2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
Information on the Federal Program Federal Program Name: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Affordable Care Act (ACA) Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program, 93.527 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (2 CFR 200.320 (a) (1) (ii)), micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. Also, the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (Appendix II to Part 200), require that Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Condition: The Organization entered to various professional services contracts for marketing, advertising and information dissemination that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and are considered micro-purchase awards, but did not maintain appropriate documentation to document the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history to support its procurement decisions. Contracts entered into also do not include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: During our testing of procurement requirements, vendor contracts over the micro-purchase threshold did not have appropriate documentation to evidence the basis of vendor selection (documentation of the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history). Also, related to the vendor payments, noted that vendor contracts do not contain the provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Effect: Micro-purchases were made without appropriate documentation to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Also, contracts were entered into and approved without the required provision of Appendix II to Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization does not have a comprehensive procurement policy that is in line with Uniform Guidance requirements. Adequate supporting documentation on the procurements were not obtained or maintained within vendor files and vendor contracts do not contain the necessary contract provision and language required by the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revisit controls over this compliance requirement to ensure that appropriate documentation is gathered and retained within its procurement files to support all Federally funded purchasing decisions. We also recommend the Organization perform a comprehensive review of its procurement policy and ensure that it is in compliance and in-line with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Organization will develop a policy and checklist to maintain written documentation of vendor selection and procurement process, along with the review and approval process required under the Uniform Guidance requirements.
Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Procurement. The District should follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Condition: The District did not follow the small purchase method for procurement that is required for purchases made between $10,000 and $250,000. This method requires that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b). Questioned Costs: None. Context: There was only one purchase over $10,000 made with these grants funds during the fiscal year and the required procurement method was not followed. Effect: The District did not comply with the required procurement standard. Cause: This purchase had to be made quickly so the District used their perferred vendor. Recommendation: We recommend that care is taken to ensure that all the procurement requirements are followed based on the amount of the purchase being made with the federal funds. Management's response: We will follow the procurement standard when not in urgent situations for the product or service we are seeking.
Condition: During the audit, we noted that a procurement policy meeting the minimum requirements under 2 CFR 200.320 was not in place at the Organization. Criteria: The Organization should have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards for any method of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal or sub-award. Cause: The Organization received a new grant in 2021 and was therefore required to have a procurement policy in place meeting the minimum standards under 2 CFR 200.320. The Organization was unaware of the requirement and did not implement a policy. Effect: Due to the condition above noted, the Organization did not follow procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.320 when acquiring services. However, most costs associated with the major program did not require the acquisition of outside services. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a procurement policy that meets the standards requirement under CFR 200.320 and ensure that all relevant personnel are aware of and follow the requirements in place.
2023-003 Procurement; Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services; Program: Social Services Research and Demonstration (ALN 93.647); Pass-through Entity: N/A; Federal Assistance Identification Number or Pass-Through Numbers: N/A; Federal Award Years: Year ended June 30, 2023; Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance; Other Matter Compliance Finding; Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that each non-Federal entity must "Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." 2 CFR 200.320 requires that each non-Federal entity must "have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award." Condition: While testing the procurement requirement, we were able to test compensating controls, but noted that internal controls were not properly designed over the procurement requirement. Prior to receiving federal funding beginning in August 2022, the program conducted a request for proposal (RFP) process and began contracting with a vendor. When federal funding was obtained, the vendor was not reevaluated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to ensure the procurement requirements were being met. In addition, we noted UW Health – Madison’s procurement policy documents do not include all of the information that is required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Because the vendor was already in place for the program prior to receiving federal funds, management did not recognize the need to reevaluate the vendor under the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management also did not recognize the need to include additional information in its procurement policy documents related to the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Without appropriate internal controls, there is an increased risk of noncompliance related to federal funding. Context: We identified and tested one vendor that was direct and material to the program and related to the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits.Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding?: No; Recommendation: While it was determined that the requirements of the Uniform Guidance were met related to the vendor tested, we suggest that management reevaluate all vendors that were previously used prior to receiving federal funding. In addition, we recommend that management update its procurement policies to incorporate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. View of responsible officials of the auditee: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Department of Education COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) – Assistance Listing #84.425E, #84.425F #2023-002 – Major Federal Award Finding – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance This is a repeat of prior year finding #2022-002. Conditions: We noted during testing of procurement for the HEERF program (Institutional Aid) that the University’s procurement policy was not being followed. Competitive bids were not obtained for projects over the simplified acquisition threshold. Criteria: Federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317- 200.326 provide that the University must have and use documented procurement procedures and follow written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in §200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Cause/Context: We tested two transactions over the micro purchase threshold. These transactions were subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations. We tested two transactions for a vendor over the simplified acquisition threshold. These transactions were not subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations and/or competitive bids. Recommendation: Management should review the University’s procurement policy and update appropriately to reference Uniform Guidance and specific purchasing thresholds. The University should ensure that it follows the requirements outlined in its procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The University agrees with the recommendations put forth by the auditors. The University will review its current procurement policy to include federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317-200.326. Proper oversight will be provided over the procurement process. See also attached Corrective Action Plan.
Department of Education COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) – Assistance Listing #84.425E, #84.425F #2023-002 – Major Federal Award Finding – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance This is a repeat of prior year finding #2022-002. Conditions: We noted during testing of procurement for the HEERF program (Institutional Aid) that the University’s procurement policy was not being followed. Competitive bids were not obtained for projects over the simplified acquisition threshold. Criteria: Federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317- 200.326 provide that the University must have and use documented procurement procedures and follow written standards that promote full and open vendor competition. Methods included in written standards covering the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or sub-award must be consistent with specific thresholds as set forth in CFR 200.320. There are five allowable procurement methods described in §200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Cause/Context: We tested two transactions over the micro purchase threshold. These transactions were subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations. We tested two transactions for a vendor over the simplified acquisition threshold. These transactions were not subject to the procurement processes required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to price quotations and/or competitive bids. Recommendation: Management should review the University’s procurement policy and update appropriately to reference Uniform Guidance and specific purchasing thresholds. The University should ensure that it follows the requirements outlined in its procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The University agrees with the recommendations put forth by the auditors. The University will review its current procurement policy to include federal regulations 2 CFR Section 200.317-200.326. Proper oversight will be provided over the procurement process. See also attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-003 Material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: United States Department of State Program Titles: Office of Global Women’s Issues Assistance Listing Number: 19.801 Pass-Through Entity: N/A Award Numbers: SLMAQM21CA3275 Award Periods: September 30, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326 Internal Controls, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirement identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A nonfederal entity among others must: - Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). - For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition/Context Although the Organization has a procurement policy, and the procedures include the use of a micro purchase threshold of $3,500, small purchases and simplified acquisition thresholds are not clearly identified. As such, the policy does not fully incorporate the procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance including sealed bids, cost or price analysis etc. Cause The Organization's management was not aware that all components including procurement methods of 2 CFR section 200.320 are required to be included in the Organization's procurement policy even if the Organization's procurements would not typically include all procurement methods. Effect The Organization did not ensure that its procurement policy follows the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement measures to ensure that its procurement policy reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations and conform to applicable federal statutes and requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.CNC Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Institution Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-135901-SB-546; 2023-135901-NSL-547; 2023-135901-DPI-SK_NSL-561 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District did not have a procurement or suspension and debarment policy that met the requirements of the Uniform Guidance at the time the transactions took place. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District is not following federal procurement requirements, as it relates to conflict of interest. In addition, during our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following federal suspension and debarment requirements nor does the currently policy include procedures relating to suspension and debarment. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement or suspension and debarment policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair completive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management has reviewed and updated the procurement and suspension and debarment policy to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.CNC Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Institution Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-135901-SB-546; 2023-135901-NSL-547; 2023-135901-DPI-SK_NSL-561 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District did not have a procurement or suspension and debarment policy that met the requirements of the Uniform Guidance at the time the transactions took place. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District is not following federal procurement requirements, as it relates to conflict of interest. In addition, during our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following federal suspension and debarment requirements nor does the currently policy include procedures relating to suspension and debarment. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement or suspension and debarment policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair completive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management has reviewed and updated the procurement and suspension and debarment policy to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.CNC Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Institution Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-135901-SB-546; 2023-135901-NSL-547; 2023-135901-DPI-SK_NSL-561 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District did not have a procurement or suspension and debarment policy that met the requirements of the Uniform Guidance at the time the transactions took place. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District is not following federal procurement requirements, as it relates to conflict of interest. In addition, during our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following federal suspension and debarment requirements nor does the currently policy include procedures relating to suspension and debarment. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement or suspension and debarment policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair completive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management has reviewed and updated the procurement and suspension and debarment policy to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.CNC Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Institution Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-135901-SB-546; 2023-135901-NSL-547; 2023-135901-DPI-SK_NSL-561 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District did not have a procurement or suspension and debarment policy that met the requirements of the Uniform Guidance at the time the transactions took place. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District is not following federal procurement requirements, as it relates to conflict of interest. In addition, during our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following federal suspension and debarment requirements nor does the currently policy include procedures relating to suspension and debarment. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement or suspension and debarment policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair completive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management has reviewed and updated the procurement and suspension and debarment policy to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-591029-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least 2). Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical. Additionally, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District was not consistently following the procurement policy, specifically requirements related to small purchases. Small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) or proposals to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. In addition, during our testing of suspension and debarment, we identified two vendor contracts that were entered into that did not include language related to suspension and debarment. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. In our sample of five procurement transactions subject to small purchase requirements we noted that the District did not retain documentation of an adequate number of price quotes for two vendors selected for testing. Additionally, in our sample of two suspension and debarment transactions, the District did not verify that either vendor was not suspended or debarred before entering into the transaction. Cause: The District did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement Policy and District controls did not properly document procurement, suspension and debarment requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Obtaining price quotes and proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of price quotes or proposals may cause the District to overpay for supplies or services. The lack of documentation related to suspension and debarment could result in the District doing business with a suspended or debarred vendor.Recommendation: We recommend the District review their policies and procedures related to Uniform Guidance and the District’s Federal Funds Procurement Policy. We also recommend the District evaluate current procedures and controls, including segregation of duties, to ensure that policies are consistently followed and properly documented in accordance with District policies. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-591029-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least 2). Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical. Additionally, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District was not consistently following the procurement policy, specifically requirements related to small purchases. Small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) or proposals to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. In addition, during our testing of suspension and debarment, we identified two vendor contracts that were entered into that did not include language related to suspension and debarment. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. In our sample of five procurement transactions subject to small purchase requirements we noted that the District did not retain documentation of an adequate number of price quotes for two vendors selected for testing. Additionally, in our sample of two suspension and debarment transactions, the District did not verify that either vendor was not suspended or debarred before entering into the transaction. Cause: The District did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement Policy and District controls did not properly document procurement, suspension and debarment requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Obtaining price quotes and proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of price quotes or proposals may cause the District to overpay for supplies or services. The lack of documentation related to suspension and debarment could result in the District doing business with a suspended or debarred vendor.Recommendation: We recommend the District review their policies and procedures related to Uniform Guidance and the District’s Federal Funds Procurement Policy. We also recommend the District evaluate current procedures and controls, including segregation of duties, to ensure that policies are consistently followed and properly documented in accordance with District policies. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-155130-SB-546; 2023-155130-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement Type of Finding Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance Criteria 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least 2) and that the procurement is vendor aggregate, not single item. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Condition During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that 2 of 3 vendors selected were not supported by any price or rate quotations to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. Questioned Costs None. Context The District's procurement did not conform to Uniform Guidance for 2 of 3 vendors tested in our sample. Cause The District did not follow Federal Funds Procurement policy. Effect Obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of quotes and proposals may cause the District to over pay for supplies or services. Repeat Finding Yes – 2022-005Recommendation We recommend the District review procurement policies and establish a procurement process in order to ensure this policy is being followed. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2023-155130-SB-546; 2023-155130-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2022 – 06/30/2023 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement Type of Finding Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance Criteria 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least 2) and that the procurement is vendor aggregate, not single item. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Condition During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that 2 of 3 vendors selected were not supported by any price or rate quotations to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. Questioned Costs None. Context The District's procurement did not conform to Uniform Guidance for 2 of 3 vendors tested in our sample. Cause The District did not follow Federal Funds Procurement policy. Effect Obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of quotes and proposals may cause the District to over pay for supplies or services. Repeat Finding Yes – 2022-005Recommendation We recommend the District review procurement policies and establish a procurement process in order to ensure this policy is being followed. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.