U.S. Department of Treasury passed through State of Utah Department of Workforce Services and through Colorado Department of Human Services 2023-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number): Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). Context and Condition - We selected five contracts to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for one contract lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause - The Academy did not follow its procurement policy for publicly soliciting bids. Effect - A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Recommendation - We recommend the Academy ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The Academy will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Environmental Quality Incentives Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Periods: September 3, 2019 through July 31, 2024 and September 30, 2020 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.924 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Conservation Stewardship Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Periods: September 3, 2019 through July 31, 2024 and September 30, 2020 through September 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 require a nonfederal entity to establish written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct, including procedures to implement the cash management requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, procedures that comply with the procurement standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326, and procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E of 2 CFR Part 200. Specifically, 2 CFR sections 200.430, 200.431, and 200.475 require written policies. Condition: There are no written policies and procedures for allowable costs/cost principles, cash management, procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not have a process for reviewing their accounting policies and procedures manual on a regular basis to ensure written procedures conform to Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A lack of written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct may result in noncompliance with the requirements of federal programs and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization’s written policies and procedures be reviewed and updated for compliance with Uniform Guidance. The organization should become familiar with the requirements of Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 and establish appropriate written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and they will evaluate our findings to determine an appropriate corrective action.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Environmental Quality Incentives Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Periods: September 3, 2019 through July 31, 2024 and September 30, 2020 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.924 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Conservation Stewardship Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Periods: September 3, 2019 through July 31, 2024 and September 30, 2020 through September 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 require a nonfederal entity to establish written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct, including procedures to implement the cash management requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, procedures that comply with the procurement standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326, and procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E of 2 CFR Part 200. Specifically, 2 CFR sections 200.430, 200.431, and 200.475 require written policies. Condition: There are no written policies and procedures for allowable costs/cost principles, cash management, procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not have a process for reviewing their accounting policies and procedures manual on a regular basis to ensure written procedures conform to Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A lack of written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct may result in noncompliance with the requirements of federal programs and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization’s written policies and procedures be reviewed and updated for compliance with Uniform Guidance. The organization should become familiar with the requirements of Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 and establish appropriate written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and they will evaluate our findings to determine an appropriate corrective action.
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy. Repeat Finding - 2022-001
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy. Repeat Finding - 2022-001
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy. Repeat Finding - 2022-001
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy. Repeat Finding - 2022-001
2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy. Repeat Finding - 2022-001
Finding: 2023-001 Program Title: Congressionally Funded Community Projects Assistance Listing: 84.215K Contract Grant Number: S215K230172 Federal Award Years: July 1, 2023 to May 31, 2025 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 establishes the procurement standards applicable to Non- Federal Entities applicable to federal awards. When acquisitions exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method, the competitive proposals method, or the noncompetitive proposals method based on the criteria outlined in 2 CFR section 200.320. Condition: Based on procedures performed, SC&C identified acquisitions in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold that were not selected using an appropriate procurement method. Cause: The Organization was unaware of the compliance requirement. Also, the Organization did not follow its written procurement policy. Effect: $324,000 of costs are questioned costs as a result of failing to meet procurement requirements. This is considered material to the Congressionally Funded Community Projects. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization establish and implement written policies and procedures to establish to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements and terms and conditions of the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the recommendations to establish and implement written policies and procedures to conform with the compliance requirements and terms and conditions of the federal award.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Highway Assistance Listing Number: 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 693JJ22330000Y300MN1921048 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing it was noted that, for 1 of the 5 the contracts tested County did not receive or verify the contract was in compliance with prevailing wage compliance requirements. It was being completed by a third party vendor, but the county did not receive documentation verifying it was being completed. Cause: The County did not request or retain the documentation of this requirement being met. Effect: It is possible that the County could be out of compliance with prevailing wage rate requirements. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a internal controls to verify they are compliant with prevailing wage requirements when a consultant is used. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
United States Department of the Treasury Reference Number: 2023-012 Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Federal Award Number: None Assigned Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement Condition: During our audit of procurement transactions related to the SLFRF, we noted one instance where the Town acquired precast restrooms at a cost of $339,500, for a park project without a competitive bidding process, as required by federal regulations and the Town’s Purchasing Policy. Criteria: Under 2 CFR §200.318-§200.326, non-federal entities must follow documented procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided those procedures conform to federal standards. The Town has adopted procurement policies requiring competitive bidding for purchases of equipment, materials, or professional services, with an estimated total cost exceeding $25,000 for an individual item/service or an overall contract exceeding $50,000. The policy also requires the documentation of vendor selection and justification. Cause: The Town did not consistently enforce its procurement policies due to turnover in key positions during the year. Effect: The Town was not in compliance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) at 2 CFR §200.318-§200.326 and with its own procurement policies. The lack of competitive bidding for purchases, where it is required increases the risk that the Town may not receive the best prices or terms for the goods and services it purchases. Recommendation: We recommend that the Finance Department enhance its processes and oversight surrounding federal and Town procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Town Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan. Responsible Positions: Town Manager and Director of Finance
Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Finding: Blue Mountain Land Trust did not have a written procurement policy that complies with the procurement standards established in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 in place during the year. Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than States must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR 200. Condition and context: Blue Mountain Land Trust maintains a practice of soliciting bids for services from at least three contractors, but it has not established a written policy that contemplates all required elements under 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Sample size and population: Sampling was not applicable to this finding. Effect: The result of the finding is that Blue Mountain Land Trust is not in compliance with federal procurement standards during the compliance year. Recommendation: Formalize written procurement procedures in compliance with required standards. Question Costs: None Management Response and Corrective Action Plan: See Corrective Action Plan Contact Person: Amanda Martino, Executive Director
Federal agency name: U.S. National Science Foundation & U.S. Department of Commerce Federal program title: Geosciences, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Office of International Science and Engineering & NOAA – Cooperative Institute AL No.: 47.050, 47.070, 47.079 & 11.432 Federal Award Identification No. & Award Period: EAR-1849458 (06/01/2019 -05/31/2024), EAR-2012893 (10/01/2020 – 08/31/2025), OAC-1931278 (10/1/2019 – 09/30/2023), EAR- 2244446 (03/01/2023 – 02/28/2026), OAC-2209833 (01/01/2023 – 12/31/2026), OAC-1829744 (09/01/2018 – 08/31/2023), OAC-1835592 (01/01/2009 – 12/31/2022), OAC-1835818 (10/01/2018 – 09/30/2024), OAC-2103780 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OAC-2118329 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OISE-1855654 (05/15/2019 – 12/31/2023) & A22NWS4320003 (08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 04/01/2023 – 03/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2026, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025) Pass Through Entity: University of Alabama MW2023-002 PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Material Weakness Criteria The requirements for this compliance requirement are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317- 200.326; 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44, and the clauses at 48 CRF sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203-16 and 52.215-12; agency FAR supplements; 2 CFR part 180; OMB M-18- 18; and the terms and conditions of the federal award. There is a requirement to verify that contractors in covered transactions or any of its vendors are not federally debarred, suspended, or excluded. A covered transaction is a nonprocurement or procurement transaction in excess of $25,000 that is subject to the prohibitions noted in 2 CFR part 180. The covered transaction may be at the primary tier, between a federal agency and a person or a lower tier between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Condition CUAHSI failed to maintain and provide the proper records and support to document their review of vendor files for covered transactions. Such failure led to non-compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment policies in accordance with the UG for the year ended December 31, 2023. CUAHSI did not complete the verification of its 2023 vendors until 2024. Based on our testing, no contractors in covered transactions were deemed to be federally debarred, suspended or excluded. Cause & Context CUAHSI has a policy in place to meet the procurement requirements but there was no evidence of compliance with that policy. Effect As a result of noncompliance, there could be possible repayment of funds and / or possible suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs None Prior Year Audit Finding Yes, previously reported as MW2022-006. Recommendation CUAHSI should ensure that, to the extent practicable, the use of a competitive procurement process in compliance with 2 CFR section 200/317. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action See accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
Information on the Federal Program(s): 10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities, Department of Agriculture Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.319(d) requires that the non-Federal entity must maintain written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: We noted that the City did not have written procedures for procurement transactions that include the provisions required by the Procurement Standards 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.327 in fiscal year 2023. Cause: The City was not aware of the requirement to have written procedures for procurement transactions. Effect: Failure to have adequate written procedures for procurement transactions could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, other procurement requirements, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the City identify grants that are subject to Uniform Guidance on a timely basis to ensure all compliance requirements are met and develop adequate written policies and procedures for procurement transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The City has identified federal grants subject to the Uniform Guidance and will develop written policies and procedures which include the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions.
Information on the Federal Program(s): 10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities, Department of Agriculture Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Condition: The City lacks sufficient controls over procurement to ensure compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Cause: The City did not design and implement controls over compliance with procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to have adequate internal controls over compliance with procurement could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, and other procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the City create and adopt an official written policy for procurement and contracts establishing contract files that document significant procurement history; methods of procurement authorized including selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis of contract price; verification that procurements provide full and open competition; requirements for cost or price analysis, including for contract modifications; obtaining and reacting to suspension and debarment certifications; and other applicable requirements for procurements under federal awards are followed. We also recommend that personnel with adequate knowledge and experience of responsibilities for procurements for federal awards review procurement and contracting decisions for compliance with federal procurement policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. The City will develop written policies and procedures for procurement, including the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions. Management will evaluate the need to contract with local government consultants to perform control procedures where City personnel are not available or qualified to perform.
Finding 2023-003 Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recover Funds, AL# 21.027 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and immaterial non-compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR §200.318, non-federal entities must have documented procurement procedures that conform to the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.326. Condition and Context: The auditee did not have written procurement procedures that conformed to the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.326. However, the auditee did follow the methods of procurement required (per 2 CFR §200.320) for federal procurements made during the audit period. Cause: There were not adequate internal controls over compliance in place to ensure there were written procurement policies that conformed with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The deficiency in the internal controls over compliance could result in material non-compliance with the procurement compliance requirement of the federal award and the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization document procurement policies in a formal written procurement policy that contains all required elements of and conforms to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.