FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive an SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing, will be considered an SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors were identified as falling within the small purchase threshold. Both vendors were selected for testing. Supporting documentation to show that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained to ensure full and open competition could not be provided for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive an SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing, will be considered an SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors were identified as falling within the small purchase threshold. Both vendors were selected for testing. Supporting documentation to show that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained to ensure full and open competition could not be provided for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive an SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing, will be considered an SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors were identified as falling within the small purchase threshold. Both vendors were selected for testing. Supporting documentation to show that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained to ensure full and open competition could not be provided for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive an SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing, will be considered an SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors were identified as falling within the small purchase threshold. Both vendors were selected for testing. Supporting documentation to show that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained to ensure full and open competition could not be provided for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023-004 (2021-005) – FEDERAL AND FINANCIAL PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DEBARMENT COMPLIANCE Type of Finding: (B, F, G) – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards and Instance of Non-Compliance Related to Federal Awards Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Title: Emergency Solution Grant (ESG) Program AL #: 14.231 Award #: 20-02-HDH-EHA-001, E-22-MC-35-0001 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Questioned Costs: None Statement of Condition Heading Home did not follow federal procurement, suspension and debarment regulations or its federal procurement policy. Context During our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment we noted the following: • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors who received more than $10,000 in fiscal year 2023 and noted no evidence of obtaining bids or quotes. Additionally, adequate sole source documentation was absent to support the procurement. • We sampled two (out of a population of two) vendors for tests of internal control over compliance and noted that Heading Home did not provide evidence of internal controls regarding suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria • Heading Home’s procurement policy states that for purchases exceeding $10,000, three (3) written competitive bids must be obtained before selecting a vendor. • Per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) Small purchases - o (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000 in fiscal year 2023) but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($249,999 in fiscal year 2023). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. • Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires vendors awarded contracts expected to equal or exceed $25,000 to be checked for suspension and debarment via the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM.gov). Heading Home is required to verify that entities it plans to do business with are not excluded or disqualified under the federal procurement regulations and the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority. According to §200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity (Heading Home) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provide reasonable assurance that Heading Home is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to §180.300 of Subpart C–Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business with Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person you intend to conduct business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Cause Heading Home has not followed its policies and procedures related to procurement. Additionally, the procurement policy does not include the requirement for checking suspension and debarment via SAM.gov. Effect Heading Home is not in compliance with its policies and the federal procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Heading Home may have entered into contracts with ineligible contractors, exposing itself to potential liability and the risk of losing federal funds. Recommendation We recommend Heading Home follow its internal control policies and procedures related to procurement, as well as the following: • Document controls such as including the procurement files include proof of SAM.gov verification to ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations and internal procurement policy. • Implement policies and procedures to verify contractor suspension or debarment status before awarding contracts using federal funds. • Include the required suspension and debarment clause in contracts with federally funded contractors. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan Heading Home management agrees with this finding. Management has reviewed existing procurement policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #301 of Heading Home’s fiscal policies and procedures with appropriate staff and will enforce policies and procedures to ensure competitive bids are obtained where required. Management has also reviewed the existing suspension and debarment policies and procedures found in Section III Policy #302 with appropriate staff, and which require vendors to be reviewed on the SAM website, to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. Although this review was conducted after the fact, each of the five vendors noted in this finding has since been reviewed on the SAM website, and none of them returned a notice of suspension or debarment. Management is in the process of reviewing all vendors paid $10,000 or more against the SAM website and will ensure all vendors are checked against the website who currently meet this requirement, as well as for those anticipated to meet this threshold. Proof of the SAM website review and approval will be maintained in each vendor file. Management reviewed the above mentioned vendors and noted none of them were suspended or debarred. Circumstantial evidence consisting of emails leads the organization to believe bids/quotes were in fact solicited but the actual procurement packets could not be located due to the extensive turnover in management during 2023. Management anticipates the above corrective action plan will be fully implemented by September 30, 2025. The personnel responsible for overseeing implementation include Connie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer; Debbie Brickman, Chief Financial Officer; and Armando Sanchez, contract accountant team lead.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 025 – Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform guidance requires auditees to follow procurement standards set forth. sections of the Uniform Guidance set forth five permissible procurement methods for non-Federal entities expending Federal financial assistance: (1) micro-purchases (§ 200.320(a)(1)); (2) small purchases (§ 200.320(a)(2)); (3) sealed bids (§ 200.320(b)(1)); (4) proposals (§ 200.320(b)(2)); and (5) noncompetitive procurement (§ 200.320(c)(1)-(5)). Condition: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Context: The University's procurement policy does not currently match requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to defining the required levels of procurement and when competitive bids are required. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the procurement policy met Uniform Guidance. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance for procurement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to insure it meets federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
2023-007 – Procurement, Small Purchases (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance, Questioned Costs Greater than $25k) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210288, P031C200002 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of procurement testing, the College did not follow small purchase procedures and obtain quotes to ensure the vendor with the lowest price was used for one sample. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), non-federal entities must retain documentation sufficient to detail the history of procurement decisions. Cause: The College did not obtain three quotes prior to using vendor for a purchase. Effect: The College may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $32,607 Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen controls to ensure purchasing policies and procedures are being followed and train staff in the purchasing department to comply with all relevant federal procurement requirements.
Information on the Federal Program Federal Program Name: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Affordable Care Act (ACA) Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program, 93.527 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (2 CFR 200.320 (a) (1) (ii)), micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. Also, the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (Appendix II to Part 200), require that Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Condition: The Organization entered to various professional services contracts for marketing, advertising and information dissemination that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and are considered micro-purchase awards, but did not maintain appropriate documentation to document the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history to support its procurement decisions. Contracts entered into also do not include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: During our testing of procurement requirements, vendor contracts over the micro-purchase threshold did not have appropriate documentation to evidence the basis of vendor selection (documentation of the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history). Also, related to the vendor payments, noted that vendor contracts do not contain the provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Effect: Micro-purchases were made without appropriate documentation to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Also, contracts were entered into and approved without the required provision of Appendix II to Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization does not have a comprehensive procurement policy that is in line with Uniform Guidance requirements. Adequate supporting documentation on the procurements were not obtained or maintained within vendor files and vendor contracts do not contain the necessary contract provision and language required by the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revisit controls over this compliance requirement to ensure that appropriate documentation is gathered and retained within its procurement files to support all Federally funded purchasing decisions. We also recommend the Organization perform a comprehensive review of its procurement policy and ensure that it is in compliance and in-line with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Organization will develop a policy and checklist to maintain written documentation of vendor selection and procurement process, along with the review and approval process required under the Uniform Guidance requirements.