procurement policy requiring two quotes for a micro-purchase expenditure, three quotes for a small purchase expenditure and advertising for bids publicly for the large >$5,000 purchase expenditures. They only obtained one quote for each expenditure for micro and small purchases, and they did not use a public bid process for expenditures over $5,000. Cause: While the City has a formal policy around required bids, the thresholds had not been updated in several years and there was a lack of controls that ensured the City DPS procurement policy was being adhered to in order to be compliant with the compliance standards. Effect: Possible effects on the performance is centered around potentially not awarding the purchase to the lowest qualified bidder. Prevalence: Systemic in nature. Questioned Cost: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement controls that require review of each expenditure to ensure the City obtained the adequate number of bids for each expenditure. Additionally, we recommend that the City update their procurement thresholds to be more consistent with the compliance thresholds. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2023-007: Significant Deficiency, Procurement and Noncompliance Finding – Procurement – Internal Control over Procurement Assistance Listing Program Title and Number: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.027 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-through Entity: N/A Award year: 2022 and 2023 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. Condition: SPED/Grant Administration did not adhere to the Danbury Public Schools “Bids and Purchases-Competitive” procurement policies, that were compliant with Federal Part 3 compliance guidelines. The DPS had a procurement policy in place that was consistent with the standards of the aforementioned compliance sections; however, the City did not follow their own procurement policy requiring two quotes for a micro-purchase expenditure, three quotes for a small purchase expenditure and advertising for bids publicly for the large >$5,000 purchase expenditures. They only obtained one quote for each expenditure for micro and small purchases, and they did not use a public bid process for expenditures over $5,000. Cause: While the City has a formal policy around required bids, the thresholds had not been updated in several years and there was a lack of controls that ensured the City DPS procurement policy was being adhered to in order to be compliant with the compliance standards. Effect: Possible effects on the performance is centered around potentially not awarding the purchase to the lowest qualified bidder. Prevalence: Systemic in nature. Questioned Cost: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement controls that require review of each expenditure to ensure the City obtained the adequate number of bids for each expenditure. Additionally, we recommend that the City update their procurement thresholds to be more consistent with the compliance thresholds. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2023-007: Significant Deficiency, Procurement and Noncompliance Finding – Procurement – Internal Control over Procurement Assistance Listing Program Title and Number: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.027 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-through Entity: N/A Award year: 2022 and 2023 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. Condition: SPED/Grant Administration did not adhere to the Danbury Public Schools “Bids and Purchases-Competitive” procurement policies, that were compliant with Federal Part 3 compliance guidelines. The DPS had a procurement policy in place that was consistent with the standards of the aforementioned compliance sections; however, the City did not follow their own procurement policy requiring two quotes for a micro-purchase expenditure, three quotes for a small purchase expenditure and advertising for bids publicly for the large >$5,000 purchase expenditures. They only obtained one quote for each expenditure for micro and small purchases, and they did not use a public bid process for expenditures over $5,000. Cause: While the City has a formal policy around required bids, the thresholds had not been updated in several years and there was a lack of controls that ensured the City DPS procurement policy was being adhered to in order to be compliant with the compliance standards. Effect: Possible effects on the performance is centered around potentially not awarding the purchase to the lowest qualified bidder. Prevalence: Systemic in nature. Questioned Cost: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement controls that require review of each expenditure to ensure the City obtained the adequate number of bids for each expenditure. Additionally, we recommend that the City update their procurement thresholds to be more consistent with the compliance thresholds. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Finding Reference 2023-05 Assistance Listing Number 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction (Federal-Aid Highway Program) Name of Federal Agency Department of Transportation Compliance Requirement Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Type of Finding Significant Deficiency on Internal Control and Non-Compliance Condition: From a sample of fifteen work weeks examined, we noted that three certified payroll weeks were not certified within the required weekly period as required by federal regulations. The delays in certifications ranged from four days to thirty-three days in excess of the required weekly timeframe. Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause: The delays in the certification of payroll weeks may be due to inefficient payroll processing procedures within the contractor or subcontractor's system. Effect: The failure to certify payrolls on a weekly basis as required by federal regulations can lead to noncompliance with federal regulations, specifically the Davis-Bacon Act and related Department of Labor (DOL) regulations. However, the fact that the Authority discharges its obligation by withholding payment to the contractor or subcontractor until the certified payroll is received and reviewed, mitigates all economic risks. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: To address the identified issues, the following corrective actions are recommended: • Enhance Oversight and Compliance Reviews: Designate a compliance officer or team responsible for verifying that certified payrolls are submitted timely. Include within the internal audit functions to test compliance with this requirement and recommend corrective actions promptly. • Request a non-compliance waiver from the FHWA: The Authority should request the FHWA for a 20% non-compliance waiver, as it is impracticable for the Authority to ascertain that all contractors or subcontractors comply timely with this requirement. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to Management’s unaudited corrective action plan. -
Finding 2023-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. As governmental subrecipients of states are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non‐federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context: During fiscal year 2023, the Town did not comply with the required procurement policies and procedures process for procurements that exceeded both State and Federal thresholds. Questioned Costs: Unkown Cause: A Town State/Federal grants procedures manual that included proper procurement procedures did not exist until February 2023. Effect or Potential Effect: Due to the weaknesses in internal controls noted above, there is a risk that amounts charged to federal awards may not be in accordance with procurement, suspension, and debarment principles. No known questioned costs are reported, as it is not quantifiable. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes, finding number 2022-002 Recommendation: The Town should address the weaknesses in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Managements Response: We acknowledge the audit finding related to non-compliance with the required procurement policies and procedures for procurements exceeding the State and Federal thresholds during Fiscal Year 2023. The Town and Schools have Acushnet’s Federal Grant Procedures Manual (February 2023) to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with Federal and State requirements – in particular, the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. We are pleased to report that we believe to have addressed this issue in Fiscal Year 2024 to ensure compliance with the procurement policies and procedures, as required by both State and Federal thresholds
Finding 2023-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. As governmental subrecipients of states are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non‐federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context: During fiscal year 2023, the Town did not comply with the required procurement policies and procedures process for procurements that exceeded both State and Federal thresholds. Questioned Costs: Unkown Cause: A Town State/Federal grants procedures manual that included proper procurement procedures did not exist until February 2023. Effect or Potential Effect: Due to the weaknesses in internal controls noted above, there is a risk that amounts charged to federal awards may not be in accordance with procurement, suspension, and debarment principles. No known questioned costs are reported, as it is not quantifiable. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes, finding number 2022-002 Recommendation: The Town should address the weaknesses in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Managements Response: We acknowledge the audit finding related to non-compliance with the required procurement policies and procedures for procurements exceeding the State and Federal thresholds during Fiscal Year 2023. The Town and Schools have Acushnet’s Federal Grant Procedures Manual (February 2023) to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with Federal and State requirements – in particular, the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. We are pleased to report that we believe to have addressed this issue in Fiscal Year 2024 to ensure compliance with the procurement policies and procedures, as required by both State and Federal thresholds
Finding 2023-003 – COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund - AL No. 21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Noncompliance and Material Weakness Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. As governmental subrecipients of states they are also required to use the same state procurement policies and procedures for federal funds as for non‐federal funds, the Town is required to follow Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter (MGL) 30(b). MGL 30(b) requires the solicitation of three written or oral quotes for procurements of supplies between $10,000 and $49,999 and sealed bids or proposals for procurements of supplies $50,000 and over. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. Condition: During fiscal year 2023, the Town could not provide evidence that they complied with the required procurement policies and procedures in place as it related to two of the expenses charged to the major program. Context: The Town purchased a new boiler for the School however the procurement documentation could not be located and the employee who would have overseen the project was unavailable to provide the supporting documentation. In addition, the Town could not locate or provide evidence that procurement procedures were followed when selecting an engineer for the Water Tank project. Questioned Costs: $71,500 related to the School Boiler Project and $170,163.70 related to the Water Tank Project. Cause: Directors used the Massachusetts procurement guidelines and not federal guidelines. Effect or Potential Effect: There is a risk that the amount charged to the federal awards major program may not be in accordance with procurement, suspension, and debarment principles. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: The Town of Hopedale should address the noncompliance and material weakness in internal controls noted above in order to ensure that procurements are conducted in accordance with federal and state requirements. Management Response: New procedures in place for documentation and reporting.
Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Federal Award Identification Number: Grant Year: 2023 Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977 Award Period: June 7, 2022, through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the Board of Education plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Board of Education procurement policies do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Client did not have adequate support for verification by management of vendor status for suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None Context: Per review of vendor agreements during testing over suspension and debarment, there was no indication of a suspension and debarment clause or verification of vendor status by management. Cause: The significant deficiency is primarily due to inadequate internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review and enhance the procedures over the procurement and purchasing process, to be sure that all federal grant expenditures and contracts with vendors are performed properly in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Federal Award Identification Number: Grant Year: 2023 Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977 Award Period: June 7, 2022, through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the Board of Education plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Board of Education procurement policies do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Client did not have adequate support for verification by management of vendor status for suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None Context: Per review of vendor agreements during testing over suspension and debarment, there was no indication of a suspension and debarment clause or verification of vendor status by management. Cause: The significant deficiency is primarily due to inadequate internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review and enhance the procedures over the procurement and purchasing process, to be sure that all federal grant expenditures and contracts with vendors are performed properly in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Federal Award Identification Number: Grant Year: 2023 Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977 Award Period: June 7, 2022, through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Board of Education must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance including the verification that an entity with which the Board of Education plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Board of Education procurement policies do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Policies regarding verification of compliance with suspension and debarment requirements were not found. Client did not have adequate support for verification by management of vendor status for suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None Context: Per review of vendor agreements during testing over suspension and debarment, there was no indication of a suspension and debarment clause or verification of vendor status by management. Cause: The significant deficiency is primarily due to inadequate internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City could process transactions that do not follow federal Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review and enhance the procedures over the procurement and purchasing process, to be sure that all federal grant expenditures and contracts with vendors are performed properly in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Procurement. The District should follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Condition: The District did not follow the small purchase method for procurement that is required for purchases made between $10,000 and $250,000. This method requires that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b). Questioned Costs: None. Context: There was only one purchase over $10,000 made with these grants funds during the fiscal year and the required procurement method was not followed. Effect: The District did not comply with the required procurement standard. Cause: This purchase had to be made quickly so the District used their perferred vendor. Recommendation: We recommend that care is taken to ensure that all the procurement requirements are followed based on the amount of the purchase being made with the federal funds. Management's response: We will follow the procurement standard when not in urgent situations for the product or service we are seeking.
Assistance Listing Number 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Department of Education North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Special Tests and Provisions 2 CFR Part 200.326 F84425U 2023 Grant Year Criteria For construction contracts and subcontracts greater than $2,000, the District should verify prevailing wage rate clauses were included in the contract or subcontract and for each week in which work was performed under the contract or subcontract the District should monitor certified payroll registers to ensure contractors and subcontractors were paying employees the prevailing wage rates. Condition The District did not provide wage rate clauses to contractors. In addition, the District did not obtain from contractors the certified payroll registers, nor did they perform testing to ensure contractors were paying the prevailing wage rates. Cause The District was unaware of the compliance requirements regarding the construction projects. Effect The District is not in compliance with Wage Rate Requirements, a part of the Special Tests and Provisions. Questioned Costs Undeterminable. Repeat Finding See finding 2022-002 Recommendation We recommend the District to review the wage rate compliance requirements as part of the special tests and provisions of this program in the compliance supplement and to create and implement a process of submitting prevailing wage rates to contractors as well as obtaining the certified payroll registers to determine if contractors are in compliance. Management’s Response The District will plan to get payroll registers monthly from contractors moving forward. This will be monitored by the Superintendent and Head of Facilities.
Assistance Listing Number 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Department of Education North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Special Tests and Provisions 2 CFR Part 200.326 F84425U 2023 Grant Year Criteria For construction contracts and subcontracts greater than $2,000, the District should verify prevailing wage rate clauses were included in the contract or subcontract and for each week in which work was performed under the contract or subcontract the District should monitor certified payroll registers to ensure contractors and subcontractors were paying employees the prevailing wage rates. Condition The District did not provide wage rate clauses to contractors. In addition, the District did not obtain from contractors the certified payroll registers, nor did they perform testing to ensure contractors were paying the prevailing wage rates. Cause The District was unaware of the compliance requirements regarding the construction projects. Effect The District is not in compliance with Wage Rate Requirements, a part of the Special Tests and Provisions. Questioned Costs Undeterminable. Repeat Finding See finding 2022-002 Recommendation We recommend the District to review the wage rate compliance requirements as part of the special tests and provisions of this program in the compliance supplement and to create and implement a process of submitting prevailing wage rates to contractors as well as obtaining the certified payroll registers to determine if contractors are in compliance. Management’s Response The District will plan to get payroll registers monthly from contractors moving forward. This will be monitored by the Superintendent and Head of Facilities.
Assistance Listing Number 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Department of Education North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Special Tests and Provisions 2 CFR Part 200.326 F84425U 2023 Grant Year Criteria For construction contracts and subcontracts greater than $2,000, the District should verify prevailing wage rate clauses were included in the contract or subcontract and for each week in which work was performed under the contract or subcontract the District should monitor certified payroll registers to ensure contractors and subcontractors were paying employees the prevailing wage rates. Condition The District did not provide wage rate clauses to contractors. In addition, the District did not obtain from contractors the certified payroll registers, nor did they perform testing to ensure contractors were paying the prevailing wage rates. Cause The District was unaware of the compliance requirements regarding the construction projects. Effect The District is not in compliance with Wage Rate Requirements, a part of the Special Tests and Provisions. Questioned Costs Undeterminable. Repeat Finding See finding 2022-002 Recommendation We recommend the District to review the wage rate compliance requirements as part of the special tests and provisions of this program in the compliance supplement and to create and implement a process of submitting prevailing wage rates to contractors as well as obtaining the certified payroll registers to determine if contractors are in compliance. Management’s Response The District will plan to get payroll registers monthly from contractors moving forward. This will be monitored by the Superintendent and Head of Facilities.
Assistance Listing Number 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Department of Education North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Special Tests and Provisions 2 CFR Part 200.326 F84425U 2023 Grant Year Criteria For construction contracts and subcontracts greater than $2,000, the District should verify prevailing wage rate clauses were included in the contract or subcontract and for each week in which work was performed under the contract or subcontract the District should monitor certified payroll registers to ensure contractors and subcontractors were paying employees the prevailing wage rates. Condition The District did not provide wage rate clauses to contractors. In addition, the District did not obtain from contractors the certified payroll registers, nor did they perform testing to ensure contractors were paying the prevailing wage rates. Cause The District was unaware of the compliance requirements regarding the construction projects. Effect The District is not in compliance with Wage Rate Requirements, a part of the Special Tests and Provisions. Questioned Costs Undeterminable. Repeat Finding See finding 2022-002 Recommendation We recommend the District to review the wage rate compliance requirements as part of the special tests and provisions of this program in the compliance supplement and to create and implement a process of submitting prevailing wage rates to contractors as well as obtaining the certified payroll registers to determine if contractors are in compliance. Management’s Response The District will plan to get payroll registers monthly from contractors moving forward. This will be monitored by the Superintendent and Head of Facilities.
Assistance Listing Number 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Department of Education North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Special Tests and Provisions 2 CFR Part 200.326 F84425U 2023 Grant Year Criteria For construction contracts and subcontracts greater than $2,000, the District should verify prevailing wage rate clauses were included in the contract or subcontract and for each week in which work was performed under the contract or subcontract the District should monitor certified payroll registers to ensure contractors and subcontractors were paying employees the prevailing wage rates. Condition The District did not provide wage rate clauses to contractors. In addition, the District did not obtain from contractors the certified payroll registers, nor did they perform testing to ensure contractors were paying the prevailing wage rates. Cause The District was unaware of the compliance requirements regarding the construction projects. Effect The District is not in compliance with Wage Rate Requirements, a part of the Special Tests and Provisions. Questioned Costs Undeterminable. Repeat Finding See finding 2022-002 Recommendation We recommend the District to review the wage rate compliance requirements as part of the special tests and provisions of this program in the compliance supplement and to create and implement a process of submitting prevailing wage rates to contractors as well as obtaining the certified payroll registers to determine if contractors are in compliance. Management’s Response The District will plan to get payroll registers monthly from contractors moving forward. This will be monitored by the Superintendent and Head of Facilities.
Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper internal controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 147.
Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper internal controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 147.
Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper internal controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 147.
Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper internal controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 147.
Special Tests – Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ALN 84.425D & 84.425U) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: 2022-2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely manner. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 88.
Special Tests – Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ALN 84.425D & 84.425U) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: 2022-2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely manner. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 88.
Special Tests – Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ALN 84.425D & 84.425U) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: 2022-2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely manner. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 88.
Special Tests – Wage Rate Requirements Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ALN 84.425D & 84.425U) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: 2022-2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our review of the federal program, we determined that the District lacks internal controls and therefore, cannot detect whether the District receives the required documentation for Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely manner. Cause: The District does not have sufficient detection and prevention procedures. Effect: Without proper controls, the District cannot prevent or detect instances of Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements noncompliance. Lack of internal controls may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the District adhere to the Uniform Guidance and establish internal controls to ensure the District obtains the required documentation for the Davis- Bacon prevailing wage requirements on a timely basis. Management’s views Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 88.
FINDING 2023-001 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into an agreement with a contractor for building renovations, paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. A formal contract that required compliance with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act was put into place. However, the School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week that work was performed under the contract. Criteria The 2023 Compliance Supplement states: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A- 102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School is unable to document that the contractor is compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
FINDING 2023-001 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into an agreement with a contractor for building renovations, paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. A formal contract that required compliance with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act was put into place. However, the School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week that work was performed under the contract. Criteria The 2023 Compliance Supplement states: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A- 102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School is unable to document that the contractor is compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
FINDING 2023-001 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into an agreement with a contractor for building renovations, paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. A formal contract that required compliance with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act was put into place. However, the School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week that work was performed under the contract. Criteria The 2023 Compliance Supplement states: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A- 102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School is unable to document that the contractor is compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
FINDING 2023-001 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into an agreement with a contractor for building renovations, paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. A formal contract that required compliance with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act was put into place. However, the School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week that work was performed under the contract. Criteria The 2023 Compliance Supplement states: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A- 102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School is unable to document that the contractor is compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 23.
Program: Education Stabilization Fund Governor's Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (84.425D) American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) American Rescue Plan - Emergency and Secondary School Emergency Relieft - Homeless Children and Youth (84.425W) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed a sample the District’s construction contracts that were financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. A failure to collect the certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed, updated and trained staff on the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts to ensure compliance with the Wage Rate Requirements as published in 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction when applicable.
Program: Education Stabilization Fund Governor's Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (84.425D) American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) American Rescue Plan - Emergency and Secondary School Emergency Relieft - Homeless Children and Youth (84.425W) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed a sample the District’s construction contracts that were financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. A failure to collect the certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed, updated and trained staff on the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts to ensure compliance with the Wage Rate Requirements as published in 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction when applicable.
Program: Education Stabilization Fund Governor's Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (84.425D) American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) American Rescue Plan - Emergency and Secondary School Emergency Relieft - Homeless Children and Youth (84.425W) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed a sample the District’s construction contracts that were financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. A failure to collect the certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed, updated and trained staff on the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts to ensure compliance with the Wage Rate Requirements as published in 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction when applicable.
Program: Education Stabilization Fund Governor's Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (84.425D) American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) American Rescue Plan - Emergency and Secondary School Emergency Relieft - Homeless Children and Youth (84.425W) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed a sample the District’s construction contracts that were financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. A failure to collect the certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed, updated and trained staff on the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts to ensure compliance with the Wage Rate Requirements as published in 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction when applicable.
Program: Education Stabilization Fund COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed the District’s construction contract that was financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund until after the construction contract was completed. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts and have implemented changes to ensure that the Wage Rate Requirements are adhered to when applicable.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Listing Number: 21.027, 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080926, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: City of Hartford, Career Resources Inc. Pass-Through Number: C2212 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization and noted that the policies do not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Listing Number: 21.027, 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080926, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: City of Hartford, Career Resources Inc. Pass-Through Number: C2212 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization and noted that the policies do not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Listing Number: 21.027, 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080926, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: City of Hartford, Career Resources Inc. Pass-Through Number: C2212 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization and noted that the policies do not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) – Assistance Listing #84.425E, #84.425F #2023-002 – Major Federal Award Finding – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance This is a repeat of prior year finding #2022-002. Conditions: We noted during testing of procurement for the HEERF program (Institutional Aid) that the University’s procurement policy was not being followed. Competitive bids were not obtained for projects over the simplified acquisition threshold. Criteria: Federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317- 200.326 provide that the University must have and use documented procurement procedures and follow written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in §200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Cause/Context: We tested two transactions over the micro purchase threshold. These transactions were subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations. We tested two transactions for a vendor over the simplified acquisition threshold. These transactions were not subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations and/or competitive bids. Recommendation: Management should review the University’s procurement policy and update appropriately to reference Uniform Guidance and specific purchasing thresholds. The University should ensure that it follows the requirements outlined in its procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The University agrees with the recommendations put forth by the auditors. The University will review its current procurement policy to include federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317-200.326. Proper oversight will be provided over the procurement process. See also attached Corrective Action Plan.
Department of Education COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) – Assistance Listing #84.425E, #84.425F #2023-002 – Major Federal Award Finding – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance This is a repeat of prior year finding #2022-002. Conditions: We noted during testing of procurement for the HEERF program (Institutional Aid) that the University’s procurement policy was not being followed. Competitive bids were not obtained for projects over the simplified acquisition threshold. Criteria: Federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317- 200.326 provide that the University must have and use documented procurement procedures and follow written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in §200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Cause/Context: We tested two transactions over the micro purchase threshold. These transactions were subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations. We tested two transactions for a vendor over the simplified acquisition threshold. These transactions were not subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations and/or competitive bids. Recommendation: Management should review the University’s procurement policy and update appropriately to reference Uniform Guidance and specific purchasing thresholds. The University should ensure that it follows the requirements outlined in its procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The University agrees with the recommendations put forth by the auditors. The University will review its current procurement policy to include federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317-200.326. Proper oversight will be provided over the procurement process. See also attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-003 Material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: United States Department of State Program Titles: Office of Global Women’s Issues Assistance Listing Number: 19.801 Pass-Through Entity: N/A Award Numbers: SLMAQM21CA3275 Award Periods: September 30, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326 Internal Controls, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirement identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A nonfederal entity among others must: - Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). - For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition/Context Although the Organization has a procurement policy, and the procedures include the use of a micro purchase threshold of $3,500, small purchases and simplified acquisition thresholds are not clearly identified. As such, the policy does not fully incorporate the procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance including sealed bids, cost or price analysis etc. Cause The Organization's management was not aware that all components including procurement methods of 2 CFR section 200.320 are required to be included in the Organization's procurement policy even if the Organization's procurements would not typically include all procurement methods. Effect The Organization did not ensure that its procurement policy follows the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement measures to ensure that its procurement policy reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations and conform to applicable federal statutes and requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Program: Education Stabilization Fund COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed the District’s construction contract that was financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund until after the construction contract was completed. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts and have implemented changes to ensure that the Wage Rate Requirements are adhered to when applicable.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.