Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
2023-003 Procurement; Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services; Program: Social Services Research and Demonstration (ALN 93.647); Pass-through Entity: N/A; Federal Assistance Identification Number or Pass-Through Numbers: N/A; Federal Award Years: Year ended June 30, 2023; Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance; Other Matter Compliance Finding; Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that each non-Federal entity must "Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." 2 CFR 200.320 requires that each non-Federal entity must "have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award." Condition: While testing the procurement requirement, we were able to test compensating controls, but noted that internal controls were not properly designed over the procurement requirement. Prior to receiving federal funding beginning in August 2022, the program conducted a request for proposal (RFP) process and began contracting with a vendor. When federal funding was obtained, the vendor was not reevaluated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to ensure the procurement requirements were being met. In addition, we noted UW Health – Madison’s procurement policy documents do not include all of the information that is required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Because the vendor was already in place for the program prior to receiving federal funds, management did not recognize the need to reevaluate the vendor under the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management also did not recognize the need to include additional information in its procurement policy documents related to the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Without appropriate internal controls, there is an increased risk of noncompliance related to federal funding. Context: We identified and tested one vendor that was direct and material to the program and related to the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits.Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding?: No; Recommendation: While it was determined that the requirements of the Uniform Guidance were met related to the vendor tested, we suggest that management reevaluate all vendors that were previously used prior to receiving federal funding. In addition, we recommend that management update its procurement policies to incorporate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. View of responsible officials of the auditee: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X & 84.173X Compliance Finding and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,917.50 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X & 84.173X Compliance Finding and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,917.50 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X & 84.173X Compliance Finding and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,917.50 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X & 84.173X Compliance Finding and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,917.50 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X & 84.173X Compliance Finding and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,917.50 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X & 84.173X Compliance Finding and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without an appropriate procurement process. Cause: The School relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $85,917.50 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21 .027, Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year - SLFRP2024-2001 Pass-through Entity - Not applicable Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The City should ensure there is a process in place, prior to theprocurement of goods and services, to verify that the City has followed its internal procurement policy pursuant to 2 CFR 200.319 and 200.320. Condition - We identified 4 expenditures, during testing, that the City did not verify were in accordance with its internal procurement policy, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.319 and 200.320 prior to entering into contracts with award funds. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - From July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, any good or service purchased by the City is subject to the City's internal procurement policy, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.319 and 200.320. We selected 22 expenditures for testing, and 4 lacked evidence of the City following its internal procurement policy. However, based on our testing, we noted that all 4 expenditures were allowable under the terms of the grant, thereby creating no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - The City is required to verify that there is a process in place to ensure all eligible expenditures adhere to its internal procurement policy, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.319 and 200.320. The City did not complete this requirement due to override of preexisting controls implemented by the City. Recommendation - We recommend that an additional internal control be put in place to ensure that all eligible expenditures adhere to the City's internal procurement policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Procedures have already been put into place to ensure that each purchase adheres to the internal purchasing policies. City management and staff will continue to improve communication with and between departments to ensure all staff understand the purchasing policy.
2023-001 U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through Norfolk County, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: One vendor was awarded a contract without a procurement process. Cause: The Town relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $19,575 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to federal awards. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Identification of Federal Program 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for formal methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.320(b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition thresholf, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require either sealed bids to be publicly solicited or requests for proposal publicized. Non-competitive procurement are only allowed if the purchase is under the micro-purchase threshold, if the item is only available from a single source, if public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation, if the Federal awarding agency or pass through agency expressly authorizes a non-competitive procurement, or if after solicitiation of a number of sources, competition is deemed inadequate. Condition The County did not follow formal procurement procedures related to the purchase of jail camera system. Cause The County followed its internal procurement policies which are less restrictive than formal procurement processes as required under 2 CFR 200.320. Potential Effect Open competition was not insured. Questioned Costs None Context The County followed their modified procurement procedure (PPCO 15.140(1) which allows for direct solicitation of bids from vendors that work with existing technology infrastructure already in place in the County in an effort to reduce cost and waste. As a result, formal procurement processes as required were not followed. Identification of a repeat finding, if applicable This is a new finding for the County Recommendations Formal procurement processes should be followed for all Federal award purchases that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Views of Responsible Officials The County agrees with the finding and will develop a corrective action plan.
Identification of Federal Program 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for formal methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.320(b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition thresholf, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require either sealed bids to be publicly solicited or requests for proposal publicized. Non-competitive procurement are only allowed if the purchase is under the micro-purchase threshold, if the item is only available from a single source, if public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation, if the Federal awarding agency or pass through agency expressly authorizes a non-competitive procurement, or if after solicitiation of a number of sources, competition is deemed inadequate. Condition The County did not follow formal procurement procedures related to the purchase of jail camera system. Cause The County followed its internal procurement policies which are less restrictive than formal procurement processes as required under 2 CFR 200.320. Potential Effect Open competition was not insured. Questioned Costs None Context The County followed their modified procurement procedure (PPCO 15.140(1) which allows for direct solicitation of bids from vendors that work with existing technology infrastructure already in place in the County in an effort to reduce cost and waste. As a result, formal procurement processes as required were not followed. Identification of a repeat finding, if applicable This is a new finding for the County Recommendations Formal procurement processes should be followed for all Federal award purchases that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Views of Responsible Officials The County agrees with the finding and will develop a corrective action plan.
Criteria – Under Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.319 “All procurement transaction for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal awards must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with eh standards of this section and 200.320” Also, as required by federal regulations in 2 CFR 200.320 and 2 CFR 200.213 “EPLS (excluded parties list system) review of vendors proposing on a federal project is requested at the time of receipt of proposal through the Federal Awarding Agency Contracting Department.” Condition/Context – For the one new vendor contract entered into during the fiscal year, the County did not follow federal procurement standards. A formal procurement method such as sealed bids, proposals or noncompetitive procurement was not performed and there was no evidence that the County verified the vendor was not suspended or debarred per the federal EPLS prior to entering the contract. We verified that the vendor was not suspended or debarred during the fiscal year 2023. Cause – The individuals overseeing contract procurement applied the normal state level requirements and was not aware the additional federal level requirements applicable due to the grant funds coming from a federal source. Effect – Without following the proper federal policies, the County may be entering into transactions with vendors that have been suspended or debarred. Repeated Finding – This is not a repeated finding. Recommendation – We recommend the County assigns a knowledgeable individual with proper training and skill to complete the procurement process and update policies and procedures for federal awards to ensure that the vendors are checked before entering into a contract. Management’s Response – We concur with the finding. Historically, the procurement process is handled at the department level and departments are expected to understand and comply with the requirements related to the funding source(s) used to procure goods and services. The Health and Human Services department followed our County procurement policy and solicited input from the State, the agency that passes WIC monies to the County, on suggestions for procuring dietitian/nutritionist services. While County policy was followed and input from the State was provided, documentation to support the procurement method used did not illustrate compliance with federal procurement standards and the service provider’s suspension and debarment status was not verified prior to entering into a contract. To mitigate this issue in the future, County Counsel reminded departments of the importance of understanding the requirements tied to the source being used to procure goods and services and to notify Counsel when federal monies are being used. Furthermore, County Counsel will include the suspension and debarment clause in the County’s standard contract templates, and the County Purchasing Policy (4-03) will be updated to reflect the importance of complying with requirements tied to a specific funding source. Lastly, County Counsel and Internal Audit will develop and provide training to departments.
Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Award Information: Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Assistance Listing Number: 20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program. Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as sub-recipients of states, must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes meeting the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors and maintaining records to document history of procurements. This also includes conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319 including the use of micro-purchases and small purchase methods for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR section 200.320. Condition The District does not have documented procurement procedures in accordance with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause Previous management did not implement and previous District policies did not include documentation of procurement procedures in accordance with federal standards. New management is in place and have commenced an ongoing project to summarize accounting related activities into an accounting procedures manual, this includes the required procurement procedures. Effect The District does not have documented procurement procedures as required by federal standards. Not having the required procurement procedures in place could lead to awarding contracts and making purchases without adequate competition. Questioned Costs No questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District formally document a procurement policy in accordance with federal standards to include all general requirements such as oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, maintaining records to document history of procurements and conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. Management Response and Planned Corrective Action Following these findings are management’s view and corrective action plan.
Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Award Information: Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Assistance Listing Number: 20.509, Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program. Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as sub-recipients of states, must follow procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. This includes meeting the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors and maintaining records to document history of procurements. This also includes conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319 including the use of micro-purchases and small purchase methods for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR section 200.320. Condition The District does not have documented procurement procedures in accordance with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause Previous management did not implement and previous District policies did not include documentation of procurement procedures in accordance with federal standards. New management is in place and have commenced an ongoing project to summarize accounting related activities into an accounting procedures manual, this includes the required procurement procedures. Effect The District does not have documented procurement procedures as required by federal standards. Not having the required procurement procedures in place could lead to awarding contracts and making purchases without adequate competition. Questioned Costs No questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District formally document a procurement policy in accordance with federal standards to include all general requirements such as oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, maintaining records to document history of procurements and conducting procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition. Management Response and Planned Corrective Action Following these findings are management’s view and corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.205, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year CPG222, CPG23, CPG223, MT23, OZ23, OZ22, IC22, IC23, PC23, PC22, RS23, RS22 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319(d), a non federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Further, under 2 CFR 200.320(c), there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micropurchase threshold; 2) The item is available only from a single source; 3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4) The federal awarding agency or pass through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non federal entity; or 5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318(h), the non federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. Further, the regulations under 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition The Council did not have adequate controls in place to ensure compliance with the applicable procurement and suspension and debarment standards and its own internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs $125,000 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent contracts entered into under noncompetitive procurement methods with opportunities for full and open competition and activity related to those contracts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period under audit. Context - During procurement testing, we noted two contracts over the Council's formal procurement threshold of $50,000 where the Council procured these services using noncompetitive methods. However, opportunities existed to procure services with full and open competition. Additionally, we noted six instances for which a check for suspension and debarment was not performed. The Council did perform the suspension and debarment check after we identified the noncompliance and noted that none of the six contractors were suspended or debarred; therefore, noting no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - Per review of the Council's financial management manual, we noted procurement guidelines for primary use vendors (those procured using noncompetitive methods) wer not clearly defined). Additionally, the Council's procurement guidelines are silent on services provided on an extended contract. Further, we noted a lack of controls surrounding chcks for suspension and debarment on primary use vendors. The lack of clarity within the Council's policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment resulted in the noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend the Council update its policies and procedures to align with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management has revised the financial management manual with an updated procurement policy in accordance with federal regulations. The Council has developed detailed procedures and required documentation for staff to ensure compliance. Mandatory training will be provided to staff that engage in purchasing activities.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance for small purchases. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for five of the five vendors tested. A total of $82,230 was spent with the five vendors. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria Indiana Code 4-13.6-5-2 states: "(a) Except as provided by this chapter and IC 16-33-4-10, if the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall award a contract for the project based on competitive bids. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) If the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall develop contract documents for a public works contract and keep the contract documents on file in its offices so that they may be inspected by contractors and members of the public. . . ." 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and adhere to procurement procedures for all purchases of goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance for small purchases. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for five of the five vendors tested. A total of $82,230 was spent with the five vendors. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria Indiana Code 4-13.6-5-2 states: "(a) Except as provided by this chapter and IC 16-33-4-10, if the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall award a contract for the project based on competitive bids. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) If the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall develop contract documents for a public works contract and keep the contract documents on file in its offices so that they may be inspected by contractors and members of the public. . . ." 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and adhere to procurement procedures for all purchases of goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance for small purchases. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for five of the five vendors tested. A total of $82,230 was spent with the five vendors. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria Indiana Code 4-13.6-5-2 states: "(a) Except as provided by this chapter and IC 16-33-4-10, if the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall award a contract for the project based on competitive bids. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) If the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall develop contract documents for a public works contract and keep the contract documents on file in its offices so that they may be inspected by contractors and members of the public. . . ." 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and adhere to procurement procedures for all purchases of goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters. Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-002. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance for small purchases. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. There was no documented oversight, review, or approval process in place at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for five of the five vendors tested. A total of $82,230 was spent with the five vendors. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria Indiana Code 4-13.6-5-2 states: "(a) Except as provided by this chapter and IC 16-33-4-10, if the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall award a contract for the project based on competitive bids. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) If the estimated cost of a public works project is at least one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000), the division shall develop contract documents for a public works contract and keep the contract documents on file in its offices so that they may be inspected by contractors and members of the public. . . ." 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREENCASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and adhere to procurement procedures for all purchases of goods and services. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23