Condition: During our testing we noted that for 2 out of 3 vendors selected for procurement testing there was no documentation to demonstrate that procurement was conducted in full and open competition according to 2CFR section 200.319 or any documentation of the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and ascertain if the limitation was justified per 2CFR sections 200.319 and 200.320(f) and 48 CFR section 52.244-5. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement files are complete and adequately document decisions made to sole source procurements of goods and services in accordance with the Institute’s procurement policies. Cause: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute’s procurement policy was not in alignment with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303. Effect: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute did not document and maintain records for the procurement of goods and services resulting in noncompliance with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303 during the year ending June 30, 2024. Recommendation: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute should improve its policies and procedures regarding the procurement process and maintain documentation. Management Response: The management staff of Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute take very seriously the federal compliance related to the procurement of goods and services. Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute acknowledges the finding and has subsequently updated their procurement policy and procedures to be in compliance with 2 CFR 200.303. Management has adopted a plan of action to prevent future instances of non-compliance.
Condition: During our testing we noted that for 2 out of 3 vendors selected for procurement testing there was no documentation to demonstrate that procurement was conducted in full and open competition according to 2CFR section 200.319 or any documentation of the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and ascertain if the limitation was justified per 2CFR sections 200.319 and 200.320(f) and 48 CFR section 52.244-5. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement files are complete and adequately document decisions made to sole source procurements of goods and services in accordance with the Institute’s procurement policies. Cause: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute’s procurement policy was not in alignment with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303. Effect: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute did not document and maintain records for the procurement of goods and services resulting in noncompliance with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303 during the year ending June 30, 2024. Recommendation: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute should improve its policies and procedures regarding the procurement process and maintain documentation. Management Response: The management staff of Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute take very seriously the federal compliance related to the procurement of goods and services. Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute acknowledges the finding and has subsequently updated their procurement policy and procedures to be in compliance with 2 CFR 200.303. Management has adopted a plan of action to prevent future instances of non-compliance.
Condition: During our testing we noted that for 2 out of 3 vendors selected for procurement testing there was no documentation to demonstrate that procurement was conducted in full and open competition according to 2CFR section 200.319 or any documentation of the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and ascertain if the limitation was justified per 2CFR sections 200.319 and 200.320(f) and 48 CFR section 52.244-5. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement files are complete and adequately document decisions made to sole source procurements of goods and services in accordance with the Institute’s procurement policies. Cause: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute’s procurement policy was not in alignment with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303. Effect: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute did not document and maintain records for the procurement of goods and services resulting in noncompliance with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303 during the year ending June 30, 2024. Recommendation: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute should improve its policies and procedures regarding the procurement process and maintain documentation. Management Response: The management staff of Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute take very seriously the federal compliance related to the procurement of goods and services. Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute acknowledges the finding and has subsequently updated their procurement policy and procedures to be in compliance with 2 CFR 200.303. Management has adopted a plan of action to prevent future instances of non-compliance.
Condition: During our testing we noted that for 2 out of 3 vendors selected for procurement testing there was no documentation to demonstrate that procurement was conducted in full and open competition according to 2CFR section 200.319 or any documentation of the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and ascertain if the limitation was justified per 2CFR sections 200.319 and 200.320(f) and 48 CFR section 52.244-5. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement files are complete and adequately document decisions made to sole source procurements of goods and services in accordance with the Institute’s procurement policies. Cause: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute’s procurement policy was not in alignment with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303. Effect: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute did not document and maintain records for the procurement of goods and services resulting in noncompliance with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303 during the year ending June 30, 2024. Recommendation: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute should improve its policies and procedures regarding the procurement process and maintain documentation. Management Response: The management staff of Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute take very seriously the federal compliance related to the procurement of goods and services. Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute acknowledges the finding and has subsequently updated their procurement policy and procedures to be in compliance with 2 CFR 200.303. Management has adopted a plan of action to prevent future instances of non-compliance.
Condition: During our testing we noted that for 2 out of 3 vendors selected for procurement testing there was no documentation to demonstrate that procurement was conducted in full and open competition according to 2CFR section 200.319 or any documentation of the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and ascertain if the limitation was justified per 2CFR sections 200.319 and 200.320(f) and 48 CFR section 52.244-5. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement files are complete and adequately document decisions made to sole source procurements of goods and services in accordance with the Institute’s procurement policies. Cause: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute’s procurement policy was not in alignment with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303. Effect: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute did not document and maintain records for the procurement of goods and services resulting in noncompliance with the procurement compliance requirements stated in 2 CFR 200.303 during the year ending June 30, 2024. Recommendation: Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute should improve its policies and procedures regarding the procurement process and maintain documentation. Management Response: The management staff of Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute take very seriously the federal compliance related to the procurement of goods and services. Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute acknowledges the finding and has subsequently updated their procurement policy and procedures to be in compliance with 2 CFR 200.303. Management has adopted a plan of action to prevent future instances of non-compliance.
Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Federal Government Federal Program Title: Integrative Activities, Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 47.083 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: CE2559-SB-873905 A2, A3 - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Other Matters • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The University did not complete documentation for reasonings of why they did not obtain price quotes or competitive bids prior to entering the transaction. Context: During our testing we identified 1 of the 5 contracts tested did not include adequate documentation to award the contracts without price quotations or a competitive bid process. Questioned costs: $39,160 Cause: Lack of training for procurement personnel regarding federal funds passed through State agencies to the University. Effect: Documentation for why the University did not obtain price quotes or competitive bids was not documented in a timely manner. Repeat finding: Yes, 2023-003 Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures and implement an additional control to document reasons for not obtaining price quotes or competitive bids prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled three contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with CFR and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in one of three vendors tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $53,291 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: To correct the finding Nutrition Services will do the following: (1) request piggybackable formal bid options from US Foods (2) take necessary steps to increase micropurchase threshold to $50,000 (3) consider opening a Purchase Order with Sysco Foods to spread the micropurchases to another online retailer, thus mitigating the issue of in-person shopping and price comparisons (4) work with purchasing department to ensure open purchase orders do not exceed $50,000 for any vendor that does not have formal procurement in place.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled three contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with CFR and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in one of three vendors tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $53,291 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: To correct the finding Nutrition Services will do the following: (1) request piggybackable formal bid options from US Foods (2) take necessary steps to increase micropurchase threshold to $50,000 (3) consider opening a Purchase Order with Sysco Foods to spread the micropurchases to another online retailer, thus mitigating the issue of in-person shopping and price comparisons (4) work with purchasing department to ensure open purchase orders do not exceed $50,000 for any vendor that does not have formal procurement in place.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled three contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with CFR and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in one of three vendors tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $53,291 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: To correct the finding Nutrition Services will do the following: (1) request piggybackable formal bid options from US Foods (2) take necessary steps to increase micropurchase threshold to $50,000 (3) consider opening a Purchase Order with Sysco Foods to spread the micropurchases to another online retailer, thus mitigating the issue of in-person shopping and price comparisons (4) work with purchasing department to ensure open purchase orders do not exceed $50,000 for any vendor that does not have formal procurement in place.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled three contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with CFR and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in one of three vendors tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $53,291 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: To correct the finding Nutrition Services will do the following: (1) request piggybackable formal bid options from US Foods (2) take necessary steps to increase micropurchase threshold to $50,000 (3) consider opening a Purchase Order with Sysco Foods to spread the micropurchases to another online retailer, thus mitigating the issue of in-person shopping and price comparisons (4) work with purchasing department to ensure open purchase orders do not exceed $50,000 for any vendor that does not have formal procurement in place.
2024-003: Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 10.760, U. S Department of Agriculture - Water and waste disposal systems for rural communities Federal Award Identification Number and Year: RD Loan 92-12 Loan Period 9/6/23 - 9/1/2063, RD Loan 10 Loan and RD Loan 13 Loan period 1/1/24 - 1/1/2064 Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318 (a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Village did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the engineering services for the Water and Sewer Fund project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from actual engineering design and construction cost billed (federal portion) during the July 6, 2018 through June 30, 2024 period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted. Known Questioned Costs: $562,676 Context: We tested the procurement of three contracts and identified one contract that did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: The Village's controls were not adequate to ensure it followed the federal requirement for procurement process. As a results, there was one instance of noncompliance related to procurements. Recommendation: We recommend the Village follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319 (d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action plan: See attached corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027X Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a proper competitive procurement process. A fourth vendor was awarded a contract that the School believes is a sole source procurement, but written documentation of the circumstances and rationale for the non-competitive procurement, as well as a history of the process, was not maintained by the client. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements and did not have procedures in place to document non-competitive procurements. Effect: The School is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $466,606.60 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform appropriate procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services and to maintain all required documentation of the procurement process in the School purchasing files. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027X Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a proper competitive procurement process. A fourth vendor was awarded a contract that the School believes is a sole source procurement, but written documentation of the circumstances and rationale for the non-competitive procurement, as well as a history of the process, was not maintained by the client. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements and did not have procedures in place to document non-competitive procurements. Effect: The School is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $466,606.60 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform appropriate procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services and to maintain all required documentation of the procurement process in the School purchasing files. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027X Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a proper competitive procurement process. A fourth vendor was awarded a contract that the School believes is a sole source procurement, but written documentation of the circumstances and rationale for the non-competitive procurement, as well as a history of the process, was not maintained by the client. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements and did not have procedures in place to document non-competitive procurements. Effect: The School is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $466,606.60 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform appropriate procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services and to maintain all required documentation of the procurement process in the School purchasing files. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027X Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a proper competitive procurement process. A fourth vendor was awarded a contract that the School believes is a sole source procurement, but written documentation of the circumstances and rationale for the non-competitive procurement, as well as a history of the process, was not maintained by the client. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements and did not have procedures in place to document non-competitive procurements. Effect: The School is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $466,606.60 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform appropriate procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services and to maintain all required documentation of the procurement process in the School purchasing files. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027X Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a proper competitive procurement process. A fourth vendor was awarded a contract that the School believes is a sole source procurement, but written documentation of the circumstances and rationale for the non-competitive procurement, as well as a history of the process, was not maintained by the client. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements and did not have procedures in place to document non-competitive procurements. Effect: The School is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $466,606.60 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform appropriate procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services and to maintain all required documentation of the procurement process in the School purchasing files. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster – CFDA 84.027X Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a proper competitive procurement process. A fourth vendor was awarded a contract that the School believes is a sole source procurement, but written documentation of the circumstances and rationale for the non-competitive procurement, as well as a history of the process, was not maintained by the client. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements and did not have procedures in place to document non-competitive procurements. Effect: The School is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $466,606.60 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform appropriate procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services and to maintain all required documentation of the procurement process in the School purchasing files. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled one contract that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Expenditures for the vendor totaled $53,132. The District has a $50,000 threshold. Additionally, we sampled three contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and require competitive bidding or the noncompetitive proposals method of procurement. The District could not provide evidence of proper procurement procedure for either method in one of three instances for $751,360. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of four vendors tested. Questioned Cost: $804,492 in awarded contracts. Effect: This resulted in roughly $804,492 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Hollandia Dairy bid in question was originally for the 2020-2021 school year, and the audit inquiry was related to the 2023-2024 school year. Upon reviewing the bid, we realized that a new bid should have been issued for the 2023-2024 school year. This oversight was unintentional. However, we did conduct a bid for Hollandia Dairy this year (2024-2025), but unfortunately, no other bidders responded to our solicitation. To prevent similar issues from occurring in the future, we will implement a dedicated district system to track all formal bids, informal bids, and RFQs by contract year. This will be done through a combination of individual files and a shared Google document within the Nutrition Drive. This process will help us maintain proper documentation and ensure compliance with procurement requirements moving forward. The live Google document will include key information such as bid solicitation dates, contract dates, and renewal dates for all Nutrition Services bids, RFPs, RFQs, and micro-purchases. Additionally, the Nutrition Services Director will review all contracts at the beginning of each school year before issuing a purchase order to verify that we are in compliance with federal procurement procedures.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled one contract that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Expenditures for the vendor totaled $53,132. The District has a $50,000 threshold. Additionally, we sampled three contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and require competitive bidding or the noncompetitive proposals method of procurement. The District could not provide evidence of proper procurement procedure for either method in one of three instances for $751,360. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of four vendors tested. Questioned Cost: $804,492 in awarded contracts. Effect: This resulted in roughly $804,492 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Hollandia Dairy bid in question was originally for the 2020-2021 school year, and the audit inquiry was related to the 2023-2024 school year. Upon reviewing the bid, we realized that a new bid should have been issued for the 2023-2024 school year. This oversight was unintentional. However, we did conduct a bid for Hollandia Dairy this year (2024-2025), but unfortunately, no other bidders responded to our solicitation. To prevent similar issues from occurring in the future, we will implement a dedicated district system to track all formal bids, informal bids, and RFQs by contract year. This will be done through a combination of individual files and a shared Google document within the Nutrition Drive. This process will help us maintain proper documentation and ensure compliance with procurement requirements moving forward. The live Google document will include key information such as bid solicitation dates, contract dates, and renewal dates for all Nutrition Services bids, RFPs, RFQs, and micro-purchases. Additionally, the Nutrition Services Director will review all contracts at the beginning of each school year before issuing a purchase order to verify that we are in compliance with federal procurement procedures.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled one contract that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Expenditures for the vendor totaled $53,132. The District has a $50,000 threshold. Additionally, we sampled three contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and require competitive bidding or the noncompetitive proposals method of procurement. The District could not provide evidence of proper procurement procedure for either method in one of three instances for $751,360. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of four vendors tested. Questioned Cost: $804,492 in awarded contracts. Effect: This resulted in roughly $804,492 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Hollandia Dairy bid in question was originally for the 2020-2021 school year, and the audit inquiry was related to the 2023-2024 school year. Upon reviewing the bid, we realized that a new bid should have been issued for the 2023-2024 school year. This oversight was unintentional. However, we did conduct a bid for Hollandia Dairy this year (2024-2025), but unfortunately, no other bidders responded to our solicitation. To prevent similar issues from occurring in the future, we will implement a dedicated district system to track all formal bids, informal bids, and RFQs by contract year. This will be done through a combination of individual files and a shared Google document within the Nutrition Drive. This process will help us maintain proper documentation and ensure compliance with procurement requirements moving forward. The live Google document will include key information such as bid solicitation dates, contract dates, and renewal dates for all Nutrition Services bids, RFPs, RFQs, and micro-purchases. Additionally, the Nutrition Services Director will review all contracts at the beginning of each school year before issuing a purchase order to verify that we are in compliance with federal procurement procedures.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled one contract that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtain prior to selecting one of the vendors. Expenditures for the vendor totaled $53,132. The District has a $50,000 threshold. Additionally, we sampled three contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and require competitive bidding or the noncompetitive proposals method of procurement. The District could not provide evidence of proper procurement procedure for either method in one of three instances for $751,360. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of four vendors tested. Questioned Cost: $804,492 in awarded contracts. Effect: This resulted in roughly $804,492 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Hollandia Dairy bid in question was originally for the 2020-2021 school year, and the audit inquiry was related to the 2023-2024 school year. Upon reviewing the bid, we realized that a new bid should have been issued for the 2023-2024 school year. This oversight was unintentional. However, we did conduct a bid for Hollandia Dairy this year (2024-2025), but unfortunately, no other bidders responded to our solicitation. To prevent similar issues from occurring in the future, we will implement a dedicated district system to track all formal bids, informal bids, and RFQs by contract year. This will be done through a combination of individual files and a shared Google document within the Nutrition Drive. This process will help us maintain proper documentation and ensure compliance with procurement requirements moving forward. The live Google document will include key information such as bid solicitation dates, contract dates, and renewal dates for all Nutrition Services bids, RFPs, RFQs, and micro-purchases. Additionally, the Nutrition Services Director will review all contracts at the beginning of each school year before issuing a purchase order to verify that we are in compliance with federal procurement procedures.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.319 states that all procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with Federal procurement standards. 2 CFR 200.214 states in part that recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 in part states that a recipient of a Federal award must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award. Condition: We have selected and tested three of the largest vendors from the Child Nutrition Cluster for compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. We identified that one vendor was not properly procured, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319–2 CFR 200.324. As a result, the District incurred questioned costs in the amount of $31,401.63, which was in excess of $25,000 Federal requirement, based on 2 CFR 200.516. Also, the District did not perform procedures to verify suspension and debarment on the same vendor. Cause: District’s internal controls over procurement in the Child Nutrition Cluster were properly designed but not operating effectively to verify that all vendors are properly procured and verified for suspension and debarment. The District did not properly procure one vendor within the Child Nutrition Cluster that incurred questioned costs in excess of the $25,000 threshold, based on 2 CFR 200.516. Effect: The District did not properly procure one vendor within the Child Nutrition Cluster that incurred questioned costs in excess of the $25,000 threshold, based on 2 CFR 200.516, and, as a result, revealed a significant deficiency in internal controls over procurement in the Child Nutrition Cluster. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District re-evaluate the procurement processes in the Child Nutrition Services program and re-evaluate the design of internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to be in compliance with the Federal requirements and the District’s procurement policy.
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP; 23611-043-PN01; 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Condition: The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect or potential effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. During the fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP; 23611-043-PN01; 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Condition: The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect or potential effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. During the fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP; 23611-043-PN01; 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Condition: The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect or potential effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. During the fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2024-001 Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program: Social Services Research and Demonstration (ALN 93.647) Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Assistance Identification Number or Pass-Through Numbers: N/A Federal Award Years: Year ended June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance; Other Matter Compliance Finding Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that each non-Federal entity must "Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." 2 CFR 200.320 requires that each non-Federal entity must "have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award." Condition: While testing the procurement requirement, we noted that internal controls were not properly designed over the procurement requirement. Prior to receiving federal funding beginning in August 2022, the program conducted a request for proposal (RFP) process and began contracting with a vendor. When federal funding was obtained, the vendor was not reevaluated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to ensure the procurement requirements were being met. In addition, we noted UW Health – Madison’s procurement policy documents do not include all of the information that is required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Because the vendor was already in place for the program prior to receiving federal funds, management did not recognize the need to reevaluate the vendor under the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Management became aware of the need to perform additional procedures to comply with Uniform Guidance part way through the year and completed the evaluation once it became known. However, by that time, the vendor was already charged to the grant prior to the completion of the vendor evaluation. In addition, management also did not recognize the need to include additional information in its procurement policy documents related to the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Without appropriate internal controls, there is an increased risk of noncompliance related to federal funding. Context: We identified and tested 3 vendors that were direct and material to the program and related to the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding?: Yes Recommendation: While it was determined that the requirements of the Uniform Guidance were met related to the vendor tested, we suggest that management reevaluate all vendors that were previously used prior to receiving federal funding. In addition, we recommend that management update its procurement policies to incorporate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. View of responsible officials of the auditee: Management agrees with the finding.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchases threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the small purchase requirements. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was no review or oversight process performed. Suspension and Debarment There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation did not verify that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. They did not have a contract with the vendors that included the suspension and debarment clause, did not collect a certification from the vendors, and did not check the Sam.gov website to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was not a review or oversight performed. The School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to provide documentation to show that a verification was done to determine that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation could have used a vendor that charged more than the lowest quote for small purchases or could have entered into transaction with vendors that were excluded from participating in federal transactions. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchases threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the small purchase requirements. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was no review or oversight process performed. Suspension and Debarment There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation did not verify that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. They did not have a contract with the vendors that included the suspension and debarment clause, did not collect a certification from the vendors, and did not check the Sam.gov website to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was not a review or oversight performed. The School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to provide documentation to show that a verification was done to determine that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation could have used a vendor that charged more than the lowest quote for small purchases or could have entered into transaction with vendors that were excluded from participating in federal transactions. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchases threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the small purchase requirements. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was no review or oversight process performed. Suspension and Debarment There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation did not verify that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. They did not have a contract with the vendors that included the suspension and debarment clause, did not collect a certification from the vendors, and did not check the Sam.gov website to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was not a review or oversight performed. The School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to provide documentation to show that a verification was done to determine that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation could have used a vendor that charged more than the lowest quote for small purchases or could have entered into transaction with vendors that were excluded from participating in federal transactions. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchases threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the small purchase requirements. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was no review or oversight process performed. Suspension and Debarment There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation did not verify that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. They did not have a contract with the vendors that included the suspension and debarment clause, did not collect a certification from the vendors, and did not check the Sam.gov website to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was not a review or oversight performed. The School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to provide documentation to show that a verification was done to determine that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation could have used a vendor that charged more than the lowest quote for small purchases or could have entered into transaction with vendors that were excluded from participating in federal transactions. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchases threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the small purchase requirements. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was no review or oversight process performed. Suspension and Debarment There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation did not verify that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. They did not have a contract with the vendors that included the suspension and debarment clause, did not collect a certification from the vendors, and did not check the Sam.gov website to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was not a review or oversight performed. The School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to provide documentation to show that a verification was done to determine that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation could have used a vendor that charged more than the lowest quote for small purchases or could have entered into transaction with vendors that were excluded from participating in federal transactions. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024, FY23/FY24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchases threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the small purchase requirements. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was no review or oversight process performed. Suspension and Debarment There were no internal controls in place to ensure that the School Corporation complied with the suspension and debarment requirements. The School Corporation did not verify that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. They did not have a contract with the vendors that included the suspension and debarment clause, did not collect a certification from the vendors, and did not check the Sam.gov website to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation obtained quotes for the two vendors that qualified for the small purchase threshold, but there was not a review or oversight performed. The School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to provide documentation to show that a verification was done to determine that the two vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation could have used a vendor that charged more than the lowest quote for small purchases or could have entered into transaction with vendors that were excluded from participating in federal transactions. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH VERMILLION COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553 & 10.555 (includes COVID-19 funding) Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Two vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $40,311 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553 & 10.555 (includes COVID-19 funding) Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Two vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $40,311 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553 & 10.555 (includes COVID-19 funding) Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Two vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $40,311 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553 & 10.555 (includes COVID-19 funding) Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Two vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $40,311 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.