Findings Citing § 200.320

FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023-2024, FY 2024-2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed and implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 NORTH HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors were tested that exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period. For one vendor no quotes were obtained. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation entered into four covered transactions during the audit period and were unable to provide evidence they followed its policy for one of those transactions. The total purchases made from that vendor totaled $29,091. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 NORTH HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states: The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 NORTH HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.509 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2025; FAIN not available. Pass-Through Agency: State of Vermont Agency of Transportation Pass-Through Numbers: EA#FT202201-704 EA#FT25FLEX-054 EA#FT25FLEX-954 EA#FT23FLEX-954 EA#FT25FLEX-454 EA#FT23FORM-704 EA#FT25FLEX-554 EA#FT24FORM-924 EA#FT25FLEX-854 EA#FT24FORM-934 EA#FT25FLEX-924 Award Period: July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance; material noncompliance and modified opinion on compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.319 indicates procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.320 indicates that for any allowable method chosen, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Part 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR Part 180.300). 2 CFR Part 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The District did not maintain documentation to support the procurement, suspension and debarment procedures performed for covered transactions in order to demonstrate compliance with 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Two (2) of the six (6) procurement transactions and two (2) of the five (5) suspension and debarment transactions. Cause: Procedures were not implemented to maintain documentation to support compliance with the standards of procurement, suspension and debarment contained in 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Effect: Compliance with the requirements of the federal award could not be demonstrated. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2024-004 Recommendation: We recommend management enhance procedures and controls to ensure documentation is maintained to support all procurements and suspension and debarment verifications related to expenditures from federal award programs. Justification for noncompetitive procurements (i.e., sole source, public exigency, or consent of the awarding agency), should also be documented. Such documentation should be consolidated and maintained in a secure, accessible location. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY24, FY25 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-005. Condition and Context Procurement When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation procured goods totaling $149,426 from five vendors that fell under the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Price or rate quotes were not obtained for any of the vendors nor was there any documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 DELPHI COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions, recipients are required to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions list, collection of a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. There were four covered transactions over $25,000 identified during the audit period totaling $130,448. All four were selected for testing; however, the School Corporation did not verify that two of the four vendors totaling $70,411 were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3(d) states: "If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 DELPHI COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect Material noncompliance with the grant agreement and compliance requirements could cause federal expenditures to be unallowable which the funding agency could potentially recover. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure compliance with requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 DELPHI COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2025-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-151-PN01, 23611-151-PN01, 24611-151-PN01, 22611-151-ARP, 23619-151-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation procured goods totaling $60,002 from four vendors that fell under the small purchase threshold during the audit period. The School Corporation did not provide adequate documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, for all four vendors. Price or rate quotes were not obtained for three of the vendors as required. The School Corporation obtained three quotes for one vendor; however, the highest quote was selected without a documented reason. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions, recipients are required to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions list, collection of a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. There was one covered transaction over $25,000 identified during the audit period which was selected for testing. The School Corporation did not verify that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 DELPHI COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3(d) states: "If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases— INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 DELPHI COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect Material noncompliance with the grant agreement and compliance requirements could cause federal expenditures to be unallowable which the funding agency could potentially recover. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure compliance with requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Program Name: SNAP Cluster: State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ALN #: 10.561 Award Number (Federal Award Year): IDHS SNAP FCSDQ03623 (2024-2025) Questioned Costs: None 2025-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy procurement system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Prior to June 15, 2025, when a noncompetitive procurement method was selected, a radio button within the iBuy system allowed for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection was made, additional information supporting this rationale should have been available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method was appropriate. Out of four small purchase procurement transactions tested prior to June 15, 2025, for one transaction (25%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive method selected was inappropriate. This transaction was selected from the period prior to the iBuy enhancement. Subsequent to June 15, 2025, the purchase requisition form in the iBuy system was enhanced to require users to complete mandatory fields within the purchase requisition form when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected and provide detailed written justification. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. University officials further stated the electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code No. 2025-004, 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: While the University accepts the finding, we note that corrective action was implemented on June 15, 2025. No exceptions related to the iBuy central procurement file were found after implementation.

FINDING 2025-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-148-PN01, 23611-148-PN01, 24611-148-PN01, 25611-148-PN01, 22611-148-ARP, 22619-148-PN01, 23619-148-PN01, 24619-148-PN01, 25619-148-PN01, 22619-148-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 GRIFFITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement - Micro-Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold, which is set at $10,000. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. Three vendors determined to fall under the micro-purchase threshold were selected for testing. One claim from one of the vendors selected for testing did not have proper supporting documentation maintained by the School Corporation to determine if the proper procurement method was followed. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. One vendor provided contracted services paid with special education grant funds during the audit period totaling $269,948. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation did not verify that the contractor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 GRIFFITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Micro-purchases — (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in § 200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (iii) Micro-purchase thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining and documenting an appropriate micro-purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. The micropurchase threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. Non-Federal entities may establish a threshold higher than the Federal threshold established in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) in accordance with paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (v) of this section. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 GRIFFITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) Non-Federal entity increase to the micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000. Non-Federal entities may establish a threshold higher than the micro-purchase threshold identified in the FAR in accordance with the requirements of this section. The non-Federal entity may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the Federal awarding agency and auditors in accordance with § 200.334. The self-certification must include a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation of any of the following: (A) A qualification as a low-risk auditee, in accordance with the criteria in § 200.520 for the most recent audit; (B) An annual internal institutional risk assessment to identify, mitigate, and manage financial risks; or, (C) For public institutions, a higher threshold consistent with State law. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to affect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments equal to, or in excess of $25,000, were not verified to not be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 GRIFFITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2025-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027X Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 22611-019-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Condition and Context Procurement Small purchases, procurements between $50,000 and $150,000, require three quotes to be obtained and a contract awarded. There was one disbursement tested for $52,598 for small purchase procurement, and, while the appropriate number of quotes were obtained, a contract was not awarded for the transaction as required by Indiana Code 5-22-8-3. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. It was determined that the School Corporation had a process in place to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred, but the process was not operating effectively. For the one vendor tested also related to the transaction noted above, documentation of the SAM.gov search could not be provided. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 OAK HILL UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the transaction and award number noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 OAK HILL UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. (c) The purchasing agent shall mail an invitation to quote to the persons described in subsection (b) at least seven (7) days before the time fixed for receiving quotes. (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. (e) The purchasing agent may reject all quotes. (f) If the purchasing agent does not receive a quote from a responsible and responsive offeror, the purchasing agent may purchase the supplies under IC 5-22-10-10." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation was not aware of the Indiana Code requirement to enter into a contract for the equipment purchase. The School Corporation was aware of the requirements to check for suspension and debarment, but due to newer personnel at the School Corporation they were not able to locate the records or verify that the suspension and debarment verification was performed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 OAK HILL UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to remain undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation amend its procurement policy and system of internal controls to ensure that procurement requirements meet the stricter federal and/or state requirements. Additionally, the internal control system effectiveness should be improved to ensure all contractors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into contracts. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2025-005 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Partially Repeated from Prior Year Finding 2024-002) Federal Program: Continuum of Care Program Federal Identifying Number: Direct funding grants - IL0395L5T102214, IL0395L5T102315, IL0184L5T102316, IL0184L5T102417, IL1790H5T102200, IL1791H5T102200, IL1792H5T102200; Passed- through grants -IL1759D5T102201, IL1878D5T102300, IL1759D5T102202, and 8567-D Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Passed Through: All Chicago Making Homeless History and Aids Foundation of Chicago Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Criteria/Specific Requirement: A. The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 200.318(a) General Procurement Standards states the following, “Documented procurement procedures. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services.” B. The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 200.319 Competition states the following, “All procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides for full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320.” C. The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 180.300 states a participant entering into a covered transaction must verify that the person with whom it intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by: a. Checking SAM Exclusions; or b. Collecting a certification from that person; or c. Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. D. The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 200.303 Internal Controls states the following, “The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Condition: For fourteen (14) out of fourteen (14) procurement and suspension and debarment transactions tested we noted the following: 1) The Inner Voice, Inc. did not complete the appropriate procurement process; 2) The Inner Voice, Inc. did not maintain appropriate documentation to support the procurement method utilized (if any); and 3) The Inner Voice, Inc. did not provide or maintain documentation that suspension and debarment searches were performed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Inner Voice, Inc. expended a total of $5,207,762 of federal awards in fiscal year 2025. The Inner Voice, Inc. expended a total of $3,992,341 of federal awards in fiscal year 2025 under the Continuum of Care program. The procurement, suspension and debarment transactions we selected for testing totaled $1,180,252 or 29.6% percent of program expenditures. Effect: The Inner Voice, Inc. is not in compliance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 as it relates to procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Additionally, the effect of noncompliance can result in questioned costs. Cause: 1. The Inner Voice, Inc.’s procurement policy provides limited guidance on procurement methods, documentation of procurement process, and references to Uniform Guidance procurement categories and definitions. Additionally, policy does not include processes pertaining to suspension and debarment checks. 2. Where policies are in place, they are not being followed. Recommendation: We recommend that The Inner Voice, Inc.: a. Enhance policies and procedures surrounding procurement, suspension and debarment. b. Communicate and reinforce its policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.

Federal program: AL 21.027, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; Federal agency: U.S. Department of Treasury; Award year: 2025; Criteria: Per the 2025 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement, part 4, requirement I., Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Per Uniform Guidance section 2 CFR 200.319(a): All procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and section 200.320. Per section 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i): …If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources...; Condition: Procurement methods did not always follow Uniform Guidance requirements. Contracts were directly awarded to vendors without full and open competition or obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources.; Cause: The cause appears to be attributable to lack of staff training and knowledge regarding federal grant procurement requirements and which contracts support federal awards. Program staff did not appear to be aware that all federal grant contracts are required to comply with a competitive bid process, and instead applied federal funding to contracts that were directly awarded.; Effect or potential effect: Not conducting open competition or solicitation of quotations or bids could result in higher grant program costs by missing the opportunity to select the best available vendor source in the market.; Questioned costs: No known or estimated questioned costs identified.; Context: Out of a population of 100 contracts above the micro purchase threshold of $10,000 and below the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000, two of thirteen contracts selected for testing did not follow required Uniform Guidance procurement procedures.; Repeat finding: No.; Recommendation: The County should provide training to staff regarding Uniform Guidance rules of procurement and how to identify which contracts support federal award programs.; Views of responsible officials: The County understands and concurs with the finding.

FINDING 2025-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023-2024, FY 2024-2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation procured goods and services totaling $5,967,079 from three vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold during the audit period. The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for one of the three vendors. Multiple quotes were obtained for the purchase of cafeteria equipment totaling $361,575; however, the procurement method used should have been the bidding process. Additionally, the School Corporation did not obtain a contract for the purchase. The School Corporation made three small purchases totaling $35,045 that were selected for testing. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes as required. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 SCHOOL CITY OF EAST CHICAGO SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions, recipients are required to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions list, collection of a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. There were three covered transactions over $25,000 during the audit period, which totaled $5,967,079. The School Corporation did not verify that one of the three covered transactions, totaling $361,575, was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3(d) states: "If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 SCHOOL CITY OF EAST CHICAGO SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect Material noncompliance with the grant agreement and compliance requirements could cause federal expenditures to be unallowable which the funding agency could potentially recover. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 SCHOOL CITY OF EAST CHICAGO SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure compliance with requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Reference Number: 2025-001 United States Department of Agriculture Federal Assistance Listing Number & Program Name: 10.553 & 10.555 Child Nutrition Cluster Description: Procurement Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the Sealed Bids method is used - This is a procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms to all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. The Organization’s procurement policy also states that purchases ranging from >$100,000 require a minimum of three written bids. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we totaled purchases by vendor and one vendor above $100,000 purchases had no price quotes as required by the Organization’s procurement policy. Cause: The Organization did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement policy related to the appropriate methods of procurement. Effect: Obtaining price quotes or proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the Organization to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of quotes and proposals may cause the Organization to overpay for supplies or services. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend the Organization review their procurement policy and adhere to current policy for going out for the minimum amount of bids on required vendors. Corrective Action Plan: See attachment for Organization’s corrective action plan.

FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-004. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For the audit period, the School Corporation self-certified a micro-purchase threshold of $50,000. Any purchase above this threshold but below the $150,000 simplified acquisition threshold would be considered a small purchase. During fiscal year 2023-2024 , the School Corporation had one vendor with disbursements totaling $60,757, which exceeded the School Corporation established small purchase threshold of $50,000. The School Corporation did not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes were obtained from qualified sources for the purchases. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one vendor noted above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation and inspection of supporting documentation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, it was identified that the School Corporation did not have policies or procedures in place to verify if vendors were suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participation in federal awards. In 2023-2024, for one covered transaction totaling $60,757, there was no evidence provided that the School Corporation verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one vendor noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 WABASH CITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause An effective system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the School Corporation. The School Corporation had outlined a process for handling small purchase vendor related transactions, but that process was not followed, nor was supporting evidence maintained for the items described in the Condition and Context. Also, the School Corporation had designed a process for determining whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, but that process was not completed. Effect As a result of not designing and implementing an effective system of internal controls and following the School Corporation's policies and procedures, goods that fell within the small purchase threshold were not properly procured, and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement an effective internal control system and follow through with the policies and procedures related to small purchase vendor procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements that they designed through an action plan to correct the prior audit period finding. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Number: 2025-002 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL # 84.027 Special Education Cluster Federal Award Identification Number / Year: 2025 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education and Workforce Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR § 200.320(a) through 2 CFR § 200.320(c) which describes three types of procurement methods: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. • Informal procurement methods for small purchases. These procurement methods expedite the completion of transactions, minimize administrative burdens, and reduce costs. Informal procurement methods may be used when the value of the procurement transaction under the Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold as defined in § 200.1. Recipients and subrecipients may also establish a lower threshold. • Formal procurement methods. Formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a Federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. • Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; (4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or (5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate. Additionally, District Policy: PROCUREMENT - FEDERAL GRANTS/FUNDS, describes both formal and informal procurement methods, including noncompetitive procurement. The District did not have the proper internal controls in place to identify and select the proper procurement method for two out of two procurements (100%) entered into by the District using Special Education Cluster (IDEA) funds. The District erroneously identified two procurements totaling $24,000 as single source, a type of noncompetitive procurement. Given the facts and circumstances surrounding these procurements, small purchase procurement method should have been utilized. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the appropriate procurement method was not utilized for two procurements in the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) program during fiscal year 2025. Failing to have the appropriate controls in place may result in noncompliance with federal requirements. Prior to entering into covered transactions, the District should follow its policies and procedures to ensure the correct procurement method is used.

Finding 2025-001 Federal Program: Congressional Directives Assistance Listing Number: 93.493 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.326 requires non-Federal entities to use documented procurement procedures that provide for full and open competition and are consistent with applicable Federal standards. Specifically, 2 CFR §200.320 requires procurement transactions for construction in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold to be conducted using competitive proposals or sealed bids, unless conditions exist to justify noncompetitive procurement. Additionally, the Agency’s internal procurement policy requires competitive bidding for construction projects exceeding established dollar thresholds unless an approved exception is documented. Condition: During our audit of procurement transactions charged to the Federal program, we noted that the Agency did not obtain competitive bids for a construction project funded in part with Federal award funds. The project was awarded to a contractor without evidence that competitive proposals were solicited, evaluated, or documented. Furthermore, the Agency did not maintain documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement justification or evidence of advance written approval as required by Uniform Guidance and internal policy. Cause: The condition appears to have resulted from inadequate internal controls over procurement compliance, including insufficient review of procurement documentation prior to contract execution and limited understanding of Uniform Guidance procurement requirements by personnel responsible for project oversight. Additionally, there has been turnover in senior leadership positions since receipt of the award and since the project began. Effect and Questioned Costs: The failure to follow Uniform Guidance procurement requirements increases the risk that Federal funds may not be used in a manner that ensures full and open competition, reasonableness of cost, and compliance with federal regulations. This condition exposes the Agency to potential disallowance of costs, repayment of federal funds, and increased scrutiny from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. No questioned costs were identified as a result of this finding. Was the finding a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year? No Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency strengthen internal controls over procurement by: 1. Ensuring all construction procurements funded by Federal awards comply with the competitive procurement requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. 2. Requiring documented evidence of bid solicitation, evaluation, and selection prior to contract award. 3. Establishing procedures to ensure noncompetitive procurements are supported by written justification and receive required approvals in advance. 4. Providing periodic training to personnel involved in procurement and project management on Uniform Guidance requirements. Management Response: The procurement of construction services funded through this award was done in early 2023 and preceded Dimock’s updated procurement policy which calls for competitive bidding. It also preceded changes in procurement leadership. Subsequent procurement for services have since been subject to competitive bidding by Dimock consistent with CFR 200.318-200.326.

2025-002 Procurement Supporting Documentation CFDA No: 93.434 Program Name: Preschool Development Grants Award Number: 25FPDGCN-510841-01A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Pass-Through Grantor: Arizona Department of Education Compliance Requirement: L. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $29,281 Summary of Finding: Material weakness in internal controls over compliance which resulted in a qualified opinion on federal program compliance. Repeat Finding? No Condition Heartwood could not provide documentation for the selection of two vendors within the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, which totaled $29,281. The population of vendors who met applicable thresholds was tested and totaled four vendors. Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, 2 CFR 200.318(i) states “The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Cause Heartwood did not retain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources or document justification for the use of sole source vendors. 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states: “Unless specified by the Federal agency, the recipient or subrecipient may exercise judgment in determining what number is adequate.” Effect The inability of Heartwood to retain procurement documentation impairs the ability to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements, increases the risk of unallowable or unreasonable costs, and may result in repayment/disallowance of the related expenditures. Recommendation Primarily, Heartwood should enforce their written procurement and documentation procedures which are prepared as part of grant award acceptance. Then, Heartwood should ensure every purchase is supported, and retained in a central file. At a minimum, the school should: Establish checklist for every purchase (paper or electronic), retained centrally, that includes:  Requisition/need justification and funding source, in this instance Preschool Development Grant (PDG)  Evidence of price reasonableness:  quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources (or documented attempts)  Basis for vendor selection  Approvals (who approved, when)  Contract/purchase order, invoice, and proof of receipt/performance  Required contract provisions (when applicable)  In the case of sole source procurements, justification dcumentation for the use of the vendor.  Suspension/debarment verification (SAM check) when required by the school’s policy/pass-through requirements Centralize record retention  Store all procurement documentation in a single shared location (e.g., secured drive) by grant year and vendor, with a naming convention.  Assign a specific role (grant manager/business office) responsible for completeness before payment.

2025-004 Improve Procurement Process for Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Cluster/Program: Child Nutrition Cluster AL Number(s): 10.553/10.555/10.559/10.582 Award Year: 2025 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Type of Finding Compliance Internal Control over Compliance – Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.318–200.320) requires recipients of federal funds to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to applicable federal and state laws and promote full and open competition. For small purchases, Uniform Guidance and School policy require obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, which per School policies is at least three. Additionally, proper contract documentation must be maintained for vendor relationships. Condition and Context Of the three vendors tested for procurement transactions under the Child Nutrition Cluster program, sufficient support could not be provided for one small purchase selection. School policy requires at least three quotes for small purchases; however, only two quotes were consistently obtained from vendors throughout the year. Each month, only two vendors provided quotes and the lowest-priced vendor was selected to supply produce. Further, no contracts were in place with the vendor supplying the produce. Effect or Potential Effect Noncompliance with policies and procedures regarding required number of quotes and maintaining formal contracts with vendors increases the risk of noncompliance with federal procurement requirements, lack of competition, and unallowable costs. Questioned Costs Due to the condition noted above, we were unable to determine if costs of $241,737 charged to the grant were allowable. Cause The School Department did not implement adequate controls to ensure compliance with its procurement policy for obtaining sufficient quotes and did not formalize vendor relationships with contracts as required. Recommendation The School Department should strengthen its procurement controls by ensuring that the required number of quotes are obtained and documented for all small purchases, in compliance with School policy and Uniform Guidance. The School should also implement procedures to ensure that contracts are in place with all vendors providing goods and services to the program. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action Management’s views and Corrective Action Plan are included at the end of this report after the summary Schedule of Prior Year Findings.

2025-003 Improve Controls and Documentation Over Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Cluster/Program: Special Education Cluster AL Number(s): 84.027/84.173 Award Year: 2025 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Type of Finding Compliance Internal Control over Compliance – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.320) permits noncompetitive (sole source) procurements only when specific conditions are met, such as when the item is available from a single source, and requires documentation justifying the sole source determination. All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, to the maximum extent practicable. Condition and Context Of the two vendors tested for procurement transactions under the Special Education Cluster, support could not be provided for one vendor to justify that they were the only vendor capable of providing the product and that the purchase therefore met the requirements for a sole source procurement. Effect or Potential Effect Lack of documentation to support justification for sole source procurement increases the risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance, limits transparency, and could allow for inappropriate procurement practices. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Cause The School Department did not have controls to ensure that sole source procurement transactions are properly documented in accordance with federal requirements. Recommendation The School Department should enhance its procurement controls to ensure all sole source purchases are fully documented with justification in accordance with Uniform Guidance, and maintain supporting records for all federal procurement transactions. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action Management’s views and Corrective Action Plan are included at the end of this report after the summary Schedule of Prior Year Findings.

Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Indian School Equalization 15.042 A23AV00813 N/A Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools 15.046 A23AV00813 N/A Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.027 A24AV00760 N/A Federal Agency(ies): U.S. Department of Interior Pass‐Through Agency(ies): Bureau of Indian Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. Additionally, the School should adhere to procurement methods outlined in 2 CFR §200.320. Condition The School’s internal controls over procurement of goods and services were not adequate. Cause The School has procures in place to perform procurement, suspension, and debarment in accordance with federal regulations and guidelines, however, they were not followed. Effect The School was not in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines related to suspension and debarment or procurement. Context - The School did not maintain documentation that a review to determine that vendors with whom the School spent greater than $25,000 were not suspended and debarred. The deficiency applied to two vendors with the Special Education Cluster (IDEA) and one vendor with the Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools. - For three non‐cooperative‐purchase vendors paid in excess of the small purchase threshold ($10,000), the School did not prepare and maintain documentation for at least 3 written quotes from qualified sources. The deficiency applied to two vendors with the Administrative Cost Grant, and one vendor with the Special Education Cluster (IDEA). -For all eight vendors procured via sole source reviewed, the School did not prepare and maintain documentation in accordance with School policy that there was only one sole source and that the determination was reasonable. Additionally, the School did not present the procurement to the Board for approval as a sole source for all eight vendors. The deficiency applied to five vendors procured through funding from the Administrative Cost Grant for Indian Schools, two vendors procured through funding from the Indian School Equalization Program, and one vendor which was procured through various sources of federal funding. -For the first of three vendors reviewed with whom the School had purchases exceeding $50,000 during the fiscal year, the School did not perform a sealed procurement. For the second of three vendors reviewed with whom the School had purchases exceeding $50,000 during the fiscal year, the School did not retain evidence that a sealed procurement was performed. Finally, for the third of three vendors reviewed with whom the School had purchases exceeding $50,000, the School did not maintain evidence that bids were solicited from an adequate known suppliers, were opened at the prescribed time and place, and that the award was made to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder. All three deficiencies applied to the Special Education Cluster (IDEA). The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The School should review documented policies and implement them in school procedures to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Procurement Noncompliance Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127: Reconnect Age Expansion - Financial Aid Compliance Funds passed through Michigan Department of Lifelong Education, Advancement, and Potential. Criteria. Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR §200.320 requires non-Federal entities to use one of the approved procurement methods: micro-purchase, small purchase procedures, sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive (sole source) procurement. Noncompetitive (sole source) procurement is allowable only under specific circumstances, including: (a) The item is available only from a single source; (b) A public exigency or emergency does not permit delay; (c) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes a sole source in writing; or (d) Competition is determined inadequate after soliciting multiple sources. Entities must maintain documentation supporting the chosen procurement method and justification. Condition. During our testing of four procurement transactions charged to the federal award, we noted that the College procured goods/services totaling $18,750 from a single vendor using a sole source justification. The College did not obtain the required quotes for the purchase. Our review of the documentation determined that the rationale provided for sole source procurement did not meet the criteria outlined in Uniform Guidance. As a result, the College did not follow required competitive procurement procedures. Cause. Internal controls over procurement documentation were not adequately followed to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. The College did not obtain sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the vendor was the only available provider or that any other sole source condition was met. Effect. Because competitive procurement procedures were not used, the College may not have obtained the best price or ensured full and open competition. Questioned Costs. $18,750. Recommendation. We recommend that the College strengthen internal controls to ensure personnel verify and document that sole source criteria under 2 CFR §200.320 are fully met before awarding a procurement without competition. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.

Finding 2025-001 Internal control deficiency and noncompliance over procurement and suspension and debarment. Identification of the federal program: Assistance Listing Number 93.493: • Congressional Directives • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Federal award identification number – CE146487 • Federal award year – 7/1/2024 – 6/30/2025 • Pass-through entity – The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center • Pass-through entity identifying numbers: H79FG000747 and H79FG001034 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government,” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318, General procurement standards: (a) the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327; (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders; (c) (1) the non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318, General procurement standards: (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.319, Competition: (a) All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and 200.320. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320, Methods of procurement to be followed: The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate –(1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price; (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320, Methods of procurement to be followed: (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.324, Contract cost and price: (a) The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but, as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart C 200.214, Suspension and debarment: Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations that restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter I, Part 180, Subpart C 180.300: What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier? When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we observed management did not have documented procurement procedures that conformed to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 to 200.327 and written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Management did not have internal controls in place over procurements to ensure price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, formal procurements to ensure sealed bids or proposals were obtained through public advertising, and completion of a cost or price analysis in connection with all procurement actions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Management did not maintain records for procurements to document the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, during our testing over suspension and debarment, we observed management did not retain support for internal control documentation for all vendors, evidencing that the vendors were searched for suspension and debarment upon entering into a contract supported with federal funds. Cause: Management did not have internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or potential effect: Procurements were not supported by internal controls and could potentially include unreasonable prices or rates. In addition, if a search for suspension and debarment is not conducted, the entity could contract with vendors that are suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $1,385,165 – Assistance Listing Number 93.493 Federal award identification number – CE146487 Pass-through entity identifying numbers: H79FG000747 and H79FG001034 Questioned costs were computed as all procurements selected for testing. Questioned costs for each award are as follows: • CE146487: $60,874 • H79FG000747: $119,479 • H79FG001034: $1,204,812 Questioned costs means an amount, expended or received from a Federal award, that (1) is noncompliant or suspected noncompliant with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal award or (2) at the time of the audit, lacked adequate documentation to support compliance. Context: During our testing over procurements, we selected five vendors for testing with total expenditures of $1,385,165 from a population of procurements totaling $1,425,361, subject to formal procurement procedures. We observed management did not have internal controls in place to ensure the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above were performed for any of the five procurements selected for testing. For suspension and debarment, we selected five vendors for testing totaling $1,385,165. Management was unable to provide documentation that internal controls were executed for any of the vendors selected for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management should create documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327 and written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Management should develop and implement internal controls over procurements to ensure price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, formal procurements to ensure sealed bids or proposals are obtained through public advertising, and completion of a cost or price analysis in connection with all procurement actions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Management should maintain records for procurements to document the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Management should create documented suspension and debarment procedures and develop and implement internal controls to ensure vendors were searched for suspension and debarment at the time of awarding a contract supported by federal funding and retain evidence supporting such procedures. Management should review the procurements identified as questioned costs to identify if any improper payments were made to the entity. Views of responsible officials: We agree with the finding that internal controls were not sufficient to maintain compliance with federal procurement standards under Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318 to 200.327 for a non-federal entity. However, the funds were expended for the intended purpose of the federal award. The Company is committed to implementing internal controls to ensure procurement related to federal awards follow 2 CFR section 200.318 to 200.327. The Company will update the procurement policy to ensure it complies with the requirements of 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327, which includes the written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest, governing the actions of its employees who select, award, and administer procurement contracts. This policy will include procedures to ensure proper procurement for purchases to ensure sufficient price quotations are obtained from the required number of qualified sources, proper sealed bids or proposals are obtained through public advertising, an appropriate cost or price analysis is performed for procurement actions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, documentation is retained, and proper oversight is exercised to demonstrate compliance with 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327.

Finding 2025-002 Use of Sole-Sourced Justification for Procurement Federal Agency: United States Department of Justice Federal Program: Edward Bryne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program Assistance Listing Number: 16.738 Award Identification Numbers: 2019-YA-BX-K002; 15PBJA-22-GK-01566-JAGJ; 15PBJA-22-GK- 04999-BSCI Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.320(f) “Methods of procurement to be followed”, procurements by noncompetitive proposals (i.e. sole-sourced justification) may be used only when one or more of the following circumstances apply:  The item is available only from a single source;  The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation;  The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or  After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testwork performed over procurement, we determined that the Association did not have adequate justification to permit sole sourced procurements. Cause: The Association does not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that solesourced procurements meet one of the applicable circumstances identified above. Effect or Potential Effect: The Association could enter into contractual arrangements whereby they are not receiving the best value for the organization and/or in which there exists conflicts of interest. Ultimately, transparency with respect to these transactions could be compromised if the proper procurement actions are not followed. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: 3 of 4 samples selected for testing disclosed instances of consultants hired under the solesourced justification method of procurement. Although the expenses were properly supported, the rationale for sole-sourced selections did not appear to qualify for sole source exemption. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Association limit its use of sole-sourced justification based on the above-noted requirements. In cases where sole-sourced is appropriate, we recommend that the actions (or lack of actions) be properly and fully documented. The importance in maintaining a record of each procurement action is to support the Association's due diligence process. We also believe this process helps identify any actual or potential conflicts of interest with prospective vendors and contractors.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Center for Substance Abuse Treatment - Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 93.696 Direct Federal Award Program: PA0029L3T002316 - Tioga Arms PA0568L3T002308 - Shelton Court 22TI85374A – Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Type of Finding: - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Other Matters Criteria: Federal regulations at 2 CFR Part 200 require non-Federal entities to follow documented procurement procedures that comply with applicable federal statutes and procurement standards. Under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2), small purchase procedures must include obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold but not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.319 requires procurement transactions to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Condition: As part of our audit procedures over the Organization’s procurement policy and the small purchase requirements under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2), we sampled a total of five vendors who incurred costs exceeding $10,000 for each of the two major programs. For two of the five vendors selected, management was unable to provide written documentation demonstrating that price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (generally 2-3 quotes) for purchases above the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) and below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000). This documentation should have included the names of suppliers contacted, prices quoted, and the justification for vendor selection. Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The Organization is responsible for administering federal funds under the Continuum of Care (CoC) Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic programs and must adhere to the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR Part 200. As part of the single audit process, procurement transactions were reviewed to verify that the organization implemented appropriate procurement methods based on total vendor expenditures and maintained all required supporting documentation for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Cause: Management’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the required procurement documentation was obtained and retained, and there were limited controls in place to monitor vendor expenditures in the aggregate to help determine the appropriate procurement method. Effect: Controls over the procurement process are not in place to determine that all procurement transactions are conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. Repeat Finding: N/A: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: We recommend management update its policies and procedures over procurement to ensure compliance with 2 CFR Part 200. This includes requiring and retaining documentation supporting the use of small purchase procedures, obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, and monitoring vendor expenditures on an aggregate basis to ensure the appropriate procurement method is applied. Management should also provide training for staff responsible for procurement activities to promote consistent compliance with federal requirements. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Gaudenzia, Inc. and Gaudenzia Foundation, Inc.’s Corrective Action Plan.

FINDING 2025-004 FEDERAL PROGRAM CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (93.575) FEDERAL AGENCY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMPLIANCE PROCUREMENT TYPE OF FINDING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY- INSTANCE OF NON COMPLIANCE CONDITIONS During our disbursements test, we identified six (6) purchases that were awarded based on a single quote, without following standard competitive procurement procedures. Each purchase was accompanied by a certification indicating that the purchase was urgently needed, but it was not documented what this urgency consisted of. CRITERIA According to 2 CFR §200.319(a), all procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.320(a)(2) requires that small purchase procedures obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources unless an exception applies. CAUSE The Program does not have proper internal control over procurement and non compliance with policies and procedures for acquisitions and with the funds delegation agreement. EFFECT The lack of competition increases the risk that goods or services may not have been acquired at the most reasonable cost, and non-compliance with regulatory requirements. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that management strengthen internal controls over procurement to ensure compliance with 2 CFR Part 200. Specifically: 1. Require the solicitation and documentation of multiple quotes for all applicable purchases. 2. Document and approve exceptions in cases where only a single quote is obtained, with justification. 3. Monitor compliance regularly to ensure all procurement activities follow federal regulations and internal policies. QUESTIONED COST: None PRIOR YEAR Not Applicable MANAGEMENT RESPONSE We concur with the finding RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS Mrs. María Ortiz Martinez, Finance Department Director

Finding Reference: 2025-003 – I. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Program Information Federal Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services Department of Justice Awards: Assistance Listing 93.078 – Strengthening Emergency Care Delivery in the United States Healthcare System through Health Information and Promotion Assistance Listing 16.753 – Congressionally Recommended Awards Award Periods: September 30, 2023 – September 29, 2025 July 1, 2024 – September 30, 2026 Description: Incomplete Federal Requirements within Procurement Policies Criteria In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200.303, Internal controls, “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Part 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed states the following: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319” regarding the methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Condition As part of our testing over the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Procurement, Suspension and Debarment assertion for our major programs, we noted that the Corporation did not have a procurement policy that conforms to all applicable standards contained in the Uniform Guidance, when purchasing goods or services with the federal funds. Cause The Corporation did not comply and maintain a procurement policy that conforms to the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance upon receiving such federal funds related to their federal programs. Effect or potential effect Purchasing of goods and/or servicing with the major federal programs may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs None. Identification of a repeat finding This is a repeat finding of Finding 2024-006. Context Management has not established a procurement policy in line with the applicable standards contained in the Uniform Guidance based on review of the existing policy and discussions with management, however, no other instances of noncompliance with procurement standards identified in 2 CFR part 200 were noted as the amount of purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold was not direct and material to these programs and therefore no further testing over procurement was performed. Recommendation The Corporation should update its procurement policy to include the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance for purchasing goods and/or services with federal funds. View of responsible officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2025-001 Improve Procurement Process Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Cluster/Program: Child Nutrition Cluster AL Number(s): 10.553/10.555 Award Year: 2025 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Cluster/Program: Special Education Cluster AL Number(s): 84.027/84.173 Award Year: 2025 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Type of Finding - Compliance Internal Control over Compliance – Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance (2 CFR § 200.318–200.320) requires recipients of federal funds to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to applicable federal and state laws and promote full and open competition. For large purchases, Uniform Guidance and Massachusetts General Law (MGL) require obtaining competitive proposal or sealed bids. Additionally, proper contract documentation must be maintained for vendor relationships. Condition and Context The primary vendor tested for procurement under the Child Nutrition Cluster program did not have a signed contract or proof of the competitive procurement process for fiscal year 2025. Further, the Special Education Cluster did not have quotes for vendors tested or recent sole source letters on file. Effect or Potential Effect Noncompliance with policies and procedures regarding required procurement practices with vendors increases the risk of noncompliance with federal procurement requirements, lack of competition, and unallowable costs. Questioned Costs: None. Cause The District did not implement adequate controls to ensure compliance with procurement policies for obtaining sufficient quotes or competitive bids and did not formalize vendor relationships with contracts as required. Recommendation The District should strengthen its procurement controls by ensuring that the Uniform Guidance and MGL procurement practices are followed. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action Management’s views and Corrective Action Plan are included at the end of this report.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: Federal regulations require non-federal entities to follow specific procurement standards when making purchases with federal award funds: • 2 CFR 200.320 requires the use of specific procurement methods (micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bids, competitive proposals, etc.) based on the value of the transaction. • 2 CFR 200.318 requires the District to maintain oversight that ensures contractors perform in accordance with terms, conditions, and specifications. • 2 CFR 200.319 requires full and open competition and prohibits practices that restrict competition. • 2 CFR 200.324 requires cost or price analysis for certain procurements. • 2 CFR 200.213 requires verification that contractors are not suspended or debarred Condition: During testing of procurement transactions charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted that the District did not consistently follow the federal procurement standards required by 2 CFR 200.318-327. Specifically: The District did not obtain the required number of price or rate quotations for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. • For procurements that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold, the District did not maintain documentation supporting full and open competition. • In several cases, the District was unable to provide evidence that vendors were verified against the SAM.gov exclusion list prior to contract award. • Procurement files did not contain required elements such as cost/price analysis, written procurement method selection, or justification for sole-source procurements. The transactions identified totaled approximately $50,000, which represents a material portion of federal expenditures tested under this major program. Cause: The District did not employ adequate internal controls to ensure that all federally funded procurements consistently followed the federal procurement standards. Staff turnover and insufficient training regarding federal procurement requirements also contributed to the deficiencies. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District design and follow internal controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed to comply with Uniform Guidance standards. Effect: Failure to follow federal procurement requirements increases the risk of: • Noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance, • Potential favoritism or lack of competition, • Unallowable costs being charged to federal programs, and • Federal funds being used inefficiently or in a manner inconsistent with federal regulations. The nature and extent of the exceptions identified represent a material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.320(a), recipients and subrecipients may use informal procurement methods for small purchases when the value of the procurement does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. However, small purchase procedures require the solicitation of price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources and documentation supporting the procurement decision. In addition, 2 CFR 200.318(a) requires recipients and subrecipients to maintain and use documented procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement standards and applicable state and local laws and regulations. Condition: During our review of procurement transactions charged to federal awards, we noted that the Town did not follow required small purchase (informal procurement) procedures for certain purchases. Specifically, for selected procurement transactions with values above the micro purchase threshold but below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, the Town did not solicit price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources and did not retain documentation to support price reasonableness, as required by federal procurement standards. Universe/Population: Four contracts totaling $7,347,577 were subjected to compliance testing. For two of the four contracts totaling $90,955 that were below the Simplified Acquisition threshold were subjected to compliance testing. The Town did not solicit price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for one contract and did not retain documentation to support price reasonableness, as required by federal procurement standards, for the other contract. Cause: The Entity did not have written procurement procedures or internal controls as required by 2 CFR 200.318(a). As a result, inconsistent application of small purchase requirements, including the failure to obtain and document required price or rate quotations and support for price reasonableness, occurred. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Effect: Failure to follow small purchase procedures increases the risk that procurements are not conducted in a manner that ensures full and open competition and cost reasonableness. This noncompliance exposes the Town to potential questioned costs, cost disallowance, and increased federal or pass through oversight. Recommendation:. We recommend that the Town: 1. Update its written procurement policies and procedures to clearly define small purchase requirements, including quotation thresholds and documentation standards. 2. Require procurement staff to solicit and retain documentation of price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for all small purchases. 3. Provide training to relevant personnel on federal procurement requirements under 2 CFR Part 200, including informal procurement methods. 4. Implement supervisory review of procurement files to ensure compliance prior to payment. View of Responsible Official: Management concurs with the finding.

Federal agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal program title: Continuum of Care Program FALN Number: 14.267 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: December 1, 2024 – November 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Immaterial Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR section 200.320 outlines the acceptable methods of procurement. Purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold, but above the micro-purchase threshold, require that price or rate quotations be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Furthermore, the Organization's procurement policies require the maintaining of records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price Condition: The Organization did not follow the procedures outlined within its internal policies related to maintaining documentation associated with purchases made via the simplified acquisition method of procurement. Questioned costs: $31,673. Context: This condition impacted one (1) of one (1) transaction selected for testing. Cause: Oversight. Effect: The Organization could potentially use federal funds in a manner which is not the most efficient or economical. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the organization consistently follow its established policies and procedures related to the maintaining of necessary documentation to support the method of procurement utilized. The Organization may also consider qualifying multiple vendors for particular goods/service and then utilizing an approved vendors list. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY; CRITERIA: Per 2 CFR 200.320 the auditee must use appropriate procurement methods based on dollar amounts and conditions of project-level contracts.; CONDITION: For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 one FEMA‑funded project reviewed during the audit period, the Town allowed the contractor to begin work before a written contract was executed. The contractor mobilized and started work without a signed agreement defining scope, pricing, Federal requirements, or terms and conditions.; EFFECT: Noncompliance with Federal procurement regulations increases the risk that FEMA may consider associated costs ineligible or unreasonable. The Town could be subject to disputes over scope, pricing, or performance due to the absence of formal terms agreed upon before work began. Lack of assurance that required Federal contract provisions were included carries the potential for questioned costs that could lead to deobligation or repayment of FEMA funds.; CAUSE: The Town initiated work urgently due to the nature of the emergency event and did not follow formal procurement procedures. Staff cited time constraints and the immediate need for response activities, but no emergency procurement documentation or justification was concurrently prepared as allowed under 2 CFR §200.320(c) (noncompetitive procurement during public exigency). Personnel were also not fully aware of FEMA documentation requirements.; RECOMMENDATION: The Town should update its written procurement policies to fully incorporate the current Federal procurement standards under 2 CFR §200.317–§200.327 and applicable state laws. The Town should provide staff training on the revised procurement procedures and establish a periodic review schedule to ensure ongoing compliance with Federal and state requirements.; VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: The Town of Spruce Pine agrees with this finding. Finance procedures will be updated to include a standard form and procedure for cost and price analysis that will be implemented immediately.

2 C.F.R. § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 C.F.R. § 200. 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(a) requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under the Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(i) requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 C.F.R § 200.320 provides three types of procurement methods: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures. 2 C.F.R. § 200.320(a)(2) provides the requirements for simplified acquisitions. The aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. New Philadelphia City School District Federal Purchasing Procedures documents small purchases are those from $10,001 to $25,000. The policy stipulates that quotes for small purchases must be obtained from at least two vendors. Quotes may be obtained in writing, verbally, or from a website. Documentation of all quotes must be maintained. While price must be a consideration, other criteria such as quality, availability, service and expertise must also be considered. The rational for the recommended vendor must be documented on the Rubric. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to maintain supporting documentation for the procurement history for one of the three selected vendors. During fiscal year 2025 the School District made one procurement falling within the simplified acquisition dollar threshold (formerly referred to as a small purchase) which was for the renewal of a contract for individualized education instruction (IEP) software. However, documentation was not available to support the procurement process for this fiscal year 2025 purchase. Failing to have appropriate controls in place may result in the School District not entering procurement transactions with the most appropriate vendor. The School District should review their policies and procedures and take steps necessary to ensure that procurement procedures are properly followed. The School District should also ensure they comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements, ensuring open competition through procurement.

Finding Reference Number: 2025-002 Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Inadequate Controls over Procurement documentation retention Program name and CFDA: Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) 64.033 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) 21.027 Federal award identification number: SSVF – 23-CA-437 CSLFRF – UNKNOWN Federal award year: SSVF – 10/1/2022-9/30/2025 CSLFRF – 8/1/2024-6/30/2025 Federal awarding agency: SSVF – Department of Veterans Affairs CSLFRF – Department of the Treasury Name of pass-through entity: SSVF – None CSLFRF – Alameda County Criteria Federal procurement requirements under 2 CFR 200.318–200.320 outline expectations for maintaining documentation to show procurement activity aligns with written procedures and promotes full and open competition. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.300, incorporated by 2 CFR 200.214, requires organizations to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred before entering into an agreement. This verification can be completed by checking SAM.gov or obtaining a vendor certification. Statement of Condition Organization has written procurement procedures and consistently performs cost analyses for rental assistance-related procurements. Audit testing also confirmed that none of the vendors involved were suspended or debarred. However, the Organization was not able to provide documentation showing that suspension/debarment checks were performed before onboarding these vendors. While the procedures appear to be followed in practice, the documentation step was not retained. Cause It appears that documentation was not transitioned between staff members when the individual who initially performed these procedures left the organization. Effect or Potential Effect Without documentation of these checks, the Organization cannot fully demonstrate compliance with federal procurement and suspension/debarment requirements. Although no ineligible vendors were used, the missing documentation increases the risk that future procurements could be questioned or require additional follow-up. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend the Organization take a few steps to strengthen this process going forward:  Incorporate a simple, consistent step for keeping documentation of SAM.gov checks or vendor certifications in each procurement file.  Communicate this requirement to the staff performing vendor onboarding so expectations are clear.  Periodically review procurement files to make sure documentation is being consistently retained. These adjustments should help ensure the strong practices already in place are fully supported by required documentation. Reportable Views of Responsible Officials See corrective action plan.

During the fiscal year, the District contracted with Trumbull County Educational Service Center (ESC) to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $62,545 which were paid for out of the Special Education fund and subject to the Federal procurement laws. Under 2 CFR §200.320 the District should have competitively bid the services needed or obtained price quotes from qualified sources as further defined in the School’s procurement policy. The District also has the option of procurement by noncompetitive proposal if approved by the grantor agency. The District did not provide a contract, price quotes from qualified sources, or a grantor approved noncompetitive proposal waiver. The District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure compliance over procurement. The District should competitively bid for services, obtain written price quotes from an adequate number of sources, or obtain approval for a noncompetitive proposal from the grantor agency. Failing to have the proper controls in place could result in questioned costs.

Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform guidance) requires non-federal entities other than States to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. This includes using the small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(b). Condition, Cause, and Effect/Potential Effect: Internal controls at the County were not sufficient to ensure full and open competition on grant-funded contracts. Individuals involved in the procurement process incorrectly relied on NRS requirements instead of the County’s procurement policy and federal procurement guidelines. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: A nonstatistical sample of the procurement transactions funded with the ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds revealed that the County did not conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing fair and open competition on two construction contracts. Recommendation: We recommend that the County provide additional training to grantoversight personnel and ensure controls are sufficiently enhanced to ensure procurement policies are followed on federal grant-funded purchases. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with this finding and will enhance control procedures as recommended. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; 2024-008.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Congressional Directives - 93.493 Award# CE152271 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g ., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e ., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR Section 180.215. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e ., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition – The Hospital's Procurement Policy and Procedure is not in alignment with the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.320. The policy does not document different procurement methods for documentation to be retained, etc. Additionally, formalized documentation supporting the Hospital is in compliance with policies and regulations supporting its procurement decisions did not exist. Lastly, there was no suspension and debarment check completed prior to purchases made with federal funds. Cause – The Hospital's procurement policies are not in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, nor are there controls in place to ensure policies are followed, and lastly, there are no controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors receiving federal funds. Effect or Potential Effect – Federal funds could be used to make an unauthorized purchase including paying paying an entity that is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs – None noted. Context – During fiscal year 2025, only one vendor was subject to procurement and suspension and debarment requirements and was therefore selected for testing. The Hospital expended $1,100,000 for goods goods and services from this vendor during the fiscal year. The Hospital was able to provide bid documentation related to vendor selection; however, the Hospital did not have formally documented written procurement policies addressing compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements, including procedures for suspension and debarment verification. As part of audit testing, it was noted that the vendor had not been evaluated for suspension or debarment at the time of procurement. A subsequent check performed during the audit indicated that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that procurement policies are in alignment with federal regulations, support for procurement decisions are maintained and suspension and debarment checks on vendors are performed prior to making purchases with federal funds and are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with finding. See corrective action plan.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Charter Schools Assistance Listing Number: 84.282 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S282A230008-2025 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2025-678022-DPI-WCSPWC1-360 Award Period: 7/01/2024-6/30/2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 allows for noncompetitve procurement, but requires documentation of the circumstances. Condition: The School had one procurement transaction applied to the grant in excess of the small purchase threshold and one in excess of the micro-purchase threshold that did not meet the procurement requirement regarding documentation of the circumstances for a noncompetitive procurement process. Questioned costs: None Context: We tested three procurement transactions. Two of the transactions did not comply with requirements. The School has a procurement policy that includes the necessary requirements, but this policy was not followed in all cases. Cause: Management Oversight Effect: The effect of not following procurement requirements would be noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.320. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: It is recommended that the School follow their formal procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management will work with their staff to adopt the relevant policies.

FA 2025-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program; 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Numbers: 255GA324N1199 (Year: 2025) Questioned Costs: $7,536 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential child care institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding is granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,718,778.68 were expended and reported on the Jeff Davis County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2025. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state, “(a)… the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations… (b) Recipients and subrecipients must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Procurement Methods provide guidance for informal procurement methods and state “If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the recipient or subrecipient must “verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For twenty expenditures, documentation maintained to support the entity’s verification that the vendors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction lacked evidence of supervisory review as required by the School District’s policies and procedures. • The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for two small purchase expenditures reviewed. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $82,497 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $7,536 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,613,491 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $147,385. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and likely questioned costs: 10.553 and 10.555. Cause: In discussing these deficiencies with the School District, they believe these issues are primarily due to the lack of proper documentation and not following its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of federal funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

2025-001 U.S. Department of Education, Assistance Listing #84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Program and U.S. Department of Treasury, Assistance Listing #21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLRF) Program for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025 Criteria: Uniform Guidance section 2 CFR §200.317-200.327 Procurement Standards, requires purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 to follow small purchase procedures, which require obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources (§200.320) prior to entering into a contract. In addition, 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR §200.214 require non-federal entities to verify if contractors are suspended or debarred (e.g., Sam.gov check or certification) and include appropriate contract clauses in applicable contracts. Condition: The School Department did not obtain price or rate quotations for two projects that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Additionally, the Department did not perform, or document required suspension and debarment procedures for the contractor (e.g., verification against SAM.gov, obtaining certifications, or including contract clauses). The City did not perform, or document required suspension and debarment procedures for the contractor (e.g., verification against SAM.gov, obtaining certifications, or including contract clauses) for three of the six contracts tested. Cause: School staff were not aware the projects would be funded with federal funds and did not ensure compliance with federal requirements for competitive pricing and suspension/debarment verification. City staff were not aware projects covered under the SLRF definition of “revenue replacement”, which excludes most procurement requirements, are still required to follow 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR §200.214. Effect: Failure to obtain competitive quotes and verify contractor eligibility to receive Federal funds increases the risk of noncompliance, inefficient use of federal funds, and potential disallowance of costs. Known Questioned Costs: $61,891 for #84.027/84.173; $51,750 for #21.027 Likely Questioned Costs: $12,799 for #21.027 Recommendation: We recommend training staff on procurement and suspension/debarment requirements and implementing a pre-award compliance checklist. We also recommend increasing communication between grant personnel and facilities management personnel so all parties are aware which projects will be funded with federal funds.

FINDING 2025-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other identifying Numbers): 22611-133-PN01, 23611-133-PN01, 24611-133-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 LEWIS CASS SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The internal control system in place at the School Corporation was not effective in ensuring compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of two vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures, totaling $123,078. For the two vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations. Additionally, documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was absent for those two vendors. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. A population of two covered transactions for goods or services totaling $123,078, both of which equaled or exceeded the $25,000 threshold paid from the special education funds during the audit period, were identified and selected for testing. For both transactions, the School Corporation did not verify that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities prior to issuing payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 LEWIS CASS SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have adequate internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 LEWIS CASS SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are verified to not be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

PRAIRIE-HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 144 07‐016‐1440‐02 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ending June 30, 2025 SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 1. FINDING NUMBER:14 2025 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: X New Repeat from Prior year? Year originally reported? 3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 24-4210-00, 25-4210-00, 25-4299-00, 24-4220-00, 25-4220-00, 25-4240-00 5. AL No.: 10.553, 10.555 6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education 7. Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture 8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) The District is required to follow the Federal Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §§ 200.320) procurement standards for purchasing goods or services with federal awards. Key requirements include documented procedures, full and open competition, cost and price analysis, conflict of interest policies, and adherence to specific purchasing thresholds (micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bids, competitive proposals, or sole source). 9. Condition15 The District procured $285,867 from a food service vendor (Gordon) and $539,977 from another food service vendor (Sysco Business Services) and did not follow full and open competition guidelines by using a bidding process. Under (2 CFR §§ 200.320) payments to vendors in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000) are required to be procured through a formal competitive bid process. 10. Questioned Costs16 The District's internal accounting records recorded $1,463,085.99 of expenditures to purchased services, supply and capital outlay accounts. Our sampled procurement population noted that $865,844 of services procurred from 2 vendors were not awarded through a competitive bid process. 11. Context17 The District is to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified vendors as well as use a competitive bidding process. During our audit procedures we were unable to obtain supporting documentation for goods procured from food service vendors during the year. The District has not implemented internal procedures to ensure compliance with procurement requirements as outlined in the Federal Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §§ 200.320). 12. Effect Failure to use federal procurement standards results in noncompliance and exposes the District to potentially overpaying for food service commodities or services, potential misuse or of funds, and reduced transparency and accountability. 13. Cause The District did not implement appropriate procurement policy procedures to ensure compliance with procurement requirements in accordance with the Federal Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §§ 200.320). 14. Recommendation We recommend that the District follow the procedures for the procurement of goods that meet the procurment procedures as defined by the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §§ 200.320). The District should maintain documentation to show that they complied with these requirements. 15. Management's response18 See corrective action plan

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER - AL NUMBERS 10.553, 10.555, AND 10.582 PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 7503 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 2025-002. Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria or specific requirement: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2 CFR part 200.320 and Ark. Code Ann. § 6-21-304 establish methods of procurement to be followed by a non-federal entity when purchasing supplies or services with federal awards. Price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for purchases greater than $10,000 and up to $25,700. For purchases of supplies and services exceeding $25,700, solicitation of bids or proposals must be utilized. Condition: The District did not retain documentation for price quotations obtained from at least two qualified vendors for Child Nutrition program commodities purchased from one vendor totaling $14,766. School board approval of vendors for Child Nutrition program purchases exceeding $25,700 was not obtained. Additionally, during our review of Child Nutrition program invoices, we identified food purchases that did not agree to the vendor's bid sheet description or price. Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight over the procurement of supplies and services. Effect or potential effect: Failure to retain documentation of price quotations and bid approvals increases the overall risk of noncompliance with federal regulations. Questioned costs: $0 Context: An examination of non-payroll expenditures for 11 checks totaling $25,622 from a population of 109 checks totaling $432,754. Of the 11 checks examined, 3 checks were to vendors that required solicitation of quotes or bids. Our sample was not statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement proper controls and monitor Child Nutrition program purchases for compliance with applicable procurement requirements. Views of responsible officials: The District will gather two qualified vendors for purchases of $10,000 to $25,000. The District will have Board approval for purchases exceeding $25,700. In addition, the Food Service Director will exercise care to order items on the bid list, but will not be limited to only items on the bid list as new items become available.

III Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs FA 2025-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program; 10.555 – National School Lunch Program 10.582 - Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Award Numbers: 255GA324N1199 (Year: 2025), 255GA324L1603 (Year: 2025) Questioned Costs: $6,267 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential child care institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding is granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $3,568,611.24 were expended and reported on the Jones County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2025. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state, “(a)… the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations… (b) Recipients and subrecipients must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Procurement Methods provide guidance for informal procurement methods and state “If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for four small purchase expenditures reviewed. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $159,951.89 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $6,267 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,778,019 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $69,659. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and likely questioned costs: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.582. Cause: In discussing these deficiencies with the School District, they stated that the internal control procedures related to procurement were not being followed appropriately. In addition, management did not adequately monitor the procurement internal control procedures. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of federal funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2025-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Title: 84.027A – Grants to States; 84.173A – Preschool Grants Federal Award Number: H027A230073 (Year: 2024), H027A240073 (Year: 2025), H173A240081 (Year: 2025) Questioned Costs: $4,500 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was authorized under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Special Education Cluster funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $525,466 were expended and reported on the Evans County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2025. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state, “(a)… the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations… (b) Recipients and subrecipients must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Procurement Methods provide guidance for informal procurement methods and state “If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320(c) – Noncompetitive Procurement states that procurement by a noncompetitive method may only be used if one of the circumstances outlined applies, including when “the procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the recipient or subrecipient must “verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.” Condition: A sample of 12 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources or documentary evidence as justification for single source procurement for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. In addition, a sample of 2 covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. Although it was determined that the vendors associated with these transactions were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification as required by the School District’s policies and procedures. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $10,504 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $4,500 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $101,739 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $43,585. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and likely questioned costs: 84.027A and 84.173A. Cause: In discussing these deficiencies with the School District, they believe these issues are primarily due to the lack of proper documentation and not following its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Specifically, Management stated that rate or price quotations were not obtained because the vendor was considered a single source provider; however, documentation supporting the single source procurement method was not maintained. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of federal funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

KANKAKEE SCHOOL DISTRICT 111 32-046-1110-25 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ending June 30, 2025 SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 1. FINDING NUMBER:14 2025 - 002 2. THIS FINDING IS: X New Repeat from Prior year? Year originally reported? 3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 24-4210-00, 25-4210-00, 25-4299-00, 25-4299-00, 24-4220-00, 25-4220-00 5. AL No.: 10.553, 10.555 6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education 7. Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture 8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) The District is required to follow the methods of procurement outlined in 2 CFR 200.320, , 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, and the District's procurement policy when purchasing goods or services with federal awards. Key requirements include documented procedures, full and open competition, cost and price analysis, conflict of interest policies, and adherence to specific purchasing thresholds (micro-purchase, simplified acquisitions, sealed bids, competitive proposals, or sole source). Specifically, when the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $35,000), formal methods of procurement are required. 9. Condition The District procured $885,950 of services from a food service vendor and did not follow the formal methods of procurement outlined in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2), 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, and their established procurement policy as they did not procure the services through a competitive request for proposal process. 10. Questioned Costs Since the expenditures related to the procurement are pooled in the School Food Service account, the questioned costs of $885,950 relate to all the projects under assistance listing numbers 10.553 and 10.555. Our sample was not statistically valid and consisted of two vendors with a total sampled vendor payments of $1,078,742. 11. Context During our audit procedures we were unable to obtain supporting documentation for demonstrating that the district followed the formal methods of procurement outlined in 2 CFR 200.320(b) for goods procured from one food service vendor during the year that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. 12. Effect Failure to comply with federal and state procurement standards results in noncompliance and may expose the District to overpayment for food service commodities and services, increase risk of misuse of funds, and reduced transparency and accountability in the procurement process. 13. Cause The District failed to follow their established procurement policy, including inadequate review controls, to ensure compliance with procurement requirements as outlined in (2 CFR 200.320 )and 105 ILCS 5/10-20.021. 14. Recommendation We recommend that the District follow the procedures for the procurement of goods that meet the procurement procedures as defined by (2 CFR 200.320), 105 ILCS 5/10-20.021, and their established procurement policy. The District should maintain documentation to show that they complied with these requirements. 15. Management's response See corrective action plan

2 CFR 180.305 states that Non-Federal entities are prohibited from entering into a covered transaction with parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR § 180.135. 2 CFR 180.200 identifies “covered transactions” as nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions as defined in 2 CFR § 180.970 (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless exempt by 2 CFR § 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking SAM exclusions (https://sam.gov/content/home); collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that entity. Furthermore, Ohio Rev. Code § 3313.843 and 3313.845 allow traditional schools to contract with Educational Service Centers (ESCs) to provide services as outlined in the agreement between the two parties. Ohio Rev. Code §3313.843(C) requires these agreements to be filed with the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce (DEW) by the first day of July of the school year for which the agreement is in effect. In addition, District Policy # 6325, Procurement - Federal Grants/Funds, states, in part, that A. Informal procurement methods for small purchases expedite the completion of transactions, minimize administrative burdens, and reduce costs. Informal procurement methods may be used when the value of the procurement transaction under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by the State. The informal procurement methods include: 1. Micro-Purchases - Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed $$10,000. To the extent practicable, the District should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be made without soliciting competitive quotations if the Superintendent considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history, or other relevant information, and maintains documents to support its conclusion. The District shall maintain evidence of this reasonableness in the records of all purchases made by this method. 2. Small Purchases - Small purchases include the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. Small purchase procedures require that price or rate quotations shall be obtained from at least two (2) qualified sources unless fewer qualified sources are available. Districts are responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the Federal Acquisition Regulations ("FAR"). When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the District must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. B. Formal Procurement Methods - When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold or a lower threshold established by the State, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement method can be used in accordance with the standards on competition in 200.319 or non-competitive procurement. The formal methods of procurement are: 1. Sealed Bids - Sealed, competitive bids shall be obtained when the purchase of, and contract for, single items of supplies, materials, or equipment which amounts to more than $250,000 and when the Board determines to build, repair, enlarge, improve, or demolish a school building/facility, the cost of which will exceed the amount to be determined and published by the Ohio Director of Commerce. 2. Noncompetitive Purchases Through Educational Service Centers (ESCs) - Under State law, the Board may enter into a contract with an educational service center ("ESC") that authorizes the ESC to make purchases for supplies, materials, equipment, and services or the delivery of services on the District’s behalf. These contracts promote operational efficiency and cost savings, and further enhance the educational experience for our students. Purchases made through such contracts are exempt from competitive bidding. The District may apply for approval from the Department of Education and Workforce ("DEW") to use a noncompetitive purchasing method to procure personnel-based services from an ESC only when the following criteria are met: a. the ESC posts a list of all services it provides, including costs of these services, on its website; b. the ESC has been designated as "high performing'' by the DEW; and c. DEW as the pass-through state entity has determined that the ESC was substantially in compliance with all audit rules and guidelines during the most recent audit conducted by the Auditor of State. The Treasurer/CFO will submit an application and any required documentation to DEW on the designated form requesting approval for use of a noncompetitive purchasing method for personnel services. Purchases will not be made until the application is approved. Notice of approval will be maintained by the Treasurer/CFO. The School District contracted with the Findlay Interpreting Services for Deaf and High Road School of Lima to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $100,395 and $14,339, respectively, which were paid for out of the Special Education Cluster grants and subject to the Federal procurement laws. Under 2 CFR §200.320, the School District should have followed the simplified acquisition procedures and obtained price quotes from qualified sources. It was also noted for Findlay Interpreting Services for Deaf that the School District did not check SAM.gov, did not collect a certificate, or the contract between the School District and the above-named vendor did not contain a suspension / debarment clause. Also, during the fiscal year, the School District contracted with Allen County ESC, Midwest Regional ESC, and Montgomery County ESC to provide purchased services. These services included expenditures of $51,744, $40,817, and $30,128 respectively, which were paid for out of the Special Education Cluster and subject to the Federal procurement laws. Under 2 CFR §200.320 the School District should have competitively bid the services needed or obtained the ESC waiver allowed by Ohio law and the School District’s procurement policy. The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce (ODEW) published a form that allows schools to request ODEW authorize a noncompetitive proposal for their ESC Services. This form is available on ODEW’s website and should be completed and maintained by schools moving forward. Failing to have the appropriate controls in place may result in the School District overpaying for service as well as vendors receiving federal funds that are suspended or debarred. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the Board should obtain appropriate price quotes and non-competitive proposals and verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.

Finding 2025-002: Documentation of Procurement and Competitive Bidding Procedures Condition During testing of procurement transactions, we noted that a vendor was selected for services without documented evidence that competitive bidding or price quotations were obtained, and the procurement file did not include documentation describing the basis for vendor selection. While Home Start, Inc.’s fiscal policies allow for the use of oral quotes and permit vendor selection based on responsiveness and advantage to the Organization considering factors such as price, quality, and other relevant considerations, the procurement documentation maintained by the Organization did not include evidence that quotes were obtained or documentation supporting the basis for vendor selection. Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.318(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the procurement process to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.318(i) requires non-federal entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis of the contract price. Further, 2 CFR §§200.319–200.320 require that procurements be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, and that appropriate price or rate quotations be obtained depending on the procurement method. Cause The Organization did not consistently maintain documentation supporting the procurement process, including evidence of quotes obtained or documentation explaining the basis for vendor selection when competitive quotes were not documented. Effect The absence of procurement documentation reduces the Organization’s ability to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements and increases the risk that procurements funded with federal awards may not meet federal competition standards. Recommendation We recommend that management strengthen procurement documentation procedures to ensure that procurement files include sufficient documentation of the competitive bidding or quotation process, including: • Evidence of quotes or bids obtained, including oral quotes where permitted by policy. • Documentation supporting the evaluation and selection of vendors. • Written justification when competitive bids or quotes are not obtained, consistent with both Uniform Guidance requirements (2 CFR §200.318(i)) and the Organization’s fiscal policies. Implementing these procedures will help ensure that procurement activities funded by federal awards are adequately documented and compliant with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.

Federal Program: ALN 93.600 Head Start Program Category: Compliance/ internal control significant deficiency Compliance requirements: Procurement and Suspension/Debarment Condition: BGCPR did not follow its procurement policies in compliance with applicable State and Federal procurement requirements. Criteria: BGCPR’s Fiscal Policy Manual — VI. Cash Disbursements & Expense Allocations, Incoming Invoice Processing, item 2 established that vendors must be created in the Workflow system in accordance with established procedures. Documentation for new vendors must be obtained and reviewed for completeness and accuracy and must include, at a minimum, Form W-9, the new vendor form, and a valid Merchant Registration Certificate issued by the applicable local governmental agency. 2 CFR § 200.318(a) requires recipients and subrecipients to maintain and use documented procurement procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including the acquisition of property or services. These procedures must be consistent with applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the Federal procurement standards. 2 CFR § 200.318(h) requires recipients and subrecipients to award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration must be given to contractor integrity, public policy compliance, proper classification of employees, past performance, and financial and technical resources. 2 CFR § 200.318(i) requires recipients and subrecipients to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Under 2 CFR § 200.319(a), procurement transactions must provide full and open competition. When simplified acquisition procedures apply, § 200.320(a)(2)(i) requires price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources; noncompetitive procurement is permitted only under the circumstances in § 200.320(c) and must be supported by the procurement record. Under 2 CFR § 200.214 and Appendix II(H) to Part 200, contract awards must not be made to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded in SAM. Section 200.327 requires contracts under Federal awards to contain the applicable provisions in Appendix II. Cause: BGCPR did not consistently apply its procurement policies and did not have an effective pre-award and supervisory review control to confirm vendor eligibility, required competition and approvals, complete procurement documentation, and applicable contract provisions before purchase commitments and payments were made. Context: Of 21 procurement transactions tested: 7 samples did not have an available supplier merchant registration certificate; 5 samples did not evidence the required quotation process and/or purchase order and did not include a documented justification; and 3 samples had contracts of which 2 samples did not include a debarment and suspension provision. Effect or potential effect: The absence of required vendor documentation, competition support, purchase orders or documented justification, and debarment and suspension controls increases the risk that purchases may be made from unauthorized or excluded vendors, may not provide full and open competition, and may be unsupported or subject to questioned costs under the Federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen and enforce procurement controls by: (1) requiring a current Puerto Rico Merchant Registration Certificate before award or purchase; (2) documenting the required quotations and purchase order, or an approved justification citing the allowable basis for a noncompetitive procurement; (3) performing and retaining a dated SAM.gov exclusion search before contract award and renewal; (4) using standardized contracts containing all applicable Federal provisions, including debarment and suspension language; and (5) requiring documented supervisory review of a procurement checklist before approval and payment. Views of officials responsible: BGCPR agrees with the deficiency identified, mostly attributable to employee turnover within the Finance Division. As a result of this, during fiscal year 2026-2027 BGCPR will implement procedures to ensure proper procurement process including the following: a. Review the procurement check list to ensure that all required documentation is included within and ensure revision before a purchase order is issued to the vendor. b. Training to the personnel to guarantee that policy and procedures are implemented as required. c. Enforce standardized procedures to ensure that all approvals are consistently documented and maintained in accordance with policy or grant requirements. Anticipated completion date: September 30, 2026

Material Weakness Finding No. 2025-003: Procurement Policies U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Federal Assistance Listing Number 93.243. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Care for Native Hawaiians Federal Assistance Listing Number 93.932. Criteria The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.320 sets forth the methods of procurement to be followed in the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward, which includes formal purchase methods such as proposal or bids when the value of the property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds a certain threshold, as defined. Furthermore, 2 CFR §200.320(c) provides specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Condition During our audit, we noted that the Organization made subawards to entities which were subject to a formal purchase method, for which competitive processes for selection were not performed, nor was documentation of the specific criteria of 2 CFR §200.320(c) met to support noncompetitive procurements maintained. Cause Management had not updated its policies and procedures to incorporate certain pertinent sections of the procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance.Effect The lack of procurement standards in accordance with the Uniform Guidance may result in allowable cost issues. Identification of a Repeat Finding This finding was reported as a federal award finding in the immediately previous audit as Finding No. 2024-003. Recommendation We again recommend that the Organization incorporate the procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance to its policies and procedures manual to ensure compliance with Federal standards, including 2 CFR §200.318(h) which stipulates that sufficient detail of the history of the procurement must be maintained, including the selection of the contractor. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action The Organization acknowledges incorporation of the procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance to its policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Federal standards, including 2 CFR §200.318(h). The Organization concurs with the prior year (2024-003) and current year renumbered recommendation (2025-003), and highlights its ongoing progressive and corrective implementation of policy and process actions. For context, the Organization’s progressive and corrective actions as of the fiscal year ended (FYE) June 30, 2024 report included the following:A. Financial Policies – May 2025. Completed financial policies related to: implementation of significant accounting policies, internal control environment, cash and banking, cash disbursements and check issuance, payroll processes, procure to pay and revenue recognition policies, processes and procedures. In addition, when applicable, documenting procurement circumstances, processes, decisions and CEO approval was implemented via memo(s) to the procurement file (MTPF). B. Procurement Related Processes – May 2025. Initiated use of MTPF, and process implementation of Request(s) for Professional Services Qualifications, Request(s) for Professional Services, Request(s) for Proposal. C. HRSA Policies – July 2025. Developed HRSA related policies re: implementation of HRSA policies; executive performance evaluation, non-executive performance evaluation, executive compensation, non-executive compensation, timesheets, suspension & debarment procedure, financial management system, legislative mandates, legislative mandates process & procedure and cash management for federal draws and return of funds.D. Board Policy Provision & Awareness – August 2025. Informed the Board about the progress of the Organization’s policy framework, including the above policies. For the year ended June 30, 2025, to the period of the audit report date, the Organization continued the prospective implementation of the above policies and processes, including the following reflective contract review work by the Organization: A. Reviewed all contracts executed between July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025. B. Discussed with respective program director(s), the application of initiation, consideration, decision, documentation and monitoring phased activities. C. Worked with respective program director(s) to document in memorandum(s) to file (MTF), the basis for decision and documentation on a contract-by-contract basis. D. Initiated work with respective program contract monitors to implement and document consistent Organization wide contract monitoring processes and activities (e.g., contract, term, billing, deliverables, eligible expenditures, data input, frequency). E. Updated procurement processes for emergency disaster recovery and support of community needs, including MTF documentation. Although as of June 30, 2025 the implementation of the resolution was not completed, the implementation continues and is expected to be fully implemented by the next audit report date.

2025-003 Improve Controls Over Special Education Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Program: Special Education Grants to States AL Number: 84.027/84.173 Award Year: 2025 Type of Finding Compliance – Procurement Internal Control over Compliance – Procurement – Significant Deficiency Criteria or Specific Requirement Under 2 CFR 200.318 and 200.320, non-federal entities are required to maintain adequate documentation supporting procurement decisions, including the method of procurement used; and justify and document the use of noncompetitive (sole source) procurement, including the reasons why competition was not feasible. Specifically, 2 CFR 200.320(c) permits noncompetitive procurement only under limited circumstances and requires proper justification and documentation. Condition and Context During testing of procurement transactions charged to the Special Education Grants to States program, we identified one instance in which the School Department utilized a sole source procurement method; however, no documentation was maintained to support or justify the determination that the vendor qualified as a sole source provider, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). Cause The School Department does not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that sole source determinations are appropriately evaluated and documented against Uniform Guidance criteria. Effect or Potential Effect The lack of documentation supporting sole source procurement increases the risk that procurement may not comply with federal requirements, competitive procurement processes may be inappropriately bypassed; and federal funds may not be used in a manner that ensures full and open competition. Questioned Costs No evidence of improper payment or unallowable costs was identified; therefore, no questioned costs are reported. Recommendation We recommend that the School Department develop and implement formal procedures requiring written justification for all sole source procurements. Ensure documentation clearly addresses the criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(c). Implement a review process to verify that procurement files include all required documentation prior to payment, and provide training to relevant personnel on federal procurement requirements under Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action Management’s corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.

FA 2025-002 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program; 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 255GA324N1199 (Year: 2025) Questioned Costs: $40,701 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that expenditures were appropriately reviewed, approved, and documented. Background: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding is granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $9,655,237 were expended and reported on the Liberty County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2025. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following criteria to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the recipient or subrecipient… (g) Be adequately documented, (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period…” Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state, “(a)… the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations… (b) Recipients and subrecipients must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Procurement Methods provide guidance for informal procurement methods and state “If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Condition: A sample of 23 expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For four expenditures, evidence of review and approval was not reflected within the voucher package. • The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources or documentary evidence as justification for single source procurement for three small purchase expenditures. • The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of sealed bids or proposals were obtained from qualified sources or documentary evidence as justification for single source procurement for three simplified acquisition expenditures. • Two expenditures were not recorded in the correct fiscal year. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $1,659,140 in expenditure transactions, known questioned costs of $40,701 were identified. Using the total population of $5,920,045 in expenditure transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $145,228. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and likely questioned costs: 10.553 and 10.555. Cause: In discussing these deficiencies with the School District, they believe these issues are primarily due to employee turnover, the lack of proper documentation and not following its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or GaDOE guidance related to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Failure to ensure that expenditures are reviewed, approved, and documented appropriately and follow proper procurement procedures exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds. Additionally, failure to ensure that appropriate documentation exists to support the allowability of payments associated with the CNC fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with improperly documented expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to Child Nutrition Cluster expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures reflect evidence of review and approval prior to payment and follow appropriate procurement procedures. In addition, all expenditure voucher packages and procurement documentation should be maintained on-file according to the School District’s record retention policy and should contain all required components. Furthermore, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that controls are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2025-001 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: None Assistance Listing Number and Title: 93.243 – Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Federal Award Number: H79SM088573 (Year: 2025) Questioned Costs: $80,321 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance program revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance (SAMH) program provides funds for the purpose of increasing student access to evidence-based and culturally relevant trauma support services and mental health care by developing innovative initiatives, activities, and programs to link local school systems with local trauma-informed support and mental health systems, including those under the Indian Health Service. SAMH funding is granted to Liberty County Board of Education by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. SAMH funds totaling $995,591 were expended and reported on the Liberty County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2025. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state, “(a)… the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations… (b) Recipients and subrecipients must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Procurement Methods provide guidance for informal procurement methods and state “If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the recipient or subrecipient must “verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.” Condition: A sample of 17 expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were identified: • One expenditure did not reflect evidence of supervisory review. • The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources or documentary evidence as justification for single source procurement for one simplified acquisition expenditure reviewed. • For two expenditures, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $127,714 in expenditure transactions, known questioned costs of $80,321 were identified. Using the total population of $630,037 in expenditure transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $396,237. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and likely questioned costs: 93.243. Cause: In discussing these deficiencies with the School District, they believe these issues are primarily due to the lack of proper documentation and not following its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Failure to ensure that expenditures are appropriately approved and implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds for unallowable purposes and/or with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that expenditures are reviewed and approved prior to payment, that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.