Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Signficiant Deficiency - Internal Controls over Procurement Department of Treasury - Direct Program- COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - ALN 21.027 - Program Year 2023 Criteria - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) award funds may be used to enter into contracts to procure goods and services necessary to implement one or more of the eligible purposes outline in 42 sections 802(c) and 803(c) and the Treasury's Interim and Final Rules. Recipients are expected to have procurement standards outline in the Uniform Guidance as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Condition- The County did not obtain the supporting documentation from the Medical Examiner's Office at the time of the purchases to support that the procurement standards as outline in Uniform Guidance had been followed. Cause/Effect - The State of Florida Medical Examiner does have procurement policies in place that state that the County's Medical Examiner shall follow the procurement standards as outline in the Uniform Guidance. The County Medical Examiner follows the procurement policies of the State of Florida Medical Examiner. However, the County did not obtain documentation from the County Medical Examiner to support the procurement policies and Uniform Guidance had been followed as of the time of the purchase. Questioned Costs- None Auditor's Recommendation - We recommend the County obtain all documentation to support compliance with procurement under Uniform Guidance prior to the purchase of goods or services. Management Response - See Correction Plan Letter
U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements as required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not had single audits performed until recently as a result of the increase in funding due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Because of this, they had not updated their purchasing policy to be compliance with Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test the policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Item 2023‐001 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements (Repeat) Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Years ended September 30, 2021 (84.425U) and September 30, 2020 (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and to provide timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that certain payments to contractors selected for testing did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $117,000. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received each week in which construction work is performed.
Item 2023‐001 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements (Repeat) Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Years ended September 30, 2021 (84.425U) and September 30, 2020 (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and to provide timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that certain payments to contractors selected for testing did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $117,000. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received each week in which construction work is performed.
U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S. Treasury Department Federal Financial Assistance Listings 20.507 Federal Transit Cluster FTA 5307 CARES Act 2020 – Agreement #CA-17, ID-2021-027 Federal Financial Assistance Listings 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. This created a situation where the City did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contract with that vendor. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not reviewed its procurement policy to ensure that the policy and contracts included the provisions that were required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test compliance of the Policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the auditor’s findings.
U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S. Treasury Department Federal Financial Assistance Listings 20.507 Federal Transit Cluster FTA 5307 CARES Act 2020 – Agreement #CA-17, ID-2021-027 Federal Financial Assistance Listings 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. This created a situation where the City did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contract with that vendor. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not reviewed its procurement policy to ensure that the policy and contracts included the provisions that were required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test compliance of the Policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the auditor’s findings.
U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S. Treasury Department Federal Financial Assistance Listings 20.507 Federal Transit Cluster FTA 5307 CARES Act 2020 – Agreement #CA-17, ID-2021-027 Federal Financial Assistance Listings 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. This created a situation where the City did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contract with that vendor. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not reviewed its procurement policy to ensure that the policy and contracts included the provisions that were required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test compliance of the Policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the auditor’s findings.
Condition: The Organization purchased property and services without implementing procedures that comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Cause: The Organization did not use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Effect: The Organization did not comply with procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Context: A sample of 5 purchases totaling $37,971 was selected for audit from a population of 21 purchases totaling $284,550. The test found that five purchases did not adhere to the Organization's documented procurement procedures and 1 purchase that also did not include competitive bidding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization use their own documented procurement procedures that comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Item 2023-001 (Originally of 2022-001) Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 (Repeated) U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Years ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2023 (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and provided timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure that accurate and complete certified payrolls were provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that payments to contractors did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $1,521,784.16 Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received from each week in which construction work is performed.
Item 2023‐001 (Originally of 2022‐001) Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 (Repeated) U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Years ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and provided timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that payments to contractors did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $110,029. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received from each week in which construction work is performed.
Item 2023‐001 (Originally of 2022‐001) Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 (Repeated) U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Years ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and provided timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that payments to contractors did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $110,029. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received from each week in which construction work is performed.
Item 2023-001 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425U U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education, Pass Through Grantor Number 199 Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and provided timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure that accurate and complete certified payrolls were provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that payments to contractors did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $149,982 Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received from each week in which construction work is performed.
2023-006 — Procurement Federal/state program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination ALN: 93.441 Award period: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023 Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. Further, according to the CBNHC Finance Policies and Procedures, the Board of Directors shall approve all purchases over $5,000. Condition: For one vendor paid over $5,000 during fiscal year 2023, there was no evidence that selection and use of this vendor was approved by the Board of Directors. For one additional contractor, CBNHC did not have an active contract in place with the contractor. Context: Two of 35 nonpayroll transactions tested. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: CBNHC is not implementing their Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved according to purchase authority levels. Effect: CBNHC is not in compliance with procurement requirements for the Indian Self-Determination program. Auditor’s Recommendations: CBNHC should implement its Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved. Management’s Response: In fiscal year 2023, CBNHC experienced significant disruption in its administrative operations caused by political struggles over its rightful governing body. During this period, two key leadership members were administratively unavailable to support the proper procurement of vendor contract renewals. The purchases were made outside the CBNHC procurement policies unbeknownst to CBNHC leadership.
2023-006 — Procurement Federal/state program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination ALN: 93.441 Award period: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023 Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. Further, according to the CBNHC Finance Policies and Procedures, the Board of Directors shall approve all purchases over $5,000. Condition: For one vendor paid over $5,000 during fiscal year 2023, there was no evidence that selection and use of this vendor was approved by the Board of Directors. For one additional contractor, CBNHC did not have an active contract in place with the contractor. Context: Two of 35 nonpayroll transactions tested. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: CBNHC is not implementing their Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved according to purchase authority levels. Effect: CBNHC is not in compliance with procurement requirements for the Indian Self-Determination program. Auditor’s Recommendations: CBNHC should implement its Financial Policies and Procedures to ensure that the selection and use of all vendors and contractors are properly documented and approved. Management’s Response: In fiscal year 2023, CBNHC experienced significant disruption in its administrative operations caused by political struggles over its rightful governing body. During this period, two key leadership members were administratively unavailable to support the proper procurement of vendor contract renewals. The purchases were made outside the CBNHC procurement policies unbeknownst to CBNHC leadership.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal and State Awards (continued) Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022‐002, 2021‐002 Federal Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 20.507, 20.526 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award Number: 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039, 5339‐R‐2022‐GCTD‐00039 Federal Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Department of Transportation State Program Name: State Urbanized Area Formula Program, State Formula Grants For Rural Areas State Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Type of Finding: Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements and Federal/State Major Programs, Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: N/A; In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(b)(7), when there are known questioned costs but the dollar amount is undetermined or not reported, the audit findings must include a description of why the dollar amount was undetermined or otherwise could not be reported. Based on our description of the finding below, the District was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines were followed for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Due to inadequate records being maintained by the District, we were unable to determine if proper procured occurred for each purchase, and could not be located, or proper procurement never occurred. Therefore, we were unable to differentiate transactions as questioned costs from transactions in question caused solely because of deficiencies in internal control. Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition: The District did not meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Additionally, the District did was unable to provide evidence that the federal guidelines for purchases exceeding the small purchases threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. During our review of purchasing, we noted the following: • For 7 out of 7 procurements reviewed, documentation demonstrating a vendor check for suspension and debarment was not retained. • For 3 out of 5 vendors reviewed with total expenditures below the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of quotes was maintained. • For 2 out of 2 vendors reviewed with total expenditures that exceeded the Simplified Acquisition threshold, no documentation of a sealed procurement issued in accordance with federal guidelines was maintained. Recommendation: The District should maintain documentation of procurement actions in the vendor file including sealed procurements issued, quotes and suspension and debarment checks. Review of procurement compliance should occur before the District’s funds are obligated. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with the finding and has taken steps to address this issue as detailed in the Corrective Action Plan.
Signficiant Deficiency - Internal Controls over Procurement Department of Treasury - Direct Program- COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - ALN 21.027 - Program Year 2023 Criteria - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) award funds may be used to enter into contracts to procure goods and services necessary to implement one or more of the eligible purposes outline in 42 sections 802(c) and 803(c) and the Treasury's Interim and Final Rules. Recipients are expected to have procurement standards outline in the Uniform Guidance as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Condition- The County did not obtain the supporting documentation from the Medical Examiner's Office at the time of the purchases to support that the procurement standards as outline in Uniform Guidance had been followed. Cause/Effect - The State of Florida Medical Examiner does have procurement policies in place that state that the County's Medical Examiner shall follow the procurement standards as outline in the Uniform Guidance. The County Medical Examiner follows the procurement policies of the State of Florida Medical Examiner. However, the County did not obtain documentation from the County Medical Examiner to support the procurement policies and Uniform Guidance had been followed as of the time of the purchase. Questioned Costs- None Auditor's Recommendation - We recommend the County obtain all documentation to support compliance with procurement under Uniform Guidance prior to the purchase of goods or services. Management Response - See Correction Plan Letter
U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements as required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not had single audits performed until recently as a result of the increase in funding due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Because of this, they had not updated their purchasing policy to be compliance with Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test the policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Item 2023‐001 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements (Repeat) Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Years ended September 30, 2021 (84.425U) and September 30, 2020 (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and to provide timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that certain payments to contractors selected for testing did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $117,000. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received each week in which construction work is performed.
Item 2023‐001 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements (Repeat) Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Years ended September 30, 2021 (84.425U) and September 30, 2020 (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non‐Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – Adequate controls were not in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and to provide timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the Wage Rate Requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that certain payments to contractors selected for testing did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $117,000. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received each week in which construction work is performed.
U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S. Treasury Department Federal Financial Assistance Listings 20.507 Federal Transit Cluster FTA 5307 CARES Act 2020 – Agreement #CA-17, ID-2021-027 Federal Financial Assistance Listings 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. This created a situation where the City did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contract with that vendor. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not reviewed its procurement policy to ensure that the policy and contracts included the provisions that were required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test compliance of the Policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the auditor’s findings.
U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S. Treasury Department Federal Financial Assistance Listings 20.507 Federal Transit Cluster FTA 5307 CARES Act 2020 – Agreement #CA-17, ID-2021-027 Federal Financial Assistance Listings 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. This created a situation where the City did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contract with that vendor. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not reviewed its procurement policy to ensure that the policy and contracts included the provisions that were required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test compliance of the Policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the auditor’s findings.
U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S. Treasury Department Federal Financial Assistance Listings 20.507 Federal Transit Cluster FTA 5307 CARES Act 2020 – Agreement #CA-17, ID-2021-027 Federal Financial Assistance Listings 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: We noted that while the City does have a purchasing policy, elements required by Uniform Guidance are absent from the policy. This created a situation where the City did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contract with that vendor. In addition, elements that are required to be included in contracts with vendors who are paid using federal monies were missing from the contracts. Cause: The City had not reviewed its procurement policy to ensure that the policy and contracts included the provisions that were required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: While our testing noted no instances of noncompliance, the absence of internal controls over compliance as it relates to having a Uniform Guidance compliant policy, could lead the City to enter into covered transactions that are not compliant with federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used to test compliance of the Policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: The City should review the applicable provisions of the CFR to ensure their written procurement policy is compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the auditor’s findings.