Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal controls system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, repair services were purchased from one vendor that fell within the small purchase threshold. Quotes were not obtained nor was full and open competition provided for the three vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During 2020-2021 the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The School Corporation did not verify that one of four contracts over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal controls system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, repair services were purchased from one vendor that fell within the small purchase threshold. Quotes were not obtained nor was full and open competition provided for the three vendors that fell within the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During 2020-2021 the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The School Corporation did not verify that one of four contracts over $25,000 was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "(b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . . " INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 BROWNSTOWN CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2022-003 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and non-compliance. Federal Award Program: HUD Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Assistance Listing #14.181) Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria: Pursuant to the Uniform Guidance, for procurements of goods and services made with federal awards, River Kourt Apartments is required to have policies in place that conform with the Procurement Standards as prescribed in 2 CFR ?200.318 through ?200.320. River Kourt Apartments is required to follow the methods of procurement as prescribed in 2 CFR ?200.320. Condition: River Kourt Apartments has written policies and procedures regarding the procurement of goods and services; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR ?200.318 through ?200.320. Cause of Condition: River Kourt Apartments has written policies and procedures regarding the procurement of goods and services; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR ?200.318 through ?200.320. Effect of Condition: This increases risk that River Kourt Apartments would not materially comply with the procurement requirement for the major program. Questioned Costs: None. Context: There were no procurements over the de minimis threshold made during the year period ended June 30, 2022; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR ?200.318 through ?200.320. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend management revise the current policies and procedures to include all required elements for procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR ?200.318 through ?200.320. Procurement methods shall follow the methods as prescribed in 2 CFR ?200.320. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
AL 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster, US Department of Agriculture, Award ID: 1603003, Award Year: July 1, 2022 ? June 30, 2022. Criteria: The non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with CFR 200.320 for any procurements exceeding the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, and must maintain records to detail the history of procurement including (1) rationale for the method of procurement, (2) selection of contract type, (3) contractor selection or rejection, and (4) the basis for the contract price. Small purchases (between $10,000 and $250,000) require price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the non-federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of federal contracts. Condition and context: Culver School District maintains written board policies regarding procurement, however they are not sufficiently developed to meet the requirements for federal procurement as required by CFR 200.320, described above. We identified three procurements during the fiscal year which exceeded the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. Two of the contracts were not procured in accordance with the federal procurement requirement: one contract received only one quote, the other had no quotes. Cause: In addition to the lack of formal documentation with relation to federal procurement described above, the Nutrition Manager did not receive adequate training related to using competitive methods of procurements for large awards. Effect: Two of three procurements were awarded without evidence of employing competitive methods. Recommendation: We recommend the District revisit their procurement policies to ensure they comply with requirements related to federal procurement. Additionally, annual training should be required for all employees with federal procurement responsibilities. Views of responsible officials: The District is reviewing the current procurement policies to identify what changes are necessary to be compliant with federal guidelines on procurement. The District has also researched and selected a procurement training for the Nutrition Department to attend. The District will also be researching what trainings can be attended on an annual basis for all employees that have federal procurement responsibilities.
AL 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster, US Department of Agriculture, Award ID: 1603003, Award Year: July 1, 2022 ? June 30, 2022. Criteria: The non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with CFR 200.320 for any procurements exceeding the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000, and must maintain records to detail the history of procurement including (1) rationale for the method of procurement, (2) selection of contract type, (3) contractor selection or rejection, and (4) the basis for the contract price. Small purchases (between $10,000 and $250,000) require price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the non-federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of federal contracts. Condition and context: Culver School District maintains written board policies regarding procurement, however they are not sufficiently developed to meet the requirements for federal procurement as required by CFR 200.320, described above. We identified three procurements during the fiscal year which exceeded the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. Two of the contracts were not procured in accordance with the federal procurement requirement: one contract received only one quote, the other had no quotes. Cause: In addition to the lack of formal documentation with relation to federal procurement described above, the Nutrition Manager did not receive adequate training related to using competitive methods of procurements for large awards. Effect: Two of three procurements were awarded without evidence of employing competitive methods. Recommendation: We recommend the District revisit their procurement policies to ensure they comply with requirements related to federal procurement. Additionally, annual training should be required for all employees with federal procurement responsibilities. Views of responsible officials: The District is reviewing the current procurement policies to identify what changes are necessary to be compliant with federal guidelines on procurement. The District has also researched and selected a procurement training for the Nutrition Department to attend. The District will also be researching what trainings can be attended on an annual basis for all employees that have federal procurement responsibilities.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.214 States in part: "Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2CFR 200.318 (a) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) . . . if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) . . . the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. There was no documented control over procurements made under the small purchase threshold. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not provide audit evidence that it verified that vendors which were paid $25,000 or more per school year were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.214 States in part: "Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2CFR 200.318 (a) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) . . . if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) . . . the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. There was no documented control over procurements made under the small purchase threshold. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not provide audit evidence that it verified that vendors which were paid $25,000 or more per school year were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Department of Energy, passed through Colorado Governor's Energy Office, Weatherization Assistance for Low-Income Persons/CFDA Number 81.042 for year ended June 30, 2022 Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.320(c), Noncompetitive Procurement, establishes there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can be awarded if the item/service is available only from a single source. Condition: The Organization has a written procurement policy for the year ended June 30, 2022 which established all the requirements of 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), including 2 CFR section 200.320(c), Noncompetitive Procurement; however, documentation of compliance with the policy was not retained for one instance of a single-source vendor for services provided. Cause: In discussing the condition with the Organization?s personnel, the vendor was considered a single source, but proper documentation to this consideration was not maintained. Effect: Noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance could jeopardize future federal funding. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 40 transactions out of 684 total transactions were selected for procurement testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure documentation of compliance with all the requirements of Uniform Guidance, including 2 CFR section 200.320(c), Noncompetitive Procurement. We recommend that the Organization review, approve, and document process for any vendors which would qualify for noncompetitive procurement in the future. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement changes through a corrective action plan to ensure proper review, approval, and documentation of procurement policy.
2022 ? 005 - Procurement Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2022-591029-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2021 ? 06/30/2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least two). Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District was not consistently following the procurement policy, specifically requirements related to small purchases. Small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) or proposals to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. In our sample of four procurement transactions subject to small purchase requirements we noted that the District did not retain documentation of an adequate number of price quotes for two vendors selected for testing. Cause: The District did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement Policy related to appropriate methods of procurement. Effect: Obtaining price quotes and proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of price quotes or proposals may cause the District to overpay for supplies or services. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures to ensure that the District?s procurement policy is consistently followed. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
2022 ? 005 - Procurement Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2022-591029-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2021 ? 06/30/2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least two). Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the District was not consistently following the procurement policy, specifically requirements related to small purchases. Small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) or proposals to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that the small purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. In our sample of four procurement transactions subject to small purchase requirements we noted that the District did not retain documentation of an adequate number of price quotes for two vendors selected for testing. Cause: The District did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement Policy related to appropriate methods of procurement. Effect: Obtaining price quotes and proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of price quotes or proposals may cause the District to overpay for supplies or services. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures to ensure that the District?s procurement policy is consistently followed. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Federal Grants Management Procurement Policy Assistance Listing Number: 32.009 Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition: The District used grant funds to purchase Chromebooks and other devices needed by the District using the same vendor that the District had previously purchased these items from. Per the District's procurement policy the District should have obtained two quotes or documented why the District did not use a competitive procurement method. Additionally, the District did not verify that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Criteria Uniform Guidance establishes methods of procurement (200.320) which states that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least two). Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical. Additionally, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Cause The District did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement and Suspension and Debarment policy related to appropriate methods of procurement and suspension and debarment. Effect Obtaining price quotes or proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of quotes and proposals may cause the District to over pay for supplies or services. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is not debarred or suspended could result in entering covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend the District follow their procurement and suspension and debarment policy related small purchases which includes obtaining price quotes from an adequate number of vendors (at least two) and suspension and debarment policy for verifying vendors and maintaining this documentation. Repeat Finding No Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal program title: Public and Indian Housing Assistance Listing Number: 14.850 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FL071-00000120D, FL071-00000121D, FL071-00000122D, FL071-00000220D, FL071-00000221D, FL071-00000222D Award Period: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Authority should meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. The Entity should conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319 and 200.320. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During the testing of the Public Housing contract files, certain eligibility deficiencies were noted as summarized below: Number of Instances Finding 1 The Authority did not follow their policy with contracts that had expenses during the fiscal year as they did not go through the procurement process. 1 The Authority did not verify the vendor's eligibility regarding suspension and debarment prior to signing the agreement for services Questioned costs: Undeterminable Context: During our testing, we reviewed the contract, which contained the error noted above. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause: The Authority failed to have an updated procurement policy, until an updated was approved on September 20,2022, that adheres to Unform Grant Guidance. Effect: The Authority is out of compliance by not following their procurement policy. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority update its Procurement Policy from 2009, which was done on September 30, 2022, putting in place the procedures listed in the UG and clarifying procurement methods. As well as, including in the policy that all vendors' eligibility needs to be verified prior to signing contracts, either through SAM or by collecting a certification form from the vendor. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number: 20-DG-11030000-004 & 21-DG-11030000-020 Award Year: All Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Assistance Listing Number: 10.694 Pass-through Agency: Not Applicable Pass-through Identification Number: Not Applicable Questioned Costs: $43,747 Condition - The University did not apply the correct small purchase threshold for identifying purchases that need to obtain quotes in their policy. The population between $10,000 and $20,000 not included in policy included 3 transactions totaling $43,747. Criteria ? 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of grant agreements. 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Cause ? The University was unaware that the policy amount had changed to a threshold of $10,000. Effect ? The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Auditors? Recommendation ? The procurement policy should be updated to comply with all relevant state and local procurement requirements and reviewed for necessary revisions regularly.
Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number: 20-DG-11030000-004 & 21-DG-11030000-020 Award Year: All Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Assistance Listing Number: 10.694 Pass-through Agency: Not Applicable Pass-through Identification Number: Not Applicable Questioned Costs: $43,747 Condition - The University did not apply the correct small purchase threshold for identifying purchases that need to obtain quotes in their policy. The population between $10,000 and $20,000 not included in policy included 3 transactions totaling $43,747. Criteria ? 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of grant agreements. 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained. Cause ? The University was unaware that the policy amount had changed to a threshold of $10,000. Effect ? The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. Auditors? Recommendation ? The procurement policy should be updated to comply with all relevant state and local procurement requirements and reviewed for necessary revisions regularly.
Finding 2022-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
Finding 2022-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
Finding 2022-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
Finding 2022-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
Finding 2022-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
Finding 2022-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 20-21, SY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the purchases that fell under the micro-purchase threshold. Small Purchases During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain quotes, nor did they provide full and open competition. There was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition During 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold without soliciting a bid and awarding a contract. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into an agreement with a purchasing cooperative to purchase food items from one vendor. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the agreement with the purchasing cooperative. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During 2020-2021, the School Corporation entered into contracts with two vendors but did not verify they were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a contract with one vendor, but did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non- Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 20-21, SY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the purchases that fell under the micro-purchase threshold. Small Purchases During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain quotes, nor did they provide full and open competition. There was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition During 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold without soliciting a bid and awarding a contract. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into an agreement with a purchasing cooperative to purchase food items from one vendor. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the agreement with the purchasing cooperative. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During 2020-2021, the School Corporation entered into contracts with two vendors but did not verify they were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a contract with one vendor, but did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non- Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 20-21, SY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the purchases that fell under the micro-purchase threshold. Small Purchases During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain quotes, nor did they provide full and open competition. There was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition During 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold without soliciting a bid and awarding a contract. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into an agreement with a purchasing cooperative to purchase food items from one vendor. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the agreement with the purchasing cooperative. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During 2020-2021, the School Corporation entered into contracts with two vendors but did not verify they were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a contract with one vendor, but did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non- Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 20-21, SY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the purchases that fell under the micro-purchase threshold. Small Purchases During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain quotes, nor did they provide full and open competition. There was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition During 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold without soliciting a bid and awarding a contract. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into an agreement with a purchasing cooperative to purchase food items from one vendor. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the agreement with the purchasing cooperative. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During 2020-2021, the School Corporation entered into contracts with two vendors but did not verify they were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a contract with one vendor, but did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non- Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 20-21, SY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the purchases that fell under the micro-purchase threshold. Small Purchases During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain quotes, nor did they provide full and open competition. There was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition During 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold without soliciting a bid and awarding a contract. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into an agreement with a purchasing cooperative to purchase food items from one vendor. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the agreement with the purchasing cooperative. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During 2020-2021, the School Corporation entered into contracts with two vendors but did not verify they were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a contract with one vendor, but did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non- Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 20-21, SY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the purchases that fell under the micro-purchase threshold. Small Purchases During fiscal year 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from two vendors with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that fell within the small purchases threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain quotes, nor did they provide full and open competition. There was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition During 2020-2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold without soliciting a bid and awarding a contract. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into an agreement with a purchasing cooperative to purchase food items from one vendor. The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented an internal control system over the agreement with the purchasing cooperative. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During 2020-2021, the School Corporation entered into contracts with two vendors but did not verify they were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. During 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a contract with one vendor, but did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non- Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.556 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2022-592605-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2021 ? 06/30/2022 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods, thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District does not have a procurement policy that meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a policy in place related to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following the policy. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that District is not following federal procurement requirements and that the District policy does not follow Uniform Guidance procurement thresholds. In our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not retaining documentation related to verification of suspension and debarment. In our sample of three covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District did not retain documentation for two of the covered transactions. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a written policy related to suspension and debarment, the policy was not being followed. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair competitive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will review and update the procurement policy in to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.556 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2022-592605-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2021 ? 06/30/2022 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods, thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District does not have a procurement policy that meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a policy in place related to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following the policy. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that District is not following federal procurement requirements and that the District policy does not follow Uniform Guidance procurement thresholds. In our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not retaining documentation related to verification of suspension and debarment. In our sample of three covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District did not retain documentation for two of the covered transactions. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a written policy related to suspension and debarment, the policy was not being followed. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair competitive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will review and update the procurement policy in to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.556 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2022-592605-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2021 ? 06/30/2022 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods, thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District does not have a procurement policy that meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a policy in place related to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following the policy. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that District is not following federal procurement requirements and that the District policy does not follow Uniform Guidance procurement thresholds. In our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not retaining documentation related to verification of suspension and debarment. In our sample of three covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District did not retain documentation for two of the covered transactions. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a written policy related to suspension and debarment, the policy was not being followed. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair competitive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will review and update the procurement policy in to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Federal Agency: United State Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.556 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2022-592605-DPI-NSL-547 Award Period: 07/01/2021 ? 06/30/2022 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement outlines various purchasing methods, thresholds and requirements including, but not limited to, guidance with regards to when a non-federal entity is required to obtain rate quotations and sealed bids. Additionally, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District does not have a procurement policy that meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a policy in place related to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not following the policy. Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program we noted that District is not following federal procurement requirements and that the District policy does not follow Uniform Guidance procurement thresholds. In our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District is not retaining documentation related to verification of suspension and debarment. In our sample of three covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District did not retain documentation for two of the covered transactions. Cause: The District has not implemented procurement policies that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, while the District does have a written policy related to suspension and debarment, the policy was not being followed. Effect: Implementing and consistently following procurement policies that meet the requirements of Uniform Guidance are required and are designed to ensure fiscal responsibility, objective contractor performance and elimination of unfair competitive advantage while spending federal funds. Additionally, not verifying that an entity is debarred or suspended could result in entering into covered transactions with debarred or suspended vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. We also recommend that the District ensure that approved policies that meet federal requirements are consistently followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: There is no disagreement with the finding. Management will review and update the procurement policy in to be in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CHARLES A. BEARD MEMORIAL SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not properly procure one of seven vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The vendor was paid $72,780; however, a contract was not awarded as specified by Indiana code. As such, the School Corporation did not verify that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the vendor noted above during fiscal year 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 CHARLES A. BEARD MEMORIAL SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal controls system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CHARLES A. BEARD MEMORIAL SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not properly procure one of seven vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The vendor was paid $72,780; however, a contract was not awarded as specified by Indiana code. As such, the School Corporation did not verify that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the vendor noted above during fiscal year 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 CHARLES A. BEARD MEMORIAL SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal controls system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CHARLES A. BEARD MEMORIAL SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not properly procure one of seven vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The vendor was paid $72,780; however, a contract was not awarded as specified by Indiana code. As such, the School Corporation did not verify that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the vendor noted above during fiscal year 2021-2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 CHARLES A. BEARD MEMORIAL SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal controls system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR 3474.1 provides that the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. A nonfederal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors? performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(ii)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of five circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.327. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, ?Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.? Western Toledo Preparatory Academy Procurement Policy for Federal Grants indicates the following methods of procurement will be used for all purchases of goods and services made with federal funds: 1. Purchases under $2,000 require little formal documentation; they are likely to be a catalog purchase, with prices that are readily available from many vendors. A quick notation or copy of the prices checked from at least one other source should be attached to the order or noted in the file. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner that maximizes opportunities, increases quality (if a factor), and reduces cost of the purchase. 2. Purchases from $2,000 to $10,000 should have a telephone or other quotations and simple purchase or performance descriptions. Inquire in the open market to ensure an advantageous price and quality. The file should document the inquiries made and offers received from at least three sources. 3. Purchases from $10,000 to $100,000 should be treated more formally, though the acquisition procedures can still be somewhat streamlined. Consider using mini-proposals for negotiated acquisitions; more formal purchase and performance descriptions should be included, with bid responses requirements spelled out. To ensure that you have an adequate number of bidders, you may wish to advertise and devise pre-qualification procedures aimed at vendors who offer goods and services you use often. Purchases over $10,000 require grater documentation and cost allowability, need for the procurement, and the vendor selection. Request competitive quotes orally or in writing, from at least three different sources. The file shall document each invitation made and offer received. Document Prices: Maintain files on all quotations solicited and offers and bides received and any criteria for selection. In all instances in which the lowest bid is not awarded in the contract, justification for the selection must me contained in the file. Due to deficiencies in monitoring compliance over procurement, 18 percent of the procurements did not contain the required price or rate quotations. The Academy expended the following amounts without using the proper procurement method: o $30,559 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a projector; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. o $17,588 was paid to a vendor for materials and installation of a video surveillance system; however, the Academy could not provide documentation to support the required price quotations were obtained from a minimum of three vendors. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the Academy is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The Academy should review the procurement requirements specified above and ensure the proper procurement method is used. The Academy should also maintain adequate documentation to detail the history of procurement. Officials? Response: See Corrective Action Plan
Finding 2022-003 ? Procurement. (ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies; ALN 84.425D ESSER I, ALN 84.425D ESSER II, ALN 84.425U ARP ESSER; ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants; and ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment programs) CRITERIA: 2 CFR 200.318 (i) states that a non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000 for the 2021-2022 year), formal procurement methods are required and may include sealed bids and/or proposals. Formal procurement methods require documenting procedures. Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. The non-federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319 or paragraph ? of 2 CFR 200.320. 2 CFR 200.321 states that the non-federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. 2 CFR 200.214 states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. CONDITION: During our testing of nonpayroll expenditures, we noted 24 purchase orders issued under a formal request for proposal (RFP) process used to secure instructional consulting services for a three year period to include the 2021-2022 school year. There was no evidence to show that public advertising was used to solicit vendors. Instead, vendors were solicited through email communications. There was no evidence that the district took all necessary steps to assure that minority businesses and women?s business enterprises were used when possible. There was no evidence to support detailed vendor selection or rejection methods. The evaluation process was informal and not documented. There was no evidence to support that vendor suspension or debarment statuses were checked at the time of the informal evaluation of the RFP or at the time purchase orders were issued. Daily consulting rates submitted by the various vendors responding to the RFP were identical rates or nearly identical rates. We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RPF during the 2021-2022 year in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies - $396,876.76 ALN 84.425 Elementary and secondary school emergency relief fund (ESSER) - $266,686.62 We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RFP during the 2021-2022 year that were under the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants - $102,171.59 ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment program - $7,654.72 CAUSE: Likely there was confusion about the RFP process and the requirements inherent in that process. EFFECT: While competition was introduced into the proposal process for procurement of instructional consulting services for the 2021-2022 school year, the process used by the district was highly informal and did not include all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement standards. QUESTIONED COSTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the district follow all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement requirements. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See the school district?s response in the auditee?s corrective action plan in this report.
Finding 2022-003 ? Procurement. (ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies; ALN 84.425D ESSER I, ALN 84.425D ESSER II, ALN 84.425U ARP ESSER; ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants; and ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment programs) CRITERIA: 2 CFR 200.318 (i) states that a non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000 for the 2021-2022 year), formal procurement methods are required and may include sealed bids and/or proposals. Formal procurement methods require documenting procedures. Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. The non-federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319 or paragraph ? of 2 CFR 200.320. 2 CFR 200.321 states that the non-federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. 2 CFR 200.214 states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. CONDITION: During our testing of nonpayroll expenditures, we noted 24 purchase orders issued under a formal request for proposal (RFP) process used to secure instructional consulting services for a three year period to include the 2021-2022 school year. There was no evidence to show that public advertising was used to solicit vendors. Instead, vendors were solicited through email communications. There was no evidence that the district took all necessary steps to assure that minority businesses and women?s business enterprises were used when possible. There was no evidence to support detailed vendor selection or rejection methods. The evaluation process was informal and not documented. There was no evidence to support that vendor suspension or debarment statuses were checked at the time of the informal evaluation of the RFP or at the time purchase orders were issued. Daily consulting rates submitted by the various vendors responding to the RFP were identical rates or nearly identical rates. We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RPF during the 2021-2022 year in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies - $396,876.76 ALN 84.425 Elementary and secondary school emergency relief fund (ESSER) - $266,686.62 We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RFP during the 2021-2022 year that were under the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants - $102,171.59 ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment program - $7,654.72 CAUSE: Likely there was confusion about the RFP process and the requirements inherent in that process. EFFECT: While competition was introduced into the proposal process for procurement of instructional consulting services for the 2021-2022 school year, the process used by the district was highly informal and did not include all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement standards. QUESTIONED COSTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the district follow all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement requirements. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See the school district?s response in the auditee?s corrective action plan in this report.
Finding 2022-003 ? Procurement. (ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies; ALN 84.425D ESSER I, ALN 84.425D ESSER II, ALN 84.425U ARP ESSER; ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants; and ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment programs) CRITERIA: 2 CFR 200.318 (i) states that a non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000 for the 2021-2022 year), formal procurement methods are required and may include sealed bids and/or proposals. Formal procurement methods require documenting procedures. Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. The non-federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319 or paragraph ? of 2 CFR 200.320. 2 CFR 200.321 states that the non-federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. 2 CFR 200.214 states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. CONDITION: During our testing of nonpayroll expenditures, we noted 24 purchase orders issued under a formal request for proposal (RFP) process used to secure instructional consulting services for a three year period to include the 2021-2022 school year. There was no evidence to show that public advertising was used to solicit vendors. Instead, vendors were solicited through email communications. There was no evidence that the district took all necessary steps to assure that minority businesses and women?s business enterprises were used when possible. There was no evidence to support detailed vendor selection or rejection methods. The evaluation process was informal and not documented. There was no evidence to support that vendor suspension or debarment statuses were checked at the time of the informal evaluation of the RFP or at the time purchase orders were issued. Daily consulting rates submitted by the various vendors responding to the RFP were identical rates or nearly identical rates. We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RPF during the 2021-2022 year in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies - $396,876.76 ALN 84.425 Elementary and secondary school emergency relief fund (ESSER) - $266,686.62 We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RFP during the 2021-2022 year that were under the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants - $102,171.59 ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment program - $7,654.72 CAUSE: Likely there was confusion about the RFP process and the requirements inherent in that process. EFFECT: While competition was introduced into the proposal process for procurement of instructional consulting services for the 2021-2022 school year, the process used by the district was highly informal and did not include all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement standards. QUESTIONED COSTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the district follow all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement requirements. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See the school district?s response in the auditee?s corrective action plan in this report.
Finding 2022-003 ? Procurement. (ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies; ALN 84.425D ESSER I, ALN 84.425D ESSER II, ALN 84.425U ARP ESSER; ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants; and ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment programs) CRITERIA: 2 CFR 200.318 (i) states that a non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000 for the 2021-2022 year), formal procurement methods are required and may include sealed bids and/or proposals. Formal procurement methods require documenting procedures. Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. The non-federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319 or paragraph ? of 2 CFR 200.320. 2 CFR 200.321 states that the non-federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. 2 CFR 200.214 states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. CONDITION: During our testing of nonpayroll expenditures, we noted 24 purchase orders issued under a formal request for proposal (RFP) process used to secure instructional consulting services for a three year period to include the 2021-2022 school year. There was no evidence to show that public advertising was used to solicit vendors. Instead, vendors were solicited through email communications. There was no evidence that the district took all necessary steps to assure that minority businesses and women?s business enterprises were used when possible. There was no evidence to support detailed vendor selection or rejection methods. The evaluation process was informal and not documented. There was no evidence to support that vendor suspension or debarment statuses were checked at the time of the informal evaluation of the RFP or at the time purchase orders were issued. Daily consulting rates submitted by the various vendors responding to the RFP were identical rates or nearly identical rates. We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RPF during the 2021-2022 year in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies - $396,876.76 ALN 84.425 Elementary and secondary school emergency relief fund (ESSER) - $266,686.62 We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RFP during the 2021-2022 year that were under the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants - $102,171.59 ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment program - $7,654.72 CAUSE: Likely there was confusion about the RFP process and the requirements inherent in that process. EFFECT: While competition was introduced into the proposal process for procurement of instructional consulting services for the 2021-2022 school year, the process used by the district was highly informal and did not include all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement standards. QUESTIONED COSTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the district follow all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement requirements. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See the school district?s response in the auditee?s corrective action plan in this report.
Finding 2022-003 ? Procurement. (ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies; ALN 84.425D ESSER I, ALN 84.425D ESSER II, ALN 84.425U ARP ESSER; ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants; and ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment programs) CRITERIA: 2 CFR 200.318 (i) states that a non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000 for the 2021-2022 year), formal procurement methods are required and may include sealed bids and/or proposals. Formal procurement methods require documenting procedures. Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. The non-federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319 or paragraph ? of 2 CFR 200.320. 2 CFR 200.321 states that the non-federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. 2 CFR 200.214 states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. CONDITION: During our testing of nonpayroll expenditures, we noted 24 purchase orders issued under a formal request for proposal (RFP) process used to secure instructional consulting services for a three year period to include the 2021-2022 school year. There was no evidence to show that public advertising was used to solicit vendors. Instead, vendors were solicited through email communications. There was no evidence that the district took all necessary steps to assure that minority businesses and women?s business enterprises were used when possible. There was no evidence to support detailed vendor selection or rejection methods. The evaluation process was informal and not documented. There was no evidence to support that vendor suspension or debarment statuses were checked at the time of the informal evaluation of the RFP or at the time purchase orders were issued. Daily consulting rates submitted by the various vendors responding to the RFP were identical rates or nearly identical rates. We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RPF during the 2021-2022 year in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies - $396,876.76 ALN 84.425 Elementary and secondary school emergency relief fund (ESSER) - $266,686.62 We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RFP during the 2021-2022 year that were under the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants - $102,171.59 ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment program - $7,654.72 CAUSE: Likely there was confusion about the RFP process and the requirements inherent in that process. EFFECT: While competition was introduced into the proposal process for procurement of instructional consulting services for the 2021-2022 school year, the process used by the district was highly informal and did not include all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement standards. QUESTIONED COSTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the district follow all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement requirements. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See the school district?s response in the auditee?s corrective action plan in this report.
Finding 2022-003 ? Procurement. (ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies; ALN 84.425D ESSER I, ALN 84.425D ESSER II, ALN 84.425U ARP ESSER; ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants; and ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment programs) CRITERIA: 2 CFR 200.318 (i) states that a non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000 for the 2021-2022 year), formal procurement methods are required and may include sealed bids and/or proposals. Formal procurement methods require documenting procedures. Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. The non-federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319 or paragraph ? of 2 CFR 200.320. 2 CFR 200.321 states that the non-federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. 2 CFR 200.214 states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. CONDITION: During our testing of nonpayroll expenditures, we noted 24 purchase orders issued under a formal request for proposal (RFP) process used to secure instructional consulting services for a three year period to include the 2021-2022 school year. There was no evidence to show that public advertising was used to solicit vendors. Instead, vendors were solicited through email communications. There was no evidence that the district took all necessary steps to assure that minority businesses and women?s business enterprises were used when possible. There was no evidence to support detailed vendor selection or rejection methods. The evaluation process was informal and not documented. There was no evidence to support that vendor suspension or debarment statuses were checked at the time of the informal evaluation of the RFP or at the time purchase orders were issued. Daily consulting rates submitted by the various vendors responding to the RFP were identical rates or nearly identical rates. We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RPF during the 2021-2022 year in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.010 Title I grants to local educational agencies - $396,876.76 ALN 84.425 Elementary and secondary school emergency relief fund (ESSER) - $266,686.62 We noted instructional consulting expenditures awarded under the RFP during the 2021-2022 year that were under the simplified acquisition threshold as follows: ALN 84.367 Supporting effective instruction ? state grants - $102,171.59 ALN 84.424 Student support and academic enrichment program - $7,654.72 CAUSE: Likely there was confusion about the RFP process and the requirements inherent in that process. EFFECT: While competition was introduced into the proposal process for procurement of instructional consulting services for the 2021-2022 school year, the process used by the district was highly informal and did not include all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement standards. QUESTIONED COSTS: None. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the district follow all of the requirements of 2 CFR 200 with respect to federal procurement requirements. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See the school district?s response in the auditee?s corrective action plan in this report.
2022 ? 004 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Type of Finding: ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to ? 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. According to ? 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Criteria or specific requirement (Continued): According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing?s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent. According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing?s records. According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred. Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Assistance Listing Number 21.027 ? For one of five procurements, the written justification does not contain how the Department knows that there is only one source for the item/service nor the basis upon which the price/cost was determined to be fair and reasonable. Also, no evidence of approval of the sole source procurement in the procurement file. Context (Continued): Assistance Listing Number 21.027 (Continued) ? For three of five procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file. ? For two of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction nor evidence of the review and approval of the verification check. ? For one of five procurements, formal procurements are required. However, the County did not use a formal procurement method. Also, no amendment to revise original agreement terms for this contract which reads as a subrecipient relationship rather than a contractor relationship. Assistance Listing Number 93.323 ? For three of five procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the sole source procurement in the procurement file. ? For one of five procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file. ? For one of five procurements, formal procurements are required. However, the County did not use a formal procurement method rather the County used a personnel recruitment process led by a contracted recruiting firm. ? For five of five procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction nor evidence of the review and approval of the verification check. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities. Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
2022 ? 004 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 93.323 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1505-0271 - 2021 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Public Health Pass-Through Number(s): COVID-19ELC29 and COVID-19ELC87 Award Period: May 26, 2021 - December 31, 2026 May 18, 2020 - November 17, 2022 and January 15, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Type of Finding: ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. According to ? 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to ? 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. According to ? 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Criteria or specific requirement (Continued): According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing?s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent. According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing?s records. According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred. Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. Questioned costs: Unknown Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment. Assistance Listing Number 21.027 ? For one of five procurements, the written justification does not contain how the Department knows that there is only one source for the item/service nor the basis upon which the price/cost was determined to be fair and reasonable. Also, no evidence of approval of the sole source procurement in the procurement file. Context (Continued): Assistance Listing Number 21.027 (Continued) ? For three of five procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file. ? For two of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction nor evidence of the review and approval of the verification check. ? For one of five procurements, formal procurements are required. However, the County did not use a formal procurement method. Also, no amendment to revise original agreement terms for this contract which reads as a subrecipient relationship rather than a contractor relationship. Assistance Listing Number 93.323 ? For three of five procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the sole source procurement in the procurement file. ? For one of five procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file. ? For one of five procurements, formal procurements are required. However, the County did not use a formal procurement method rather the County used a personnel recruitment process led by a contracted recruiting firm. ? For five of five procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction nor evidence of the review and approval of the verification check. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities. Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria: Requirements per 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance state that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Condition: Management had not established an adequate system of internal control over compliance with the relevant federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards as management?s internal control procedures did not cause the entity to retain documentation supporting compliance with the Procurement requirements under the Emergency Connectivity Fund Program and the Special Tests and Provisions requirements under the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund. Cause: Management did not retain appropriate documentation to support obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(b). Management also did not retain appropriate documentation to support compliance with wage rate requirements established under 29 CFR Part 5. Effect or Potential Effect: Without appropriate documentation, non-compliance could occur which the entity may not identify. We were not able to determine if the entity was in compliance with these compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: N/A Recommendation: Management should retain documentation to support proper operation of internal controls over compliance and compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Views of Responsible Officials: We are in agreement with the finding and GCCS management will retain documentation to support proper operation of internal controls and compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Auditor?s Evaluation of the Views of Responsible Officials: Management?s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management?s response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
Criteria: Requirements per 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance state that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Condition: Management had not established an adequate system of internal control over compliance with the relevant federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards as management?s internal control procedures did not cause the entity to retain documentation supporting compliance with the Procurement requirements under the Emergency Connectivity Fund Program and the Special Tests and Provisions requirements under the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund. Cause: Management did not retain appropriate documentation to support obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(b). Management also did not retain appropriate documentation to support compliance with wage rate requirements established under 29 CFR Part 5. Effect or Potential Effect: Without appropriate documentation, non-compliance could occur which the entity may not identify. We were not able to determine if the entity was in compliance with these compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: N/A Recommendation: Management should retain documentation to support proper operation of internal controls over compliance and compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Views of Responsible Officials: We are in agreement with the finding and GCCS management will retain documentation to support proper operation of internal controls and compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Auditor?s Evaluation of the Views of Responsible Officials: Management?s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management?s response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
Criteria: Requirements per 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance state that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Condition: Management had not established an adequate system of internal control over compliance with the relevant federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards as management?s internal control procedures did not cause the entity to retain documentation supporting compliance with the Procurement requirements under the Emergency Connectivity Fund Program and the Special Tests and Provisions requirements under the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund. Cause: Management did not retain appropriate documentation to support obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(b). Management also did not retain appropriate documentation to support compliance with wage rate requirements established under 29 CFR Part 5. Effect or Potential Effect: Without appropriate documentation, non-compliance could occur which the entity may not identify. We were not able to determine if the entity was in compliance with these compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: N/A Recommendation: Management should retain documentation to support proper operation of internal controls over compliance and compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Views of Responsible Officials: We are in agreement with the finding and GCCS management will retain documentation to support proper operation of internal controls and compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Auditor?s Evaluation of the Views of Responsible Officials: Management?s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management?s response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.320. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Per 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: Documentation was not maintained to support why vendors were selected using noncompetitive procurement. Furthermore, the documentation to support the vendor?s suspension debarment status was not provided. Questioned costs: None Context: For 5 of 7 procurement transactions greater than $10,000, no documentation was provided to justify noncompetitive procurement method used. 3 of the 7 vendors exceeded $25,000 in procurement and further were not reviewed to ensure the vendors were not suspended or disbarred. Cause: The College used vendors that have been historically used by the institution during non-pandemic periods of time to acquire needed supplies and materials for the suppression and monitoring of COVID where possible. Several purchases that were needed for these efforts were not available from the College?s normal vendors and those costs had to be acquired from new sources. Multiple sources were investigated, but with supply chain issues, the College was unable to always find multiple vendors that could meet the needs of the institution. With changes in staffing at the institution, the records related to the processes used and vendor?s investigated have not been retained. The vendor?s used have all subsequently been checked for suspension debarment status and none where found to have any issues. Effect: Vendors may be selected in a manner that is not consistent with Federal guidelines and Federal funds may be paid to parties that are ineligible to participate in a Federal program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College establish policies and procedures to properly identify procured transactions and maintain documentation to support performance of the procurement procedures. We also recommend the College evaluate its policies procedures to ensure that suspension and debarment requirements are being met prior to entering into transactions with vendors. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ??200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity? (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present. . . . (B) Two or more responsible bidders. . .. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources. . .. ? 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During school year 2021-2022, the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that this vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 2021-2022 school year. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ??200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity? (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present. . . . (B) Two or more responsible bidders. . .. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources. . .. ? 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During school year 2021-2022, the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that this vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 2021-2022 school year. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ??200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity? (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present. . . . (B) Two or more responsible bidders. . .. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources. . .. ? 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During school year 2021-2022, the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that this vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 2021-2022 school year. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School?s management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement When the value of procurement of property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, customarily set at $250,000, a formal bid process must take place and a contract must be awarded. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2021, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain quotes, nor provide full and open competition. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. During fiscal year 2022, the School Corporation purchased food and supply items from one vendor with total purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation did not solicit bids or award a contract. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During fiscal years 2021 and 2022, the School Corporation entered into covered transactions with one vendor exceeding $25,000 but did not verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.